Trump's budget bill is closer to becoming law - here are the remaining sticking points
The bill narrowly cleared the Senate, or upper chamber of Congress, on Tuesday. Vice-President JD Vance cast a tie-breaking vote after more than 24 hours of debate and resistance from some Republican senators.
It could prove equally tricky for Trump's allies to pass the bill through the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson hopes to hold a vote as early as Wednesday.
The lower chamber approved an earlier version of the bill in May with a margin of just one vote, and this bill must now be reconciled with the Senate version.
Both chambers are controlled by Trump's Republicans, but within the party several factions are fighting over key policies in the lengthy legislation.
Sticking points include the question of how much the bill will add to the US national deficit, and how deeply it will cut healthcare and other social programmes.
During previous signs of rebellion against Trump at Congress, Republican lawmakers have ultimately fallen in line.
Facing intense pressure, House must decide if Trump's bill is good enough
What's in Trump's budget bill?
Trump and Musk feud again over budget plans
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the version of the bill that was passed on Tuesday by the Senate could add $3.3tn (£2.4tn) to the US national deficit over the next 10 years. That compares with $2.8tn that could be added by the earlier version that was narrowly passed by the House.
The deficit means the difference between what the US government spends and the revenue it receives.
This outraged the fiscal hawks in the conservative House Freedom Caucus, who have threatened to tank the bill.
Many of them are echoing claims made by Elon Musk, Trump's former adviser and campaign donor, who has repeatedly lashed out at lawmakers for considering a bill that will ultimately add to US national debt.
Shortly after the Senate passed the bill, Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina, a Freedom Caucus member, called the move "unconscionable".
"What the Senate did, I'll vote against it here and I'll vote against it on the floor," he added.
Norman's colleague from Texas, Chip Roy, was also quick to signal his frustration.
"I think the odds are a hell of a lot lower than they were even 48 hours ago or 72 hours ago based on the deal-cutting that I just saw," Roy said in response to a question about meeting Trump's 4 July deadline.
Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris of Tennessee told Fox News that "a group of us are not going to vote to advance the bill until we iron out some of the deficit problems".
"Mr Musk is right, we cannot sustain these deficits," Harris continued. "He understands finances, he understands debts and deficits, and we have to make further progress."
On Tuesday, Conservative Congressman Andy Ogles went as far as to file an amendment that would completely replace the Senate version of the bill, which he called a "dud", with the original House-approved one.
Meanwhile, Ohio Republican Warren Davison posted on X: "Promising someone else will cut spending in the future does not cut spending." He added: "We will eventually arrive at the crash site, because it appears nothing will stop this runaway spending train. A fatal overdose of government."
Beyond fiscal hawks, House Republican leadership will also have to contend with moderates in their party who represent more liberal-leaning states and key swing districts that helped the party rise to power in the November election.
"I've been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers," said Congressman David Valadao, who represents a swing district in California. This echoes the criticism of opposition Democrats.
Other Republicans have signalled a willingness to compromise. Randy Fine, from Florida, told the BBC he had frustrations with the Senate version of the bill, but that he would vote it through the House because "we can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good".
Representatives from poorer districts are worried about the Senate version of the bill harming their constituents, which could also hurt them at the polls in 2026. According to the Hill, six Republicans planning to vote down the bill due to concerns about cuts to key provisions, including cuts to medical coverage.
Some of the critical Republicans have attacked the Senate's more aggressive cuts to Medicaid, the healthcare programme relied upon by millions of low-income Americans.
House Republicans had wrestled over how much to cut Medicaid and food subsidies in the initial version their chamber passed. They needed the bill to reduce spending, in order to offset lost revenue from the tax cuts contained in the legislation.
The Senate made steeper cuts to both areas in the version passed on Tuesday.
Changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (better known as Obamacare) in the Senate's bill would see roughly 12 million Americans lose health insurance by 2034, according to a CBO report published on Saturday.
Under the version originally passed by the House, a smaller number of 11 million Americans would have had their coverage stripped, according to the CBO.
Discussing the Medicaid issue with former Trump adviser and conservative podcaster Steve Bannon, Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene was asked whether the House might simply "rubber stamp" the Senate version.
The right-wing House member and Trump loyalist responded that there was not enough support to get the bill through the House, using strong language to suggest the situation was a mess.
"I think it's far from over," she said. "It's really a dire situation. We're on a time clock that's really been set on us, so we have a lot of pressure."
The bill also deals with the question of how much taxpayers can deduct from the amount they pay in federal taxes, based on how much they pay in state and local taxes (Salt). This, too, has become a controversial issue.
There is currently a $10,000 cap, which expires this year. Both the Senate and House have approved increasing this to $40,000.
