
China-Pak-Afghanistan meeting in Beijing, NVIDIA CEO says US policy on tech to China ‘failed'
The Ministry of External Affairs said on Thursday (May 22) that India's National Security Adviser (NSA) had conveyed New Delhi's 'resolute stance against cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan' to Beijing, and that the 'Chinese side is aware that mutual trust, mutual respect and mutual sensitivity remain the basis of India-China relations'.
Senior Indian defence officers had earlier mentioned China in the context of Pakistan's use of the Chinese-made PL-15 long-range missile, which India's air defences shot down during Operation Sindoor, as we wrote in our last tracker.
During Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar's three-day visit to China this week, both sides invoked their 'brotherly' and 'ironclad' relationship.
The Chinese government released a white paper on national security earlier this month – meant to act both as a report card of where the country stands and as a projection of its rhetoric to the world.
As the AI race between the US and China continues to intensify, Jensen Huang, CEO of the world's largest semiconductor company, Nvidia, has weighed in – saying the American efforts to squeeze China's access to cutting edge chips that are needed for advanced AI ended up making Chinese tech companies stronger.
Here is a closer look at these developments:
Dar visited China from May 19 to 21. Wang Yi, his Chinese counterpart, said 'China welcomes and supports Pakistan and India in properly handling their differences through dialogue, achieve a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire and seek fundamental solutions.'
He repeated that 'China will, as always, firmly support Pakistan in safeguarding its national sovereignty and territorial integrity.'
Wang also called for an 'upgraded version of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor', the infrastructure project under China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
Importantly, Wang and Dar met informally with Afghan Acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi in Beijing, where Afghanistan and Pakistan expressed willingness to 'elevate bilateral diplomatic relations', which have suffered in recent years.
The two sides agreed 'in principle to exchange ambassadors expeditiously'. They said the CPEC, which extends from China's Xinjiang region to Pakistan's Gwadar port, would be expanded to Afghanistan.
Wang said China respected Afghan independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, as well as the independent choices, religious beliefs and ethnic culture of the Afghan people – and supported their just struggle against foreign aggression'.
UPSHOT: A reiteration of support from China, its biggest benefactor, at a time of tensions with India, matters for Pakistan. The two countries have deepened their strategic relationship over the decades to the end of curtailing India's regional influence.
Getting Afghanistan in the mix, however, complicates the situation, given the fraught bilateral relations between Islamabad and Kabul under the Taliban. Pakistan has carried out air strikes against alleged militants on Afghan soil, and pushed back tens of thousands of Afghan refugees.
China was among the first countries to exchange ambassadors with Afghanistan under the Taliban, even though it withheld full recognition. India, which does not recognise the Taliban, has also reached out to the Afghan government in the last few months. Foreign Secretary Misri spoke to Muttaqi in January this year.
Meanwhile, CPEC has been struggling, with Baloch militant attacks hampering construction efforts. The financial returns on these massive investments remain questionable.
2. New pivot in national security white paper
The State Council Information Office, the top information office of the Chinese government, released a white paper, 'China's National Security in the New Era', this month.
The document covers multiple topics under the umbrella of national security, ranging from AI to climate change, alongside Taiwan and Hong Kong. It refers to the expansive Overall National Security Concept (ONSC), introduced in 2014 under President Xi Jinping. There is also a focus on balancing development and security.
The paper only makes one reference to India, in the context of China's border security and interests. 'China has negotiated with 12 of its 14 land neighbours to resolve land border issues, and border negotiations with India and Bhutan continue to advance,' it says.
UPSHOT: Security and stability have long been emphasised by the Chinese state with regard to the longevity of both the nation and the Communist Party. Anushka Saxena, a researcher at the Bengaluru-based think tank Takshashila Institute who focuses on the People's Liberation Army, told The Indian Express the paper implied a 'pan securitisation of everything'.
'High-level security is going to be the pillar on which development and growth are harnessed, and it is also described as a new 'red line' in the white paper.
'So, it's indirectly telling the US that open growth and economic development is a national security issue for us (China) now, and if you are going to stop that, say, through tariffs or other restrictions, it is going to be treated as a red line, just like Taiwan is a red line,' Saxena said.
But at another level, it shows China's anxiety, she said, pointing in particular to a line that says: 'Some key core technologies are still controlled by others, the foundation for economic recovery is not yet solid… affect(ing) social security and stability…'
China on Monday asked the US to 'immediately correct its wrongdoings' after the latter warned companies not to use advanced computer chips from China. These chips are crucial for training AI models (such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini).
