logo
From lumber to lighting: How Trump's tariffs drive up home construction costs

From lumber to lighting: How Trump's tariffs drive up home construction costs

NBC News06-07-2025
NBC News modeled out a 3-bedroom home and found tariffs added more than $4,000 to total costs.
By Alex Ford and Jiachuan Wu
July 6, 2025
Lumber from Canada? That will be another $534.
Major appliances from China? Add a cool $445.
New homes in the United States are set to get more expensive thanks to President Donald Trump's tariff agenda, which is expected to raise the costs of a wide variety of materials that go into building houses.
An NBC News analysis of building materials and import data found that the total cost of building a mid-range single-family home could rise by more than $4,000 — an estimate that industry experts who reviewed the analysis called conservative. An April survey from the National Association of Home Builders estimated tariff impacts at $10,900 per home. Neither analysis included labor costs.
Robert Dietz, chief economist at the National Association of Home Builders, said the tariffs have an impact beyond their direct cost as they send uncertainty rippling through the supply chain and leave builders unsure how to plan for the future.
"About three-quarters of home builders right now are having difficulty pricing their homes for buyers because of uncertainty due to construction input costs," Dietz said.
The United States remains in a housing shortage that has driven up costs. The NBC News Home Buyer Index, which measures how difficult a local housing market is, has remained at an extreme difficulty level for more than two years. And conversations about how to encourage building more housing has become a major part of U.S. political discussions, especially among some Democrats.
Trump, meanwhile, has continued to pursue an aggressive tariff agenda while promising that the United States would sign trade deals, most of which have yet to materialize.
Whether tariffs are implemented, paused or reversed, the timeline for cost impacts will vary significantly across suppliers, materials and regions. Dietz said that while some suppliers may initially absorb parts of tariff costs, "generally speaking, in the long run, you would expect consumers to pay most of the tariff."
NBC News modeled the cost of materials for an 1,800 square-foot single-family house and then analyzed import and survey data from the U.S. Trade Commission and the Census Bureau's annual manufacturing survey to determine which countries dominate the home construction supply chain. While some foundational materials like concrete are sourced domestically, others — such as electrical equipment, lighting and fixtures — depend heavily on imports.
Products from China, Mexico and Canada — countries that are currently tariffed at high rates — are responsible for the largest projected cost increases in our model home. We reached this by calculating a weighted tariff rate for each item based on the share of imports from each country and the tariff rate for that country, with the assumption that the full cost of each tariff was passed on to the consumer.
Materials primarily imported from China would add $1,708 to per-home costs, Canadian products would contribute $1,300, and Mexican imports would add $981.
Take lumber, for example. NBC News calculated that a typical 1,800-square-foot home requires about 14,400 board feet of framing lumber, totaling roughly $7,762 at wholesale prices. Almost one-third of the U.S. lumber supply is imported, and Canada supplied nearly 80% of the United States' $14.5 billion in annual imports in 2021. A weighted 23% tariff could increase lumber prices by 7% — adding roughly $534 to home framing costs alone.
Scroll down to see how tariffs could raise prices during each phase of construction.
Model of home
NBC News designed a single-family house model structure for our analysis. Our model is:
1,800 square foot
Three bedrooms
Two bathrooms
A combined living room and kitchen
A laundry room
Foundation and framing
The backbone of U.S. homes is largely dependent on major trading partners that have faced some of Trump's most aggressive tariffs. Canada supplies the majority of U.S. imported material in the first phase of construction, including 24% of framing lumber. Rebar, the long steel bars that help reinforce concrete, faces a 5% price increase thanks to its Canadian and Mexican origins. And there are plenty of smaller pieces crucial to home building, such as anchor bolts and framing nails: Taiwan provides 19% of those, which will cost 8% more.
Building envelope
Many of the materials necessary to seal a home's exterior from water and weather face similarly steep tariffs. Costs for windows and exterior doors from Canada, which supply 2% of U.S. homes, are expected to rise by just 1%. And 20% of door locks and viewers come from China, which will mean a 10% jump. Others face smaller increases.
Utilities
Mexico and China split supply across key categories in the electrical phase: switches/outlets increase 14%, wiring rises 13%, and safety devices increase 11%. Service panels and breakers rise 11%, with 22% of supply from Mexico.
The plumbing system is dominated by Chinese imports, with 4% increases for lines/fittings, 13% increases for toilets and bathroom sinks, and a 9% increase for water heaters.
To regulate indoor temperature, the HVAC system includes a combined heating and cooling unit and ductwork — both sourced primarily from Mexico with a 6% increase — along with a thermostat, up 8%.
Interior finishes
Window blinds increase 12%, with 15% of supply sourced from China (32%). Stone countertops face 8% increases, sourced equally from India and Brazil (8% each). Lighting fixtures and tile both increase 7%. Lighting is dominated by Chinese imports, while tile comes primarily from Italy (9%) and Spain (7%).
Exterior finishes
The build completes with exterior details and landscaping. China supplies the majority of higher-impact items: house numbers (9% increase), exterior lighting (7% increase), and mulch 6% increase). Landscaping materials experience minimal 1% increases, with Canada providing 3% of U.S. imports.
Altogether, the impact of tariffs across the homebuilding process adds $4,405 to the materials cost — raising the total cost of materials from $86,516 to $90,921 for a typical 1,800-square-foot home.
Methodology
As the basis for the analysis, NBC News designed a typical 1,800-square-foot single-family home, cataloged all required construction materials, calculated precise quantities using industry standards and collected current market prices primarily from national vendors. Each material was mapped to its corresponding North American Industry Classification System code to align with the official U.S. Census Bureau trade data.
NBC News calculated import dependency as total imports for a given item category divided by its total domestic supply, using data from the U.S. Trade Commission and the Annual Survey of Manufactures.
For each material category, we calculated a weighted average tariff rate based on the amount the United States imports from each tariffed country, then estimated total price impacts by multiplying import dependency by the weighted tariff rate.
This analysis provides a snapshot of potential cost impacts using national averages and simplified assumptions, but it does not account for long-term market adjustments, regional variations, supply chain adaptations or uneven cost absorption across the supply chain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crime is down. Here's why Americans always feel like its getting worse
Crime is down. Here's why Americans always feel like its getting worse

