Nurses at psychiatric unit called teens 'pathetic'
Former patients at Scotland's biggest children's psychiatric hospital have told a BBC investigation of a culture of cruelty among nursing staff.
Patients who were teenagers when they were admitted to Skye House, a specialist NHS unit in Glasgow, told BBC Disclosure some nurses called them "pathetic" and "disgusting" - and even mocked their suicide attempts.
"It was almost as if I was getting treated like an animal," one young patient, being treated for anorexia, said.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said it was "incredibly sorry" and has launched two inquiries into the allegations uncovered by the BBC's investigation.
Programme-makers spoke to 28 former patients while making BBC Disclosure's Kids on The Psychiatric Ward documentary.
One said the 24-bed psychiatric hospital, which sits in the grounds of Glasgow's Stobhill hospital, was like "hell".
"I'd say the culture of the nursing team was quite toxic. A lot of them, to be honest, were quite cruel a lot of the time," she added.
The young people, who were admitted between 2017 and 2024, told the programme that nurses quickly resorted to force, including physical restraint and dragging patients down corridors, leaving them bruised and traumatised.
One said she wanted the police to be called after an alleged assault but was afraid she would be treated worse.
Others reported the over-use of medication and sedative injections so the staff could have a quiet shift, leaving patients like "walking zombies".
Some patients said they were punished for being unwell, including being made to clean up their own blood from self-harm incidents.
Warning: Some readers may find details in this report distressing
Skye House, which opened in 2009, accepts children aged 12 to 18 who are usually at crisis point.
Most are detained under the Mental Health Act, which means they cannot leave until doctors decide they are fit to be discharged.
The BBC began investigating after one young patient reported her treatment at the unit.
Many other cases soon came to light.
Cara spent more than two years in the unit, from the age of 16, being treated for anorexia.
She was restrained more than 400 times over 18 months, medical records reviewed by the BBC show.
She was often left with bruises and on one occasion a clump of her hair was pulled out.
"It traumatises you. You can't forget it," she said.
Up to five nurses could be involved in physically restraining someone to a bed or the floor if they were a danger to others or themselves.
Guidelines say restraints should only ever be used as a last resort, when all other de-escalation tactics have been exhausted.
Cara, now 21, would sometimes have to be restrained to prevent her from self-harming but says most of her restraints could have been avoided if staff had first attempted to speak to her instead of using restraints "as a first port of call".
She said one restraint in 2021 left her bruised and shaken.
"He held me down by the neck to the floor," Cara said.
"Quite scary, to have this man hovering over you, holding you down. His handprint was left around my neck."
On another occasion, Cara's medical notes reveal she felt she had been assaulted after being pushed to the floor by the same nurse.
Cara had asked to call the police, only to later change her mind.
She told Disclosure this was because she was scared of the outcome.
"I just thought they might treat me worse than they already were," she said.
When Jenna, from Inverness, was 16, she was suffering with depression, an eating disorder and had started to self-harm.
The nearest adolescent psychiatric unit was in Dundee but there were no beds and she was sent to Skye House.
"It was hell, like a prison kind of environment," Jenna said.
Jenna spent about nine months in the unit.
She was treated for anorexia by being fed through a nasogastric (NG) tube, a common but invasive treatment for malnourished people which involves threading a tube through the nose into the stomach.
Sometimes she would be restrained for this but she says the way staff administered this treatment has left her traumatised.
"Sometimes they would just come up to me and grab my arms and take me away," she said.
"I would just be dragged by however many nurses was needed."
She said sometimes staff would be so rough with her she'd be left bleeding and bruised.
"It was a kind of subtle punishment to teach me a lesson."
Self-harm behaviour was a feature in the lives of nearly all the patients who spoke to the BBC.
They claimed nursing staff would often miss mandatory 15-minute checks on patients, providing opportunities to hurt themselves.
Jenna and Cara told Disclosure there were occasions they had self-harmed and would be made to clean up their own blood from walls and floors.
Jenna said: "I remember the staff member kind of saying, 'You're disgusting, like that's disgusting, you need to clean that up'. It made me feel really horrible."
Cara said staff would sometimes be careless with her NG feeds and deliver the liquid too fast, causing her to vomit.
She said she would be made to clean her sick up herself.
Cara said: "They would give me wipes, and I'd be made to wipe the floor. It felt like a punishment, as if I'd done it on purpose.
"I just felt like I was constantly punished for things."
Stephanie was in Skye House for several admissions suffering from depression, from 2020 when she was 16.
She said she had been left with trauma from her time there.
"The nurses never really treated you with care or compassion," she said.
"Instead of asking you what's wrong, they just put you on the floor and inject you with medication."
On one occasion Stephanie alleges she was assaulted by a staff member who became frustrated at her refusal to take a shower.
Stephanie said: "The nurse got angry with me.
