logo
Files documenting worst abuses at residential schools to be destroyed unless survivors ask otherwise

Files documenting worst abuses at residential schools to be destroyed unless survivors ask otherwise

CBC07-05-2025

Files documenting the worst abuses at residential schools are set to be destroyed in 2027 and, despite a multi-year outreach, some survivors say they didn't know they could opt to have their files preserved.
Christina Kitchekesik, a member of Tataskweyak (Split Lake) Cree Nation, attended Guy Hill residential school near The Pas, Man., where she endured physical, mental, spiritual and sexual abuse.
As an advocate for survivors, Kitchekesik ,74, has shared her own experience at residential school with others over the years to help promote understanding and healing.
She also shared her experience in the Independent Assessment Process (IAP) which was created by the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement alongside the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC).
The TRC heard 6,700 survivors speak about what happened to them at residential schools. The IAP provided survivors like Kitchekesik the chance to be compensated for the abuse they suffered at school, and 38,000 came forward.
Their IAP files contain their testimony, along with documentary evidence of their time at residential school, with items like medical records documenting physical abuse.
Despite her advocacy work and her regular contact with people at the National Council for Truth and Reconciliation (NCTR), which stores the records from the TRC, Kitchekesik says she did not know that she could have her IAP file preserved as part of the historical record at the NCTR.
Order for destruction
Of the 38,000 people who filed claims with the IAP, 90 per cent had a hearing or settlement negotiation, according to the IAP website.
The process was made confidential so survivors would be comfortable sharing painful and personal details. It also meant that any people associated with the schools who were accused of abuse would not have those details made public.
The question of what to do with the files afterward arrived at the Supreme Court in 2017. The NCTR and the Canadian government opposed the destruction of the files, while many Catholic organizations, lawyers who acted for IAP claimants and the Assembly of First Nations supported destroying them.
The AFN was not available for an interview.
The court ruled the IAP files must be destroyed by Sept. 19, 2027. The court's ruling established a program to notify survivors about the deadline and to let survivors know they had options — they could request their files for their own keeping or consent to have them sent to the NCTR to be preserved, or both. If they chose to give their files to the NCTR, they could choose to have identifying information removed from the documents.
Marie Pelletier, 74, attended four different residential schools in Manitoba throughout the '50s and '60s, including Pine Creek, Fort Alexander, Sandy Bay and Assiniboia.
She wasn't aware she could give her IAP files to the NCTR.
"I heard nothing about that," she said.
Pelletier, who is Ojibway from Peguis First Nation in northern Manitoba, has had her file for many years, but isn't sure where it is.
She, like Kitchekesik, said she would be interested in sharing it with the NCTR with her personal details included — if she can find it.
Both women say they think it's good for survivors to share their stories with their children and grandchildren so they can understand why survivors behaved the way they did.
But on top of the benefits for their descendants, they say Canadians have a lot to learn from the files.
"There's still many people that don't believe [what] happened in residential schools, they think we're all lying," Kitchekesik said.
Protecting survivors' privacy
IAP adjudicator Kathleen Keating, who started with the IAP when it began in 2003 (then called Alternative Dispute Resolution) and was there until it finished processing survivors' claims in 2021, said she spoke with hundreds of survivors who were afraid their testimony would become public.
She said adjudicators would often travel to meet survivors outside of their communities to preserve their privacy and remembers reassuring survivors by demonstrating her password-protected tape recorder, highlighting security measures taken with her filing cabinet and even explaining how her paper shredder worked.
"I can remember people who threw up in a waste basket in the hearing room at the thought of sharing these stories," she said, adding she personally promised people their testimony would stay confidential.
"I just can't imagine betraying those people."
Keating said the Supreme Court ordered a two-year multimedia campaign to let survivors know what they could do with their IAP files. The campaign included print, television, radio and social media ads, as well as information phone lines and a website.
Additional efforts to reach survivors included information packages and posters sent to band offices, friendship centres, correctional facilities and other stakeholders. Since 2021, the only part of the notification program still operating is the website.
"If you look at the notification program, I don't know what else could have been done," Keating said.
The point of notification, she said, was not to persuade people one way or the other but to tell them their options. Keating said she expects the number of survivors who have shared their files with the NCTR is probably "quite small."
"I never met a single person who was anxious to share their story widely," Keating said.
Files 'generationally unprecedented'
Raymond Frogner, the NCTR's head of archives, said the NCTR has received just 96 IAP files from the 38,000 survivors who took part.
While the NCTR already has thousands of TRC documents, Frogner says the IAP files are "generationally unprecedented."
"We'll never again see this kind of a tribunal do this in-depth, profound research," he said.
Additionally, other countries like the U.S. have nothing close to the information that has been gathered in Canada, Frogner added, so the documents hold global significance, too.
Word of mouth from elders has been the most successful method of getting survivors to share their documents, Frogner said, and the NCTR is continuing that outreach.
Frogner said he regularly sees a lack of awareness when he attends conferences with community members and discusses their IAP file options.
"The overwhelming response is surprise and shock," he said.
Laura Arndt, who is Mohawk from Six Nations of the Grand River, said she understands how sacred survivors' stories are from both her personal and work experience.
Arndt, the lead at the Survivors Secretariat which is leading the investigation into unmarked burials at the Mohawk Institute, said her aunt Mary took part in the IAP after suffering medical neglect while attending the Mohawk Institute.
Her aunt has since died, and since the files can only be accessed by the survivor themselves, Mary's file is permanently out of reach.
"The hardest part in all of this is the only history that this country has is the history that's written in black ink. The IAP process, including my aunt's file, is black ink," she said.
"I appreciate those records carry such pain and such trauma that the need to handle them as sacred documents is critical. But to destroy them is to destroy the truth of what really happened."
Although she doesn't often speak with survivors about their IAPs, when it does come up Arndt said many are not aware of their options.
Arndt said knowing that records will be destroyed is heartbreaking, especially because she has seen many government and church records from residential schools — like showing what materials were purchased to repair the school or how much cutlery was purchased — but says survivor testimonies are "the most critical information."
Arndt said she believes that survivors' files could contain details about times, locations and other information that could help with the search for unmarked graves.
"In destroying the records, the evil doers of this genocide get protected," she said.
Survivors who went through the IAP can request their files for themselves and/or have them sent to the NCTR by filling out the request form or consent form (or both) and returning them by email, mail or fax before Sept. 19, 2027.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Post-Mulroney, the Conservatives' brand is ‘loser.' It's time for an overhaul
Post-Mulroney, the Conservatives' brand is ‘loser.' It's time for an overhaul