The Herald Scotland

time15 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Crime is down. Here's why Americans always feel like its getting worse

"People don't keep track of these things. They don't look at just having feelings that they're not safe," said Howard Lavine, a professor of political science and psychology at the University of Minnesota. Safety is a real concern for many. Violent crime still occurs every day at rates that can vary widely between and within cities, which can affect the public's perception of their safety, according to Alex Piquero, a professor at the University of Miami and the former director of the Bureau of Justice Statistics. "Are we safe today? Yeah, we're safer," Piquero said. "But we're not completely safe." Democrats' Achilles heel: As mayors try to defend cities from Trump, have they learned their lesson on crime? Why are Americans' perceptions out-of-whack with crime data? There are several reasons, among them: The United States is more violent than other countries. The baseline level of violence in the United States remains higher than its peer countries, which can fuel legitimate fear, according to Lavine. News and social media can stoke fear: Social media and news reports on relatively rare incidents like flash mob robberies can further fuel misconceptions about public safety, Piquero said. The Pew Research Center found in 2024 that Americans who frequently consume local crime news are more likely to be concerned about crime affecting them personally. Partisanship: The gap between Americans' perception of crime widened farther than ever in 2024, with 29% of Democrats and 90% of Republicans saying they believed crime increased that year, Gallup found. Distrust in data: Crime data is notoriously complicated, in part because of inconsistencies in how local law enforcement track crime. Drawing conclusions from the data has become political fodder. "There's a perception problem, right? And so is the perception that crime is out of control? Yeah..." Piquero said. "But the data doesn't necessarily support that." Can you trust crime data? Crime data can be found at the center of the Washington, D.C. firestorm, with Trump calling the city's crime statistics showing a big drop in some violent crime a "total fraud." D.C. Police Union Chairman Gregg Pemberton has told NBC4 Washington he doubts the local drop in crime is as large as officials claim and has accused the department of deliberately falsifying the data. People who track crime data are familiar with accuracy issues and tend to focus on big-picture trends. Piquero said the individuals who produce crime data, particularly at the federal level, are extremely committed to providing "accurate, reliable and timely" information. "I do not believe that there are people out there cooking books on crime data," he added. Data analyst Jeff Asher thinks the contested D.C. crime data likely overstates a drop in violent crime, but that's not particularly surprising to him. Asher, co-founder of the data analytics firm AH Datalytics, said it's not entirely clear why the discrepancy between data reported to the FBI and to the public exist, but it's not uncommon for law enforcement data, particularly real time data, to have inaccuracies, he said. "One of the pitfalls of people relying on publicly available data is that sometimes it's just wrong," he said. "And that happens - as someone that looks at this data - it happens with depressing frequency." National crime data has gaps National crime data isn't perfect, either. The FBI's crime reports rely on information submitted by police, but the country's 18,000 law agencies aren't required to report this data and not all do, which has led to questions about accuracy. Meanwhile, the Bureau of Justice Statistics produces an annual National Victimization Survey, which includes both reported and unreported crimes. These reports generally mirror one another, Piquero said, but the BJS survey often shows certain crimes are consistently underreported to police, such as domestic violence, rape and hate crimes. The two sets of data, taken together, can provide a sense of how crime is changing, he said. "One is not inherently better than the other. I have always advised that people should look at both of them," Piquero said. Asher said other sources, including the Gun Violence Archive, Crime Data Tool and his firm's Real Time Crime Index can help Americans understand broader trends in crime. Despite the issues with crime data, Asher said, the drop reported in DC fits a broader picture. "We certainly feel confident about the declines we're seeing nationally." Contributing: Erin Mansfield, Zac Anderson, and Kathryn Palmer; USA TODAY; Reuters

