US close to high-speed rail breakthrough
Several attendees told Newsweek they believe the U.S. could be on the verge of a high-speed rail breakthrough, setting the stage for the kind of comprehensive national system enjoyed in the likes of China, Japan and Western Europe.
Ray LaHood, a Republican who served as Transportation Secretary under President Obama from 2009 to 2013, said if one of the two high-speed rail lines currently under construction is completed, it will prove 'wildly popular' and boost support for high-speed rail across the nation. Other insiders agreed, but argued permitting reform and more explicit federal support will be needed first.
There has been concern over the Trump administration's attitude toward high-speed rail. The conference took place one month after Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced $63.9 million in funding for a proposed Dallas to Houston route had been scrapped, and amid rumors that the California High Speed Rail line under construction between Los Angeles and San Francisco could lose federal support.
This week, Duffy said there is 'no viable path' to complete California High Speed Rail on time or on budget and warned the federal government could pull billions in funding.
State of U.S. high-speed rail
At present there aren't any high-speed rail networks — defined by the International Union of Railways (UIC) as operating at a minimum of 250 kilometers per hour (155 miles per hour) along specially built tracks — that are operational in the U.S.
This compares unfavorably with the likes of Spain, Japan and France, which have around 2,460 miles, 1,830 miles and 1,740 miles of track respectively currently in use.
Most impressively, China, the chief geopolitical rival of the U.S., has gone from having virtually no high-speed rail lines to nearly 30,000 miles over the past couple of decades.
Construction is currently underway on two high-speed rail lines in the U.S.-Brightline West, which will connect Las Vegas to Southern California, and California High Speed Rail between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
A range of other projects have been proposed around the country, including plans to link Boston, New York and Washington, D.C. in the Northeast; Dallas, Houston and Fort Worth in Texas; and Chicago to East St. Louis in Illinois.
Obstacles
When asked why the U.S. had failed to build a high-speed network comparable to other advanced economies, industry experts told Newsweek there are major issues with permitting, financing and cross-party political support.
California High Speed Rail has sparked particular controversy, with its cost ballooning from $34 billion to over $128 billion, while the completion date has been pushed back.
Terry Hynes, an attorney specializing in rail infrastructure projects, argued planning issues in particular have bottled up capital investment. He is currently part of a team investigating how the permitting process could be sped up for USHSR.
Addressing Newsweek, he said: 'I've been in the business 46 years, making railroads, and I've been frustrated as hell representing the high-speed rail...it just takes forever. And there's private money that could be brought in. Wall Street's got a lot of money looking for infrastructure investments.
'This is a wonderful infrastructure investment, the trouble is they see those permitting times. Eight years for environmental review, then you build for four years and in year 13 you're finally going to see some money. Nobody's going to invest in that.'
Hynes added: 'The biggest issue to my mind is this permitting issue. The review period takes so long, the cost goes up and the more expensive it is for people doing a cost-benefit analysis, the analyses looks less beneficial.'
Brandon Wheeler, a senior program manager at the North Central Texas Council of Governments, a local government-based voluntary association, said a lack of national leadership has undermined high-speed rail construction across the U.S.
Speaking to Newsweek, he said: 'We don't have a national single point of leadership on this...without that single point of leadership it really is a little bit hopscotch and we're making the best we can of it.
'Until there is, like the interstate highway system, there's a national vision to create and you have a vision around the ability to move military and goods and those kinds of things. Until our airports get bad enough, until our roads get bad enough, until people have this massive outcry and we're able to concentrate them on something, we're going to have to find what that single vision is to rally around or we will fall behind the rest of the world.'
LaHood agreed, saying: 'I think the success of these projects in Europe and Asia is largely due to the national government making investments but then encouraging the private sector. Once the national government makes a commitment, it's easier for the private sector then — they know it's going to be a stable project, they know their investment is going to be good.'
If you build it they will come
In 2023, Brightline, the first privately built rail line in the U.S. to open in nearly a century, began operations between Miami and Orlando in Florida and has since seen passenger numbers surge.
While Brightline runs below the high-speed standard, LaHood said it showed Americans are ready to embrace new rail networks, and argued one successful project in the U.S. could turbocharge the whole industry.
'If you look at the Brightline project in Florida...It is wildly popular,' he said. 'They're putting more and more trains on that track every day because people like the idea that they don't have to get on the I95 and they don't have to travel on highways that are crowded with big trucks and cars...
'If you build it they will come, if you build it it will be successful and I think that will be the case with Brightline West, Las Vegas to L.A., and I think it will be true San Francisco to L.A. I think they will be wildly popular. I really believe at this point if you build it they will come and the proof of that is Europe and Asia-their trains are wildly popular.'
Speaking to Newsweek, Portland Mayor Keith Wilson, who is advocating for a 'Cascadia' high-speed rail line linking the city to Seattle in Washington and Vancouver in British Columbia, said: 'Our system continues to be compacted and stagnant.
