A rare ‘Black Moon' will appear in the sky this month. Here's when
Later in August, a rare Black Moon will be seen — or rather, hidden — in the night sky. A Black Moon is the moniker for a third new moon out of four in an astronomical season, instead of the usual three, as Time and Date described.
The western half of the Western Hemisphere is expected to 'see' the Black Moon starting before 12 a.m. on Aug. 22, according to Time and Date. For the rest of the world, the Black Moon will occur after 12 a.m. on Aug. 23, including for the central and eastern United States.
Black Moons happen once every 33 months, with the next one expected on Aug. 20, 2028, when it is also expected to be a supermoon, Time and Date stated. The previous Black Moon was on April 30, 2022.
In the lunar cycle, new moons take place roughly every month, according to NASA. As people likely know, the moon is invisible in the night sky when it reaches its new moon phase. The illuminated side of the moon faces the sun while the night side faces Earth.
Given that a new moon means the night sky is free from the moon's illumination, the night of a Black Moon is a perfect time for stargazing and using a telescope to view the planets and stars in the sky.
More news about the night sky
Ongoing meteor shower could produce exploding fireballs of color and light this week
A fake solar eclipse? European satellites photograph 'eclipse-making' mission
Strawberries on the brain? This full moon could be the treat for you
Here are 10 NASA missions that could be grounded under Trump's 2026 budget
Selfie on Mars? Here's how NASA caught a new glimpse of the Martian surface
Read the original article on MassLive.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NASA intern stole $21M of Lunar to use during sex to have ‘sex on the moon'
He promised her the Moon — and meant it. More than 23 years ago, NASA intern Thad Roberts hatched a daring plan to steal 17 pounds of moon rocks and a meteorite from Houston's Johnson Space Center — priceless samples from every Apollo mission, locked in a 600-pound safe and valued at $21 million, according to the FBI. Only 24 years old with a triple major in physics, geology, and geophysics at the University of Utah, with a wife he was supporting back in Utah, and financially struggling, Roberts thought his plan was foolproof. The first step was finding a buyer. With help from friend Gordon McWhorter, Roberts connected online with a potential Belgian purchaser willing to pay $1,000 to $5,000 per gram. The buyer, however, grew suspicious and alerted the FBI, who instructed him to keep talking while they investigated. Around this time, he met Tiffany Fowler, a 22-year-old NASA intern conducting stem cell research. Their friendship quickly became romantic, and after three weeks, they moved in together. When Roberts revealed his plan, Fowler agreed to help. They recruited another NASA intern, Shae Saur, and one night the trio used their NASA IDs to slip into the Johnson Space Center, making off with the entire safe. Back at the hotel, they cracked it open with a power saw. On July 20, 2002—the 33rd anniversary of the first moon landing—Roberts and Fowler drove to Orlando to meet family members of the Belgian buyer. While waiting, Roberts placed moon rocks beneath the bed covers, later claiming the couple had 'sex on the moon' as a symbolic gesture. 'I take some of the moon rocks and I put them underneath the blanket on the bed… I never said anything but I'm sure she could feel it,' he told CBS News in 2012. 'It was more about the symbol of what we were doing, basically having sex on the moon. It's more uncomfortable than not, but it wasn't about the comfort at that point. It was about the expression. And no one had ever had sex on the moon before. I think we can safely say that.' When they met with the supposed buyers, they were instead greeted by undercover FBI agents. The moon rocks were recovered from their hotel room, though the FBI reported they were now 'virtually useless to the scientific community' and that the heist destroyed three decades of handwritten research notes by a NASA scientist. After his arrest, Roberts admitted to also stealing dinosaur bones and fossils from the Natural History Museum in Salt Lake City. When asked why he stole the moon rocks, Robert told CBS News he 'wasn't' looking at it like stealing at the time. 'We weren't going to take this money we were getting from it to go buy a yacht or lots of cars or a big house. We were gonna live just the small kind of lifestyle we were, but fund science that might change the world, you know?' he said. In the end, Roberts, Fowler, and Saur all pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit theft and interstate transportation of stolen property. Roberts was sentenced to eight years in federal prison, serving six. Fowler and Saur each received 180 days of house arrest and 150 hours of community service. McWhorter, convicted at trial, was given six years in prison. Roberts and Fowler never saw each other again. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NASA launches second phase of moon recycling competition
