logo
'A political decision': Los Angeles official slams mayor's ousting of fire chief

'A political decision': Los Angeles official slams mayor's ousting of fire chief

USA Today25-02-2025

'A political decision': Los Angeles official slams mayor's ousting of fire chief
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Los Angeles fire officials fielded questions, concerns in town hall
Emotions ran high inside a packed theater in Malibu, California, as Palisades Fire victims had a chance to press officials.
Los Angeles City Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez is calling for former Fire Chief Kristin Crowley to appeal her firing by Mayor Karen Bass.
Rodriguez argues that Crowley's firing was "scapegoating" and questions if the mayor's stated reasons for the dismissal were legitimate.
Bass defends the firing, stating that it was in the best interest of public safety and that new leadership is needed in the fire department.
LOS ANGELES − A Los Angeles city councilwoman is calling for former fire Chief Kristin Crowley to appeal her controversial firing by Mayor Karen Bass, telling USA TODAY in an interview on Monday that the ousting isn't making the fire-ravaged area any safer.
Bass fired Crowley on Friday, saying in a statement that she made the move "in the best interests of Los Angeles' public safety." Bass pointed to Crowley's leadership during the devastating firestorm that killed dozens and burned thousands of homes in the Los Angeles region in January.
Councilwoman Monica Rodriguez, whose district includes areas affected by the one of the blazes (the 800-acre Hurst Fire), said in a statement Friday that Crowley's firing was "scapegoating."
"It was really distasteful and inaccurate to suggest that this was going to better public safety," Rodriguez told USA TODAY. "To suggest that she failed to do her job given that there were limitations on resources that she (Crowley) had pointed out."
Rodriguez questioned if Bass' stated reasons for the firing were legitimate and that an appeal would provide the city an opportunity to transparently examine the action.
"We have an obligation to protect the people of Los Angeles and have the right people at the helm making good and thoughtful decisions," Rodriguez said. "It shouldn't be a political decision."
The former fire chief hasn't said whether she will appeal but told KNBC on Saturday that: "It has been an absolute honor to represent and lead the men and women of one of the greatest fire departments in the world."
Crowley has the option to appeal within 10 days of her firing, or March 3. It would take two-thirds of the council's 15 members to overturn the firing.
Firing stokes criticisms of fire budget management
Explaining the firing, Bass cited a report from the Los Angeles Times saying that fire officials decided not to assign roughly 1,000 available firefighters and dozens of water-carrying engines for emergency deployment in the Pacific Palisades neighborhood before the fires broke out.
Rodriguez called that rationale a "gotcha," and said that the availability of apparatus necessary for the available firefighters would be uncovered in an investigation.
The United Firefighters of Los Angeles City Local 112 echoed Rodriguez's assessment of the firing in a statement to USA TODAY, saying that she was dismissed without a full investigation.
"We still have nearly 100 broken down fire engines, trucks, and ambulances in the maintenance yard because of civilian mechanic job cuts," the union said. "This is a city that has neglected its fire department and can't even pay our firefighters correctly for the work that we perform every single day."
Bass has been dogged by criticisms of how she managed the fire budget in the year before the wind-driven fires that burned for weeks, killed at least 28 people and destroyed more than 15,000 structures.
Budget documents previously obtained by USA TODAY show that the Los Angeles Fire Department's budget was reduced from $837 million in fiscal year 2024 to $819 million in fiscal year 2025 as a part of broader cuts for the year.
"LAFD's operating budget did get reduced by $17.6 million - part of that reduction included 61 total positions (civilian) being eliminated," the city's controller's office said in comments sent to USA TODAY accompanying the documents.
Crowley spoke out against the budget cuts in television interviews during the emergency, echoing warnings she made to the fire commission in December.
"The $17 million budget cut and elimination of our civilian positions, like our mechanics, did and has and will continue to severely impact our ability to repair our apparatus," Crowley said on CNN.
Tensions between Crowley and Bass nearly hit a boiling point after the interviews, and the mayor's office had to deny rumors that Crowley had been fired during a meeting between the two on Jan. 10.
Councilmember pushes back on notification after-action report claims
Bass was out of the country as the Palisades caught fire, having left on a diplomatic trip to attend the inauguration of Ghana's President John Dramani Mahama.
"She knew that we had a major wind event coming up that had the potential for a wildfire," Tom Doran, who fled the Palisades Fire that destroyed his home told USA TODAY in January. "She's off in another country, and at the taxpayer's expense, when she should've been here ... She is the chief executive of Los Angeles. Yes, she delegates but if you delegate you're the one in charge."
In an interview on local Fox program "The Issue Is," Bass claimed that Crowley failed to notify her about the coming fire danger and that she was not aware of warnings made before the firestorm.
Days before the fires broke out, the National Weather Service forecasted the fire weather, warning residents: "A LIFE-THREATENING, DESTRUCTIVE, Widespread Windstorm."
Rodriguez said that she was aware of the danger ahead of the fires through multiple media outlets and that the responsibility of notifying the mayor fell on the Emergency Management Department − not on the fire chief.
The councilwoman called the mayor's rationale around Crowley not participating in an after-action report, "not accurate."
"Everything that I know about Chief Crowley and everything that I know about ... her participation and cooperation in every single (after action-report), it was just out of character for the standard operating procedures that occurred with every major incident," Rodriguez said.
Bass' office stood by the firing in a statement to USA TODAY on Monday, pointing to the off-duty firefighters and saying: "Bringing new leadership to the fire department is what our city needs."
City Council president Marqueece Harris-Dawson told City News Service Monday that he wanted Crowley fired.
'I was one who was encouraging the mayor to separate with the chief weeks ago,' said Harris-Dawson, whose district in central Los Angeles was not in any immediate danger from the fires.
'I was acting mayor at the time and I was not getting a flow of information from the chief during that time period,' Harris-Dawson told the outlet. 'Frankly, I did not talk to her until I showed up to a press conference at 4 o'clock that afternoon of the fire.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wildfire smoke, shark pardons and lost 401(k) accounts: Your week in review
Wildfire smoke, shark pardons and lost 401(k) accounts: Your week in review

