
Judge makes call on Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury transcripts
Unsealing the transcripts would be an exception to the secrecy of grand juries, wrote the judge supervising Maxwell's case, Paul A Engelmayer.
Permitting such an exception 'casually or promiscuously' would erode confidence in people called to testify before future panels, Engelmayer wrote in a 31-page opinion.
He said the Justice Department's 'entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein's and Maxwell's crimes, or the government's investigation into them — is demonstrably false.'
Epstein, a financier who moved in some of America's most exclusive circles, was indicted in 2019 on sex trafficking charges. He was found dead in his cell the next month while awaiting trial. The death was ruled a suicide, but spurred improbable theories, including that he was killed by Democrats and that he was blackmailing rich and famous people.
Top aides to US President Donald Trump promoted some of those theories before they entered government, and the administration's failure to disclose any revelations about Epstein has threatened to drive a wedge between Mr Trump and some of his fervent supporters.
Mr Trump has tried to subdue criticism by pushing for the transcripts' disclosure. Another Manhattan federal judge, Richard Berman, is considering a separate Justice Department request to unseal grand jury materials from the investigation into Epstein.
Maxwell was arrested a year after Epstein's death and in December 2021 was found guilty of sex trafficking and other charges. Her conviction was affirmed on appeal. She has asked the Supreme Court to review her case.
The government argued the transcripts should be released because of intense public interest in the case, but Engelmayer wrote that anyone familiar with the trial record would 'learn next to nothing new.'
'The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor,' the judge wrote.'They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes.'
Maxwell's lawyers have argued that she had been scapegoated by prosecutors who had no one else to pursue after Epstein died. The lawyers had opposed the government's request to release the transcripts, writing that while Epstein is dead, 'Ghislaine Maxwell is not.'
'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, Maxwell's lawyers said, 'that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable and her due process rights remain.'
Monday's order came weeks after a federal judge in Florida denied a request by the Justice Department to release transcripts from two federal grand juries there that investigated Epstein in 2005 and 2007.
For months, Attorney General Pam Bondi had promised the release of material that could show damaging details of the investigation. But in February, when Bondi released documents connected to the case, she failed to appease Mr Trump's supporters and conservative media figures.
The documents primarily had information that had already been in the public domain and did not reveal wrongdoing by people other than Epstein.
The Justice Department announced last month that it had closed an 'exhaustive review of investigative holdings relating to Jeffrey Epstein.'
In a memo, the FBI and the Justice Department said a review 'revealed no incriminating 'client list'' or evidence that 'Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals.' It indicated that there would be no more disclosures about Epstein.
The announcement merely fueled the backlash. In recent weeks, Todd Blanche, Bondi's deputy, held two days of interviews with Maxwell in Florida, in an effort to quell criticism that the government was hiding information about Epstein.
Last week, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena to the Justice Department for its files related to the Epstein case.
In his opinion Monday, Engelmayer said that government had conceded that the grand jury information it wanted released largely duplicated the public record.
The push to unseal the records might be seen as an effort not 'aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion — aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' he wrote.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2025 The New York Times Company

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Perth Now
3 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Famous Perth influencer complains about NZ accommodation
Gracie Piscopo has shared her thoughts on her New Zealand holiday accommodation, situated among the mountains of Queenstown with lakeside views. The Perth influencer is in the country with her young son Romeo and boyfriend Daniel Classen, where the three are enjoying a getaway in the snow. On Tuesday, Piscopo took to Instagram to share some pros and cons about her room at the Kamana Lakehouse, where she has stayed once before, after 'quite a few questions' from her 1m followers. The lifestyle and fashion content creator said the cons included the fact that construction was taking place in front of the resort. 'Not a deal breaker, didn't have any issues with noise etc and it doesn't obstruct the view but it's good to take note,' she said. 'The rooms are quite small, especially for a family.' On a more positive note, Piscopo said the lakehouse was close to the town, had a beautiful view, nice food, was clean and well kept, and the staff were friendly. If you'd like to view this content, please adjust your . To find out more about how we use cookies, please see our Cookie Guide. She also praised the hot pools, boutique vibes and calm atmosphere. Piscopo is no stranger to the NZ slopes, having holidayed there last year. The well-travelled influencer also spends a lot of time modelling bikinis in Bali and relaxing in other idyllic locations like Fiji and the Maldives. Gracie Piscopo on holiday in New Zealand. Credit: Supplied She shares her her six-year-old son with convicted murderer Andre Rebelo, who was jailed for life in April after he was found guilty of killing his mother Colleen at her Bicton home in May 2020. Rebelo wanted to gain $1.5 million from life insurance policies to sort out his and Piscopo's financial struggles. He owed more than $40,000 to creditors for a personal loan and credit card debt, while Piscopo owed more than $70,000 on a Range Rover Evoque and around $40,000 in unpaid taxes that Rebelo never told her about. Supreme Court Justice Bruno Fiannaca said Rebelo's shocking crime was driven not just by a desire to keep up the façade of the affluent lifestyle her shared with Piscopo — but also to appear as a successful cryptocurrency trader.


7NEWS
12 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Almost 70 per cent of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles
Two thirds of Britons believe Prince Andrew should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Prince Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie in August delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex-obsessed, a 'useful idiot' and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13 per cent opposed the removal of his titles and 21 per cent were unsure, the survey suggested. Three years ago, 62 per cent believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67 per cent in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just five per cent have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle who has a 20 per cent positive rating and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, at 28 per cent. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of his royal highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.


Perth Now
15 hours ago
- Perth Now
Two-thirds of Britons want Andrew stripped of titles
Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Some 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, according to YouGov. (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP Two thirds of Britons believe the Duke of York should be stripped of his remaining royal titles, according to a new poll. Research by YouGov found that 67 per cent of the public would back the removal of Andrew's York dukedom, as well as his princely title. An unflattering biography of the disgraced duke by Andrew Lownie in August delved into the private life of the late Queen's son, depicting him as sex-obsessed, a "useful idiot" and easy prey for Jeffrey Epstein. Some 13 per cent opposed the removal of his titles and 21 per cent were unsure, the survey suggested. Three years ago, 62 per cent believed Andrew should have his York title removed, with the current 67 per cent in-favour figure seeing a jump of five percentage points. Another YouGov survey found that just five per cent have a positive view of the King's brother, with Andrew languishing at the bottom of the royal favourability tables, beneath the Duchess of Sussex who has a 20 per cent positive rating and the Duke of Sussex at 28 per cent. Legislation would be required for Parliament to prevent Andrew continuing as the Duke of York, while his birthright to be a prince, as the son of a monarch, could be changed if a Letters Patent were issued by the King. The duke stopped using his style of his royal highness following his disastrous Newsnight interview, but it could be removed entirely by a Letters Patent. Andrew stepped away from his public role in 2019 amid the furore over his friendship with convicted billionaire paedophile Epstein. He later paid millions to settle a civil sexual assault case with Virginia Giuffre, who was trafficked by Epstein as a teenager and who Andrew claimed never to have met.