Australia's housing crisis ‘decades in the making'
The deterioration of housing affordability and continued low levels of new housing supply in 2024 were 'stark reminders that Australia is still very much in a housing crisis that has been decades in the making'.
However, there are signs of slight improvement in parts of the housing system, according to Susan Lloyd-Hurwitz, chair of National Housing Supply and Affordability Council.
In an annual update to federal Housing Minister Claire O'Neil, the council acknowledges the national supply of new housing is near its lowest level in a decade, with about 177,000 dwellings completed in 2024, significantly short of underlying demand of 223,000.
The supply of higher-density apartments was particularly weak, with only 65,000 new higher-density dwellings built in 2024, well below the peak of 106,000 in the year to September 2017. By contrast, detached housing supply has shown more resilience, with about 111,000 detached houses completed in 2024, which is similar to pre-Covid average levels.Underlying demand – which reflects demographic factors such as population growth and the age structure of the population – is expected to slow to 175,000 households per year from 2025-26.
The report acknowledges 938,000 dwellings are forecast to be completed during the Housing Accord period, which falls short of the 1.2 million target. The net new supply is expected to total 825,000 over the Housing Accord period, which is 79,000 dwellings fewer than expected after accounting for the expected demolition of around 113,000 dwellings.
Detached housing is tipped to be about two-thirds of new supply over the period, with medium-and higher-density dwellings set to remain low relative to the previous decade. This supply of detached houses is expected to reach a three-decade high by the end of the five-years, with a stabilisation of construction costs and an easing of financing constraints as interest rates decline.
The council expects new supply of higher-density housing will remain low relative to the previous decade, as poor project feasibility weighs on new supply and the low levels of approvals currently in the system interact with long lead times.
Structural constraints include an inadequate pipeline of skilled workers; scarce, fragmented and costly land suitable for development; and low rates of productivity and innovation in construction.
Supply is also being affected by elevated material costs, labour shortages and high financing costs, which are easing but remain a headwind.
Significant systemic reform, government support measures and industry innovation are needed to improve housing supply and affordability outcomes.
All states and territories are projected to fall short of their share of the Housing Accord target.
NSW is at only 65 per cent of its target, despite the state government measures to boost supply.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Darwin Port owner defends 99-year lease as future hangs in the balance
Landbridge, the Chinese-owned business that operates the Port of Darwin, is defending itself against what it calls a campaign of 'myths and mistruths'. The company wants to retain control of the Port while the federal government has vowed to end its lease, which has long been controversial. Matt Garrick reports from Darwin.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Canada is good middle ground for Albanese to meet Trump
Australia has reason to be thankful that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's first meeting with US President Donald Trump is not taking place in Washington. Trump is fond of having visiting political leaders pay court in the White House. He has been suitably gracious to some, but his unpredictability when meeting friendly allies means things can go horribly wrong, as when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky went to the Oval Office in March only to be humiliated, bullied and sent packing. Australia has maintained close links with the US for generations, but Trump's unpredictable nature does not guarantee he will extend the hand of friendship when he meets Albanese at this week's Group of Seven meeting in Kananaskis, Canada. That said, Trump certainly behaves when overseas: he holstered his bravado when subsequently meeting Zelensky at Pope Francis' funeral in Rome. But the US president will also be mindful that he is visiting the land of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who achieved a remarkable comeback victory for the governing Liberals in April by partly positioning himself for a global role as a champion of multilateralism against Trump's more protectionist policies. Carney is not only building a coalition of like-minded countries to counterbalance Trump's shadow-boxing on long-standing arrangements, but the cornerstones in his successive campaign were the US president's ill-considered threat to annex Canada and make it the 51st state and his opponent's Trumpian policies. Trump's bluster vanished when the pair met at the White House recently, and the host was all sweetness and light. 'He won a very big election in Canada, and I think I was probably the greatest thing that happened to him,' Trump said. 'But I can't take full credit.' Loading Albanese met Carney on Monday and emerged saying he defined success with Trump as being able to argue Australia's case. The two men meet later this week at a time when there are an unusual number of sticking points in the once smooth Australia-US relationship. Their meeting comes after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called for Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP – a potential increase of about $40 billion annually and nearly double the current level of 2 per cent – and after US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, announced a review of the AUKUS submarine pact last week. Admirably, Albanese parried such crude attempts at brinkmanship and strongman tactics.