Globe and Mail

time28 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Post-Mulroney, the Conservatives' brand is ‘loser.' It's time for an overhaul

How have Conservatives fared since making the big swerve rightward in the early 1990s? We recall that under Brian Mulroney's Progressive Conservative banner they won majority governments in 1984 and 1988. Then along came the dividers, the ideologues of the Reform Party, who grabbed 52 seats in the 1993 election and then proceeded to swallow the old Tories whole. And the rest is history – a primarily painful party history. Since the late Mr. Mulroney's departure from the party leadership in 1993, the Liberals have won eight elections to the Conservatives' three. The question now is whether the party will continue on its Liberal gift-giving track or clue in and opt, like the Liberal Party has just done, for a change of course: in the Conservatives' case, a change that broadens their identity beyond their Prairies-driven populist brand. Lawrence Martin: Why the Conservatives should dump Poilievre – but won't To be sure, the Conservatives' tradition is to lose most of the time. But in being bracketed further on the right in recent decades, they've lost even more of the time. If we count the four years (or so) to come under Mark Carney, the Liberals will have been in power for 27 years since 1993. The Conservatives? Nine. Their three victories came under Stephen Harper, who also lost two elections. Whether the wins were on account of ideology is doubtful. Two of the three wins came against Stéphane Dion and Michael Ignatieff, arguably two of the weakest leaders in Liberal Party history. As for the Conservatives' defeats, three came courtesy of Jean Chrétien, one from Paul Martin, three from Justin Trudeau and one so far from Mr. Carney. In the meantime, a more moderate form of conservatism, as practiced by Ontario Premier Doug Ford, has resulted in three straight majority victories in the province. On that more centrist side is where the federal party has been most successful, as exemplified by multiple election winners John A. Macdonald, John Diefenbaker and Mr. Mulroney. More bad news for the Conservative Party in its current form is the advantage the collapsed NDP gives the Liberals. Their plight, and Mr. Carney's shift away from left-leaning Trudeauism to the centre, means Liberals' available real estate has significantly expanded. It is especially the case if the Conservatives are cocooned on the right. Another factor that suggests the Conservatives need a big rethink is the plight of the populist brand. Leader Pierre Poilievre, who joined the Reform Party as a teenager, is an embedded populist. What Donald Trump is doing to the image of populism is ghastly. Under him, it is authoritarian, xenophobic, demagogic, vulgar, imperialist ... and I'll stop there. Lawrence Martin: How the Conservatives can save themselves: Changing Canada's image as the great white weakling of the North With the election of Mr. Carney – a big banker, an establishment man, a globalist respected for his knowledge – Canadians have signalled a turn away from populism. They're fed up with the politics of polarization. Mr. Carney might even bring back a modicum of respect for elites. His Liberals are popular in Quebec. As Mr. Mulroney argued, without Quebec the Conservatives' chances of winning a majority are scant. Post-Mulroney, the party has scored low in the province. A political party's deficiencies can be overcome with a popular leader, but the current Conservatives are saddled with one who lost his own seat and who, according to a new Nanos poll, is almost 25 points behind Mr. Carney in approval ratings. In the election campaign, many of Mr. Poilievre's economic policies were welcome enough, so much so that they were copied by the Liberals. Policy was less his problem than personality, likeability and his concocted look. Having been an MP for 20-plus years and party leader for almost three, that image is ingrained, hard to change. There's an old saying about all politics being local. That is not the case now. With foreign threats on the rise, with the country being bludgeoned by Donald Trump's tariffs, with Big Tech and AI posing new challenges, politics is becoming more and more global. The Liberals found a man of global stature to meet the times. Ironically, given all his political experience, Mr. Poilievre looks unseasoned by comparison. He has spent precious little time abroad. He gives no sense of having an informed global perspective. Hard economic times are ahead for the country. The Carney honeymoon will likely end before long. How he hopes to pay for all his wide-eyed promises is a mystery. There's a good chance the Conservatives will benefit in the polls, thus dampening momentum for bold change. But that would be folly. The trajectory Conservatives have been on since being overtaken by the Reform ideologues has been predominantly a failing one. They need put this phase of their history behind them.

