logo
India File: Yes Bank deal has a message for RBI

India File: Yes Bank deal has a message for RBI

Reuters21-05-2025

(This was originally published in the India File newsletter, which is issued every Tuesday. Sign up here to get the latest news from India and how it matters to the world.)
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation's $1.58 billion deal for a 20% stake in Yes Bank, India's first big banking acquisition by a foreign investor in five years, looks set to reignite a debate about bank ownership in India. Is it time to consider easing regulations and allowing strategic investors more opportunities in Indian banking? That's our focus this week.
And India starts drawing up plans on water supplies after it put the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan in abeyance, as tensions heated up between the two countries. Scroll down for more on that.
** JPMorgan upgrades emerging market equities as Sino-US trade war eases
** Some Chinese companies eye Singapore listings to expand markets amid trade war
** Japan's Ishiba rules out tax cuts funded by debt issuance
** Qualcomm to make data center processors that connect to Nvidia chips
It took more than a year to negotiate and the Japanese buyer ended up with less than half of what it wanted, but Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation's deal to buy 20% of Yes Bank was still one for the record books - India's biggest bank deal to date with a foreign buyer.
The $1.58 billion acquisition emerged from a clash of two formidable forces: the banking sector's drive to support the world's fastest-growing major economy, and the central bank's attachment to a stifling array of ownership restrictions.
The deal is one of two big cross-border banking acquisitions expected this year, breaking a five-year drought while drawing attention to restrictions on foreign buyers, which may be depriving Indian banking of new sources of long-term capital and more diverse ownership. More than half of the banking system's assets are with government-owned institutions.
The second deal, a plan to sell a majority stake in government-owned IDBI Bank, has been in the works for more than two years, while a broader plan to privatise at least a couple other government-owned banks has stalled.
The need for capital is evident in India's credit-to-GDP ratio. At 90%, including credit from bank and non-bank lenders, it falls short of the 113% average among major economies, the Reserve Bank of India said in a December report.
Strategic long-term investors, including foreign financial institutions, would be critical, analysts say, to mobilising banking sector support for rapid economic growth.
The RBI, whose governor Sanjay Malhotra said earlier this year that India should aspire to annual growth of 7% or more, may be coming around to that point of view.
"(The RBI) is slowly becoming more open to allowing regulated global financial institutions to own larger stakes, although this hasn't been codified in the regulations yet," said Abizer Diwanji, founder of NeoStrat Advisors LLP, a Mumbai-based consulting firm.
The Reserve Bank of India has already in recent years grown more inclined to grant exceptions to a 15% limit on a single foreign financial institution's shareholding in an Indian bank, especially when a bailout of the target was needed.
In the case of Yes Bank, shareholders that had been brought in to rescue the lender in 2020 needed an exit. DBS and Fairfax Holdings have also been allowed in past years to buy stakes in distressed lenders.
But the RBI has held fast on other rules, such as a 26% limit on a foreign owner's voting rights.
"The big hindrance still is the 26% voting cap and that may need to be revisited as it deters a lot of potential foreign buyers," NeoStrat Advisors' Diwanji said.
RBI rules also require that a "promoter" - a regulatory classification in India for a large shareholder with influence over bank decisions - must reduce its equity holding to 26% within 15 years of acquiring its stake. Corporate ownership of banks is also barred in India.
Globally, while most countries require well-diversified ownership of banks, far fewer have restrictions on voting rights and not all bar corporate ownership.
India's plethora of rules has meant banking merger and acquisition deals are rare and often sub-optimal for both buyer and seller. For Yes Bank, Moody's Ratings said it would only factor in limited benefits from the SMBC deal, given the small influence afforded by a 20% stake, although it termed the transaction as "credit positive" for the Indian bank.
The RBI last reviewed its rules in 2020, when it floated allowing corporations to own banks and making it easier for non-bank lenders to apply for a bank licence. But the final rules retained most of the existing restrictions while the pool of potential buyers, as evidenced by recent deals, has remained thin.
Does India need to rethink bank ownership rules to give strategic investors more flexibility? Write to me at ira.dugal@thomsonreuters.com, opens new tab.
After putting a decades-old water-sharing treaty with Pakistan in abeyance, India is expediting planning and execution of projects on the Chenab, Jhelum and Indus rivers.
One plan under discussion would double to 120 km (75 miles) the length of a 19th-century canal on the Chenab, which runs through India to Pakistan's breadbasket of Punjab.
Don't miss this Reuters exclusive.
India's April foreign trade data, watched closely by markets for signs of front-loading of production during the 90-day pause in President Donald Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs, showed a 27% increase in exports to the U.S., with electronic goods up particularly sharply.
Overall exports, though, rose a more modest 9% and the trade gap widened. Read here to understand the data.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed's Bowman confirmed by Senate to central bank's top regulatory post
Fed's Bowman confirmed by Senate to central bank's top regulatory post

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Fed's Bowman confirmed by Senate to central bank's top regulatory post

WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman was confirmed to the central bank's top regulatory post by the U.S. Senate on Wednesday, where she is expected to push an agenda aimed at easing rules for banks. Bowman, a former community banker who President Donald Trump nominated to the Fed's Vice Chair for Supervision role in March, has served on the Fed's board as a governor since 2018. She was confirmed by a vote of 48 to 46. In her new role, Bowman will lead the Fed's efforts to supervise and write rules for the nation's largest and most complex banks. That is expected to include easing leverage rules for large banks, making the annual "stress test" of big banks more transparent, and rolling out simpler capital rules for large firms, according to analysts. When she testified before lawmakers in April, she said current financial rules have grown "overly complicated and redundant" and impose unnecessary costs on banks and their customers. She has vowed to be a "pragmatic" regulator, as the Trump administration has made trimming rules in a bid to boost economic growth a top priority.