Aug. 11 (UPI) -- NASA is launching the second phase of its moon recycling competition to clean up trash in space. The space agency's LunaRecycle Challenge is looking for the brightest minds to figure out a way to recycle plastics, foams and metals left behind by ongoing activity and building in space. "NASA is eager to see how reimagining these materials can be helpful to potential future planetary surface missions," said Jennifer Edmunson, acting program manager for Centennial Challenges at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama. "I'm confident focusing on the most critical trash items -- and integration of the prototype and digital twin competition tracks -- will yield remarkable solutions," Edmunson added, "that could enable a sustainable human presence off-Earth and transform the future of space exploration." As the United States discusses replacing the International Space Station and placing a small nuclear reactor on the moon, the potential for increased waste in space is growing. LunaRecycle's Phase 1 competition attracted record-breaking interest with more than 1,200 registrations. Seventeen teams, from five countries and nine U.S. states, were named winners in that challenge. For Phase 2, only U.S. individuals and teams may participate and must build a physical prototype to manage a year's worth of trash. The challenge estimates a crew of four astronauts would produce more than 4,600 pounds of single-use waste to include food packaging and discarded clothing. The goal for competitors is to recycle the waste, while minimizing crew time and any hazards. Submissions for NASA's LunaRecycle milestone round, which is being administered by the University of Alabama, are open now and due January 2026. Finalists from that round will be announced in February with up to 20 finalists competing in the challenge's in-person prototype demonstrations next August. Successful solutions in both rounds could net winners cash prizes totaling $2 million. Solve the daily Crossword
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Medical journal rejects RFK Jr.'s call for retraction of vaccine study
Aug 11 (Reuters) - An influential U.S. medical journal is rejecting a call from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to retract a large Danish study that found that aluminum ingredients in vaccines do not increase health risks for children, the journal's editor told Reuters. Kennedy has long promoted doubts about vaccines' safety and efficacy, and as health secretary has upended the federal government's process for recommending immunization. A recent media report said he has been considering whether to initiate a review of shots that contain aluminum, which he says are linked to autoimmune diseases and allergies. The study, which was funded by the Danish government and published in July in the Annals of Internal Medicine, analyzed nationwide registry data for more than 1.2 million children over more than two decades. It did not find evidence that exposure to aluminum in vaccines had caused an increased risk for autoimmune, atopic or allergic, or neurodevelopmental disorders. The work is by far the best available evidence on the question of the safety of aluminum in vaccines, said Adam Finn, a childhood vaccination expert in the UK and pediatrician at the University of Bristol, who was not involved in the study. "It's solid, (a) massive dataset and high-quality data," he said. More: Trump's ex-surgeon general slams RFK Jr.'s vaccine cuts: 'People are going to die' Kennedy described the research as "a deceitful propaganda stunt by the pharmaceutical industry," and said the scientists who authored it had "meticulously designed it not to find harm" in a detailed Aug. 1 opinion piece on TrialSite News, an independent website focused on clinical research. He called on the journal to "immediately retract" the study. "I see no reason for retraction," Dr. Christine Laine, editor in chief of the Annals and a professor of medicine at Thomas Jefferson University, said in an interview. The journal plans to respond to criticism the article has received on its website, Laine said, but it does not intend to respond directly to Kennedy's piece, which was not submitted to the Annals. The lead author of the study, Anders Peter Hviid, head of the epidemiology research department at the Statens Serum Institut in Denmark, defended the work in a response post to TrialSite. He wrote that none of the critiques put forward by Kennedy were substantive and he categorically denied any deceit as implied by the secretary. More: Trump admin orders federal agencies to scrub all worker COVID vaccination records "I am used to controversy around vaccine safety studies - especially those that relate to autism, but I have not been targeted by a political figurehead in this way before," Hviid said in an emailed response to Reuters. "I have confidence in our work and in our ability to reply to the critiques of our study." Kennedy had a number of critiques, including the lack of a control group, that the study deliberately excluded different groups of children to avoid showing a link between aluminum and childhood health conditions - including those with the highest levels of exposure - and that it did not include the raw data. Hviid responded to the criticisms on TrialSite. He said some of the points were related to study design choices that were reasonable to discuss but refuted others, including that the study was designed not to find a link. In fact he said, its design was based on a study led by Matthew Daley, a pediatrician at Kaiser Permanente Colorado, which did show a link, and which Kennedy cited in his article. More: There's a war brewing between medical groups and RFK Jr. It's about to explode. There was no control group because in Denmark, only 2% of children are unvaccinated, which is too small for meaningful comparison, Hviid added. The data is available for researchers to analyze, but individual-level data is not released under Danish law, he said. Other prominent vaccine skeptics including those at the antivaccine organization Kennedy previously ran, Children's Health Defense, have similarly criticized the study on the Annals site. TrialSite staff defended the study for its scale, data transparency and funding while acknowledging the limitations of its design, a view seconded by some outside scientists. Laine said that while some of the issues Kennedy raised in his article may underscore acceptable limitations of the study, "they do not invalidate what they found, and there's no evidence of scientific misconduct." An HHS spokesman said the department had "no further comment than what the secretary said." (Reporting by Michael Erman in New York and Jennifer Rigby in London; Editing by Michele Gershberg, Caroline Humer and Mark Porter)
