UK retail insolvencies surge amid tax burden and weak consumer confidence
While some had anticipated a post-pandemic correction in the retail ecosystem, this latest data suggests a more structural reckoning is underway—one exacerbated by government fiscal tightening and shifting consumer behaviour.
Gordon Thomson, a restructuring partner at RSM UK, framed the uptick as a predictable consequence of the Chancellor's recent tax hikes. 'We're starting to see the impact of the government's new fiscal policies bite,' Thomson noted. 'The increase in corporation tax, coupled with rising employer National Insurance contributions, is squeezing the viability of many retailers who were already operating on tight margins.'
This financial stress coincides with ongoing shifts in consumer priorities. Though broader indicators suggest that confidence is recovering modestly, spending remains cautious. High costs of living, particularly for essentials such as food and fuel, are eroding disposable income. For retailers dependent on discretionary purchases, fashion, interiors, and lifestyle, the short-term outlook is now clouded with uncertainty. Untenable costs physical stores
The question now is whether the UK's fiscal framework is inadvertently hastening the decline of its retail sector. Many in the industry are calling for a re-evaluation of business rates and the National Insurance threshold, policies which disproportionately affect brick-and-mortar operations. While online retailers often benefit from lower operational costs and broader reach, high-street stores remain tethered to fixed expenses that are becoming untenable.
Insolvencies, while headline-grabbing, are merely the symptom. At the core lies a deeper issue: the pace of change in consumer expectations is accelerating, while many legacy retailers have failed to keep up. A division is emerging between those who are agile, data-savvy, and digitally native, and those still structured around pre-digital retail models.
To survive, retail brands must now operate more like tech companies: leveraging analytics, optimising supply chains in real-time, and speaking fluently to consumers across digital channels. For fashion in particular, the opportunity lies in cultivating niche communities online, offering personalisation, and creating experiences that transcend the transactional.
The retail landscape has always evolved, but rarely has the transformation been so abrupt or unforgiving. If insolvencies continue their upward trajectory, May 2025 may well mark a tipping point, a moment when traditional British retail, hemmed in by policy and pressured by shifting demand, began to give way to a leaner, tech-driven new order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britain set for minor boost as world economy growth forecast upgraded despite Trump tariffs
The world economy will grow faster than expected after the impact of Donald Trump 's tariff war waned and imports to the US surged, new projections show. Britain is in line for a small boost with the IMF upgrading its growth predictions by just 0.1 per cent for 2025. Growth is expected to sit at 1.2 per cent this year and 1.4 per cent for 2026, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) latest World Economic Outlook forecasts. It came as the IMF said the global economy would be more resilient than it expected in May. Global growth is set to be 3 per cent this year and 3.1 per cent next year, up from 2.8 per cent and 3 per cent respectively. Like Britain, Germany and Italy have both had their growth upgraded by 0.1 per cent for 2025, and received no upgrade for 2026. Meanwhile, Canada was handed a marginally bigger upgrade of 0.2 per cent in 2025 and 0.3 per cent in 2026, taking its growth to 1.6 per cent in 2025 and 1.9 per cent in 2026. The world growth upgrade reflects what the IMF called front-loading in recent months, with countries rushing to ship goods to the US to get ahead of Mr Trump's tariffs. This has happened as businesses and households tried to prepare for planned increases to US tariff rates, following Mr Trump's "liberation day" announcements in April, according to the report. The IMF said front-loading had "shaped economic activity in the first half of the year", adding that it was "creating exposures that could amplify the impact of any potential negative shocks". For example, firms could end up having too much stock, therefore pushing down future imports, or it could lead to additional holding costs or the risk of items becoming obsolete. Meanwhile, the growth upgrade since April was also driven by US tariffs being lowered since higher rates were first announced by Mr Trump, alongside improved conditions in the financial markets. This came after the US struck new trade deals, including with the UK and, most recently, the EU. But the UK's growth rate flatlining while trade deals benefited other economies poses fresh questions for Rachel Reeves. The chancellor has been accused of stalling growth with her and Sir Keir Starmer 's economic doom and gloom after taking office last July and through October's tax-hiking Budget. She has a multi-billion pound black hole to fill ahead of this autumn's Budget and is considering a range of potential tax hikes and spending cuts to balance the country's books. The Conservatives said under Labour 'growth is going nowhere', adding that the IMF report confirms that. Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'Business confidence has collapsed all because of the chancellor's reckless economic choices. "You can't tax your way to growth - we need to back British businesses and workers. "Yet Rachel Reeves looks set to do it all over again in the autumn - yet more taxes, yet more pain for our economy." But Ms Reeves said the forecast still forecasts the UK to have the highest growth in the G7. The chancellor said: 'I am determined to unlock Britain's full potential, which is why we are investing billions of pounds through our Plan for Change - in jobs through better city region transport, record funding for affordable homes, as well as backing major projects like Sizewell C to drive economic growth and put more money into people's pockets.' Countries also benefited via the introduction of some higher tariff rates while others were paused until August, notably between China and the US, helping diffuse escalating trade tensions and open the door to negotiations. However, the IMF warned that a "rebound in effective tariff rates could lead to weaker growth" and weigh on wider sentiment. "Elevated uncertainty could start weighing more heavily on activity, also as deadlines for additional tariffs expire without progress on substantial, permanent agreements," the report said. Furthermore, the IMF flagged conflict in the Middle East creating potential risks to global shipping and trade, which could further raise commodity prices like oil. On the other hand, the report found that global growth could be lifted if trade negotiations lead to lower tariffs, ease tensions, and create more certainty and predictability. The IMF also highlighted technological advancements, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI), as a way to further boost growth around the world.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The experts are being proved wrong about the Trump economy
Here is a tale of two economies. One is the US, which, like some kind of levitational trick performed by an Indian swami, seems to defy gravity, together with almost anything else that is thrown at it. Hardly anyone thought the US economy could withstand the post-pandemic surge in interest rates from virtually zero all the way up to 5.33pc without inducing a recession, yet here we are nearly two years after the Federal Funds Rate hit its peak, and there is still little sign of a significant downturn. Similarly with Trump's tariff threats. Most economists thought they would be as damaging to the US as those they targeted, with rising inflation undermining household spending, but thus far apparently not. It's true that Trump's protectionism is proving less severe than initially threatened, but the tariffs are still substantial by historical standards – slightly bigger, for instance, than the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the Great Depression. The same might be said of the crackdown on immigration. Without a constant infusion of migrant labour, crops would be left unharvested and fruit would rot on the tree, it was widely said. Similarly, the entire low-wage economy, from meatpacking to Uber drivers, would grind to a halt. No doubt instances of these afflictions can be found, but in aggregate there's little sign of the much anticipated damage in the wider economic data. It may be that all these matters are on a long fuse. It is still early days, and a slowdown may be just around the corner. Goldman Sachs, for one, has been steadily reducing its forecast of US growth for this year, and at the last count was down to just 1.1pc, with a high risk of outright recession. But Goldman's gloom is not reflected in the stock market, which continues to hit new records. To date at least, the economic establishment has been largely wrong-footed, prompting Trump to gleefully declare that 'the Fake News and Experts were wrong again. Tariffs are making our country BOOM'. The situation is similar in some respects to the economic debate that surrounded Brexit here in the UK. Once the immediate shock of the vote to leave the EU had worn off, the economy carried on much as before; the more gory predictions of serious economic harm turned out to be ill-founded. The big lesson, perhaps, is that abrupt changes in trade policy are not as significant as imagined in fundamentally shifting the dial in large and diverse advanced economies with high dependence on service-based industries. The other country in my tale of two economies is the UK, which has indeed slowed markedly, and may even have contracted in the second quarter. As it is, the economy shrunk by 0.3pc in April, and again by 0.1pc in May, according to initial ONS estimates. Here in Britain, the problem is almost entirely self-inflicted. Despite an autumn Budget which in overall terms was strongly expansionary, the decision to raise employer National Insurance contributions and other forms of business taxation has dealt a hammer-blow to business confidence. In anticipation of harder times to come, consumer confidence has also sagged. Meanwhile, rising concern over how the Labour Government might seek to fill a ballooning shortfall in the public finances is causing capital flight and other forms of precautionary behaviour among the asset-rich. Nobody can say that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, wasn't warned about the likely counterproductive effects of her tax raid. More tax threatens to spawn less tax. Shortly after the last Budget, she told business leaders that she would not be coming back with more tax rises and more borrowing. It is now abundantly clear that she will be. That she is unlikely to be able to keep that promise has no doubt instructed her more recent refusal to rule out wealth taxes as a way of filling the fiscal hole. She is wary of further tying her hands. Yet her ambivalence has served only to heighten anxiety among those who might be targeted, further fuelling evasive action. Even if she eventually does nothing, failure to rule out further wealth taxes has already inflicted considerable damage. All this against a backdrop of still elevated inflation, which at the last count remained stubbornly adrift of target at 3.6pc, slightly up on the month before. This is unlikely to deter the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee from further trimming interest rates at its meeting next week. Even so, the combination of nil growth with still-higher-than-acceptable inflation is proving particularly awkward for policymakers. The Bank is under no obligation to help the Government through an economic mire which is almost entirely of its own making. Back in the US, there are two main reasons that the economy is continuing to hold up relatively well. One is the continuation of massive fiscal