Two days later, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said in Taipei, Taiwan, that the US policy of putting export controls on AI chips to China had been 'a failure'. He said they had contributed to reducing Nvidia's China market share from 95% to 50% over the last four years, and motivated China to hasten the production of its own chips.
The Chinese company Huawei, he said, was 'incredible in computing and network technology, all these essential capabilities to advance AI'. 'They have made enormous progress in the last several years.'
Over the last few years, the US has instituted several restrictions on the sale of AI chips to China. The AI Diffusion Rule that former President Joe Biden signed in January – but was rescinded by the Trump administration – focused on the 'most advanced' AI models and 'advanced computing integrated circuits (ICs) to protect US national security and foreign policy interests'.
Countries were classified into three tiers: total access, limited access and effective ban. While India was in the middle category, China and Russia had no access.
UPSHOT: The release of Chinese AI company DeepSeek's models in January shattered several assumptions about the state of the AI race. The company was able to build quality models at a fraction of the cost of American companies, using comparatively inexpensive chips. Soon after its launch, Nvidia's stock plummeted.
Chinese technology, and companies such as Huawei, have long faced restrictions from the US. China, too, has imposed blockades such as export controls on critical minerals gallium and germanium (used in chipmaking) to the US.
Huawei has posted high growth figures with its new smartphones and chips, driven by domestic demand. This is what Huang was likely referring to when he said the original assumption behind the diffusion rules – that China would lose the tech race if it was cut off from American advanced tech – has turned out to be incorrect.
Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India.
... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Hewlett Packard beats Q2 revenue estimates on AI demand; records $1.36 billion charge
Hewlett Packard Enterprise beat Wall Street revenue estimates for the second quarter on Tuesday, driven by demand for its artificial-intelligence servers and hybrid cloud segment. Shares of the server-maker, which also recorded an impairment charge of $1.36 billion in the reported quarter, were up 3.2% in extended trading. HPE has benefited from a surge in spending on advanced data center architecture, designed to support the complex processing needs of generative AI. The boom in GenAI has bumped up demand for HPE's AI-optimized servers, which are powered by Nvidia processors and can run complex applications. "In a very dynamic macro environment, we executed our strategy with discipline," CEO Antonio Neri said. HPE was focusing on achieving efficiencies and streamlining operations across its businesses, said CFO Marie Myers. For the quarter ended April 30, HPE posted revenue of $7.63 billion, ahead of analysts' average estimate of $7.45 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Adjusted profit per share came in at 38 cents, beating an estimate of 32 cents per share. It forecast third-quarter revenue between $8.2 billion and $8.5 billion, compared to an estimate of $8.17 billion.


Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple can inch toward India and Vietnam, but it can't leave China, with or without tariffs
By Catherine Thorbecke During US President Donald Trump 's first term, he famously toured a Texas factory and claimed credit for bringing Apple Inc . production back to America. Except the plant had been running long before he took office. And it was an 'unmitigated fiasco.' Workers in China had to be flown in to help fix the mounting manufacturing issues encountered in the US heartland. This telling anecdote from Apple in China, a gripping read by former Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee, shows how the tech giant became beholden to America's biggest geopolitical adversary. Up until this point, the book recounts how Apple flew engineers from California to China to train and collaborate with local workers to manufacture its most iconic products. Now, it seems, the tables have irreversibly turned. McGee argues that the technology transfer facilitated by Apple to China, via small decisions compounding over decades, ultimately made it the biggest corporate investor into Made in China 2025, President Xi Jinping's bold plan to end reliance on Western technology. 'Here was America's most famous tech giant volunteering to play the role of Prometheus, handing the Chinese the gift of fire,' McGee writes. Yet the overarching argument of the book — that the US company made China into the tech behemoth it is today — begs the question of why Apple didn't make the same kind of investment in the US. And amid Trump's second term, when he has repeatedly threatened tariffs on the company if it doesn't onshore manufacturing, this query has new urgency. But the reality is that Trump's nagging will never be able to recreate the ecosystem that local governments in China, with the help of Taiwanese suppliers such as Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., created to lure Apple. A simplistic answer from a scholar early in the book is that China was a 'low wages, low welfare and low human rights' nation. Suppliers could exploit a massive underclass of migrant workers, and local authorities could quickly suppress any labor unrest or media reports of it. If there were any voices I wanted to hear more of in the book, it wasn't the dozens of Cupertino, California, engineers but these Chinese workers who turned Apple into the $3-trillion-dollar company it is today. (Apple has publicly called claims in the book untrue and full of inaccuracies.) But if there's a lesson for Trump — or American consumers — here, it is that electronics manufacturing jobs can come at a high cost for workers. It's hard to imagine that these are the kinds of positions Trump's base is hoping for, in an area where automation would be welcome. China is hardly a low-wage manufacturing base anymore. Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook acknowledged this before, saying that his company produces in the country not because of labor costs but because of its legions of skilled workers. McGee argues that this upskilling is now being used to fuel innovation at homegrown tech giants such as Huawei Technologies Co. — and a direct result of Apple's investments. While the iPhone maker was chasing short-term profits, savvy suppliers in Asia were playing the long game. We've all heard about the legendary union between founder Steve Jobs and designer Jony Ive that made the iPhone a unique product. But the partnership that made it a revolutionary one, owned by more than a billion people, was between Cook and 'Uncle Terry,' McGee argues. Terry Gou, the founder of Hon Hai (better known as Foxconn), was the hyper-efficient manufacturing genius who brought the iPhone to the masses. Gou was described as obsessed with cutting costs — even if that meant diluting hand soap in factories with increasing amounts of water. One source in the book described him as worth billions in 'nickels and dimes.' But Gou recognized the value of working with Apple wasn't just profits: It was the tacit knowledge that he and his team would receive from the engineers shipped over from California to help set up and run the factories. This learning was invaluable, Gou understood, and made even losing money to get Apple orders worth it. Ultimately, the high-tech manufacturing ecosystem built up in China took decades, marked not just by the factories producing its iconic goods but by the creation of sub-suppliers nearby and an army of skilled engineers. It will be nearly impossible for Trump to try to recreate this during his four-year term. The US could start by focusing investments in vocational education and engineering, but policymakers should recognize that catching up now requires a strategic long game. And all the years it took to develop a reliance on China means it's not Trump's tariff threats that pose the biggest existential threat to Apple. It's Beijing. Uncoupling too fast risks angering local authorities, but not doing so quickly enough makes it even harder for it to inevitably be done. As this book convincingly argues, Apple can inch toward India and Vietnam, but it can't leave China anytime soon.


Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tecno India says building components ecosystem with Dixon, to expand R&D focus
NEW DELHI: Transsion Group 's Tecno said domestic manufacturing of electronic components will support innovation in the country and contribute to the brand's long-term success in India. 'The ( electronic components manufacturing ) scheme supports local innovation, which is critical to our long-term success in India. We plan to continue to expand our local research & development and production capabilities to tailor our products to the needs of Indian consumers,' Arijeet Talapatra, chief executive officer (CEO), Tecno India , told ETTelecom. He said that Tecno and homegrown contract electronics manufacturer, Dixon Technologies , are jointly working to build a domestic electronics component ecosystem in India, supported by the ECMS 2.0 scheme. Atul Lall, MD of Dixon, said during the company's most recent earnings call that Transsion and Dixon have a joint venture (JV) in the electronic components domain to deepen manufacturing initiatives domestically. The Central government, earlier this year, notified the electronics components manufacturing scheme (ECMS) with an outlay of over ₹23,000-crore, which aims to drive the local manufacturing of sub-assemblies, bare components, and selected bare components such as display and camera sub-assemblies, passive components, multi-layered printed circuit boards (PCBs), Li-ion cells, and others. Ashwini Vaishnaw, union minister for electronics & IT, told news agency PTI in a recent interview that the government has received 70 applications for this scheme, with a majority of applicants from the small and medium enterprises sector. Talapatra further said that Tecno is actively pursuing to develop localised artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and collaborating to improve the design of its smartphones to differentiate against rivals. It has established a new R&D centre in Noida with up to 60 engineers, which will drive the development of new AI features and regional product design for India, Bangladesh, and Nepal. According to the executive, the smartphone maker expects to grow at 200% year-on-year in the ₹15,000 to ₹20,000 5G smartphone segment , led by the rural markets, as demand in the urban regions starts maturing. 'We are strategically intensifying our focus on the ₹15,000 to ₹20,000 smartphone segment, which is currently the fastest-growing category in India, to cater to aspirational consumers seeking premium features at accessible prices,' the chief executive said. 'The demand for affordable yet feature-rich 5G phones is also growing rapidly in tier-2 and tier-3 cities,' he added. Transssion operates three brands in India – iTel, for budget-grade feature phones and smartphones; Tecno, for mid-range devices; and Infinix, for the premium, or flagship segment. Tecno India, according to the top executive, is focusing on a balanced growth strategy. 'We are emphasising profitability and volume at the same time. Backed by a strong global supply chain, we are aiming at further cost efficiency, and we will launch smartphones across all price points, including a ₹80,000 Tecno device,' he said.