
The Unapologetic Hindu: How Modi's Civilisational Confidence Fuels India's Ascent
Last Updated:
Modi 3.0, far from being chastened by a reduced parliamentary majority, appears to be doubling down on the unapologetic embrace of Hindu identity.
For decades, India's political elite danced a peculiar waltz: they governed a nation steeped in Hindu tradition yet shied away from embracing this identity publicly. Secularism, as it was practiced, often felt like a polite apology for the country's cultural core, a self-imposed silence over the vibrant rhythms of a civilisation older than most. Leaders draped their public personas in a neutral, almost sterile modernity, as if acknowledging India's Hindu wellspring risked fracturing a 'pluralistic" fabric – a fabric, ironically, largely woven from the inclusive threads of that very Hindu worldview. It was a strange disconnect, like a mighty river trying to hide its source, leaving the nation's identity oddly subdued and its confidence stunted.
Narendra Modi didn't just change the tune; he changed the entire orchestra. And now, Modi 3.0, far from being chastened by a reduced parliamentary majority, appears to be doubling down on this unapologetic embrace of Hindu identity – not as a tool of exclusion, but as the very bedrock of India's cultural revival and its determined global ascent. This isn't about crafting a theocracy or sidelining minorities, as critics reflexively charge in often predictable editorials. Instead, this is the story of a nation finally comfortable in its own skin, drawing profound strength from its ancient ethos to fuel a modern, aspirational, and genuinely inclusive future for all its citizens.
What does this civilisational confidence look like in practice? Consider the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. This is not merely a temple rising from the dust of a long-disputed site; it's a spiritual anchor restored after centuries of struggle. Past governments, paralysed by political calculations, allowed the issue to fester. Narendra Modi's approach was different: facilitate a resolution through due legal process, then embrace the outcome as a national moment of cultural reclamation—not a slight against any community, but India making peace with a significant, long-denied part of its own history. India finally looked in the mirror and, instead of flinching, decided to own its reflection with pride.
The abrogation of Article 370 tells a similar tale of civilisational assertion. To some, scrapping the special status of Jammu and Kashmir would appear like an overhyped legislative amendment. On the contrary, it was a bold act of national integration, fully weaving a region—historically, geographically, and culturally an inseparable part of India's civilisational tapestry—into the national mainstream. The streets of Srinagar and Jammu, once living under a different constitutional shadow, now benefit from the same development schemes, the same digital infrastructure, the same opportunities as cities like Bengaluru or Bhubaneswar.
Modi's projection of this civilisational confidence extends powerfully onto the global stage. When he gifts a Bhagavad Gita to a foreign leader, he shares Bharat's profound philosophical wisdom. After all, he is India's Prime Minister and its foremost cultural ambassador. Similarly, the International Day of Yoga, championed by Modi at the UN, has blossomed into a global phenomenon. More than just coordinated stretching in parks from New York to Tokyo; the day now commemorates India's ancient science of well-being, thoughtfully packaged for a world starved of inner peace and balance. Picture yoga mats unrolled on a misty morning in London's Hyde Park or amidst the bustle of a Delhi community centre—same practice, same Indic roots, but global resonance. Modi doesn't shrink from this heritage; he wears it. Visiting temples, participating in rituals, invoking shlokas – these are presented as natural, integral facets of his identity and, by extension, India's. Why, indeed, should they be otherwise?
Internally, a less visible but equally vital project is underway: fostering greater unity within Hindu society itself. India's majority community is no monolith. For centuries, it has been fragmented by caste hierarchies, regional specificities, and sectarian interpretations. Modi's consistent call for 'Samajik Samrasta' (social harmony) and his denouncement of caste discrimination aim to bridge these historical fissures. After all, the BJP and RSS's project is much larger – attempting to forge a more cohesive, resilient Hindu identity, one capable of navigating the complexities of the 21st century after enduring centuries of Abrahamic and European colonial assaults that sought to dismantle it. He understands that a fractured and internally conflicted majority cannot provide a stable anchor for national progress. The goal is a pan-Hindu consciousness that is proud, inclusive, and forward-looking.
Critics, predictably, decry this as majoritarianism, a betrayal of some idealised, often de-Indianized, version of secularism. But their preferred model often translated into a peculiar reticence about the majority's heritage, a public square where one faith was expected to whisper while others could speak freely. True inclusivity doesn't demand the erasure of the foundational culture; it mandates equal respect for all, including the ethos that shapes the nation's deepest cultural pulse. Dismissing Modi's approach as merely divisive is to miss the woods for the trees. Modi's vision is about grounding India firmly in its unique civilisational roots to enable it to stand taller, more confidently, on the world stage.