"She's then dragged me off the bed by my legs, and turned a shower on, and put me in the shower with my clothes on. And then just walked away and left.
"At the time I just thought it was normal. Everybody else was really getting the same kind of treatment."
Jane Heslop is a retired NHS chief nurse who spent her career in child and adolescent mental health services and reviewed the BBC's evidence.
"It's abusive, it's completely wrong," she said.
"If that occurred as that young person described, it's absolutely and completely unacceptable."
Ms Heslop said that it appeared "some of these staff have lost some of their boundaries".
Abby is autistic and was admitted to Skye House at the age of 14 when she was self-harming and suicidal.
She was there for two and half years and says she felt bullied by staff, some of whom could be verbally abusive.
On one occasion, she said she was mocked for self-harming.
"The nurse came up to me and almost chuckled, like a kind of grin, and said 'You're being pathetic, like look at yourself'," Abby said.
"It felt like bullying sometimes. To the point where I just wanted to hurt myself.
"It felt true to me that if other people are seeing me as pathetic, I am pathetic."
Abby and her family believe she was over-medicated in Skye House.
She said: "A lot of the patients were like walking zombies, me included.
"Like a lot of the time we were just sedated to the point where I guess our personalities were dimmed."
Jenna said staff would over-use intramuscular sedative injections when patients were in distress.
Emergency medication should only be given as a last resort.
Jenna said: "Without kind of trying to talk to me first, or calm me down, they would just go straight to giving an [injection].
"I think to be honest it was so that they could have an easier shift whilst all their patients were kind of sedated."
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said a review of medication was carried out in 2023 and this changed the way medication was administered.
Dr Scott Davidson, medical director of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, said he found the allegations "very difficult to listen to" and accepted there were instances where care has "been below the level we would expect for our young people".
"In light of these experiences and of the accounts of other patients, a full review of the quality of care has been launched," he said.
"We have also asked for an independent review of the unit."
The health board said it had made a number of improvements to patient care including staff recruitment and training of safe-holds.
It acknowledged that Skye House had faced staffing challenges in the past which meant agency and bank staff worked in the unit.
A statement said: "This was not ideal as they lacked experience in inpatient units and the complexities of the young people being cared for in Skye House."
It said action has since been taken to address staffing levels.
The Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland has visited Skye House six times since 2017.
The main issues raised in the BBC's investigation do not feature in any of its published reports.
If you've been affected by the issues in this story you can find information and support here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
NHS 999 staff quitting and suffering burnout over ‘pressure' of calls
NHS 999 staff are quitting and suffering burnout caused by the 'relentless pressure' of calls, according to new research. Figures obtained by Unison from ambulance services showed high turnover rates among call handlers, which staff say are often over a lack of support and the non-stop, often distressing, calls that force many to take sick leave. A report launched at the union's annual conference in Liverpool today revealed the toll taken on the workforce, with more than a quarter of NHS ambulance control room staff quitting their jobs over the past three years. According to the research, more than half a million days were lost to call handler illness in the three years from April 2021. The figure for 2023/24 alone was 166,940 – the equivalent of more than a month of sick leave for each 999 call handler. The union says high staff turnover and increased sickness absences are having a negative impact on patients. It often means people are having to wait longer for 999 staff to answer calls or for their emergency to be properly assessed and dealt with. Unison general secretary Christina McAnea said: 'These findings paint a bleak picture of the conditions faced by 999 control room staff. 'TV programmes about ambulance services don't show things as they really are. Call handlers are under immense pressure, making split-second decisions that directly affect lives. 'They handle relentless calls, often from people in distress, while dealing with complex emergencies and with limited resources. 'Despite their crucial role, 999 call handlers frequently face emotional strain and operate in an environment where support is sometimes lacking. The job is rewarding, but the challenges behind the scenes are far greater than most people realise. 'It's bad for morale and for patients when so many staff quit or are burnt out. Callers who dial 999 need to know the person picking up the phone is ready to deal with their crisis. 'Ambulance employers must do more to protect the health and wellbeing of staff who provide such high stakes support. 'This would help create a more stable emergency service that can retain the skills and experience of emergency call handlers, and persuade people to stay in the job for longer.' An NHS spokesperson said: '999 call handlers play an essential role as the first point of contact in emergencies and the NHS is taking steps to help staff deal with record levels of pressure including providing a range of health and wellbeing support. 'But we know there is more to do and the health service is committed to tackling burnout by continuing to offer more flexible working options.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'One of the biggest stress factors for 999 call handlers are delays to call outs, which is why we will put almost 500 new ambulances on the roads as part of our wider urgent and emergency care plan to improve the speed and quality of care for those needing urgent or emergency treatment. 'We are also working with the NHS to support staff mental health, through occupation health provision, counselling and employee support programmes.' The data was from 11 ambulance trusts.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump to force NHS to pay for wonder drugs