But in the Senate-approved version, the cap would return to $10,000 after five years. This change could pose a problem for some House Republicans.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
House GOP clears key hurdle on Trump's big bill, pushing it closer to vote
WASHINGTON — House Republicans are preparing to vote on President Donald Trump's $4.5 trillion tax breaks and spending cuts bill early Thursday, up all night as GOP leaders and the president himself worked to persuade skeptical holdouts to drop their opposition and deliver by their Fourth of July deadline. Final debates began in the pre-dawn hours after another chaotic day, and night, at the Capitol. House Speaker Mike Johnson insisted the House would meet the holiday deadline, with just days to go after the Senate approved the package on the narrowest of margins and Vice President JD Vance breaking a tie vote.
CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Here's who stands to gain from the ‘big, beautiful bill.' And who may struggle
President Donald Trump has promised that the 'big, beautiful bill' passed by the Senate and being considered by the House of Representatives will be one of the most successful pieces of legislation in American history. Of course, the ultimate beauty of this sweeping legislation is very much in the eye of the beholder. The bill could end up boosting some workers and industries, while others may be left worse off. Corporate America Big business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable, applauded the Senate's passage of the bill on Tuesday. Corporations are betting they will benefit from the legislation making permanent the tax breaks in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Manufacturers Manufacturers are especially happy that the bill would make significant changes to how the US tax code treats the construction of new manufacturing facilities. If the bill passes, businesses would be allowed to fully and immediately deduct the cost of building new manufacturing facilities. This temporary provision is retroactive to January 19, 2025 and continues for construction that begins before January 1, 2029. And in a bid to incentivize more chipmaking in America, the legislation would enhance tax credits for semiconductor firms building manufacturing facilities in the United States. Small businesses and partnerships The National Federation of Independent Business, the leading small business lobbying group, praised the legislation for making permanent a special deduction for the owners of certain pass-through entities who pay businesses taxes on their individual tax returns. That deduction, which applies to small businesses and partnerships formed by lawyers, doctors and investors, would get increased in the House version of the bill from 20% to 23%. The Senate bill kept it at 20%. High-income Americans The net income for the top 20% of earners would increase by nearly $13,000 per year, after taxes and transfers, according to an analysis of a near-final version of the Senate bill by Penn Wharton Budget Model. That amounts to a 3% average increase in income for those households. For the top 0.1% of earners, the average annual income gain would amount to more than $290,000, according to Penn Wharton. Americans living in high-tax states should also benefit from the Senate version of the legislation because it temporarily increases limits on deductions for state and local taxes for householders making up to $500,000 annually to $40,000 per year for five years. However, millionaires who lose their jobs will not be able to collect unemployment benefits, according to a recent provision added to the Senate bill. Workers who receive tips and overtime Certain workers will receive an extra tax break through 2028. Employees who work in jobs that traditionally receive tips could deduct up to $25,000 in tip income from their federal income taxes, while workers who receive overtime could deduct up to $12,500 of that extra pay. However, highly compensated individuals, who make more than $160,000 in 2025, would not qualify. Low-income Americans Many people at the lowest end of the income ladder would be worse off because the package would enact historic cuts to the nation's safety net program, particularly Medicaid and food stamps. Among the many changes to these programs would be the addition of federally mandated work requirements to Medicaid for the first time in its 60-year history and the expansion of the work mandate in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, the formal name for food stamps. Parents of children ages 14 and up are among those who would have to work, volunteer, take classes or participate in job training to keep their benefits. Millions of low-income Americans are expected to lose their benefits because of the work requirements and the bill's other measures affecting Medicaid and food stamps. Notably, few of those dropped from Medicaid coverage would have access to job-based health insurance, according to a Congressional Budget Office report about the House version of the package. The health provisions won't only hit low-income Americans. The Senate is also tightening verification requirements for the Affordable Care Act's federal premium subsidies, which could also leave some middle-income Americans uninsured. All told, the bill could result in more than 10 million more people being uninsured in 2034, according to a CNN analysis of the bill and CBO forecasts. Hospitals Hospitals are not happy with the health care provisions of the bill, which would reduce the support they receive from states to care for Medicaid enrollees and leave them with more uncompensated care costs for treating uninsured patients. 'The real-life consequences of these nearly $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts – the largest ever proposed by Congress – will result in irreparable harm to our health care system, reducing access to care for all Americans and severely undermining the ability of hospitals and health systems to care for our most vulnerable patients,' said Rick Pollack, CEO of the American Hospital Association. The association said it is 'deeply disappointed' with the bill, even though it contains a $50 billion fund to help rural hospitals contend with the Medicaid cuts, which hospitals say is not nearly enough to make up for the shortfall. Clean energy and EVs The Senate removed a last-minute excise tax on wind and solar that experts warned would have been a 'killer' for the clean energy industry. However, the Senate bill still strips tax incentives for wind, solar and other renewable energy projects by 2027 and gives developers stringent requirements to claim them. The American Clean Power Association slammed the legislation as a 'step backward for American energy policy' that will eliminate jobs and raise electric bills. Electric vehicle makers could also be left worse off because the GOP bill ends EV tax credits of up to $7,500 at the end of September. Previously those tax credits were scheduled to last through 2032, providing a powerful incentive for car buyers. Deficit hawks The Senate version of the package would increase the deficit by about $3.4 trillion over the next decade, according to CBO. Adding trillions to the debt risks lifting already elevated interest rates. That in turn will make it more expensive for Americans to finance the purchase of a car or a home and for businesses to borrow money to grow. Not only that, but higher rates would force the federal government to devote even greater resources to finance its own mountain of debt. The CBO expects US federal government interest costs to surpass $1 trillion per year. US spending on interest has already more than tripled since 2017, surpassing what the federal government's entire defense budget.
