Edinburgh safety fears over pro-Palestine protest planned for city centre
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Questions have been raised over whether a pro-Palestine protest in Edinburgh should be banned on public safety grounds.
A Support Palestine rally has been scheduled for 19 July, but officers have said past events run by the same organiser have had inadequate stewarding and management.
The council's public safety department objected to the procession going ahead, with an officer saying: 'The reason for our objection is based on recent experience with this applicant, with serious concerns about the applicant's ability to deliver a safe and controlled procession of this scale in the city centre.
The officer said the organiser of the planned demonstration was also behind demonstrations on 29 March and 5 April, which saw 'serious public safety risks'.
He continued: 'On the 29th of March, the procession caused severe congestion at the junctions of Princes Street, Hanover Street and the Mound.
'This resulted in large groups of pedestrians and vehicles competing for space. Police Scotland had to intervene to expedite the parade's movement across the junction, which was necessary to avoid the deterioration of public safety conditions.
'On the fifth of April, participants in the procession entered the tram route. This created an uncontrolled crowd environment and introduced serious hazards to life and safety.
'Despite assurances from the organisers in advance, no effective stewarding or containment was in place to prevent this.
'Bus and tram services had to be turned around, and participants and the public were placed at considerable risk.'
The officer said that the council's public safety department had concerns over whether the organiser could handle the estimated 2,000 attendees safely, given that the previous demonstrations had been smaller.
A Police Scotland representative followed up to say: 'This is a very difficult event to police continually. There's a public safety risk that concerns us.
'While ad hoc it is manageable, it is becoming a regular occurrence which is becoming logistically challenging for us.'
Earlier in the meeting, SNP councillor Norman Work said: 'I just wondered if there would be concerns about safety?
'I think it should be a rare or special vein for [a procession across Princes Street to occur.] It can cause a lot of disruption.'
Later on, Conservative councillor Neil Cuthbert also questioned what could be done about the parade, saying: 'The applicant for this has also applied on other dates, but they've been withdrawn. Is there anything we should draw from that?
'And is it possible to say, great, it can go ahead, but in a different location?'
Council officer Andrew Mitchell explained to councillors the legal test required for a protest to be banned, saying that it would require the event to 'place an excessive burden on police'.
Conservative councillor and committee convener Joanna Mowat asked the Police Scotland representative if the bar for a ban had been reached.
She said: 'In your opinion, were the issues caused by the previous protests, did that place an unreasonable burden on the police?'
The police officer replied: 'We've had to invoke our emergency powers in order to manage traffic, which we shouldn't have to routinely do.
'But as we look at the burden of the police, we'll ultimately just stop traffic, we will absolutely stop everything in order to maintain public safety. Ultimately, we have the police officers to do that.'
A decision on the protest was delayed to the next Licensing Sub-Committee meeting, set to take place on Tuesday, 17 June, which can be viewed here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Photos of protests following the death of a blogger while in police custody
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The National
31 minutes ago
- The National
Misogynistic attacks on Nicola Sturgeon lead to real threats, warns Kate Forbes
Speaking at the Scotland 2050 conference in Edinburgh on Tuesday, Kate Forbes addressed what she called 'abhorrent' comments from Everett, who is known for roles in hit movies such as Shrek 2 and Napoleon. In an interview with The Herald, the actor – who moved to Scotland when he was 18 to work at the Citizens Theatre in Glasgow – called the former first minister 'a witch' when discussing the record of the SNP with the arts. 'As soon as the witch Sturgeon came into power, everything changed in Scottish arts and everything had to be about being Scottish,' he said. READ MORE: Hate crime figures fall but disability attacks reach record high The former first minister branded Everett's comments 'deeply misogynistic', and Forbes was asked about them on Tuesday while speaking on a panel about women in public life. 'The problem is that these accusations, these criticisms, are so often tinged with misogynistic language. 'Whether it's women making or men making it, it is reflective of the deep-seated nature of misogynistic language and the fact that politics has gone from an exchange of views to just personal attacks, devoid of policy scrutiny. 'It's abhorrent. It's despicable. 'What's remarkable is that we've now been talking about this for at least six or seven years and it's only got worse in that time.' Forbes said that any post she made on Twitter or Facebook would see replies full of 'reels of the stuff'. (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) 'It's only when somebody who should know better makes comments like that, that suddenly we all say, 'well, that's not acceptable'. But this is going on constantly. It is exhausting. 