US Congress panel to hold hearing on 'political repression in Pakistan'
Listen to article
The Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission of the US Congress will hold a hearing to examine the 'ongoing repression of political opposition' in Pakistan, according to an announcement posted on the Commission's official website.
The hearing, scheduled to be held in person and streamed online, will focus on actions by the Pakistani government that allegedly restrict political freedoms, including the treatment of opposition political figures, suppression of independent journalism, and controls over media and communication.
Hearing Notice -- Pakistan: Ongoing Political Repression
Date: Tuesday, July 15th, 2025
Time: 2:00 - 4:00 PM
Location: Rayburn 2255
Details: https://t.co/VpI1m5Wp8c — Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission (@TLHumanRights) July 9, 2025
The Commission stated that it will assess the implications of these actions for democracy and human rights in Pakistan. It is tasked with promoting, defending, and advocating for international human rights as outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other key human rights frameworks.
According to the announcement, many observers trace the current phase of repression to 2022, when then-prime minister Imran Khan was removed from office, later convicted of corruption, and imprisoned.
The US State Department's 2023 Country Report on Human Rights Practices highlights several human rights concerns in Pakistan, including enforced disappearances, extra-judicial killings, the persecution of religious and ethnic minorities, and transnational repression.
The Commission noted that Pakistan's general elections in February 2024 were marked by 'undue restrictions on freedoms of expression, association, and peaceful assembly,' as well as incidents of electoral violence and interference with fundamental rights, as outlined in a statement by the US State Department.
I am deeply grateful for the opportunity to testify on the state of #HumanRights in #Pakistan before the @TLHumanRights Commission in the #US #Congress.
I will be highlighting the arbitrary detention of Imran Khan, his wife, and other political prisoners, as well as the erosion… pic.twitter.com/0KgQlsNqpK — Sayed Z Bukhari (@sayedzbukhari) July 9, 2025
Witnesses scheduled to testify include Ben Linden of Amnesty International, human rights lawyer Jared Genser, Sadiq Amini of the Afghanistan Impact Network, and Zulfikar Bukhari, an advisor to Imran Khan.
The hearing is open to Members of Congress, staff, the public, and media. It will be streamed live on the Commission's website and on the House digital channel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Post-arrest bail: SC to hear IK's appeal against LHC order today
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will hear Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan's appeal against the Lahore High Court (LHC)'s verdict to cancel his application in 9th May cases today (Tuesday). A two-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, will take up Imran Khan's petition of bail after arrest. The former prime minister on July 26 filed the appeal through Barrister Salman Safdar and cited the federal government and Inspector Imran Sadiq of Gulberg Police Station as respondents. The Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore on November 27, 2024, had rejected Imran Khan's post-arrest bail requests in eight separate cases linked to the violent events of May 9, including the attack on Jinnah House. A two-member LHC bench, headed by Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, also dismissed the incarcerated ex-premier's bail petitions last month after hearing the arguments of lawyers from the petitioner and the government. Salman Safdar argued that his client had no role in the violence or arson on May 9. He stated that Imran Khan was in the NAB custody at the time of the mayhem and later publicly condemned the unrest. It was impossible for him to take part in those riots, besides raising doubts over the case on the basis of 'contradictions' in the prosecution statements, he added. The petitioner's lawyer stated that the First Information Report (FIR) lacked sufficient evidence and termed the allegations of his involvement in the riots as baseless. Salman contended that the charges against Khan were politically motivated, and the federal government has been changing its narrative repeatedly, comparing it to a 'cricket strategy' full of confusing deliveries like googlies and off-breaks. The lawyer said that several legal decisions had already gone against the government in similar cases, and he presented nearly 25 court decisions to support his arguments. He also pointed out that in all the cases, the complainants were police officials. The petitioner sought further investigation into the case, as he suspected malafide intent on the part of the police for avoiding his arrest for five months. He maintained that the evidence against him is inadequate, while other co-accused have already been granted bail. He also called the delayed police statements unreliable and asserted that he deserves the right to bail. The May 9, 2023, events refer to the riots that were triggered by the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan from the premises of Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a graft case. During the protests, the miscreants targeted the civil and military installations, including the Corps Commander's House in Lahore and the General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi. Several PTI leaders and workers were released on bail after their arrests, while many still remain behind bars. Imran Khan has been behind bars since August 2023 after he was sentenced in multiple cases ahead of the February 8 elections. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Restrictions on access of family to jail: Adiala jail authorities directed to act on IK's sister plea
ISLAMABAD: The special court on Monday ordered Adiala jail authorities to act on a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan's sister against restrictions on access of family members to jail during the trial of the Toshakhana-II case against Khan and his wife as per law. Special Judge Central Shahrukh Arjumand, while hearing a petition filed by Khan's sister, Aleema Khan, against barring her and her other family members from attending the jail trial of Toshakhana-II case against Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi. The court directed Adiala jail authorities to act on the petition in accordance with the law. Aleema Khan's counsel, Khalid Yousaf Chaudhry, appeared before the court. He argued that despite clear court orders, family members were not being allowed to enter Adiala Jail. According to the petition, not only were family members denied access, but Imran Khan's legal team was also barred from participating in jail proceedings. The petition stated that in previous cases such as Toshakhana, cipher, and Al-Qadir Trust, restrictions on access to jail were unjustified and unlawful. Chaudhry further told the court that denying access to family members and lawyers constitutes a violation of the legal rights of the accused. The petition also challenged the legitimacy of the trial in the cipher case due to the lack of access, claiming the proceedings were flawed. The petition stressed that under Section 352 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the trial should be open, and public access is a fundamental right. It further asserted that under Article 10-A of the Constitution, the right to legal representation is a basic right of every citizen. The petition maintained that there is no legal basis to prevent family members from attending hearings, and such denial is unconstitutional and undermines the principle of a fair trial. He said that the court had earlier issued clear orders to ensure access for both family and the legal team, but those orders were not being implemented. The court after hearing arguments, directed the jail superintendent to act in accordance with the law. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Dar not a member of Sugar Advisory Board: Tarar
ISLAMABAD: Federal Information Minister Attaullah Tarar has strongly dismissed recent media reports claiming that Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar is a member of the Sugar Advisory Board, terming the news misleading and taken out of context. Speaking to the media, Tarar clarified that a written response was submitted by the relevant department in the Senate in reply to a formal question, and all such records are available on the floor of the House. 'Before making such claims, the actual formation and composition of the Sugar Advisory Board should have been checked,' he said. Addressing other matters, the minister also defended Ishaq Dar over remarks related to Dr Aafia Siddiqui, stating that his statement had been deliberately misinterpreted. He noted that the Pakistani government is actively pursuing diplomatic and legal efforts for Dr Siddiqui's release, and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif has already met with Dr Fauzia Siddiqui. A legal committee, headed by the Law Minister, has also been formed to handle the case. Tarar added that unprecedented efforts are being made under the current administration for DrAafia Siddiqui's release, and political opponents are attempting to create controversy by misrepresenting facts. The minister also spoke about Pakistan's progress in regulating crypto currency, stating that it is the only country in the region to have established a proper regulatory framework. He criticised former finance minister Miftah Ismail's views on crypto, comparing them to India's stance. 'Crypto is a growing and regulated industry in Pakistan. Making uninformed statements or spreading baseless allegations only serves enemy agendas, not Pakistan's,' he said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
