logo
Royal protection officers protest over Notting Hill Carnival

Royal protection officers protest over Notting Hill Carnival

Telegraph05-07-2025
Members of Scotland Yard's elite royal protection unit are being drafted in to help police this year's Notting Hill Carnival amid mounting concern over the safety of the event, The Telegraph can reveal.
Hundreds of personal protection officers – whose day to day roles involve looking after members of the Royal family, senior politicians and other VIPs – have been ordered to turn out and help man the barricades at next month's event.
They will join around 7,000 other Metropolitan Police officers tasked with keeping an estimated two million revellers safe throughout the three day street party.
Any officers with specific public order policing qualifications will be deployed to units primed to respond quickly to outbreaks of trouble or violence.
But the vast majority – who only have basic public order training – will effectively be employed as stewards attempting to marshal the huge crowds.
Crowd density concerns
The decision to draft in specialist units to assist with the carnival comes amid growing concern at Scotland Yard that there could be a crush at the event because of the high density of attendees.
In a report published in April this year, Asst Commissioner Matt Twist, from the Met Police, said: 'While we acknowledge the crime often gets the headlines, the thing that worries me most is the crowd density and the potential for a mass casualty event.'
Met bosses are therefore determined to have as many resources available as they can muster.
The decision to draft in personnel from royal protection and other specialist units also comes after Scotland Yard was criticised for relying too heavily on neighbourhood officers to fulfil public order commitments.
Extracting officers from community policing makes it harder to tackle street crime and reduces trust and confidence in the Met.
The recent pro-Palestinian marches and other large scale demonstrations have put a huge strain on the force, with a recent figures revealing that between Oct 7 2023 and June 2024 almost 52,000 officer shifts were dedicated to policing protests.
Sir Mark Rowley, the Met Commissioner, has pledged to spread the public order load more fairly and ensure it is not just the neighbourhood teams that bear the brunt.
But the order has gone down badly with many of those in the Royal and Specialist Protection (RaSP) command and is not without its practical problems
Most RaSP officers work in plain clothes roles and have not worn uniform for years.
Some of those ordered onto the front line have discovered that their original kit is out of date or no longer fits and so have been forced to order new ones in time for the carnival.
They also had to urgently complete a Body Worn Video (BWV) training course as it is not standard equipment in RaSP, but is compulsory when doing public order jobs.
Sources within the unit have said the orders have gone down very badly with officers, most of whom have not done public order work for years.
'No choice in the matter'
One source said: 'They are highly trained, highly experienced specialists, and so are not happy about being told they have to do basic public order policing.
'They will essentially be working as glorified stewards but they don't have any choice in the matter. It's an order from the top but it could hardly be less welcome.
'Notting Hill is the least popular job of the year. It's not an exaggeration to say that the vast majority of officers hate working at Notting Hill, even those who do regular public order work.
'The shifts are very long, the conditions are really stressful and it is a pretty thankless role. The crowds seem to get bigger every year and it is extremely difficult to move around. Even when something happens it can be almost impossible for officers to get to the scene quickly.
'Huge drain' on Met resources
Susan Hall, the vice chairman of the London Assembly Police and Crime Committee, also expressed concern about this year's event.
She said: 'There is little wonder the police hate having to work at Notting Hill Carnival. It is a huge drain on the Met's resources each year and senior officers share my concerns that it is becoming far too dangerous.
'The organisers have failed to ensure there is sufficient stewarding and it is becoming almost impossible to manage the crowds. Do we have to wait until there is a mass casualty tragedy before the organisers listen to our concerns?
'Also the pro-Palestinian protests have been an enormous drain on Met resources. Virtually every weekend sees a massive public order policing event and so Notting Hill Carnival is frankly the last thing the force needs.
'Now we hear they are even having to draft in officers from royal protection to plug the gaps. It is surely time to end this madness and let the police get back to policing rather than working as glorified security guards at an unnecessary event.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols
Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Police will not endorse activities of volunteer ‘force' launching patrols

A police force said it will not endorse the activities of volunteers in Bournemouth who have set up a uniformed 'force' to patrol the streets, adding a review of their vetting processes highlighted 'areas of significant concern'. Safeguard Force, whose volunteers will wear branded bibs, said it aims to create 'safer, more supportive communities by providing visible, compassionate and non-confrontational patrols' which were set to start on August 11. The move follows two high-profile murder cases in the town as well as the local police force having to introduce dispersal powers on the seafront after a disturbance involving a 'large group of people' on June 30 which left a teenage girl and two officers injured. Dorset Police said a multi-agency meeting was held with Safeguard Force on Friday and 'a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern'. Assistant Chief Constable Mark Callaghan, of Dorset Police, said: 'Following a multi-agency meeting on Friday 15 August 2025, which involved Dorset Police, other emergency services, the local authority and representatives of Safeguard Force, we will not be endorsing their activities. 'We have engaged with the group extensively and a review of their vetting processes has highlighted areas of significant concern. The organisers have been unable to provide reassurance that this group has sufficient safeguards in place to ensure volunteers are adequately vetted, trained, and equipped to undertake high-visibility patrols in the community. 'Safeguard Force's policies provided to police contain insufficient details in relation to the use of body-worn cameras, publishing of photographs of members of the public, administration and recording of any force used or first aid provided and limited evidence of any training provided. 'We welcome the responsible use of volunteers, who wish to carry out public service and there are many ways in which this can be facilitated in a safe way, including becoming a Special Constable, joining the street pastor programme, or via established Watch schemes. 'All these initiatives have appropriate policies and processes in place, particularly around the vetting of individuals and safeguarding of vulnerable people. 'Dorset Police continues to carry out high-visibility patrols, with 289 foot patrols taking place in the past seven days throughout Bournemouth town centre, gardens and seafront. 'This resulted in arrests being made and dispersal notices being issued, stop searches for drugs or weapons, anti-social behaviour incidents attended, intelligence gathered and almost 1,200 conversations with members of the public and 131 businesses and local premises visited. 'We would encourage members of the public to speak to our officers and report incidents and crimes directly to us so we're able to effectively respond and investigate.' In March, Nasen Saadi was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 39 years at Winchester Crown Court for the murder of Amie Gray and attempted murder of Leanne Miles on Bournemouth beach on May 24 2024. And in January 2023, Afghan asylum seeker Lawangeen Abdulrahimzai was jailed for life to serve a minimum of 29 years at Salisbury Crown Court for the murder of 21-year-old Thomas Roberts outside a Subway takeaway shop in Bournemouth in March 2022.