Notice a theme to Trump's takeover of cities? These Black mayors do.
Notice a theme to Trump's takeover of cities? These Black mayors do.

The Herald Scotland

time15 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Notice a theme to Trump's takeover of cities? These Black mayors do.

Lee and other Black mayors, along with civil rights activists and lawmakers across the country are increasingly concerned about Trump singling out cities like Oakland, Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, Baltimore and Washington, DC. All of them are led by Black mayors and all of those leaders are Democrats. "We just can't help but feel in some kind of way that we're being specifically profiled," said Van R. Johnson, president of the African American Mayors Association and mayor of Savannah, Georgia. "That's not right. That's not fair. We want our federal government to work with us. We're just a phone call away." New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, called Trump's takeover of DC's policing a "blatantly racist and despicable power grab." "It won't stop in Washington, DC," she said in a statement. "The stakes are high not just for Washington, DC, but for the future of democracy in every corner of this country." Trump used his presidential powers in early August to take over policing in Washington, DC, complaining crime is rampant and officials haven't done enough to address it - despite statistics showing crime in the district is at a 30-year-low. Trump also threatened to deploy the National Guard to help fight crime in other communities. "We're going to take back our capital," Trump said Aug. 11. "And then we'll look at other cities also." He called it a "historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse." Different visions for tackling urban problems White House officials argue the nation's capital is filthy and that Trump has seen that firsthand. In March, Trump signed an executive order titled "Making the District of Columbia Safe and Beautiful," which sets up a task force of federal officials to clean up the city. "If Democrats had any common sense, they would follow President Trump's lead to crack down on violent crime that has plagued our nation's capital - and Democrat-run cities across the country," Taylor Rogers, White House assistant press secretary, said in an email to USA TODAY. "Instead of criticizing President Trump's popular, tough-on crime policies, they should focus on cleaning up their own cities which are some of the most dangerous places in America." Many big cities are run by Democrats, but both violent and property crimes have fallen nationwide in recent years, federal data shows. Civil rights leaders criticized Trump for portraying cities, especially those led by Black mayors, as crime ridden. "Painting a false picture of the city's largest Black-majority cities, led by Black mayors, is part of the Trump administration's ongoing strategy to exploit racial distrust for political gain,'' Marc Morial, president of the National Urban League, and George Lambert, president of the Greater Washington Urban League President, said in a statement. If Trump really wanted to help cities, several mayors argued, he wouldn't be cutting funding for anti-poverty programs and community policing efforts. "We need to have this federal government invest in cities like Oakland instead of disinvesting in us," said Lee, who spent 27 years in Congress, including during Trump's first term. "It doesn't make any sense what this government is doing if they want to see cities not just survive but thrive." More: 'DC has a right to govern itself': Civil rights leaders denounce Trump's takeover move 'Reasonable people can look at the optics' Trump has yet to publicly bring up race in his criticisms of those cities, but experts point to his history of racially disparaging remarks, including during his first term when he questioned why the United States would let in people from countries like Haiti and parts of Africa, which he referred to using an expletive. Trump also called Baltimore, a predominately Black city, a "disgusting, rat and rodent-infested mess." While the president didn't specifically mention race then or in his recent references, it's clearly implied, said Jason Williams, a professor of Justice Studies at Montclair State University in New Jersey. Williams said urban centers historically have been code for talking about Black people or communities of color. "He doesn't necessarily have to say it in order for his base to know what the implications are," said Williams, adding that most people know DC has a significant Black population. "It does give him some plausible deniability. Not that I think this president would care." Oakland's Lee told USA TODAY she finds Trump's actions "fearmongering and diversionary." "A lot of what he does is to provoke unrest and that gives him an excuse, so we have to be prepared and ready to fight," she said. Oakland has a contingency plan if Trump tries to send in National Guard, Lee added. When asked if she could provide any details, the mayor replied, "I'm not at liberty to do that right now. That would be inappropriate at this point." In DC, Trump justified his actions by citing a recent overnight assault of a former federal official and in Los Angeles, he called in the National Guard to quell civil protests spurred by the aggressive immigration crackdown. He might take advantage of other isolated incidents to target other big cities, said Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy at the Vera Institute of Justice, a nonprofit organization focused on criminal justice. "It's the red meat that Trump uses to rile up the MAGA base and it is effective as bait only when it's left unchecked," Rahman said. 'We've been here before' Federal officials have sometimes used their powers to undermine Black urban leadership and portray them as chaotic and incompetent or crime prone, Williams said. He pointed to examples such as the urban renewal of the 1960s and 1970s when federal officials displaced Black neighborhoods with highways and a century earlier, after Reconstruction, when governments dismantled post-Civil War gains. "We've been here before with federal overreach and an attempt to try to roll back hard-won wins," Williams said. The nation's capital has long been in the crosshairs of Trump and GOP congressional leaders. Earlier this year, Republican lawmakers threatened to withhold funds if Bowser didn't remove a Black Lives Matter mural from a street near the White House. "DC has always been this sort of political football for the Republicans," Williams said. While some Black mayors are concerned about their cities becoming a Trump target, they're continuing their work to combat crime, Johnson, the Savannah mayor, said. "We're worried about fighting our federal government as well as fighting crime," he said. "It's a continuous 'what if, what next,' which we think are distractions from what the American people are really talking about." Johnson said the ideologies and approaches of some Black mayors may be different than Trump's, but that doesn't mean they can't be partners on issues, including crime. "We understand elections. We're politicians ourselves," he said. "We're charged with playing with whoever is on the field. When Donald Trump became president, he became president of our cities too." Contributing: Phillip Bailey

