Georgian ex-president sentenced to nine more years on fraud charge
Mikheil Saakashvili, the former president of Georgia, has been sentenced to an additional nine years in prison on charges of embezzlement.
The ruling, handed down on Wednesday, follows his conviction for misappropriating 9 million Georgian lari (approximately USD 3.3 million) through fraudulent expense claims, which prosecutors characterized as "luxury" spending.
Saakashvili, who served as president from 2004 to 2013, denies the charges and maintains the expenses were legitimate. In response to the verdict, he called the trial an "outrageous case of political persecution" on social media.
This new sentence adds to the six years he is already serving for abuse of power. After returning to Georgia in 2021, Saakashvili was jailed immediately and has spent much of his time in a prison hospital. With both sentences running concurrently, Saakashvili is expected to remain behind bars until 2030.
The former president is also facing other legal challenges, including charges related to his illegal return to Georgia in 2021, as well as his role in a violent crackdown on protesters in 2007.
The court's decision sparked an outburst from Saakashvili's supporters, who shouted at the judge, accusing him of being a "slave" to the government. This ruling comes amid Saakashvili's polarizing influence on Georgia's political landscape.
Saakashvili's rise to power was marked by the 2003 Rose Revolution, which propelled him to leadership as a reformist and anti-corruption advocate.
Under his presidency, Georgia made significant strides in governance and economic development. However, his later years in office were marred by controversial decisions, including the authoritarian crackdown on political opponents and the disastrous 2008 war with Russia.
In 2012, his party, the United National Movement, was defeated by a coalition led by billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili, who still holds substantial political power in Georgia.
After leaving office, Saakashvili moved to Ukraine, briefly serving as governor of Odesa. Upon returning to Georgia in 2021, he was arrested and imprisoned for his past convictions.
His imprisonment has since become a focal point of Georgia's political tensions, with the ruling Georgian Dream party accusing opposition parties of maintaining ties to Saakashvili.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
'Israel' arms exports hit all time high in 2024
'Israel's' defence ministry said Wednesday that its arms exports hit an all-time high of more than USD 14.7 billion in 2024, with a sharp rise in deals with Arab Gulf states, despite international criticism of 'Israel's' ongoing war on the Gaza Strip. "Israel again reached an all-time peak in defence exports in 2024, marking the fourth consecutive record-breaking year in the scope of defence agreements," the ministry, which oversees and approves the exports of 'Israel's' defence industries, said in a statement.
Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
Vanuatu considers stripping Andrew Tate of golden passport
Vanuatu's government is reviewing the citizenship status of influencer Andrew Tate after revelations surfaced that he secured a 'golden passport' from the Pacific island nation just as he was being arrested in Romania on serious criminal charges. Tate, a controversial online figure known for his self-declared misogyny and luxurious lifestyle, was granted Vanuatu citizenship in December 2022 under a fast-track program for foreign investors. At the time, he and his brother Tristan were taken into custody in Romania on accusations of rape and human trafficking—allegations they continue to deny. The passport program, which allows individuals to acquire Vanuatu nationality by investing at least USD 130,000 in the country, has drawn scrutiny for its security vulnerabilities. In late 2024, the European Union revoked Vanuatu's visa-free travel privileges, citing concerns that the scheme could be exploited by individuals with criminal backgrounds. A Vanuatu government spokesperson confirmed the matter is under active review. 'Once we have the files, definitely, the processes will be in place to revoke his citizenship,' said Kiery Manassah, speaking to ABC News. 'The government does not want to encourage people of questionable backgrounds to be granted citizenship,' he added. 'Those who are wanted by their countries or who are investigated by police authorities from overseas are not welcome to be part of the citizens of Vanuatu.' An investigation by the Organised Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP) revealed the timing of Tate's citizenship application coincided with his arrest, raising concerns about how such programs are monitored. 'It's caused a lot of alarm because it's one of those loopholes that allows people to get a new passport or even a new identity and be able to evade law enforcement,' said Aubrey Belford, Pacific lead editor at OCCRP. Vanuatu, which does not have an extradition treaty with Romania, issued the passport to Tate in the same month he was detained in Europe. It remains unclear whether Tristan Tate also obtained citizenship through the same route. Beyond his legal issues, Andrew Tate has amassed millions of followers online by flaunting wealth and espousing toxic ideologies, particularly targeting women. His digital influence has alarmed educators and government bodies, including those in the UK, for encouraging misogynistic attitudes among boys and young men. Both brothers were born in the US and raised in the UK, where authorities are now pursuing their extradition on separate charges filed in 2024, including rape, human trafficking, and assault related to incidents from 2012 to 2015. Their legal team has said they will face the UK charges once the Romanian judicial process concludes. A Romanian court has ruled that extradition to the UK may proceed following any trial there.
Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Man convicted for Quran burning outside Turkish consulate in London
A 50-year-old man has been convicted of a religiously aggravated offence after burning a copy of the Quran in front of the Turkish consulate in London earlier this year. Hamit Coskun, who traveled from Derby to Knightsbridge, set fire to the Islamic holy book while making offensive remarks about Islam on February 13. The act, which took place outside the consulate on Rutland Gardens, was deemed both inflammatory and hostile by Westminster Magistrates Court. District Judge John McGarva found Coskun guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence as well as disorderly behaviour, handing down a 240 pound (USD 324) fine and imposing an additional statutory surcharge of 96 pounds (USD 130). In court, Judge McGarva criticized the nature of Coskun's actions, describing them as 'provocative and taunting,' and stated, 'You have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers.' The judge said Coskun's motivations were rooted in personal and familial experiences in Turkey, adding, 'It's not possible to separate your views about the religion from your views about the followers.' He further noted, 'Your actions in burning the Quran where you did were highly provocative, and your actions were accompanied by bad language… motivated at least in part by hatred of followers of the religion.' Coskun, who is of Kurdish and Armenian descent, had argued that his protest was aimed solely at the Turkish government, particularly President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom he accused of turning Turkey into a haven for "radical Islamists". Prosecutors cited social media posts where Coskun denounced Erdogan's government and voiced concern about alleged moves toward establishing a 'Sharia regime.' Following his conviction, Coskun issued a statement calling the ruling 'an assault on free speech' and warning that it could discourage others from exercising their rights to protest. His legal defense has received backing from both the National Secular Society and the Free Speech Union (FSU), who have vowed to challenge the verdict through every legal channel. An FSU spokesperson said the organization is prepared to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary, arguing, 'Religious tolerance is an important British value, but it doesn't require non-believers to respect the blasphemy codes of believers.' The case has also drawn attention from political figures. Equalities Minister and Conservative MP Kemi Badenoch took to X, stating, 'De facto blasphemy laws will set this country on the road to ruin. Freedom of belief, and freedom not to believe, are inalienable rights in Britain.' While a spokesperson for the prime minister refrained from commenting on the specific case, they reaffirmed that 'there are no blasphemy laws and no plans to introduce any.' Judge McGarva emphasized in his ruling that the conviction was not an attempt to revive blasphemy laws, which were officially abolished in 2008. He acknowledged that burning a religious book is not inherently unlawful but said the combination of Islamophobic remarks and inflammatory conduct rendered Coskun's actions criminal in this instance. Humanists UK also weighed in, expressing concern about the legal threshold for such prosecutions. A spokesperson stated, 'We must make sure that public order legislation is not used to disproportionately target speech – even offensive speech – on religious matters, thereby chilling legitimate criticism and expression.'