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Wildfire smoke, shark pardons and lost 401(k) accounts: Your week in review

Wildfire smoke, shark pardons and lost 401(k) accounts: Your week in review Show Caption Hide Caption Smoke drifting into US from Canada wildfires could impact health Smoke from wildfires in Canada has drifted into Montana, the Dakotas, Minnesota, Midwestern and East Coast states, and as far south as Florida. Canadian wildfire smoke hangs over U.S. Skies were looking milky across much of the United States for days as smoke from wildfires raging in Canada drifted into northern and Midwestern states and dipped even as far south as Florida. The Dakotas, Iowa and most of Minnesota and Wisconsin were under air quality alerts, and the haze hung over major cities including New York, Washington, Philadelphia and Boston. More than 200 wildfires were burning in Canada as of June 3, and more than half were classified as "out of control," Canadian forest fire authorities said. More news about our planet: Sign up for USA TODAY's Climate Point newsletter. Trump pardons Florida divers who freed sharks Presidential pardons have often sparked controversy, but Donald Trump's latest gesture had some teeth to it. Trump granted full clemency to two Florida divers, John Moore Jr. and Tanner Mansell, who were convicted of theft for cutting 19 sharks free from a fisherman's longline in 2020. They had assumed the gear was illegal; it turns out it belonged to a vessel permitted by the federal government to harvest sandbar sharks for research. "Whether people believe in his politics or not, he chose to pardon me ... and only ever wanted to help," Mansell said in a text. "I can't help but feel extremely grateful." A fortune sits in 'lost' 401(k) accounts You might think it would be hard to forget almost $60,000. But at least $1.7 trillion is wasting away in forgotten 401(k) accounts, the financial firm Capitalize found, and the average lost balance is $56,616. How does that happen? People who leave a job "usually have a bunch of things going on,' said David John of the AARP Public Policy Institute, and simply lose track. (More than 47 million Americans quit their jobs in the Great Resignation of 2021.) And someone who leaves a job after only a year or two might be especially prone to overlook a modest balance − which, thanks to the magic of tax-free investment growth, eventually turns into a big balance. Loretta Swit, 'M*A*S*H's beloved 'Hot Lips,' dies Fans, friends and co-stars were remembering Loretta Swit, who starred as Major Margaret "Hot Lips" Houlihan through all 11 seasons of TV's hugely popular Korean War dramedy "M*A*S*H" and gave depth and strength to a character who began as an oversexed blond stereotype. Swit, 87, died May 30. "More than acting her part, she created it," star Alan Alda, 89, posted on X. Jamie Farr, 90, who played Corporal Maxwell Q. Klinger, told USA TODAY she was his "adopted sister … as close as family can get." The cast was a tight-knit group through the years, Swit once said: "We might as well be joined at the hip." Close isn't good enough for the New York Knicks Some teams just want to win NOW. Maybe that's why the New York Knicks fired coach Tom Thibodeau, stunning much of the basketball world, just days after the franchise flirted with the NBA Finals for the first time in 25 years before falling to the Indiana Pacers. Not bad for a team that had won just 21 games in the 2019-20 season before Thibodeau took over. The Knicks might be forgiven for being a little impatient after their magical run, however: They have not won a title since 1973. (The NBA Finals, with the Pacers facing the Oklahoma City Thunder, tipped off June 5). − Compiled by Robert Abitbol, USA TODAY copy chief