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England
Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

The Independent

time20 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Why a sonic boom was heard in parts of England

A sonic boom was heard across parts of Essex, Cambridgeshire, Suffolk, Kent, and London on Friday morning. The loud bang was caused by two RAF Typhoon fighter jets that were scrambled from RAF Coningsby, Lincolnshire. The jets were launched to intercept a San Marino-registered private aircraft that had lost contact with air traffic control. The civilian aircraft was safely escorted to Stansted Airport, where communications were re-established. Essex Police confirmed that officers on the ground found nothing of concern after the aircraft landed.

Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat
Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat

Daily Mail​

time21 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat

The Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue at the centre of the Kate Forbes cancel culture row has performed a dramatic U-turn after threats to its public funding. Summerhall Arts, which was recently awarded £608,000 in grants, climbed down over an apparent ban on deputy First Minister because of her gender critical views. Bosses had claimed her appearance last week in a political talk was an 'oversight' and gave a 'guarantee' it wouldn't happen again. But after their statement was condemned by senior SNP figures, including ex First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, the charity chiefs said no politician would be banned after all. Chief executive Sam Gough told the Mail: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages. Summerhall is a collection of things in this building, including stages and venues. We have not banned anyone.' Mr Gough's uncaveated comments went further than a statement issued earlier in the day by the organisation, which put a pre-condition on future appearances. It said there would be no ban on anyone 'assuming they adhere to our zero tolerance regarding discrimination'. The damage limitation exercise followed an outcry over censorship with both the Government and arts quango Creative Scotland appearing to wash their hands of it. Ministers said they had no role in 'individual funding decisions', while Creative Scotland, which gave Summerhall £608,302 in January, claimed it had no part in 'programming decisions'. The Scottish Conservatives said both were missing the point - that taxpayers' cash was supporting an organisation that appeared to be breaking the law by stifling free speech. A condition of Summerhall's state funding that it must 'comply with all applicable laws'. Ms Forbes, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP's botched gender self-ID reforms, spoke at the venue last week. Summerhall apologised to performers just hours ahead of her appearance as it was concerned about 'the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share her 'views' and said 'we have work to do to repair the damage'. They even provided a 'designated relaxed space' or 'safe room' said to be 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in Skye MSP. The row coincided with controversies over gender critical authors being excluded from the state-backed Edinburgh Book Festival and a best-selling book of gender critical essays, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest, being pulled from a National Library of Scotland exhibition. Finance Secretary Shona Robison called Summerhall's reaction 'unwise and unnecessary', while Ms Sturgeon said she didn't agree with cancel culture or the venue's actions. The Scottish Tories demanded Summerhall's public funding be cut for potentially discriminating against people because of their beliefs. In 2023, the Stand comedy club had to back down after trying to cancel a Fringe show by then SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC because of her gender critical views, admitting its original decision was 'unfair and constituted unlawful discrimination'. Last year Creative Scotland axed £84,555 of public funding from the live arts project Rein after a plan to include real sex acts was deemed a breach of contract. Bowing to pressure yesterday, the venue said 'no-one is banned from the Summerhall building or by Summerhall Arts' and it would 'not be banning politicians or anyone else'. It was a marked departure from its message to artists eight days earlier, which an insider downplayed as merely an 'email to performers', not an official statement. Scottish Tory equalities spokeswoman Tess White said there had been too much 'craven buck-passing' by the Government and Creative Scotland. She said: 'This latest clear-as-mud statement from Summerhall just underlines the need for SNP ministers to step in and order the venue to get its act together. 'Summerhall's shameful decision to suppress free speech didn't occur in a vacuum. 'For years the SNP have been pushing their reckless and unlawful self-ID policy on Scotland's public bodies and pandering to gender extremists. 'As a result, organisations funded by taxpayers think it's okay to silence those who have the moral courage and legal vindication to stand up for women's rights. It's totally unacceptable. 'John Swinney and Creative Scotland, which has form for financing dodgy projects, should remove funding from any group or venue that blocks legitimate free speech.' It emerged yesterday that Summerhall Arts had known since April that Ms Forbes would appear in an event run by the Herald newspaper but did not object. Just 48 hours before the event, managers raised fears about 'hate speech'. SNP Culture Secretary Angus Roberson yesterday told the Herald he was 'a strong supporter of the freedom of speech and of expression at our festivals'. He said: 'It will not be easy all of the time to please everybody. 'But I think keeping an eye on the principle of freedom of expression and the expression of different views is an established and important part of our national life.' Mr Robertson is the MSP for Edinburgh Central, which is home to many cultural organisations, and he said he does not make decisions about their funding to avoid conflicts of interest. He has specifically 'recused himself from decisions in relation to Summerhall', which are taken by employment minister Richard Lochhead instead. A Creative Scotland spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland does not play a role in the programming decisions of funded organisations.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland is an arms-length funding body and Ministers have no role in individual funding decisions.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store