
COP30 must make good on past commitments
At last month's 62nd session of the United Nations Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies (SB62) in Bonn — the mid-year negotiations intended to lay the groundwork for November's UN Climate Change Conference (COP30) in Belém — countries got so hung up on the details of the agenda that little progress was made. Such delays have long characterised the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, but they are at odds with scientific reality, which demands rapid and unified action.
Building consensus is thus a key challenge facing Brazil's COP30 presidency. The task ahead is formidable — not only because of the challenges inherent in the UNFCCC process, but also because four interconnected global developments are undermining trust and impeding multilateral cooperation.
First, the global-governance architecture, with the UN at its core, is showing signs of disarray. Institutions that were designed to nurture and facilitate cooperation are increasingly hamstrung by bureaucratic inertia and outdated organisational structures.
Second, the rise of transactional diplomacy has meant countries prioritise their own short-term interests over collective long-term needs. This approach — based on a narrow conception of national interest — effectively precludes broad-based cooperation, as it erodes the norms that have traditionally underpinned international engagement.
Third, compromise is increasingly being rejected in favour of 'realism", leading to extreme polarisation and entrenched negotiating positions. Multilateral negotiations regularly come down to the wire, and the results are often disappointing, further encouraging transactional engagement at the expense of cooperation and compromise.
Finally, climate change is increasingly taking a back seat to other challenges, with armed conflicts, a global trade slowdown, intensifying growth headwinds, and record debt levels consuming countries' political attention, diplomatic space and financial resources.
Brazil clearly has its work cut out for it. Above all, it must resist the tendency for COP presidencies to emphasise fresh agreements and ambitious commitments – the kind that grab headlines and make the negotiations look like a smashing success but often fall short when the hard work of implementation begins. Brazil's COP30 presidency must eschew flashy results in favour of pragmatic pathways to deliver on past commitments.
Fortunately, Brazil recognises this. Its Fourth Letter to the International Community outlines an Action Agenda aimed at making progress on what the world has 'already collectively agreed' during previous COPs and in the Paris climate agreement. Specifically, the Agenda seeks to leverage existing initiatives to complete the implementation of the first 'global stocktake' under the Paris agreement, which was concluded at COP28.
This focus on previously agreed outcomes is well-suited to the current geopolitical context, in which any agreement can be difficult to reach. Representatives at the SB62 in Bonn did not achieve a consensus, and last month's G7 summit failed to deliver a joint communiqué. Rather than perpetuating stalemates, the Action Agenda invites stakeholders to make progress where agreement already exists.
The Agenda also charts the way forward. It is organised into six thematic 'axes", including stewarding forests, oceans and biodiversity; transforming agriculture and food systems; and building resilience for cities, infrastructure and water. 'Unleashing enablers and accelerators' in finance, technology and capacity-building — the final, cross-cutting axis — will accelerate implementation at scale.
Since responsibility for the implementation and governance of climate policy is distributed among many actors – which must have some level of trust that others are doing their part – the Agenda also establishes 'transparency, monitoring and accountability' as top priorities. To this end, Brazil's COP30 presidency should seek to deliver a set of shared principles and supportive mechanisms.