Stock market braced for tech takeover frenzy: Blow to the City as foreign predators target FIVE promising firms
Stock market braced for tech takeover frenzy: Blow to the City as foreign predators target FIVE promising firms

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Stock market braced for tech takeover frenzy: Blow to the City as foreign predators target FIVE promising firms

London's stock market is facing a damaging exodus of some of its most promising tech firms after a series of takeover swoops by foreign predators. The future of the cutting-edge chip designer Alphawave could be decided as early as today after its larger American rival Qualcomm was given until 5pm to table a bid or walk away – though the deadline could be extended. Alphawave is one of five London-listed tech firms, with a combined value of over £5billion, currently 'in play' as suitors race to cash in on their success. The flurry of takeover activity has set alarm bells ringing in the City, as experts warn the crisis gripping the stock market is undermining Britain's hopes of becoming a global technology hub. London is reeling from an exodus of companies and a dearth of new arrivals through share listings. Analysts said the UK is still struggling to recover from the decision by Cambridge-based chip designer Arm to list in New York in 2023. Arm is now worth £100billion and would be the fifth-biggest company on the FTSE 100 – and the largest tech stock in the UK – had it chosen London. 'There would have been a halo effect for the UK market as it would have a heavyweight addition which would have stimulated greater activity,' lamented one City source. Ministers were last night urged to 'move, and move quickly' to revive the stock market and turbocharge Britain's tech sector. Takeover deadlines loom for two more tech firms next week. Private equity group ICG has until June 11 to secure a deal for analytics and intelligence firm GlobalData, while US buyout giant Bain Capital has until June 13 to agree an offer for Edinburgh-based healthcare tech group Craneware. These deadlines could also be extended, however. Meanwhile, London fintech company Alpha Group has been targeted by US payments business Corpay. And Northern Ireland software group FD Technologies has backed a £570million offer from Boston-based private equity giant TA Associates. The proposed deal now requires approval. Successful takeovers would see the companies leave the London Stock Exchange, diminishing its standing and that of the City while robbing the country of much-needed tax revenues and even jobs. And it would follow the acquisition of nine firms in the technology, media and telecommunications sector with a combined value of £10billion last year, including cyber security giant Darktrace. Charles Hall, head of research at Peel Hunt, said: 'If we are serious about the UK being a centre of excellence for tech companies, then it is essential that we have a vibrant equity market to support them and provide growth capital. 'Government needs to move, and move quickly, to ensure that we retain the firms of tomorrow.' He added: 'It could all have been so different if Arm could have been persuaded to list in the UK. This would have fundamentally shifted the narrative around UK tech.' Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown, said a fresh round of takeovers would be 'another blow to London's ambitions to retain and attract more tech firms to list'.

Starmer's new bus scheme puts him on the path of failed prime ministers
Starmer's new bus scheme puts him on the path of failed prime ministers

Telegraph

time4 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer's new bus scheme puts him on the path of failed prime ministers

