logo
Salesforce joins other large tech companies in citing AI as reason for fewer engineering hires.

Salesforce joins other large tech companies in citing AI as reason for fewer engineering hires.

The debate over whether the use of artificial intelligence tools is leading to fewer roles for software engineers and coders has been ongoing for over a year. While some initially argued that AI would augment the average worker's efficiency rather than replace them, it seems the latter is becoming a reality—at least in big tech.
The latest company to join this trend is Salesforce, which now says its internal use of AI tools has enabled it to hire fewer employees, particularly engineers and customer service workers. This appears to be becoming the norm among large tech firms, offering a clearer indication of the impact AI could have on jobs for software developers, coders, and engineers.
Chief Financial and Operations Officer Robin Washington told Bloomberg in an interview that the company is hiring fewer software engineers due to productivity gains from artificial intelligence. 'We view these as assistants, but they are going to allow us to hire fewer people and, hopefully, make our existing team more productive,' she said.
As millions of students around the world, particularly in India, prepare to become software engineers—and many even consider studying abroad for their master's degrees—their chances of landing a job at the world's biggest tech companies are beginning to look slimmer, all thanks to AI.
Initially, AI tools from companies like OpenAI, Google, and Salesforce, which have been rolled out over the past few months, were seen as a way to boost productivity and improve efficiency. But now, it seems that those in the tech industry may be among the most vulnerable to displacement by AI.
'Now it is our office workers who are staring down the same kind of technological and economic disruption,' LinkedIn's chief economic opportunity officer, Aneesh Raman, wrote in a recent New York Times op-ed. 'Breaking first is the bottom rung of the career ladder.'
Hiring hasn't come to a complete halt, but there's growing chatter that getting a first job in tech—especially fresh out of college—is becoming increasingly difficult. Leaders at tech companies all indicated in recent months that AI is indeed taking over jobs. With Salesforce now openly admitting that its hiring has been reduced due to AI, it's becoming clear that more tech companies are beginning to rely on artificial intelligence over human labor for certain tasks.
At Microsoft, engineers are using AI to write 20% to 30% of code for company projects, CEO Satya Nadella said last month at Meta's LlamaCon conference. In a conversation with Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Nadella noted that the exact percentage of AI-generated code varies by programming language. He said AI writes 'fantastic' Python code, though its C++ capabilities are 'not that great.' Nadella also shared that Microsoft is increasingly relying on more advanced AI agents—software programs that perform complex tasks without human assistance—to review code.
As for Meta, Zuckerberg said he isn't sure exactly how much code AI is currently writing, but the company plans to use AI for half of its software development within the next year. 'That will just kind of increase from there,' he said.
On a podcast with Joe Rogan in January, Zuckerberg stated that Meta is developing AI that can write code at the level of a mid-level engineer. He added that the company plans to have 'a lot' of its code 'built by AI engineers instead of people engineers' this year.
At Google, CEO Sundar Pichai said on an earnings call last month that the company was using AI to write 'well over 30%' of new code—up from 25% in October. He also noted that employees are increasingly accepting AI-suggested code. 'I still see it as early days, and there's going to be a lot more to do,' Pichai said.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei also acknowledged that AI is already writing code. In just 12 months, 'we may be in a world where AI is writing essentially all of the code,' he said during a talk at the Council on Foreign Relations earlier this year. In fact, Amodei predicted that in just three to six months, AI could be writing 90% of all new code.
Duolingo CEO Luis von Ahn is another executive embracing the shift, noting that the company will replace many of its human contract workers with AI.
AI chatbots like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot were initially seen as tools for basic tasks such as rephrasing sentences or fixing grammar. But as these LLMs grow more powerful, they are increasingly being used to write full code. OpenAI recently released Codex, an AI coding engine within ChatGPT, powered by its codex-1 model—an optimized version of its o3 AI reasoning model designed specifically for software engineering tasks.
Similarly, Google has introduced Gemini Code Assist, a code-review agent that automatically identifies bugs and offers suggestions within GitHub. Code Assist allows developers to interact with a Google AI model in natural language to access and edit their codebase—much like GitHub's popular Copilot tool.
The impact of AI is real—particularly on entry-level tech jobs. SignalFire, a venture capital firm that analyses job movements across over 650 million employees and 80 million companies on LinkedIn, reported last week that major tech companies—including Meta, Microsoft, and Google—recruited fewer recent graduates in 2024 compared to previous years. New graduates accounted for just 7% of new hires in 2024, down 25% from 2023 and over 50% from pre-pandemic levels in 2019. At startups, the rate of new graduate hiring dropped from 30% in 2019 to under 6% in 2024.
While big tech companies are spending billions of dollars to build AI infrastructure, layoffs continue. So far this year, more than 62,114 tech workers have been laid off from both large and small tech firms, according to the independent tracker Layoffs.fyi.
Anuj Bhatia is a personal technology writer at indianexpress.com who has been covering smartphones, personal computers, gaming, apps, and lifestyle tech actively since 2011. He specialises in writing longer-form feature articles and explainers on trending tech topics. His unique interests encompass delving into vintage tech, retro gaming and composing in-depth narratives on the intersection of history, technology, and popular culture. He covers major international tech conferences and product launches from the world's biggest and most valuable tech brands including Apple, Google and others. At the same time, he also extensively covers indie, home-grown tech startups. Prior to joining The Indian Express in late 2016, he served as a senior tech writer at My Mobile magazine and previously held roles as a reviewer and tech writer at Gizbot. Anuj holds a postgraduate degree from Banaras Hindu University. You can find Anuj on Linkedin.
Email: anuj.bhatia@indianexpress.com ... Read More