Trump takes aim at Musk's government contracts but says ex-pal can keep White House key
Trump takes aim at Musk's government contracts but says ex-pal can keep White House key

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump takes aim at Musk's government contracts but says ex-pal can keep White House key

WASHINGTON — Their breakup was full of insults and acrimony, but President Donald Trump says Elon Musk can keep his golden key. "I don't take things back, I gave him a key, he tried very hard," Trump said of his former DOGE head. The golden key, etched with the White House insignia, is not a real key but symbolizes respect and honor from the president. Trump and Musk had a public falling out this week after the billionaire, who worked part-time for the federal government until last month, waged a war on the president's tax bill over it's projected $2.5 trillion price tag. The fight spiraled as the pair traded attacks, and the two men stopped speaking. Trump told reporters on June 6 that he was not interested in reconciling with Musk. Elon Musk hits back after Trump threatens contracts. SpaceX's government ties, explained In social media posts on June 5, the president said he asked Musk to leave his post spearheading the DOGE initiative and threatened to cancel billions of dollars of the SpaceX founder's federal contracts. Trump said the following day that he was serious about ending the government contracts —and would do so if he thought it was in the financial interest of the country. 'We'll take look at everything. I look at everything. He's got a lot of money. He gets a lot of subsidy," Trump told reporters on June 6. "Only if it's to be fair for him and for the country, I would certainly think about it." Musk responded by saying he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft immediately. He said in another post that without his help, Republicans would have lost the House and Senate and Trump would not currently be the president. A Washington Post analysis found that Musk's companies have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits over the years. SpaceX has about $22 billion in government contracts alone, Reuters reported. While the country might be twittering about his breakup with Musk, the president said on June 6 that his focus was squarely on a cache of complex international issues. 'Honestly, I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran ... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk," Trump told reporters riding with him on Air Force One to his New Jersey golf club. He also claimed he had not thought about whether or not he would keep his new Tesla. SpaceX works closely with the Department of Defense and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. But the president told reporters the federal government can survive without its partnerships with Musk's companies. 'The U.S. can survive without almost anybody," Trump said. "Except me." Contributing: Joey Garrison of USA TODAY. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump says ex-pal Elon Musk can keep his golden White House key

California board hits pause on plan to phase out gas appliances
California board hits pause on plan to phase out gas appliances