As COP30 Special Envoys, we extend our full support to the Action Agenda. By emphasising consolidation, rather than spectacle, Brazil is setting the stage for a highly productive COP30 – one focused on bridging divides, building trust and delivering genuine progress. The task ahead is daunting, but the chance to rebuild momentum is real. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Observer
21 hours ago
- Observer
Oman condemns Israeli Knesset's bill on West Bank
The Sultanate of Oman has voiced its condemnation of the Israeli Knesset's approval of a draft bill calling for the imposition of Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank in Palestine. This move, Oman affirmed, represents yet another defiance of international law, the resolutions of the international community, and a deliberate undermining of Middle East peace efforts, the Palestinian people's right to self-determination and the two-state solution. In a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry, Oman reiterates its vehement rejection of Israel's continued enforcement of policies of blockade and starvation, as well as its obstruction of food, medicine and humanitarian aid to the population in the Gaza Strip and the rest of the occupied Palestinian territories. It holds Israel and its supporters fully responsible for the legal, humanitarian and political consequences of these practices, which violate the international humanitarian law. More than 70 Israeli lawmakers passed a motion on Wednesday urging the government to impose sovereignty over the West Bank, though the symbolic move does not affect the Palestinian territory's legal status. The non-binding vote in Israel's parliament, the Knesset, was backed by members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing coalition, as well as some opposition lawmakers. 'Sovereignty in Judea and Samaria' — the name Israel uses for the West Bank, which it has occupied since 1967 — was 'an integral part of the realisation of Zionism and the national vision of the Jewish people', the text stated. It passed by a vote of 71 to 13, with 36 other lawmakers absent. Some 500,000 Israelis live in settlements in the West Bank, which is home to around three million Palestinians. Israeli settlement there is regularly condemned by the UN and is considered illegal under international law. Meanwhile, more than 100 international humanitarian organisations have called on governments around the world to immediately open all land crossings into Gaza, restore full access to food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter materials and fuel, and to support a UN-led humanitarian mechanism, alongside an immediate and lasting ceasefire. In a joint statement, humanitarian organisations said that aid workers are now standing in food lines, risking gunfire, just to feed their families, while the Israeli occupation government's blockade continues to starve Gaza's population. — Agencies


Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Oman condemns Israeli Knesset's bill to impose sovereignty on West Bank
Muscat: The Sultanate of Oman strongly condemned the Israeli Knesset's approval of a bill calling for the imposition of Israeli sovereignty over the occupied West Bank, describing it as a blatant violation of international law and UN resolutions. In a statement issued by the Foreign Ministry, Oman warned that such actions undermine international legitimacy, threaten the prospects for lasting peace in the Middle East, and violate the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and the two-state solution. The statement also reiterated Oman's strong denunciation of Israel's continued imposition of a blockade and starvation policy in the occupied Palestinian territories, especially in Gaza, including the obstruction of humanitarian aid such as food and medicine. Oman held Israel fully responsible for the legal, humanitarian, and political consequences of these practices, which constitute a clear breach of international humanitarian law.


Times of Oman
2 days ago
- Times of Oman
Over 1.1 million Afghans deported from Iran, UN rushes aid amid crisis
Kabul: Zia, an Afghan man who left for Iran seven years ago in search of a better future, now finds himself in dire conditions in a returnee camp in Kabul after being forcibly deported, Tolo News reported. Zia, now living with his children in one of the makeshift camps, spoke about the harsh treatment faced during their migration and their current struggles. "We were under pressure, they fined us and deported us, and now we are left with only 200 million tomans, of which only 100 million have been given to us to cover our expenses. The UN also provides aid that's neither enough to live nor to die. Our request is for help. We have no home now," Zia told Tolo News. According to Tolo News, Zia's story reflects the situation of thousands of other Afghan returnees who continue to live between the pain of exile and homelessness in their homeland. The hardships are visibly etched on the faces of his children, shaped by years of displacement in Iran and now life without shelter in Afghanistan. In response to the worsening crisis, Tom Fletcher, the UN's Emergency Relief Coordinator, has allocated $10 million from the Central Emergency Response Fund to assist returnees from Iran. The announcement was made by Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General, Tolo News reported. "There's been a surge of returns from Iran in recent weeks. The new funding will help expand support for the most vulnerable, including women and children, as they arrive in and in their areas of return," Dujarric said. As per Tolo News, the funds aim to bolster life-saving assistance at the borders and provide aid to vulnerable groups. According to UN data, nearly 339,000 people have returned from Iran to Afghanistan in just the first twelve days of July, with over 60 percent being families and 43 percent children under the age of 18. Filippo Grandi, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, raised the issue of forced deportations during his recent visit to Tehran, urging Iranian officials to halt such actions. The developments come amid increasing pressure on Afghan migrants in Iran, according to Tolo News. Meanwhile, Mohammad Jamal Muslim, a migrant rights activist, expressed disappointment over the UN's approach. "Multilateral meetings might send a message to governments, but unfortunately, on critical issues, the UN takes a selective approach toward Third World countries and has so far done nothing meaningful for the citizens who are in need," he told Tolo News.