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google co-founder Sergey Brin offers tip to make AI work better — threaten it
Google co-founder Sergey Brin offers tip to make AI work better — threaten it

India Today

time38 minutes ago

  • India Today

Google co-founder Sergey Brin offers tip to make AI work better — threaten it

How can you get better results from artificial intelligence? Giving good prompts—well, yes, that helps. Requesting politely? Umm, maybe. But according to Google co-founder Sergey Brin, to get better results, you should threaten AI. While Brin's comment was clearly amusing, it also contrasts with the usual way many people use AI, as users are often seen politely asking AI to answer their queries using words like 'please' and even 'thank you.' But Brin suggests that threatening generative AI models—even with physical violence—yields better at the All-In Live event in Miami, Brin said, 'We don't circulate this too much in the AI community—not just our models, but all models—tend to do better if you threaten them with physical violence.' He added, 'But like... people feel weird about that, so we don't really talk about it. Historically, you just say, 'Oh, I am going to kidnap you if you don't blah blah blah blah''This approach to dealing with AI directly contradicts the behaviour of users who believe courteous language yields better responses. Last month, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman mocked this habit as a costly quirk, joking that such pleasantries waste "tens of millions of dollars" in unnecessary compute power. Sam's comment came after a user on X asked the OpenAI CEO about "how much money OpenAI has lost in electricity costs from people saying 'please' and 'thank you' to their models."advertisementBrin's suggestion on getting the best answers from AI raises questions about the practice of prompt engineering—a method for crafting inputs to maximise the quality of AI-generated responses. The skill was very important following the emergence of AI, especially ChatGPT, in 2023. However with AI models getting smarter, many users are now asking the AI itself to generate and fine tune prompts for better Spectrum by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers even declared the practice of working on prompt "dead" due to the rise of AI-powered prompt optimisation, while the Wall Street Journal first called it the "hottest job of 2023" before later declaring it "obsolete."Daniel Kang, a professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, told The Register that while such anecdotes are common, systematic studies show "mixed results." A 2024 paper titled "Should We Respect LLMs?" even found that politeness sometimes improves Brin's return to Google after a brief retirement has been fuelled by his fascination with AI's rapid evolution. "Honestly, anybody who's a computer scientist should not be retired right now," he said during Google I/O. Brin, who stepped down from Google in 2019, rejoined the office in 2023 after the AI boom. He is now working with the AI team to guide them through projects, particularly around Google's ongoing Gemini AI models.

Mark Zuckerberg finally found a use for his Metaverse — War
Mark Zuckerberg finally found a use for his Metaverse — War

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Mark Zuckerberg finally found a use for his Metaverse — War

