RFK Jr removes entire team of CDC's vaccine panel experts
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has removed all members of a vaccine advisory board to restore "public trust above any pro- or antivaccine agenda,' he announced in a Monday op-ed.
Kennedy, a vaccine skeptic, wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece published late Monday afternoon that America is facing a 'crisis of public trust…toward health agencies, pharmaceutical companies or vaccines themselves.'
To restore what Kennedy sees as Americans' distrust in the healthcare system and ensure that they receive 'the safest vaccines possible,' the secretary announced that HHS will retire all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices.
The committee is responsible for evaluating the safety, efficacy and clinical need of vaccines and then presenting its findings to the Centers for Disease Control.
'The committee has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine,' Kennedy claimed in the op-ed.
Kennedy added that most of the panel's members 'have received substantial funding from pharmaceutical companies, including those marketing vaccines.'
The New York Times reported that the panel's members are screened for major conflicts of interest, and if there is an indirect conflict of interest, they disclose it and abstain from voting on related matters.
The current members will be replaced with new members 'currently under consideration,' HHS said in a statement.
'The new members won't directly work for the vaccine industry. They will exercise independent judgment, refuse to serve as a rubber stamp, and foster a culture of critical inquiry—unafraid to ask hard questions,' Kennedy wrote in the Journal.
Senator Bill Cassidy, a Louisiana Republican who was a crucial vote for Kennedy's confirmation as HHS secretary, said in a speech defending his vote, 'If confirmed, [Kennedy] will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes.'
Following Kennedy's announcement of the panel switch-up, Cassidy wrote on X, 'Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion. I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case.'
The Associated Press said that the panel had been in a 'state of flux' under Kennedy's leadership, pointing to a decision that the secretary made last month to change COVID-19 vaccine recommendations without consulting the panel.
Kennedy announced on May 27 that COVID-19 vaccines are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women, calling it 'common sense' and 'good science.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
RFK fires CDC's ACIP members: What does that mean for Americans?
Noel Brewer, a professor at the University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, had been on the panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), since July 2024 before the firings blindsided him. "It's surprising... shocking," he said. "None of us had any idea that this was coming, so it came out of the blue and it was not something that's ever been done before with ACIP." Kennedy plans to replace the fired members with new people "currently under consideration," according to a statement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy's decision marks a reversal from what a key Republican senator said the Trump Cabinet member had promised during his confirmation hearings earlier this year. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-Louisiana, chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, said Kennedy had promised to maintain the advisory committee's current composition. "If confirmed, he will maintain the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices without changes," Cassidy said. In a June 9 post on X, Cassidy said he's in contact with Kennedy to ensure that ACIP won't "be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines." Kennedy says "a clean sweep" will "reestablish public confidence in vaccine science," and some who follow the Make America Healthy Again movement praise his decision, but former health officials and medical experts worry the firings will sow more distrust in the public health system and impede access to vaccines. "An important part of our social contract is trust and introducing unnecessary chaos and disruption violates that trust," said Cathy Bradley, dean of the Colorado School of Public Health. Vaccine guidance: RFK Jr. fires entire 17-member CDC vaccine board. Here are the vaccines they recommended What does ACIP do? After the Food and Drug Administration approves a vaccine, ACIP reviews the scientific evidence to create guidance on who should receive it based on age, preexisting medical conditions and other factors. The CDC director approves these recommendations, which shape guidance from other medical organizations and insurance coverage. In an op-ed published by the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy said the committee has been "plagued with persistent conflicts of interest," citing evidence from 25 years ago. Brewer said the committee has since strengthened its vetting process, which typically takes a year from nomination to member status. "All ACIP members go through a vetting for conflicts of interest," he said. "We're not allowed to have them during our time, we're not allowed to accept money from drug companies for consulting or grants, we're not allowed to sue them." Members are required to disclose any conflicts of interest, which are published on the CDC website. Meetings are also open to the public, typically livestreamed on the CDC website, and are open for public comment. "It's a very open and transparent process which leads to a body of individuals with different types of expertise," said Dr. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and former acting director of the CDC. "Pulling information from decades ago to disparage the ACIP was ludicrous." Can Americans still get vaccinated? Vaccine guidance regarding all the shots recommended for adults and children remains in place, for now, which means eligible patients should have access to these vaccines. But Dr. Tina Tan, a pediatric infectious disease physician and president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, said that may change as Kennedy appoints new members to the advisory committee. She fears the administration could walk back certain vaccine recommendations, similar to how Kennedy dropped COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women on May 27. Changing vaccine recommendations could impact how private insurance companies cover certain vaccines, Tan said, which could deter Americans from getting vaccinated and fuel outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. ACIP also determines which vaccines are included in the Vaccines for Children program, which provides vaccines to children whose parents or guardians may not be able to afford them. Changes made to the program would be a "great concern for public health," Brewer said. It's also unclear if COVID-19 vaccines will be available in the fall, he said. The committee met in April to discuss the COVID-19 shot, among other vaccines, but Kennedy canceled the vote that would have made recommendations for the fall. ACIP is scheduled to meet again between June 25 and June 27 with its new committee members, according to the HHS statement. More details: RFK Jr. fires entire CDC vaccine advisory panel What parents should know Doctors and public health experts urge parents to continue discussing vaccine options with their pediatricians and primary care providers. Tan also said professional organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American Medical Association are working together to ensure that children have access to vaccines despite possible changes to the recommendations. She encourages parents to look to these national organizations for guidance and support, and to vaccinate their children if they're not up to date with their shots. "They need to get up to date now, given the fact that access to vaccines at this moment shouldn't be an issue," she said. "The American public needs to understand that the federal agencies that were in place before... they're not going to be the same now." Adrianna Rodriguez can be reached at adrodriguez@
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NHS to increase robotic surgeries to 500,000 per year by 2035
The NHS in England plans to significantly expand robotic surgery, projecting an increase from 70,000 procedures last year to around 500,000 in the next decade. By 2035, NHS officials anticipate that 90 per cent of all keyhole surgeries will be carried out with robotic assistance, up from the current rate of one in five. Health Secretary Wes Streeting, a former kidney cancer patient who underwent robot-assisted surgery, believes innovative technologies will transform the NHS, leading to quicker recovery times and shorter hospital stays for patients. NHS England boss Sir Jim Mackey stated that expanding the use of robotic surgery will help the NHS return to shorter elective waiting times by 2029, improve patient outcomes, and speed up procedures. Experts note that robotic surgery allows for greater dexterity and easier manipulation compared to traditional methods, with consultant surgeon John McGrath highlighting its potential to improve patient care and relieve pressure on NHS services.
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
'I don't think Britain's working well': Mum pays £250 for son's tooth removal - because of a one-year wait on the NHS
Three-year-old Eddie laughs as he whizzes down a slide. His mother Jodie Poole is relieved to see him smiling. A few weeks ago, he developed a painful abscess in his mouth. After being told there'd be up to a year's wait for the NHS to remove the affected tooth, Jodie paid around £250 for it to be done privately. An example, she says, of how public services are letting down families like hers. "I feel like I'm paying twice," she says. "I'm paying through my taxes, the money that I should be paying, and then I'm paying extra money that looks quite expensive because I can't get the things that we need that we should do for our taxes." As Chancellor Rachel Reeves decides how much to fund each of the public services that people across the country rely on for their everyday needs, it's people like Jodie who'll need persuading that they're getting a return for their taxes. There'll be winners and losers, with health and defence set to be prioritised. Jodie works as a childminder and runs a mother and toddler group in Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, which is where we met her for a chat. She voted for Labour at the last general election but has been disappointed so far. "I don't think Britain's working well for anyone right now," is her verdict on the state of public services. 'I don't think they have a clue' Running around with the younger children is seven-year-old LJ. It's the middle of the school day, but her mother Rachel Lawrence, 46, explains she no longer attends school due to concerns her additional needs weren't being met. She believes funding for education needs to be prioritised. "My daughter's home educated because they can't keep up with the SEN (special educational needs) needs of children," she says. Rachel used to work in a care home but had to give up due to childcare demands. She now works three jobs to pay the bills. She can't remember exactly how long LJ has been on a waiting list for an autism assessment but says it's been "years". As well as schools, she wants her taxes to be spend on extra funding for the NHS and more money for the police. "I think they seem to be very underfunded as well," she says. "Here, there's thefts all the time." She believes government ministers are out of touch with what life is really like. "I don't think they have a clue," she says. "They're too high up to kind of see what's happening to what I would call us little people down here". Hard to book appointments with GP In a nearby cafe, Eddie Bromley, 72, is enjoying a morning coffee. Asked if he's happy with local services, he shakes his head. "You can't ring your doctor up now and say, 'Can I book an appointment?'" he says. He dislikes being told to book online. "For a lot of people, you know, that's difficult," he says. Local pharmacist, Kishore Banda says inability to book GP appointments when they're needed is the biggest complaint he hears from customers. He says people then seek help at A&E departments instead. "At the end of the day it will cost more for the NHS," he says. But among the steady stream of people coming in to collect prescriptions we found people supportive of at least some of what they're hearing from the government. Whitney stops to chat briefly. " I'm quite alright with everything at the moment, obviously that's not the same for everyone," she says. Michael Lamb, who is in his 80s, thinks prioritising defence spending is key. "I can see a third world war coming," he says, genuinely concerned. The chancellor has talked about tough choices when it comes to deciding how to allocate spending. It's clear, here in Peterborough, that it will be impossible to please everyone.