NHS patients have been given new hope of accessing wonder drugs previously blocked in Britain as Donald Trump pressures the health service to spend more with US suppliers. Ministers are understood to be reviewing the value-for-money rules that govern which drugs the NHS can buy, amid demands from the Trump administration for the UK to be more welcoming to US pharmaceutical companies. Under the trade agreement signed between the two nations earlier this year, the Government agreed to 'endeavour to improve the overall environment for pharmaceutical companies operating in the UK'. Earlier this week, The Telegraph revealed that this could result in the NHS paying more for US drugs to see off criticism of the differences in medicine prices between the two nations. However, it is understood that discussions include not only paying more for treatments already supplied on the NHS but also making it easier for US drug giants to sell their most cutting-edge treatments to the health service. It follows a wave of high-profile rejections of so-called 'wonder' drugs in recent years. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (Nice), which approves new NHS drugs for purchase, has blocked treatments including one which stopped the progression of Alzheimer's disease and another that doubled the life expectancy for terminal breast cancer patients. Nice has rejected them based on assessments of how long they would extend a patient's lifespan and improve quality of life. To qualify under Nice rules a new treatment must deliver one extra year of perfect health, or longer for less perfect health, for no more than £30,000. This figure has not increased in line with inflation since 1999. If it had, it would be just over £53,000. Nice has maintained that, to get approval for use on the NHS, medicines 'must not only provide benefits to patients but also represent a good use of NHS resources and taxpayers' money'. However, critics say a failure to raise the threshold in-line with inflation meant life-changing drugs were being blocked. Richard Torbett, chief executive of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry, said: 'There is growing evidence that it is becoming harder to bring new medicines to NHS patients. Increasingly, some new medicines may not be launched in the UK at all.' Companies including US giant Eli Lilly have said the regulator must rethink how 'value-for-money' is assessed. On Monday, a spokesman for the company said: 'The UK has historically focused on medicines as a cost to the NHS rather than evaluating their social and economic value.' Ministers are understood to be listening to demands from the industry for Nice to shake up its formula, with medicines such as AstraZeneca's breast cancer treatment Enhertu likely to be resubmitted for approval for NHS use if the formula is updated. Nice and AstraZeneca previously failed to reach an agreement over a price for the drug, which costs an estimated £118,000 per course of treatment. The NHS typically gets discounts, although the level is commercially sensitive. The Nice formula is being discussed after President Trump took a personal interest in the NHS issue. In trade documents between the US and UK, it said the NHS would review drug pricing to take into account the 'concerns of the president'. US officials are particularly concerned by an arrangement that sees companies pay revenue back to the NHS if costs rise faster than expected. Drug companies paid £3bn back to the NHS last year. In April, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said he was proud that the UK had kept prices of medicines low. However, he admitted that the UK had become too focused on cost rather than the benefits in some cases. Mr Streeting said: 'We've moved from quite rightly trying to drive a good bargain on the price of drugs and treatment to a position where sometimes people view medicine spend as a dead weight cost'.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Assisted dying: Medical students voice opposition as some MPs urge vote delay
Hundreds of medical students have voiced their opposition to an assisted dying law, as dozens of Labour MPs called for this week's vote on the issue to be delayed. It is currently expected the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will have its third reading on Friday, with MPs voting to either send it through to the House of Lords or to stop it progressing any further. It would be the first vote on the overall Bill to take place since November, when the proposed legislation passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 on a historic day which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales. But, days ahead of third reading, a group of Labour MPs opposed to the Bill have written to Commons leader Lucy Powell asking for more time to scrutinise a Bill they brand as 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. They added that it 'alters the foundations of our NHS, the relationship between doctor and patient, and it strips power away from Parliament, concentrating it in the hands of future secretaries of state for health'. They also raised concerns that MPs might not have a copy of the final Bill by the time they vote, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. The MPs, including Dame Meg Hiller, wrote: 'We implore you as the Leader of the House to allocate more Parliamentary time to the scrutiny of this Bill, the valid concerns that members have about its implementation, and the consequences it could have on vulnerable populations.' Their letter came as medical students sent their own to MPs, citing concerns about the Bill. The student doctors, from universities across the UK, said: 'We do not oppose dignified death – far from it. We oppose a Bill that risks offering death in place of care, that widens health inequalities, that places vulnerable patients in danger, and that reshapes the ethical foundation that our profession is built upon without any clear support. 'As future doctors, we may not yet be the voice of this profession – but we will be. And we are asking to be heard.' The Bill's sponsor, Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has repeatedly stated that her proposed legislation has been strengthened since it was first introduced last year, insisting it is subject to robust safeguards. As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favour of the Bill last year, but said the Government remains neutral on the issue. Both Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood voted against. Last week, a majority of MPs approve a new clause, tabled by Dame Meg, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adults patients before they have raised it was voted down. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the Bill pass into law was also supported.