logo
Mississippi Passes Bill Banning Lab-Grown Meat

Mississippi Passes Bill Banning Lab-Grown Meat

WIRED10-03-2025
Mar 10, 2025 4:22 PM Three states have now passed legislation making it illegal to manufacture, sell, or distribute cultivated meat. Courtesy of New Age Meats/Megan Bayley
The Mississippi House of Representatives just passed a bill banning cultivated meat. This makes Mississippi the third state to outlaw meat grown in vats from small samples of animal cells.
The Mississippi bill will make it illegal for anyone to manufacture, sell, or distribute cultivated meat in the state. Violating the law would be a misdemeanour, punishable by a fine of no more than $500 and/or up to three months in county jail. Similar laws passed last year in Florida and Alabama also carry potential jail terms or fines of up to $500.
The bill now awaits the signature of Governor Tate Reeves and will become law unless he chooses to veto the bill. Mississippi's agriculture commissioner, Andy Gipson, has criticized the cultivated meat industry, and he supported a 2019 bill that prevented cultivated meat products being labeled as meat in the state. In 2024 he published a post on his website that commended the cultivated meat bans in Florida and Alabama. 'I want my steak to come from farm-raised beef, not a petri-dish from a lab,' he wrote.
'This has a very, very, strong sense of political theater,' says Suzi Gerber, executive director of the Association for Meat, Poultry, and Seafood Innovation, a trade group representing the cultivated meat industry. The actual impact of the law in any of these states would be minimal, she says, since cultivated meat hasn't been available for sale in any of them.
Republican representatives Bill Pigott and Lester Carpenter introduced the Mississippi bill in January 2025. It passed both houses without a single vote in opposition. But similar legislation in other states has had less of a smooth path. A Wyoming bill that would have outlawed cultivated meat was voted down in its third reading in the senate in February, while a similar bill proposed in South Dakota also failed to make it through a senate vote in February.
'I was surprised but encouraged by the results in those states,' says Gerber. In Wyoming some senators argued for better packaging and labeling provisions instead of an outright ban on cultivated meat, while in South Dakota some legislators opposed the ban, arguing it would inhibit free trade.
Other states are considering legislation similar to that already passed in Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi. A bill introduced in Georgia in January would make it illegal to sell cultivated meat. In Nebraska a bill that would prohibit cultivated meat in the state was introduced at the request of Governor Jim Pillen in January.
The Florida ban is currently being contested in a court case brought by the Californian cultivated meat firm Upside Foods and the Institute of Justice, a nonprofit public interest law firm. The case argues that the Florida ban violates two separate parts of the US Constitution, which cover interstate commerce and the relationship between federal and state law. In October a federal judge denied Upside Foods' request for a preliminary injunction that would have halted the enforcement of Florida's ban on cultivated meat.
The steady drip of state bans has coincided with a downturn in investor enthusiasm for cultivated meat. Just $226 million was invested in cultivated meat startups in 2023, significantly down from $922 million in 2022. In early 2024 Upside Foods laid off workers, while California-based SciFiFoods shut down altogether later that year.
But there are some signs that the industry is weathering these headwinds. On March 8, San Francisco–based cultivated meat company Mission Barns announced that the Food and Drug Administration had no further questions about the safety of its cultivated pork fat product, a major step toward selling the product in the US. Only two other companies, Upside Foods and Eat Just, have received a similar letter from the FDA. Now Mission Barns only needs approval from the US Department of Agriculture in order to launch in the US.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proposed Democratic maps in California drop ties to Texas, GOP states redistricting
Proposed Democratic maps in California drop ties to Texas, GOP states redistricting

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Proposed Democratic maps in California drop ties to Texas, GOP states redistricting

Changes to California's redistricting process would allow lawmakers to redraw congressional districts in ways that would heavily favor Democrats, regardless of redistricting efforts in Texas or other GOP-led states, should voters approve the measure in November. As first reported by KCRA, lawmakers took out language that tied California's redistricting changes to whether Texas or another Republican-led state enacted new maps. 'This measure, which would include a legislative finding that it is in response to redistricting in Texas in 2025, would, notwithstanding the authority of the Citizens Redistricting Commission, require the state to temporarily use the congressional districts reflected in AB 604 of the 2025–26 Regular Session for every congressional election until the new congressional boundary lines are drawn by the commission in 2031,' the measure's the bill's text now reads. The proposal is part of the broader Election Rigging Response Act, a legislative package that would override the state's independent redistricting commission for the 2026, 2028 and 2030 elections. 'Yesterday, Texas moved forward with their Trump power grab, so this notion of 'conditioning' is no longer applicable — it is self-evident that California will need to move forward in response to what Texas has done,' a spokesperson from Gov. Gavin Newsom's office said in a statement to KTLA. 'Additionally, the removal of the language allows for a clearer, more simple description for voters this November.' Newsom responded to reports about the language change on X, writing: 'Texas acted. California will now respond. The trigger has been triggered.' On Wednesday, the Texas House of Representatives approved a GOP-favored map that could flip five districts Republican. A day later, the California State Assembly passed its own map. Both measures now head to their respective state Senates. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Play Farm Merge Valley