'The great cities from around the world are all tending to go towards high-speed rail and we need an opportunity to unlock our economic renaissance, which is what's missing in our country right now, and high-speed rail would move us forward and get us completing again with the world.'
Trust fund
A number of industry insiders told Newsweek the formation of a federal government trust fund could provide the financial muscle for a major U.S. high-speed rail expansion.
Asked what one development would most speed up U.S. high-speed rail, Jim Derwinski, executive director of Chicago rail system Metra, replied: 'A trust fund so it's national, it's bipartisan so it doesn't change from administration to administration and it can be supported through the states as a national effort.
'If you're going to build something, to compare it to Europe and Asia right now, it's got to have a national campaign right now.'
Arthur Sohikian is executive director of High Desert Corridor, a proposed high-speed rail line that would link Brightline West to the California High Speed Rail line.
He expressed a similar view to Derwinski, telling Newsweek: 'We have to energize the public to make that happen...we've been trying to get a trust fund for rail since I started my career, it seems.
'For whatever reason why the politicians won't grab onto that and won't do that, especially when you realize the Highway Trust Fund keeps diminishing as cars get more efficient, we're paying less in gas taxes, that fund is diminishing...we have to invest in this infrastructure as a nation, and until that happens, seriously, we're all going to be trying to do our little pieces.'
The U.S. High Speed Rail Association paid travel and hotel expenses for Newsweek reporter James Bickerton to attend its 2025 annual conference.
Related Articles
Portland Plan To Eliminate Homelessness 'Right On Schedule'Texas High Speed Rail Plan Issued Blow From Trump AdministrationTexas Bill Seeks To Thwart High-Speed RailPossible Northwest High-Speed Rail Route Gets $50 Million Boost
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Read: White House launches "comprehensive" review of Smithsonian exhibits
The Trump administration told the Smithsonian Institution it's launching a "comprehensive internal review" of the world's biggest museum and research complex, per a letter the White House released Tuesday. The big picture: "As we prepare to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our Nation's founding, it is more important than ever that our national museums reflect the unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story," states the letter to Smithsonian secretary Lonnie Bunch, signed by White House officials Lindsey Halligan, Vince Haley and Russell Vought. "This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." The letter says the action is in accordance with President Trump's March executive order on reshaping the Smithsonian and removing what he deems "improper ideology" from the institution. Of note: The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History in July removed mentions of Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit, before restoring his name to an impeachment display with revisions. What to expect: The review will initially focus on the following museums before shifting focus to others: National Museum of American History. National Museum of Natural History. National Museum of African American History and Culture. National Museum of the American Indian. National Air and Space Museum. Smithsonian American Art Museum National Portrait Gallery. Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Zoom in: Each museum must submit within 30 days all requested materials, including current exhibition descriptions and draft plans for upcoming shows, according to the letter. An inventory of all permanent holdings must be submitted within 75 days and each museum "should finalize and submit its updated plan to commemorate America's 250th anniversary," among other requirements. Within 120 days, museums "should begin implementing content corrections where necessary, replacing divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate, and constructive descriptions across placards, wall didactics, digital displays, and other public-facing materials," per the letter. What they're saying: "The Smithsonian's work is grounded in a deep commitment to scholarly excellence, rigorous research, and the accurate, factual presentation of history," the institution said in a media statement Tuesday.


Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine's Zelensky Says Putin Will Benefit From Trump Meeting in 3 Ways
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a new interview Tuesday that he believes Russian President Vladimir Putin will benefit from his upcoming summit with President Donald Trump in three key ways. Why It Matters Trump and Putin are slated to meet in Alaska on Friday to discuss bringing an end to Russia's ongoing war against Ukraine, which Putin launched in February 2022. The White House said the Russian strongman reached out to request the meeting and that Zelensky has not been invited. The Trump administration has also sought to temper expectations around the president's meeting with Putin. Trump said in the past that he would end the Russia-Ukraine war within 24 hours of being elected or shortly after being inaugurated. Neither promise has come to fruition and the White House this week framed talks between Trump and Putin as a "listening exercise" and a "fact-finding" mission. U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the conclusion of their joint news conference at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Russian President Vladimir Putin shake hands at the conclusion of their joint news conference at the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP What To Know Zelensky was asked by NewsNation on Tuesday what he believes Putin will take away from his meeting with Trump. The Ukrainian leader didn't mince words, telling the outlet, "I believe that Putin will benefit from this, because what he is seeking, frankly, is photographs. He needs a photo from a meeting with President Trump." Zelensky continued: "First, he will be meeting on U.S. soil, which I believe is his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on U.S. soil. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed the sanctions policy. President Trump has serious sanctions, and we are very much looking forward to these sanctions." "We will see what happens next," he added. Indeed, the Trump administration's decision to allow Putin into the country is striking, given that the Russian leader has been accused of war crimes against Ukraine by the International Criminal Court. That the meeting will take place in Alaska—which Russia sold to the U.S. for a little over $7 million in 1867—adds another layer of significance. Putin's meeting with Trump will be the first time the Russian leader has met with an American president since June 2021, when he encountered then-President Joe Biden for a bilateral summit. Russia invaded Ukraine less than eight months later, cementing Putin's status as a pariah in the Western world. Trump addressed the upcoming meeting with his Russian counterpart while speaking to reporters last week and suggested that there would be "swapping of territories" between Russia and Ukraine. Zelensky flatly rejected the notion, saying that Ukrainians "will not give their land to an occupier." The Ukrainian leader's refusal to cede land to Russia irked Trump, who said Monday that he disagreed "very, very severely" with him. "I get along with Zelensky, but, you know, I disagree with what he's done," Trump told reporters at the White House. "Very, very severely disagree. This is a war that should have never happened." Zelensky spoke by phone with Trump, special envoy Steve Witkoff and European leaders on Tuesday. After the call, the Ukrainian president said he was told Russia is showing signs that it may want to end the war. "During the call, there was a signal from Mr. Witkoff, who was also on the call, that Russia is ready to end the war, or at least to make a first step toward a ceasefire, and that this was the first such signal from them," Zelensky said. "Everyone on the call felt positive about this, that there was some kind of shift." But he emphasized that it was still unclear to him what Putin may have told Witkoff regarding a cessation of hostilities. Trump's announcement on Friday about a meeting with Putin came as the Kremlin's army slowly advances deeper into Ukraine—in defiance of demands from Trump and other Western leaders to cease attacks on civilian locales, according to the Associated Press (AP). Russia and Ukraine are also far apart on their terms for peace. Zelensky has refused to agree to a ceasefire deal that doesn't include security guarantees for his country, while Putin demands Ukraine be shut out from NATO and cede to Russia four territories Moscow claims it annexed. Ukrainian soldiers on the battlefield have also expressed little hope for a diplomatic solution to the war. What People Are Saying Zelensky wrote on Telegram: Putin "is definitely not preparing for a ceasefire or an end to the war. Putin is determined only to present a meeting with America as his personal victory and then continue acting exactly as before, applying the same pressure on Ukraine as before. "So far, there is no indication whatsoever that the Russians have received signals to prepare for a post-war situation. On the contrary, they are redeploying their troops and forces in ways that suggest preparations for new offensive operations. If someone is preparing for peace, this is not what he does." A Ukrainian Spartan Brigade drone unit commander with the call sign Buda told the AP he doesn't think Russia is interested in peace, adding: "It is impossible to negotiate with them. The only option is to defeat them. I would like them to agree and for all this to stop, but Russia will not agree to that. It does not want to negotiate. So the only option is to defeat them." A howitzer commander with the call sign Warsaw in Ukraine's southern Zaporizhzhia region, told the AP: "We are on our land, we have no way out. So we stand our ground, we have no choice." What Happens Next Trump and Zelensky will speak on the phone Wednesday, with European leaders joining the call. Putin has also briefed North Korean leader Kim Jong-un about his meeting with Trump in Anchorage, according to Russian state media. Moscow and Pyongyang have strengthened their strategic partnership since Russia invaded Ukraine and North Korea has sent troops to fight alongside Russian soldiers on the front lines. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also left open the possibility that Trump could travel to Russia at some point, telling reporters on Tuesday that "perhaps" the American president will visit Putin in his home country down the road. The Associated Press contributed reporting to this article.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Bill Barr: Trump ‘right on the money' with DC police takeover
Former Attorney General Bill Barr said Tuesday that President Trump is 'right on the money' with his takeover of the Washington, DC, police. 'And I think the president's right on the money, and I think Judge Pirro laid out the case very well, and I'm glad she's there, because she has the right idea of what needs to be done in this town,' Barr said on Fox News's 'America reports. 'As far as crime is concerned, the crime levels are much too high. If it was a state, it would have the highest murder rate in the — in the country. It competes to be the capi— or the crime capital of the country, not the capital of this great republic, among St. Louis and Memphis and Chicago in terms of the violence. That's not good enough. This place belongs to the American people, it's a symbol of our country, and we have to keep it safe,' the former attorney general added. Barr's praise for the president is notable due to the strained relationship he and Trump have had in recent years. Trump announced Monday he was taking federal control of D.C.'s police department and deploying the National Guard in the city in an effort to battle crime. 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people, and we're not going to let it happen anymore. We're not going to take it,' the president said. Democrats have slammed Trump's recent DC moves, with Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) saying in a thread on the social platform X Monday that 'Trump's raw authoritarian power grab in DC is part of a growing national crisis.' 'He's playing dictator in our nation's capital as a dress rehearsal as he pushes democracy to the brink. This assault on freedom is exactly why we've fought for DC statehood & to give DC control of its National Guard,' Van Hollen added.