News24
26 minutes ago
- News24
Ukraine scrambles to build ‘our common interest' as US pares back weapons
Ukraine sought clarity on a US announcement that it was halting some weapons shipments. US officials downplayed the shift in policy. Russia celebrated the US policy, saying it would bring the war to an end. US officials on Wednesday downplayed a White House announcement that Washington was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, after the war-battered country was caught off-guard and appealed for clarity. Ukraine is contending with some of Russia's largest missile and drone attacks of the three-year war, and a halt to the provision of munitions - especially for air defence - would be a significant blow to Kyiv. 'The Department of Defence continues to provide the president with robust options regarding military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end,' Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told journalists on Wednesday. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce meanwhile told reporters that 'this is not a cessation of us assisting Ukraine or of providing weapons. This is one event, and one situation, and we'll discuss what else comes up in the future.' The White House said on Tuesday that it is halting some key weapons shipments to Ukraine that were promised under the Biden administration, without providing details on which weapons programmes were affected. READ | US blocks some weapons for Ukraine desperate to fight Russia as priorities shift It said the decision was taken after a review of US defence needs and of its military assistance to foreign countries. Moscow revelled in the decision, saying that it could bring the end of the war closer. Politico and other US media reported that missiles for Patriot air defence systems, precision artillery and Hellfire missiles are among the items being held back. But the State Department's Bruce said on Wednesday that 'the president has also indicated his remaining commitment regarding Patriot missiles,' Bruce said, referring to an air defence system that has played a key role in defending against Russian attacks. Kyiv has long feared halts to US aid after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, having criticised the tens of billions of dollars in support and weapons sent by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in an evening address that Kyiv and Washington were clarifying details on supplies. Continued American support for Ukraine, for our defence, for our people is in our common interest. Volodymyr Zelensky The Ukrainian foreign ministry summoned John Ginkel, the deputy chief of mission at the US embassy in Kyiv, in a rare diplomatic move that is usually reserved for foes and rivals, not vital allies, indicative of the uncertainty about what the cuts would mean for Kyiv. Under Biden, Washington spearheaded Western support for Ukraine, with Congress having approved more than $100 billion in aid, including $43 billion in weaponry. Trump instead has pushed the two sides into peace talks, including in phone calls with Russian President Vladimir Putin - who rejected pleas for a ceasefire and demanded that Ukraine cede more territory if it wants Moscow to halt its invasion, which was launched in 2022. Trump has refused to announce new aid packages and Kyiv has been corralling Washington's European allies to step up their support. Jose Colon/Anadolu via Getty Images Kyiv remains 'seriously dependent' on US arms supplies, a high-ranking source in the Ukrainian military told AFP. 'Europe is doing its best, but it will be difficult for us without American ammunition,' the source added. A May report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said that Europe 'had only made limited progress' in strengthening its defence industries. But it said that 'continued US aid remains extremely important for Ukraine's long-term effectiveness on the battlefield'. In Moscow, the Kremlin said that reducing weapons deliveries to Kyiv would help end the conflict. 'The fewer the number of weapons that are delivered to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation,' Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters in response to a question by AFP, using Russia's term for its more than three-year-long offensive. Oleksandr Gusev/Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Russia ramped up attacks on Ukraine in June, launching nearly twice as many missiles and more than 30% more drones than in May, according to an AFP analysis of Ukrainian air force data. Kyiv was in June subjected to at least four fatal attacks that left more than 40 people dead. Its residents are worried that a cessation of US aid would leave the capital even more vulnerable. 'We had gotten used to seeing America as a country of values, a country that defends democracy,' Igor Stambol, a Kyiv resident, told AFP. 'But there is hope that they will remember their values,' the 36-year-old added.