California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map
California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map

Chicago Tribune

time34 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

California Gov. Newsom signs legislation calling for special election on redrawn congressional map

SACRAMENTO, Calif — California voters will decide in November whether to approve a redrawn congressional map designed to help Democrats win five more U.S. House seats next year, after Texas Republicans advanced their own redrawn map to pad their House majority by the same number of seats at President Donald Trump's urging. California lawmakers voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve legislation calling for the special election. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has led the campaign in favor of the map, then quickly signed it — the latest step in a tit-for-tat gerrymandering battle. 'We don't want this fight and we didn't choose this fight, but with our democracy on the line, we will not run away from this fight,' Democratic Assemblyman Marc Berman said. Republicans, who have filed a lawsuit and called for a federal investigation into the plan, promised to keep fighting it. California Assemblyman James Gallagher, the Republican minority leader, said Trump was 'wrong' to push for new Republican seats elsewhere, contending the president was just responding to Democratic gerrymandering in other states. But he warned that Newsom's approach, which the governor has dubbed 'fight fire with fire,' was dangerous. 'You move forward fighting fire with fire and what happens?' Gallagher asked. 'You burn it all down.' In Texas, the Republican-controlled state Senate was scheduled to vote on a map Thursday night. After that, Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's signature will be all that is needed to make the map official. It's part of Trump's effort to stave off an expected loss of the GOP's majority in the U.S. House in the 2026 midterm elections. What states are doing in the battle over congressional maps as Texas pursues plan President Donald Trump soughtOn a national level, the partisan makeup of existing districts puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. The incumbent president's party usually loses congressional seats in the midterms. The president has pushed other Republican-controlled states including Indiana and Missouri to also revise their maps to add more winnable GOP seats. Ohio Republicans were also already scheduled to revise their maps to make them more partisan. The U.S. Supreme Court has said the Constitution does not outlaw partisan gerrymandering, only using race to redraw district lines. Texas Republicans embraced that when their House of Representatives passed its revision Wednesday. 'The underlying goal of this plan is straight forward: improve Republican political performance,' state Rep. Todd Hunter, the Republican who wrote the bill revising Texas' maps, said. On Thursday, California Democrats noted Hunter's comments and said they had to take extreme steps to counter the Republican move. 'What do we do, just sit back and do nothing? Or do we fight back?' Democratic state Sen. Lena Gonzalez said. 'This is how we fight back and protect our democracy.' Republicans and some Democrats championed the 2008 ballot measure that established California's nonpartisan redistricting commission, along with the 2010 one that extended its role to drawing congressional maps. Democrats have sought a national commission that would draw lines for all states but have been unable to pass legislation creating that system. Trump's midterm redistricting ploy has shifted Democrats. That was clear in California, where Newsom was one of the members of his party who backed the initial redistricting commission ballot measures, and where Assemblyman Joshua Lowenthal, whose father, Rep. Alan Lowenthal, was another Democratic champion of a nonpartisan commission, presided over the state Assembly's passage of the redistricting package. Newsom on Thursday contended his state was still setting a model. 'We'll be the first state in U.S. history, in the most democratic way, to submit to the people of our state the ability to determine their own maps,' Newsom said before signing the legislation. Former President Barack Obama, who's also backed a nationwide nonpartisan approach, has also backed Newsom's bid to redraw the California map, saying it was a necessary step to stave off the GOP's Texas move. 'I think that approach is a smart, measured approach,' Obama said Tuesday during a fundraiser for the Democratic Party's main redistricting arm, noting that California voters will still have the final say on the map. Bipartisan group led by ex-Obama officials 'rolling the dice' on new remapping plan for Illinois legislatureThe California map would last only through 2030, after which the state's commission would draw up a new map for the normal, once-a-decade redistricting to adjust district lines after the decennial U.S. Census. Democrats are also mulling reopening Maryland's and New York's maps for mid-decade redraws. However, more Democratic-run states have commission systems like California's or other redistricting limits than Republican ones do, leaving the GOP with a freer hand to swiftly redraw maps. New York, for example, can't draw new maps until 2028, and even then, only with voter approval. In Texas, outnumbered Democrats turned to unusual steps to try to delay passage, leaving the state to delay a vote by 15 days. Upon their return, they were assigned round-the-clock police monitoring. California Republicans didn't take such dramatic steps but complained bitterly about Democrats muscling the package through the Statehouse and harming what GOP State Sen. Tony Strickland called the state's 'gold-standard' nonpartisan approach. 'What you're striving for is predetermined elections,' Strickland said. 'You're taking the voice away from Californians.'

Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill
Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill

Axios

time34 minutes ago

  • Axios

Newsom signs California redistricting measures in response to Texas bill

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two redistricting bills into law on Thursday evening after a Democratic-controlled Legislature passed them earlier in the day. Why it matters: The legislation is in direct response to Texas' Republican-controlled House passing a new congressional map at the urging of President Trump, and the consequences of both could prove pivotal in the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store