'It is totally misogynistic and whether it's men making it or women making it, the point stands that it is saturated with misogynistic language, and I think that the destructive nature of social media cannot be understated. I think it is going to transform our politics for a generation. 'It's going to transform, totally change, the type of people that are in politics for a generation, and it's particularly affecting young women.' The Deputy First Minister later said that she 'almost never' speaks publicly about the abuse she faces on social media – or the threats in real life – because she fears it will put other women off entering politics. She told the Scotland 2050 conference that the misogynistic attacks on social media were not isolated, online incidents. 'It's not just what happens online, sticks and stones and all that,' she said. 'The problem is that this spills over into the real world. 'I know myself, I'm fairly short and small, and if I have people that were once accusing me of all sorts of things on social media, then turning up to surgeries – as they have done. There's certainly been enough press coverage of threats that have been made around actual means of hurting me, it spills over into that. 'We all say, well, 'isn't it dreadful, we need to do something about social media'. 'It's just going to be a cycle until there is an intervention, that something disrupts the cycle, and we as a country – and as I suppose those of us who participate in the public square – decide to take a different approach.'
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
Grooming gang report author Louise Casey appears before MPs after major review of failures
The author of a major review into grooming gangs which found authorities have 'shied away' from the ethnicity of sex offenders has appeared before MPs. Baroness Louise Casey appeared before the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, after the Government set out plans to launch a new nationwide inquiry into grooming gangs following her rapid review of the scandal. During her appearance, she urged people to "keep calm" about drawing conclusions from data on the ethnicity of suspects and offers, warning that any statistical evidence in "incomplete and unreliable". She said: 'When we asked the good people of Greater Manchester Police to help us look at the data we also collected... if you look at the data on child sexual exploitation, suspects and offenders, it's disproportionately Asian heritage. "If you look at the data for child abuse, it is not disproportionate, and it is white men. 'So again, just note to everybody, really outside here rather than in here. Let's just keep calm here about how you interrogate data and what you draw from it.' Baroness Casey said that misusing unreliable data to come to any conclusion was "a different level of public irresponsibility". As Baroness Casey faced MPs, elsewhere in London Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch held a press conference alongside a number of victims of grooming gangs. When asked if she owes an apology to survivors of grooming gangs for the Conservatives' lack of action when in office, she said she had already said sorry. She said: 'We have done that. I have spoken this is not the first time that I'm meeting the survivors. I have spoken to them about this. 'I have apologised, but what I find extraordinary is that more people are interested in prosecuting a government that did some things... rather than looking at what needs to happen right now, what I'm really worried about is that we're spending a lot of time bringing the politics back into this when we want to take the politics out of it. 'I have spoken to survivors, and what they're talking about right now is a full national inquiry. 'No one here has asked me for more apologies. They have heard the apologies. Apologies are easy. 'What we need to see is action. We can sit here and say sorry all day long, but what I actually want to see is an inquiry that gets to the bottom of this.' On Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. She said 'much more robust national data is needed' on the ethnicity of offenders, adding that the authorities 'cannot and must not shy away from these findings'. Doing so would allow 'the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities." Ms Cooper also said the Government would take action 'immediately' on all of Lady Casey's recommendations, which include launching a national inquiry and making it mandatory to record the ethnicity and nationality of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases. At the committee meeting, Baroness Casey said: 'I listened to what the Home Secretary said in Parliament yesterday, I would like to see quite a significant uplift in the prosecutions, the action, the criminal investigations on child sexual exploitation, both historic and current.' In the Commons, Ms Cooper 'unequivocally' apologised for the failings which had led to grooming and child sexual abuse. The Home Secretary also pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system, while the report warned 'a significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs 'appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'.
