Tough Ashes series awaits England, warns Australian batter Steve Smith
The ease of batting in the ongoing India-England has become a topic of debate and Smith believes the British batters shouldn't get too used to batting-friendly pitches.
The two teams have managed to score more than 500 runs in an innings at least once and have consistently put on board runs in excess of 400.
"Their (England) batters are going to be challenged a little bit differently to the wickets they have had over in England for a while, which have looked pretty flat and good for batting," Smith was quoted as saying by BBC Sport.
"The wickets in Australia in the last three or four years have been very tricky for top order batters. It is going to be a good challenge for them. But it's going to be a wonderful series." As part of preparation for the Ashes, Smith is keeping a close eye on England's clash with India.
"I have been watching the India and England series and there has been some great cricket played there, so I think the Ashes this year is going to be an absolute belter," he said.
Smith feels England have curbed down their all-out attacking approach and look more focussed on winning matches than entertaining fans.
"They have started to play a little bit differently in the last couple of weeks in terms of playing the situation, as opposed to going out and trying to be the entertainers that they said they wanted to be," Smith said.
"They are actually trying to win the games now which is perhaps different to what was said in their comments previously." Australia's T20 squad is currently in the middle of a five-match series against the West Indies, but Smith, who will captain Welsh Fire in the upcoming Hundred tournament, is in England.
Though he retired from ODIs after the Champions Trophy in February this year, Smith desires to continue playing the shortest format till 2028 Los Angels Games, where cricket will make its comeback, to become an Olympian.
"I decided to stop playing one-day cricket so I can play more franchises, with the aim to make the Olympic team," Smith said.
"So to play more shorter-form tournaments around the world is only going to be beneficial. It has been a long run for me, and I have been doing this for a long time. I am still enjoying it and particularly the shorter formats and want to keep putting my name out there.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
England cricketer blocked from promoting OnlyFans in The Hundred
Tymal Mills (Photo by) England fast bowler Tymal Mills has been denied permission by the England and Wales Cricket Board to display his OnlyFans account logo on his bat during The Hundred cricket tournament in August 2025. Mills, who has played 16 T20 internationals and was part of England's 2022 World Cup-winning squad, joined the subscription platform to share content about his life as a professional cricketer. The 33-year-old left-arm fast bowler has not displayed the OnlyFans logo in his two appearances in The Hundred this season. The ECB's decision stems from OnlyFans not aligning with the family-friendly nature of The Hundred tournament. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! When announcing his platform membership, Mills stated: "It's all about sharing my passion with you in a new way." He further emphasized that his channel would give subscribers "a closer, more personal look into life as a professional cricketer." Mills, who holds the record as the leading all-time men's wicket-taker in The Hundred, maintains that the material on his OnlyFans channel is "completely safe." The fast bowler has already made significant contributions in the current tournament, demonstrating his value to the Southern Brave team. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Effective Are Non-Surgical Treatments for Aging Skin? (Explore Benefits) AskLayers Learn More Undo In their opening match, he secured figures of 3-22 and scored crucial six runs to help his team achieve a one-wicket victory over Manchester Originals. OnlyFans operates as an online platform where content creators can share photos, videos, and live streams that subscribers can access through monthly subscriptions, tips, and pay-per-view options. The platform retains approximately 20% of the fees, with creators receiving the remaining 80%. Poll Should sports leagues allow athletes to promote their personal brands on platforms like OnlyFans? Yes, it's their personal choice. No, it conflicts with the league's image. It depends on the content shared. While OnlyFans is widely known for hosting adult content, it is not exclusively dedicated to such material. The platform supports various content creators across different fields and interests. This situation mirrors a similar case from May 2025, where British canoeist Kurts Adams Rozentals faced suspension from competition. Rozentals, who competes in individual canoe slalom, was suspended by Paddle UK following concerns about his social media posts, forcing him to choose between his Olympic aspirations and his OnlyFans account. Mills is reported to understand the ECB's decision regarding the logo display restriction. The ruling reflects the growing intersection between professional sports, personal branding, and content creation platforms, as athletes explore new ways to connect with their audience and diversify their income streams. The ECB's stance emphasizes their commitment to maintaining The Hundred's family-friendly image, even as professional athletes increasingly engage with various social media and content platforms to build their personal brands and connect with fans in new ways. This development occurs as The Hundred continues its mission to attract new audiences to cricket, particularly families and young fans, while balancing the evolving landscape of professional sports and digital content creation. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Injuries are a part of the game; injury substitutes are unnecessary