stimulus. This is in fact just an extension of the Biden-era stimulus, only done in a different way – via the tax side of the ledger rather than the spending side. Trump has taken to blaming Biden for any slight hiccup in progress, but in truth it may be the other way around: that the economy is continuing to enjoy the tail-end of the Biden boom. The other major prop is all the excitement around artificial intelligence (AI). This has prompted record levels of investment by Silicon Valley in data centres, supercomputing and other aspects of the developing technology. It's a bubble, undoubtedly, which also helps explain continued buoyancy in the stock market, sustained as it is by the surge in AI valuations. But for now, the music plays on, and as Tim Congdon of the Institute of International Monetary Research points out, the monetary indicators support the idea of continued growth. This might be further enhanced by plans to ease back on so-called Basel III capital controls, encouraging banks to load up with US Treasuries and further expand credit provision. Combined with what is already a plainly unsustainable fiscal trajectory, it might be thought an accident waiting to happen, and no doubt it is. But today is not that day. In any case, the idea that the US economy is careering towards some kind of Trump-induced recession – brought about by a combination of protectionism and policy uncertainty – is proving to be not quite right. In fact, the economy is showing a remarkable degree of resilience to the president's iconoclasm, and actually might in some ways be benefiting from it. Thanks in part to the revenue raised from tariffs, the Federal budget actually slipped into surplus in June. Even if something of an anomaly, it nonetheless makes you think. Sadly, the same cannot be said of the UK, where the economy is becalmed even as government borrowing continues to swell ever higher.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
More than half of young people have considered leaving UK under Labour
More than half of young people have considered leaving Britain under Labour, a think tank has found. Adults between 18-30 years old said they had 'serious concerns' about housing, personal finances and their future in the UK, leaving them 'overtaxed, underhoused and undervalued'. According to The Adam Smith Institute poll, 28 per cent of young Britons are either actively planning (8 per cent) or have seriously considered (20 per cent) emigrating. Meanwhile, a further 30 per cent have briefly considered it. Only 35 per cent of young people said they have never thought about leaving the UK. The polling, which was part of the think-tank's Anxious Generation series, was carried out between July 8-10. The research team concluded: 'With young people feeling increasingly disenchanted, it is clear that meaningful change is needed to prevent them from joining the UK's ongoing wealth exodus.' Majority fear housing crisis will get worse Responding to the data, Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, said: 'It's sad but not a surprise that ambitious young Brits are increasingly looking overseas for opportunities. 'High taxes and stagnant wages have crushed aspiration and punished hard work. 'This can't go on. We must give the next generation the freedom to thrive, raise families, and build a bright future here in the UK.' Researchers found that 65 per cent believe it will become 'more difficult' to find affordable housing in the next five years, with a further 38 per cent saying it will become 'much more difficult' and 27 per cent saying it will become 'somewhat more difficult'. In contrast, just 21 per cent think the housing situation will get easier. Furthermore, these concerns cut across political divides. Voters from all major parties expressed similar fears about housing and financial insecurity, signalling a generation-wide erosion of confidence in the UK's economic future. The think tank found that 63 per cent of young Conservatives, 65 per cent of Labour, and 68 per cent of Reform UK voters say housing access will worsen. Emma Schubart, Data & Insights Manager at the Adam Smith Institute, added: 'The youngest generation of British workers are sending a clear message. They feel overtaxed, underhoused and undervalued. If our political class continues to ignore these warning signs, we risk exporting our talent at precisely the moment when it is most needed. 'The dead hand of the state' 'With the country already facing a wealth exodus thanks, in large part, to its reckless decision to scrap the non-dom tax regime, the Treasury can hardly afford to lose an entire generation of ambitious young people as well. 'Addressing these challenges is not just a matter of fairness – it is essential to securing Britain's long-term economic and social future. 'Young Britons urgently need evidence that ambition and hard work still translate into security and success in this country.' Jack Rankin, Tory MP for Windsor, added: 'The Government's dismal failure to deliver growth, accessible and cheap housing, and record high taxation is not just crushing Britain, but it's driving our future away.' He described the research as 'devastating' and said that it shows that 'Britain needs to be freed from the dead hand of the state'. 'Freedom should be the order of the day, so young people feel confident enough to stay in our country and reverse the fraying intergenerational social contract,' he added. The think tank research comes after separate data from the British Council was published in December, claiming that as many as three-quarters of young people would consider moving abroad. In its survey of more than 3,000 young people aged 18-30, 75 per cent would consider living and working abroad in the short or long-term future. The researchers found that Australia, the USA, Canada and Italy were the most popular destinations for young people considering emigrating. Two-thirds of respondents said their standard of living is worse than it was for their parents' generation, while more than half cited low wages as the biggest challenge.