Post-election, with the BJP's outright majority trimmed in the Lok Sabha, the commentariat was quick to predict a course correction. Flick through social media or scan the op-ed pages, and the narrative was clear: a tighter mandate necessitates a softer, more 'centrist' approach, perhaps even a wistful glance back towards the often-chaotic compromises of 'coalition dharma.' Many seemed to be holding their breath, almost hoping for a return to the era of hesitant and diluted governance.
Yet, Modi 3.0 seems to be audaciously defying that script. There's no discernible pivot and no dilution of the core message. Instead, there's an almost palpable resolve to accelerate, to more deeply embed this civilisational confidence into India's very sinews. The election results, nuanced as they undoubtedly are by local factors, are seemingly not being interpreted as a wholesale rejection of this foundational vision. Rather, the mandate appears to have invigorated the mission to make this cultural anchoring the unshakeable bedrock of a 'Viksit Bharat'.
top videos
View all
This unapologetic civilisational stance resonates precisely because it is coupled with tangible governance and a relentless focus on development for all. New highways slicing through formerly disconnected regions, UPI transactions empowering the smallest street vendor, solar panels glinting on rural rooftops, India's enemies being eliminated – these are daily affirmations that heritage and progress are not mutually exclusive but mutually reinforcing. For too long, India was presented with a false dichotomy: cling to your past or race towards an ill-defined future. Modi's bold proposition is that the two are inextricably intertwined. A nation unmoored from its cultural anchorage drifts aimlessly, but one that embraces its roots with confidence and clarity walks with purpose towards its destiny.
Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
About the Author
Sanbeer Singh Ranhotra
Sanbeer Singh Ranhotra is a producer and video journalist at Network18. He is enthusiastic about and writes on both national affairs as well as geopolitics.
tags :
Ayodhya Ram mandir Narendra Modi Straight Talk
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 03, 2025, 16:04 IST
News opinion Straight Talk | The Unapologetic Hindu: How Modi's Civilisational Confidence Fuels India's Ascent

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
No one needed to tell India to stop, didn't need any mediation: Tharoor on Op Sindoor
India respects American presidency but New Delhi has "never wanted to ask anyone to mediate" and no one needed to tell us to 'stop', Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump of his role in the recent conflict between India and Pakistan . "All I can say is that we have enormous respect for the American presidency and the American president. All we can say for ourselves is that we have never particularly wanted to ask anyone to mediate," said Tharoor, the leader of the all-party parliamentary delegation which arrived here on Tuesday afternoon and began its packed day of meetings with lawmakers and government officials on Wednesday. During an interaction at the National Press Club here on Wednesday, Tharoor stressed that India had no real difficulty in speaking the same language as the Pakistanis. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Also Read: NDA govt devoted to welfare of poor, committed to building self-reliant India: PM Modi "As long as they use the language of terrorism , we will use the language of force. That doesn't require a third party," he said. Live Events The delegation comprising MPs Sarfaraz Ahmad, Ganti Harish Madhur Balayogi, Shashank Mani Tripathi, Bhubaneswar Kalita, Milind Deora, Tejasvi Surya, and India's former ambassador to the US Taranjit Sandhu, arrived from India in New York on May 24, and travelled to Guyana, Panama, Colombia and Brazil before arriving in Washington, the last leg of the tour to convey India's stance following the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor . Tharoor said if Pakistan were to dismantle the infrastructure of terrorism, "we can talk to them". "If they take serious actions to show they want to restore normal relationships with us, we can certainly talk to them again without needing an intermediary." "So it's not in any way a negative comment about the goodwill of people. During this conflict, as I said, in any case, India didn't need persuading to stop. No one needed to tell us to 'stop', because we were telling them the moment Pakistan stops, we're prepared to stop." "So if they, in turn, told the Pakistanis, 'you better stop, because Indians are willing to stop', and that was what they did, then that's a wonderful gesture on their part vis-a-vis Pakistan," Tharoor said. He added that "all we can say is that in our conversations, some of these things didn't come up". Also Read: Surely he's aware Pahalgam terrorists still not brought to justice: Congress on PM Modi's J&K visit Noting that he was saying this in a "constructive spirit", Tharoor said: "We have an enormous respect for the US, and we have a much more important, valuable strategic partnership with Washington that we wouldn't want to jeopardise over a matter of detail. We are interested, talking at the moment about a number of areas of cooperation, interested in enhancing all of that. So small matters can go by, and we can focus on tomorrow." Tharoor was responding to a question about India's response to the constant claim by Trump that he mediated in the conflict between India and Pakistan. He was also asked if this is a question the Congress party continues to ask back in India, and party leader Rahul Gandhi commented that Prime Minister Narendra Modi "surrendered" after receiving a phone call from Trump. Delegation member Deora said: "As far as the political question is concerned, I would like to express my admiration for Tharoor. I've known him for a long time. He always puts country before party." Surya, responding to Deora's comment, said: "Absolutely." In response to a question on what role the US had in encouraging talks between India and Pakistan, Tharoor said: "I think the US has understood for some time now that India has a very clear position that there will be no talks with a gun pointed at our head. It's not that we can't talk to Pakistan." "India can speak all the languages that Pakistanis speak. The problem is that we will not dialogue with people who are pointing a gun at our head. You're not going to talk to people who are pointing a gun at your temples. It's not going to happen," Tharoor said. Also Read: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey slams Congress for "surrendering country's pride" by agreeing to Non-Attack Agreement with Pakistan Addressing reporters at a press conference at the Indian Embassy, Tharoor said that every time anybody asked, "and that includes on the Hill", if India would talk to Pakistan or if mediation would help promote dialogue, "our answer is very clear. We cannot talk to people who are pointing a gun at our head." "If your neighbour attacks your children with their attack dogs and then says, 'let's talk', will you talk to them until they put away the attack dogs?" Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions. The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10.