Had England won the final Test at the Oval, it is possible that without facing a single delivery, their No.11 might have emerged as hero. Chris Woakes walking out gingerly, his left arm in a sling hidden under his sweater was already one of the heroic sights of the series; at Old Trafford Rishabh Pant had dragged his fractured foot to the crease. Pant swung Pant-like, and played the shot of the series when he appeared to push Ben Stokes delicately to cover only for the ball to race to the boundary like a tracer bullet, as Ravi Shastri would say. Players injured during the course of a match returning to the action are the stuff of folklore. Colin Cowdrey, arriving at the crease with his arm in a sling, Anil Kumble bowling to and dismissing Brian Lara with his jaw wired up are justly in that pantheon. Substitute fielders were always allowed in the laws of the game, and till recently substitute runners too for injured batters. Then, following the death of Phil Hughes on the cricket field, a concussion substitute was allowed to bat or bowl. The runner for batters, however, was not allowed. Following the heroics of Pant and Woakes, there has been a cry for substitutes who could replace players injured. Contrasting views Former England captain Michael Vaughan has called cricket a 'dinosaur' game for not allowing injury substitutes, claiming this 'devalues the product'. He went on to say — and this may be the nub — 'It cost England the series because England got to within six runs of beating India with ten players.' On the other hand, current captain Ben Stokes argues that the injury substitute is unnecessary. If someone gets injured, its tough luck. Deal with it, he says, adding that there may be room for manipulation if an injury substitute is allowed. Few international cricketers go through a career without injuries. These are part of the game, like sixes and dogs running onto the field. Wicketkeepers finish with crooked fingers, fast bowlers' backs rebel within a few years, and often in only their 40s, players develop dodgy knees, and carry other evidence of their harsh sporting life. The law on substitutes (Law 2) is one of the trickier ones. It has been manipulated in the past. In his autobiography, Imran Khan has written about a match in Pakistan in the 1980s, where one of the teams, realising the nature of the wicket substituted players after lunch and a whole session of play had been gone through! Nearly a century before that, when the Lancashire captain Archie Maclaren allowed Sussex to substitute a fast bowler who fell ill after three overs, he was berated by Wisden for setting up a 'very dangerous precedent.' Cricket is a tough game. The intriguing case of a substitute who took a wicket occurred in 1982. After fast bowler Gladstone Small had already bowled 15 over for Warwickshire against Lancashire, he was called up for England duty as standby. Manager David Brown (who was 40 and had played 26 Tests for England) was given special permission to take Small's place in the eleven. Brown dismissed wicketkeeper Christopher Scott. The story doesn't end there. Small was not needed by England, then returned to bat, and bowled eleven overs in the second innings. This may not have been the manipulation Stokes had in mind when he said he was against the idea of an injury substitute (or, as in this case, a 'national call' substitute). But he has a point. Would England have won the Lord's Test if Vaughan's Law had existed, and Shoaib Bashir (who got the last wicket bowling with a fractured finger) had made way for an injury substitute? Cricket is a game of pressure, and injuries add to the degree of difficulty. It is not just the romance of the fallen hero rising to a challenge — although as Pant and Woakes showed, there is that too. There is too the danger of batters and fielders becoming that bit more reckless in their approach knowing if they are injured, a substitute will do their job. The modern player (Stokes) I think is right, while the ex-player (Vaughan), who sees cricket as a 'product' has got it wrong.
Indian Express
7 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Criticism shows people care': Ellyse Perry welcomes scrutiny as sign of women's cricket growth
One of the great modern-day women cricketers, Australia's Ellyse Perry, has welcomed the increased scrutiny that women's cricketers face these days, saying it is good for the game. Perry was referring to the media scrutiny England faced after being thrashed in the Women's Ashes earlier this year. Australia whitewashed England 16-0 in the multi-format Women's Ashes, and what quickly followed for England was widespread criticism of their performance. Perry believes this shows people care about their game. 'It shows that people care, and people expect a certain level of performance from their elite female teams and they are passionate about it,' Perry told BBC Sport. 'That's a far cry from where the women's game was five to 10 years ago. So while criticism and being held to account isn't always pleasant, equally it's very positive for the direction of the game and shows it's being taken really seriously,' she added. Continuing her perspective, Perry said: 'People expect more (now we are paid more), and all we've wanted is to be taken seriously and respected for how we play the game and the level we can take it to. With that comes pressure to perform. There will be moments where that's hard to handle and it's challenging, but it's also exactly what the game needs.' Australia won the ODI and T20I series 3-0 while beating England by an innings and 122 runs in the one-off Day-Night Test. Perry defended the English side, saying the result was a 'bit of an anomaly.' 'It's really easy to get caught up in the scoreline without seeing the bigger picture,' said Perry. 'There are amazing players in that English team – world-class players who can win a game from anywhere. It was a moment in time. It was great for us and our fans during our home summer, but I feel it was probably a bit of an anomaly. The next time we meet, it'll be different circumstances – maybe in a World Cup. It's a moment that has passed, not something we want to get stuck on or gloat about because cricket is so fickle; things can change quickly,' she said.