Quebec names mediator as Montreal public transit strike in third day
Quebec names mediator as Montreal public transit strike in third day

Globe and Mail

time28 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Quebec names mediator as Montreal public transit strike in third day

Quebec's labour minister says he has named a mediator in a labour dispute between Montreal's public transit authority and its maintenance workers that has limited bus and metro service across the city. About 2,400 maintenance workers have been on strike since Monday after more than a year of negotiating. As a result, buses and metros are only operating during morning and afternoon rush hours and late at night. Labour Minister Jean Boulet said Wednesday on social media that the mediator will be tasked with easing tensions between both sides and restoring a dialogue 'conducive to negotiations.' One day earlier, he urged the union and the transit authority to jointly seek mediation to bring them closer to a deal. In a news release on Wednesday, the transit authority — Société de transport de Montréal — said negotiations with the union extended late into the prior night before the two sides agreed on the conditions governing mediation. Both sides filed a joint application for mediation to the Labour Department. 'Meetings with the union continue and are still scheduled several times a week,' the transit authority said. The mediation deal is a 'step in the right direction,' said Marie-Claude Léonard, general director of the agency. But she said, 'we are not one meeting away from reaching a solution.' The agency noted it had proposed mediation as early as May 29. Bruno Jeannotte, president of the maintenance workers union, said in an e-mailed statement that mediation will hopefully accelerate negotiations 'to quickly resolve the issues that separate us.' As part of an agreement reached with Quebec's labour tribunal, regular service will be maintained from Friday to Sunday for the Canadian Grand Prix weekend, but operations will be restricted on other days until the strike is set to end on June 17. Earlier this week, Jeannotte also said his team is in talks with the union representing bus and subway drivers — who have also voted for a strike mandate — on ways to increase pressure on the transit authority. In a post on the X platform, Mayor Valérie Plante thanked Boulet for getting involved. 'This is an important step that will help move things forward,' Plante wrote. 'Our wish is clear: that the dialogue accelerates to reach an agreement.' She also sympathized with Montrealers who've been affected by the service cuts. 'The situation is difficult and complex for thousands of us. Public transit is essential and must resume quickly,' Plante said.

Canada, U.S. exchanging potential terms on economic and security deal
Canada, U.S. exchanging potential terms on economic and security deal

Globe and Mail

time43 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canada, U.S. exchanging potential terms on economic and security deal

Canada and the United States are exchanging potential terms of agreement in closely held talks on an economic and security deal, The Globe and Mail has learned, but these do not represent the draft text of an actual pact. These exchanges are an effort to spell out what both sides might be able to agree upon as Ottawa and Washington try to find enough common ground to end their damaging trade war, sources said. The Globe is not naming the sources because they were not authorized to speak publicly. It's also far from clear whether a deal will be landed anytime soon as the United States is negotiating with close to 20 other countries that are seeking relief from tariffs U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed on their products. One government official compared the documents being exchanged to term sheets in the corporate sector, which outline the ingredients of a possible deal and serve as the basis for negotiations. Canada and the U.S. are engaging in talks on a new economic and security relationship that could amount to the first phase of talks with a second phase being the renegotiation of the trilateral United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement possibly to follow as already scheduled in 2026. ArcelorMittal laying off 153 workers in Hamilton as Trump tariffs hammer the steel industry Opinion: Carney was right to not retaliate against Trump's latest tariffs The economic-defence talks are being conducted among a very small circle of officials including International Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc, Canada's ambassador to the United States Kirsten Hillman, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Jamieson Greer, the United States Trade Representative. It's possible this deal may be an executive-handshake agreement such as the one the British government signed with the White House in May. Sources said Canada and the United States are talking about working together to counter China's unfair trade practices, a topic that could affect U.S. tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, and further border security arrangements to stop the illegal distribution of the opioid fentanyl. The United States also wants Canada to take a great role in securing the Arctic and join Mr. Trump's ambitious Golden Dome missile shield project – a project Prime Minister Mark Carney has publicly said would make sense for Canadians to be part of. They said each side is putting ideas on paper and sharing them as part of the talks. CBC News on Friday reported it had learned of the existence of a working document outlining details of a potential deal. CBC, citing an unidentified source, said the working document states that Canada is willing to participate in the Golden Dome security program, and it also mentions Canadian commitments to build more infrastructure in the Arctic, Canada's pledge to meet its NATO defence spending targets, as well as previously announced border security investments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store