New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
VHP, Bajrang Dal distance themselves from accused in Rahiman murder case
MANGALURU: VHP and Bajrang Dal leaders on Wednesday distanced themselves from those accused in the brutal murder of Abdul Rahiman in Bantwal taluk. Speaking to reporters here, VHP leader and Prantha Goraksha Pramukh Sunil KR said that VHP and Bajrang Dal workers do not commit such heinous crimes, nor does the organisation incite anyone to do so. When asked about the organisation disowning Suhas Shetty, when he was arrested in the Mohammed Fazil murder case and later owning him, when he was murdered last month, Sunil said Shetty might have done wrongs in the past. 'Still, he was involved in the cause of the nation and the Hindu religion. Anyone who strives for the cause of the Hindu religion and the nation is a Hindu worker,' he stressed. Further, he denied news that Rahiman had donated blood to the father of one of the murder accused. 'His father was electrocuted. There was no need for blood. The SP should clarify the motive behind the murder,' he urged. He criticised KPCC working president Manjunath Bhandary for taking objection to 'criminals being identified as Hindu workers'. Sunil also added that even those involved in petty crimes are on the rowdy-sheeter list, hence they cannot be called criminals. Accusing the local police of harassing Hindu workers on the pretext of law and order, he cautioned them not to test their patience. 'There is a limit for everything,' he said. 'Check animal sacrifice during Bakrid' Sunil urged the police to strictly enforce the Prevention of Cattle Slaughter Act, given the possibility of Qurbani (animal sacrifice) on Bakrid. He said the police should install barricades to check the illegal transportation of cattle and increase surveillance in places where Qurbani or illegal slaughter had taken place in the past. He thanked Mangaluru City Police Commissioner Sudheer Kumar Reddy for rescuing 24 heads of cattle, while they were being illegally transported from Kerala to the city.


New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
People need not fear cops in Dakshina Kannada: Home Minister G Parameshwara
BENGALURU: After the BJP accused police of harassing members of pro-Hindu organisations, Home Minister Dr G Parameshwara said common people need not worry and he would ensure that people are not harassed. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Parameshwara said one need not have to get scared in the Dakshina Kannada district. 'Those who work against law, those who indulge in anti-public activities, they might have to fear. But common people need not have to fear or worry,' he said. He said in Coastal Karnataka, the police might have got the information about those indulging in communal violence. 'As a duty, the policemen are doing night rounds and has increased the numbers. They are also visiting to instill courage and trust in people. At the same time, if there are anti-social elements, to monitor them, night rounds are being done. Public need not have to panic, I can assure that they will not be harmed,'' he said. Union Minister for State Shobha Karandlaje and other BJP leaders alleged that police are harassing Hindu activists. When asked, Parameshwara said they are not targeting anyone. 'Those violating laws, they have to fear,'' he said. Parameshwara said they have established Anti Communal Force, and in next 10 days, they are expected to launch it. 'Even then, there will be some opposition. But it is the responsibility of the State Government to maintain law and order, and peace. This is why we need to take action. 'Neither myself nor Chief Minister Siddaramaiah gives instruction to police every one hour. The police department officials take action on spot what has to be done at that time as per the rules,'' he added. On preventing some people from entering Dakshina Kannada, he said,'If there are people who indulge directly or supporting murder, looting, what should be done for them? They should be kept away from the place. Also, there is law and based on that, next course of action will be taken,' he said.