Northern transport schemes have become something of a panic button for prime ministers worried about falling popularity in the polls. With Sir Keir Starmer less popular than Sir Ed Davey, his Liberal Democrat counterpart, the Labour leader sent his Chancellor out to bat for him with Wednesday's announcement. Yet close watchers of politics might feel that some of the sums unveiled by Rachel Reeves, as part of what she described as 'the biggest ever investment by a British government in transport links in our city regions and the surrounding towns', are suspiciously similar to previous pledges. Those include £978 million for transport projects in the Tees Valley region, a sum previously announced in 2023 by the Tories and then placed under review by Labour after last year's general election. A similar situation holds true for the Liverpool city region, which was awarded £1.581 billion in 2023 under the city region sustainable transport settlement, after Wednesday's £1.581 billion award under Labour's newly unveiled transport for city regions funding settlements. Gareth Davies, the shadow treasury minister, said: 'Rachel Reeves is scrambling to salvage her failing economic plan after the Prime Minister has made U-turn after U-turn, punching holes in her credibility. 'She needed to do better than copying and pasting announcements made by the previous Conservative government. The country is not falling for their lies any more. Britain deserves better.' Here are some of the times in the recent past when prime ministers have reached for northern transport funding announcements to shore up their sagging popularity. Gordon Brown's 2009 light-rail systems Mr Brown, who succeeded Sir Tony Blair as prime minister, said he would improve public transport in Sunderland if his party won the 2010 general election. His manifesto that year also promised 'upgrades to Tyne and Wear light-rail systems' and electronic ticketing to promote 'cheap and easy' public transport across the country. It wasn't the first time Mr Brown had fallen back on promises of boosting transport spending outside London and the South East. The previous December, he opened the HS1 railway line in Kent while promising that it would become 'a blueprint for the future of high-speed rail travel in the United Kingdom'. He added, referring to the then not-yet-started project, that HS2 was going to 'make the case for a national high-speed rail network across this country'. Not long after Sir Tony handed over the premiership to Mr Brown, an act followed by a slump in the opinion polls and strong rumours of a 2008 snap election, the new prime minister was forced to deny that transport spending was skewed towards London and the South East. 'The Government has doubled expenditure on transport. It continues to move forward with its road programme, but also its rail and infrastructure programme,' Mr Brown said that year. 'And I don't think it's true to say that transport spending has been skewed to one particular area. In every part of the country, we are expanding transport according to the needs of these different areas. 'The important thing to recognise about transport is that we are investing in every part of the country.' Cameron on northern roads and railways In October 2010, the Tory-Lib Dem government announced deep public spending cuts as part of George Osborne's austerity programme, with the transport budget set for cuts of around 15 per cent. Mr Osborne spearheaded the Northern Powerhouse Rail project, a slogan that promised a lateral high-speed railway line across northern England, alongside plans for HS2 to move off the drawing board and into reality. As the 2015 general election loomed, however, David Cameron – now Baron Cameron of Chipping Norton – started adopting the familiar refrain of North-centric transport announcements in an attempt to woo voters. 'I think it is important that to reassure people in the next parliament we're going to spend three times more on other transport schemes, road and rail schemes, as we'll spend on HS2,' he told ITV News in 2014, ahead of the following year's general election. A year later, the prime minister was back out on the stump, promising in a YouTube video addressed to voters in Accrington, Lancashire: 'Today I'm here in the North West talking about how we're going to invest in our universities, in our science base, how we're going to build the roads and railways and infrastructure that we need for our future so we get a balanced recovery right across our country.' The promise may have worked: in 2015 the Conservatives secured a clear majority, meaning they could govern without their erstwhile Lib Dem coalition partners. A year after that, Mr Cameron dramatically stepped down after losing the 2016 EU membership referendum. Theresa May's 'transforming cities' Mr Cameron's 2016 successor was Theresa May, who felt the heat of unpopularity as early as two years into her premiership. As part of a policy intended to ' help spread growth beyond London ', a total of ten city regions around the country – including Greater Manchester, Cambridge, Peterborough, Plymouth, Southampton and Sheffield, among others – were handed a total of £1.7 billion between them for transport projects. 'Our great cities and their suburbs are home to millions of people and world-beating businesses,' Mrs May said at the time. Faced with growing calls for a general election in 2019, she went on to reassure Midlands political and business leaders that the Tories were backing the full length of HS2's northern leg. She said in a letter to the Midlands Connect trade association: 'I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that the Government remains committed to delivering the whole of HS2 Phase 2, and will continue to work closely with you to ensure that the project meets your aspirations for growth and regeneration.' Boris Johnson promises lots to Leeds… After Mrs May stepped down in 2019, Boris Johnson won the 2019 Conservative Party leadership election – and called a general election in the same year. Having been mayor of London, the one-time Telegraph correspondent was already firmly linked in the public imagination with transport projects – but that did not stop him from reaching for the familiar northern transport announcements when the polls were down. Mr Johnson said in an early 2020 speech: 'I want to be the prime minister who does with Northern Powerhouse Rail what we did for Crossrail in London, and today I am going to deliver on my commitment to that vision with a pledge to fund the Leeds to Manchester route.' That route has, so far, not materialised. … and Liz Truss repeats his pledges During her 45 days in office, Liz Truss had little time to say much. Yet in the run-up to her abortive prime ministerial term, she renewed the Conservatives' pledge to build Northern Powerhouse Rail. 'Leeds is still the largest city in Europe without its own metro network and I would work to fix that. And I will get Northern Powerhouse Rail built,' she told a Tory leadership hustings in July 2022. She did not, in fact, get the train project onto the tracks during her two months in No 10. Rishi Sunak and HS2 Rishi Sunak took a much bolder stance than his predecessors, being best remembered in transport circles for cancelling the northern leg of HS2 and freezing National Highways' smart motorways rollout. Yet by 2024, paving the ground for that year's general election, the Tory leader was keen to position himself as a generous benefactor for northern transport projects. ' Through reallocating HS2 funding, we're not only investing billions of pounds directly back into our smaller cities, towns and rural areas across the North and Midlands, but we are also empowering their local leaders to invest in the transport projects that matter most to their communities – this is levelling up in action,' he said in a statement that February. His government's 2023 announcement that HS2 Phase 2 funding was being redirected into various northern transport projects formed the basis of Wednesday's announcement by Rachel Reeves. Keen observers of politics watching Ms Reeves's speech could be forgiven for believing they had become trapped in the film Groundhog Day. But the refrain is so familiar from prime ministers in political hot water that it has become a predictable staple of these types of set-piece speech.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store