Thousands to join US ‘Fight the Trump Takeover' protests against Republican redistricting plans
Thousands to join US ‘Fight the Trump Takeover' protests against Republican redistricting plans

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

Thousands to join US ‘Fight the Trump Takeover' protests against Republican redistricting plans

Thousands are expected to gather in cities and towns across 34 states on Saturday for a national day of protest against Republican redistricting plans in Texas and elsewhere. 'Fight the Trump Takeover' will be anchored in Austin, Texas, with other sites spread nationwide. 'Texas House Democrats are blocking a redistricting vote in the Texas House right now to Stop the Trump Takeover,' a website for the protests says. 'But Trump has made it clear that he's not stopping at Texas. He's targeting Missouri, Ohio, Florida and every state he can twist to help him steal Congress.' The protests come as Texas Republicans are considering a mid-decade redistricting plan at Donald Trump's request that would add five additional Republican House seats to the red state. In response Democratic lawmakers have left the state in protest, depriving the statehouse of a quorum needed to move its plans ahead. 'Though this fight started in Texas, it doesn't end here,' Drucilla Tigner, executive director of Texas For All, said in a statement. 'This isn't just about redistricting or one state's politics. It's about the future of our democracy.' On Thursday, the Democratic governor of California, Gavin Newsom, announced Democrats there would move ahead with a plan to redistrict the blue state in response to Texas's effort. But, Newsom said, the plan for new California maps would only take effect if Texas or other red states pushed ahead with their own plans for partisan redistricting. Texas Democrats said on Thursday that they would return to the state after a nearly two-week absence if certain conditions were met, including Republicans ending their special session and California introducing its new map that would add five Democratic seats to offset Texas's proposal. 'The incredible support we're seeing – not just back home in Texas, but from Democrats, Republicans and independents across the country – proves this fight is bigger than any one state,' said congressman Gene Wu, chair of the Texas house Democrats. 'We're defending our entire country from the Trump takeover, and I'm honored to stand with every patriotic American who refuses to let extremists rig the system.' Major left-leaning organizations including Indivisible and MoveOn are helping to organize and support the protests, as is the Democratic National Committee. 'Trump knows the only way he can hold the majority after his budget betrayal is by changing the rules in the middle of the game to avoid accountability for ripping healthcare and food away from millions of Americans,' the DNC chair, Ken Martin, told NBC News. Organizers are using an approach they have honed in the second Trump administration – holding protests in places big and small to show that dissent against the administration exists in all corners of the country. An April day of protest called 'Hands Off' drew people to more than 1,000 sites. In June, as Trump held a military parade in Washington, millions turned out to more than 2,000 sites nationwide for 'No Kings' protests. Other days of action themed around labor and immigrants rights and voting rights also brought out tens of thousands of people on weekdays. Planning is under way for another mass day of protest set for Labor Day, on 1 September.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store