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

California board hits pause on plan to phase out gas appliances

Read the Los Angeles Times story here. A board that regulates air quality in the Los Angeles area voted Friday to consider more alternatives to its plan to levy a fee aimed at phasing out gas-fired water heaters and furnaces. That proposal was defeated on a 7-5 vote. But board members agreed 7-4 to consider less-stringent options, citing concerns over the cost to property owners and manufacturers and the ability of the electric grid to withstand more demand. South Coast Air Quality Management District Board Chair Vanessa Delgado said that means any rule changes aimed at lowering nitrous oxide (NOx) emissions likely would not come before the board until at least next year. The proposed rules would have encouraged homeowners to buy furnaces and water heaters that emit no NOx — a key pollutant contributing to smog — by placing a fee on manufacturers that sell natural-gas-fired appliances in the district. More than 200 speakers testified in person and online for and against the plan. The governing board's vote followed a warning Friday from Bill Essayli, the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, that any action to impede the use of domestic energy resources would face a legal challenge by his office. 'California regulators are on notice: if you pass illegal bans or penalties on gas appliances, we'll see you in court,' Essayli said on X. 'The law is clear — feds set energy policy, not unelected climate bureaucrats.' Opponents of the rule changes told the board that housing was already too expensive and the cost of living too high for area residents. Floodlight found that a coalition of groups that included SoCalGas, the country's largest gas utility, led a massive opposition campaign that included convincing officials from dozens of cities in the four-county district to oppose the rules. Those testifying in favor cited the positive health effects of the rules, which were projected to prevent 2,490 premature deaths and avoid 10,200 asthma cases by cutting NOx emissions by six tons per day. Some noted that natural gas — also known as methane — is a potent greenhouse gas that helped make the devastating wildfires that ripped through the Los Angeles area in January more likely. In voting against the proposed rules, board member Janet Nguyen said they would unnecessarily penalize people by raising the cost of household appliances. 'I, like everybody here, support clean air,' said Nguyen, who also serves as an Orange County supervisor. 'But we must also pursue environmental progress without punishing the very people we serve today. These rules don't target refineries or shipping ports. They target people, the 17 million homeowners, renters ...' Board member Holly Mitchell took the other side, saying the rules were needed to improve air quality in the nation's smoggiest air basin. 'If we don't start now, when will we effect any change?' asked Mitchell, a Los Angeles County supervisor. 'We have the worst air quality in the nation. That forces us to make hard decisions.' Board member Patricia Lock Dawson, mayor of Riverside, reflected her colleagues' mixed feelings. 'It is our job to improve air quality. We are specifically charged with reducing NOx,' Lock Dawson said. 'But Californians are really struggling now. (And) poverty is a health issue, too.' She added: 'I wish this were more carrot than stick.' To meet the targets, 30% of manufacturers' sales would have needed to consist of zero-emission models starting in 2027. That would rise to 50% in 2029 and eventually 90% by 2036. The rules were projected to affect 10 million gas appliances. Under the rules, manufacturers would be charged $100 for each gas furnace and $50 for every gas water heater they sell within the targets. For sales that exceed the cap, they would pay $500 and $250, respectively. Revenue from these fees would be used to help pay for zero-emission appliances, especially in disadvantaged communities, according to the air district. The proposal was a 'compromise,' Mitchell said, noting that staff had made numerous changes in the original proposed rule changes to answer cost concerns. Among the thousands who had registered opinions with the air-quality district ahead of the vote was second-grade teacher Barbara Ishida. Her Altadena home was destroyed in the Eaton Fire. Ishida's vision is to build a fire-resistant home with no gas appliances. That approach is backed by a University of California Berkeley study released in April that concluded all-electric construction is the fastest, most cost-effective and most climate-friendly strategy to rebuild after the fires. Ishida had signed a letter supporting the proposed rules because she believed they would encourage Altadena to build back in a sustainable way. She criticized opponents for 'thinking short term.' 'They're just putting profits over people,' Ishida said in an interview before the vote. 'They're not thinking long term, And they're not thinking very well for the next generation.' Floodlight freelance reporter Hilary Beaumont contributed to this story. Floodlight is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates the powerful interests stalling climate action.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store