Post-arrest bail: SC to hear IK's appeal against LHC order today
A two-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, will take up Imran Khan's petition of bail after arrest.
The former prime minister on July 26 filed the appeal through Barrister Salman Safdar and cited the federal government and Inspector Imran Sadiq of Gulberg Police Station as respondents.
The Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore on November 27, 2024, had rejected Imran Khan's post-arrest bail requests in eight separate cases linked to the violent events of May 9, including the attack on Jinnah House.
A two-member LHC bench, headed by Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, also dismissed the incarcerated ex-premier's bail petitions last month after hearing the arguments of lawyers from the petitioner and the government.
Salman Safdar argued that his client had no role in the violence or arson on May 9. He stated that Imran Khan was in the NAB custody at the time of the mayhem and later publicly condemned the unrest. It was impossible for him to take part in those riots, besides raising doubts over the case on the basis of 'contradictions' in the prosecution statements, he added.
The petitioner's lawyer stated that the First Information Report (FIR) lacked sufficient evidence and termed the allegations of his involvement in the riots as baseless.
Salman contended that the charges against Khan were politically motivated, and the federal government has been changing its narrative repeatedly, comparing it to a 'cricket strategy' full of confusing deliveries like googlies and off-breaks.
The lawyer said that several legal decisions had already gone against the government in similar cases, and he presented nearly 25 court decisions to support his arguments. He also pointed out that in all the cases, the complainants were police officials.
The petitioner sought further investigation into the case, as he suspected malafide intent on the part of the police for avoiding his arrest for five months. He maintained that the evidence against him is inadequate, while other co-accused have already been granted bail. He also called the delayed police statements unreliable and asserted that he deserves the right to bail.
The May 9, 2023, events refer to the riots that were triggered by the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan from the premises of Islamabad High Court (IHC) in a graft case.
During the protests, the miscreants targeted the civil and military installations, including the Corps Commander's House in Lahore and the General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi.
Several PTI leaders and workers were released on bail after their arrests, while many still remain behind bars. Imran Khan has been behind bars since August 2023 after he was sentenced in multiple cases ahead of the February 8 elections.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Pakistan's moment in Washington
In a rare shift of focus from its usual marginal position in American discourse, Pakistan has recently found itself in the headlines in the United States for all the right reasons. Normally overshadowed by stories of political chaos, power tussles, and institutional heavy-handedness against dissent, the narrative has now turned toward Islamabad's surprising diplomatic maneuvering and its growing importance in Washington's strategic calculations. While Pakistan's domestic politics remain fraught—with Imran Khan and his party under relentless state pressure and critics of the 'deep state' still facing crackdowns—the country has suddenly carved out space on the global stage. This pivot began in earnest just before the United States carried out precision strikes on Iran's Fordow and other nuclear sites. The catalyst was an unprecedented meeting: on June 18, 2025, President Donald Trump hosted Pakistan's Army Chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, for a private lunch at the White House, an event widely covered by international media. It was one of the most significant diplomatic engagements of Trump's second term and the first time a U.S. president hosted Pakistan's military chief without civilian leadership present. At the press briefing following the meeting, Trump openly acknowledged Munir's role in averting disaster during the recent five-day India-Pakistan conflict, saying: 'The reason I had him here… I wanted to thank him for not going into the war… ending it. Two very smart people decided not to keep going with that war; that could have been a nuclear war.' (NDTV, June 2025) This meeting reverberated across South Asia, creating political tremors in India. Rahul Gandhi, leader of the opposition Congress Party, seized the moment in a fiery parliamentary speech, lambasting Prime Minister Modi's government for failing to secure equivalent US attention. In India's parliament, even some pro-government lawmakers admitted that New Delhi had been outmaneuvered diplomatically, losing ground to Islamabad in Washington's halls of power. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
LHC disposes of plea seeking 250 PTI workers recovery
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday disposed of a petition of PTI leader Akmal Bari seeking recovery of around 250 PTI workers and advised the petitioner to file the petition again with details of the detainees. Earlier, a law officer contended that the petition is not maintainable. How a court could get recover the detainees without their details, he added. The petitioner's counsel, however, said the petitioner was compiling the list of the detainees. The court, therefore, disposed of the petition with direction to file it again with details of all the detainees. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
14 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Tensions escalated in NA as Gohar claims PTI under siege
ISLAMABAD: Tensions escalated in the National Assembly on Wednesday as the chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, claimed his party was under siege and warned the government not to 'put democracy on the line.' Speaking with palpable urgency, Gohar accused the government of a 'systematic campaign' to dismantle the opposition through arrests, disqualifications and blocking parliamentary participation. 'Even mothers don't love their sons as much as this nation loves Imran Khan,' he said, referring to the former prime minister, who is currently imprisoned in connection with the May 9, 2023, riots. Gohar's remarks went beyond political posturing, highlighting what he described as a deepening crackdown on PTI and insisting that suppressing a political party was wholly unjustified. He pointed to the arrest of 80-year-old party veteran Rehana Dar from Sialkot, the disqualification of Opposition Leader Omar Ayub in the National Assembly, the opposition leaders in Senate ShibliFaraz and Punjab Assembly Ahmad Bachar and disqualification of party scores of party MNAs and MPAs. 'These actions are part of a great injustice,' he warned, urging the government not to 'put democracy at risk' and calling for justice rather than vengeance amid rising political tensions. 'The doors of Parliament are being slammed shut on elected representatives,' he added. 'If our members are removed one by one, what message does that send to the nation?' In what many saw as both a passionate appeal and a veiled warning, Gohar said: 'Do not put democracy at risk. We demand justice, not vengeance.' Responding, Minister for Law and Justice Senator Azam Nazeer Tarar rejected the allegations, reminding the House that legal proceedings are the responsibility of the courts, not Parliament. 'These convictions are not the outcome of political manipulation,' Tarar said. 'They are the result of a lawful judicial process. Once a case reaches trial, it falls within the jurisdiction of the courts, not politicians.' He defended the post-May 9 prosecutions, citing the example of Jamshed Dasti, another opposition figure who recently received interim relief from the Lahore High Court. 'Objections can be raised, but the appropriate forum is the judiciary, not this assembly,' he added. Tarar also highlighted the constitutional aspects of Articles 63(g) and (h), noting that interpretation of these provisions is the remit of the courts and the Election Commission, not parliamentarians. While Gohar depicted a parliament under siege, Tarar pointed out that previous prime ministers, including Nawaz Sharif, have faced judicial scrutiny without accusations of undermining democracy. 'Our duty is not to act as judge or jury,' Tarar said. 'Our role is to improve legislation and uphold the constitutional framework.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