I can't think of any other deal that more encapsulates how Silicon Valley has changed in the past couple of years than this one, announced Thursday in a press release: Anduril and Meta are partnering to design, build, and field a range of integrated XR products that provide warfighters with enhanced perception and enable intuitive control of autonomous platforms on the battlefield. For starters, Anduril Industries Inc. is a defense tech company co-founded by Palmer Luckey , the man who created the Oculus VR headset that was acquired by Meta Platforms Inc. for $2 billion in 2014, only for Luckey to be pushed out when it emerged he had financially backed a pro-Trump campaign group. That he would be welcomed back with open arms is yet another sign that such stances are no longer taboo in the halls of Silicon Valley companies. (It could be argued they never should have been.) Second, developing technology for war had been considered a hard red line for many of the engineers working within those leafy campuses, at least in the era after the dot-com boom. At Google, for instance, workers in 2018 held walkouts and forced executives to abandon projects related to military use. Today, defense applications of technology are something companies want to shout from their rooftops, not bury in the basement. (Again, it could be argued that should have always been the case. Who will create tech for the US military if not US tech companies?) In Meta's case, there's another factor at play. Mark Zuckerberg 's deal with Anduril — which you assume is just the start of Meta's military hardware ambitions — offers a lifeline to its ailing Reality Labs business. The unit has lost more than $70 billion since the start of 2019. Advancements in quality haven't led to jumps in sales. I've written before that fitness applications are a great selling point, but apparently too few people agree with me. A newer form factor, sunglasses made in partnership with Ray-Ban, have shown potential but still represent a niche product. Live Events So instead, maybe the 'killer app' for mixed reality is indeed a killer app. 'My mission has long been to turn warfighters into technomancers,' Luckey is quoted as saying in a press release. 'And the products we are building with Meta do just that.' Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories A prototype of the 'Eagle Eye' helmet being developed by the companies is due to be delivered to the Pentagon this year, Luckey told journalist Ashlee Vance in a podcast published alongside the official announcement. He compared its utility to what a player wears in the video game Halo — a heads-up display offering reams of intricate information on targets and locations, plus an AI assistant, Cortana, relaying critical and lifesaving directions. What's also striking about this shift is that it is a sign the historical flow of technological innovation is being turned around. Silicon Valley began as a region set up to develop chips for military tech before the assembled talent branched out into making products for businesses and consumers, such as the personal computer. Many breakthroughs have followed this direction of travel — the internet, the microwave, GPS, super glue, to name a few — but it is now increasingly the other way around. As Luckey put it during the podcast discussing the deal, it turns out that Meta's headsets are 'just as useful on the battlefield as they are on the head of any consumer.' See also: artificial intelligence, developed first (and perhaps, at the cutting edge, always) by private sector tech companies. The opportunity is too big to pass up and too lucrative to hold grudges. Luckey says he was willing to work with Meta again because it had become a much different place from the one he was booted out of. Now friends again, he said he believed that Zuckerberg received bad advice when told to fire him and that his coming round to more Republican ways of thinking is genuine — as evidenced by his willingness to make Meta's AI available for government use, too. I've little reason to question Luckey's judgment here, though I wonder if it might be time for Meta to revise its mission statement. 'Build the future of human connection,' it states today, not yet updated to reflect that it's now also working on the future of human conflict. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion's US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News.

Instagram adds 3:4 aspect ratio for uncropped, full-frame photo sharing
Instagram adds 3:4 aspect ratio for uncropped, full-frame photo sharing

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Instagram adds 3:4 aspect ratio for uncropped, full-frame photo sharing

In a notable update aimed at enhancing user experience, Instagram has officially introduced support for 3:4 aspect ratio photographs on its platform. The change aligns with the default setting found on most smartphone cameras, allowing users to upload images without needing to crop them to fit Instagram's previously supported dimensions. Announced by Instagram head Adam Mosseri via Threads—Meta's microblogging service—the update means that photos taken in the 3:4 format will now appear on the platform exactly as captured. This new compatibility is available for both single-image uploads and carousel posts. You may be interested in 'For those posting photos in 3:4, they will now be displayed just as you shot them,' Mosseri said, highlighting the platform's push to better accommodate mobile photography. Until now, Instagram primarily supported square (1:1) and slightly vertical (5:4 or 4:5) aspect ratios. Although those formats will continue to be supported, users capturing photos in the standard 3:4 format often found themselves forced to crop their images, potentially losing important visual details. The newly introduced format ensures a fuller display of original content, as seen in comparison images shared via Instagram's creator broadcast channel. The platform has also been expanding its suite of content creation tools. Last month, Instagram launched a dedicated video editing application called Edits. Positioned as a competitor to ByteDance's popular CapCut app, Edits allows creators to edit videos on their smartphones and export them to various platforms without watermarks—making it a versatile tool for content creators. Additionally, Instagram recently introduced the Blend feature. Designed to personalise content discovery within messages, Blend offers an invite-only feed that recommends Reels based on shared user interests and activity. After a year of testing, the feature is now available on both iOS and Android versions of the app. These latest updates underline Instagram's continued efforts to enhance usability and creative flexibility for its global user base, whether by matching default camera settings or by expanding content creation and sharing capabilities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store