SBS Australia
2 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Queensland considering making public drunkenness a crime
Less than a year after laws decriminalising public drunkenness came into effect, the Queensland Government is considering making it a crime again - despite an outcry from First Nations, legal and human rights advocates. In September last year Queensland became the last state to decriminalise being drunk in public , more than 30 years after the move was recommended by the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. On Wednesday Liberal National Party Police Minister Dan Purdie, a former officer, said the Government was looking at introducing laws making public drunkenness and public urination offences again, saying their removal had "hamstrung police". But First Nations and human rights advocates say it's yet another move in the wrong direction for the Queensland Government, which has introduced a raft of 'tough on crime' measures since David Crisafulli's LNP swept to power in October last year. Greg Shadbolt, principal legal officer of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal service for Queensland, told NITV that there was "absolutely no basis in logic" to reintroduce laws criminalising public drunkenness. "If someone's intoxicated and does something untoward like turns up and kicks a rubbish bin, they can still be arrested, so it simply doesn't stand up to any form of scrutiny," he said. "There's no reason why being intoxicated without actually doing anything untoward of itself should be an offence." The National Network of Incarcerated and Formerly Incarcerated Women and Girls, said the proposal was a deeply irresponsible move and an attack on Aboriginal lives. Spokesperson Tabitha Lean, a Gunditjmara woman, said the National Network rejects the idea that the only way to respond to public drunkenness and public urination is through police and punishment. "Public health issues require public health responses, not criminal charges," she said. "This latest move shows once again that the lives and safety of Aboriginal people are expendable in the LNP's political playbook." Public drunkenness laws have long been used as a tool of racialised policing and criminalisation, disproportionately targeting Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islander people, Debbie Kilroy said, pointing out that was the reason the royal commission recommended scrapping them. NSW decriminalised public intoxication in 1979. A state parliamentary report looking at decriminalising offences affecting vulnerable people found a strong correlation between intoxication and higher risk a person will die in custody. "This is not about safety, it's about punishment, surveillance, and scapegoating," Ms Kilroy said. "We cannot forget the death of Yorta Yorta woman Aunty Tanya Day, who died in custody in 2017 after being arrested under public drunkenness laws, while asleep on a train (in Victoria). "Her death was entirely preventable – she should have been cared for, not criminalised. "Her family, like many others, have been tireless in their fight to abolish public drunkenness laws and demand dignity and care instead of police violence." Victoria decriminalised public drunkenness in November 2023, thanks to advocacy by Tanya Day's family and other members of the Aboriginal community. Queensland Human Rights Commissioner Scott McDougall told Guardian Australia that a move to re-introduce the laws would "represent another blow in a continuing assault on the rights of First Nations people in Queensland'. 'Police do not lack the powers to respond in the interests of community safety," he said. "The solution to these behaviours is a much greater investment in health and prevention. 'To reintroduce a public drunkenness offence would signal that the Queensland government has no interest in Closing the Gap or reducing deaths in custody.' On Tuesday LNP Townsville MP Adam Baillie told Parliament that public intoxication wasn't a new problem. "Under Labor public drunkenness and public urination laws were revoked, paving the way for the antisocial behaviour that has been plaguing our great city for years," he said. "It is only getting worse." Ms Kilroy called on the Queensland Government to implement the royal commission recommendations, including keeping public drunkenness decriminalised. "This is not just a policy decision, it is part of a broader 'law and order' blitz by the LNP, who continue to rely on carceral responses and fearmongering in the absence of any meaningful vision for the state," she said. "Rather than investing in housing, health care, or community-led responses to harm, the LNP are doubling down on the same racist, harmful strategies that have already cost too many lives."
