Leicestershire probation service rated 'inadequate' by inspectors
The probation service in Leicestershire and Rutland has been rated "inadequate" for the second time in three years following visits by inspectors.Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland Probation Delivery Unit (PDU) was inspected by HM Inspectorate of Probation in March.The inspection found the delivery of services to reduce the risk of harm posed by people on probation "insufficient" in most cases.Martin Jones, chief inspector of probation said there had been "encouraging signs of improvement" since the 2022 inspection which concluded that services in the area were "inadequate".
The HM Inspectorate report said the PDU was one of the "largest" by overall caseload in England and Wales, with offices in Leicester, Coalville and Loughborough.
'Lack of liaison'
Mr Jones said: "Since the previous inspection in 2022 the PDU has faced ongoing challenges including high staff turnover, elevated sickness rates and, like all PDUs and regions, a prolonged period of significant and frequent changes linked to early prison releases."Only in the past six months has there been a noticeable shift towards improvement."The inspection found the leadership team at the PDU was "well-respected" and staff across all grades said they felt able to provide feedback to senior managers.However, according to the report there was "a lack of professional curiosity" with practitioners not responding to new information when they received it as well as a "lack of liaison" with other agencies.The inspection also found in 24% of cases where child safeguarding information should have been requested it had not been, and in 15% of cases no request had been made for domestic abuse information when it should have been.The report made six recommendations to the PDU, including to improve the quality of work to assess and review risk of harm, and to develop practitioners' confidence and skills in the use of professional curiosity.The Ministry of Justice, which has overall control of the probation service, said the government is "on track" to recruit 2,300 more probation officers nationally by March next year.A spokesperson said: "This will help ensure offenders receive robust supervision and improve the work probation does to keep the public safe."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
New mortgage rule could add £19k to average house price
House prices could increase by 7.5pc more than expected because of changes to mortgage stress tests, research suggests. Relaxed borrowing rules could add as much as £19,425 to the average home worth £260,000 over the next five years, according to analysis by estate agents Savills. This is on top of a predicted 23.4pc increase in house prices by 2029, fuelled by anticipated drops in the Bank Rate and strong buyer demand. The average deposit needed by a first-time buyer is also predicted to fall from £58,000 to as little as £45,000 in that time, relieving pressure on the Bank of Mum and Dad. The average first-time buyer deposit in London has reached six figures, as the chart below shows. Major lenders now allow borrowers to take out mortgages of up to £40,000 more than previously allowed. Lucian Cook, of Savills, said: 'Change would not be immediate, with the impact on house prices and transactions likely to take place over a period of five years. 'But in the medium to long term, the market would feel the knock-on effect of a widening pool of buyers. This will be good news for housing delivery, but it's unlikely to be enough to allow the Government to hit its housebuilding targets.' Savills based its analysis on historical data exploring the relationship between average mortgage loans and market activity. The Government and regulators, including the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), have been calling for lenders to relax their rules. Following changes to Bank of England guidance in March, lenders relaxed their stress tests – the analysis they undertake before offering customers a mortgage. Santander became the first major bank to relax its rules after the announcement. Lloyds, HSBC, NatWest and Nationwide quickly followed suit. The changes unlocked tens of thousands of pounds of extra borrowing for more first-time buyers. The stress tests were introduced by the FCA in 2015 to prevent another 2008-style market collapse. In 2022, after Liz Truss's notorious mini-Budget, stress tests were made more rigorous, as the Bank Rate climbed. But following cuts to the Bank Rate earlier this year, borrowing is set to get cheaper. At least one more cut is predicted before 2026. Borrowers have had to prove they could afford payments on the lender's standard variable rate (SVR) plus approximately 1pc. But banks can now test based on what they believe their future rates are likely to be. This is just one of a handful of measures being considered to bring more flexibility to the mortgage market. Building societies are lobbying for powers to relax minimum income requirements for customers. The FCA is also looking at making remortgaging easier and shortening loan terms of more than 30 years, to support homeowners already on the property ladder. Emma Reynolds, the City minister, said: 'For too long politicians have ducked and dodged the decisions needed to support homeownership. 'Simplifying responsible lending rules and putting in place a permanent mortgage guarantee scheme shows our commitment to making the dream of owning a home a reality. I will work closely with regulators and industry to get this done quickly and in a way that supports as many people as possible.' Matthew Pennycook, the Housing Minister, added: 'The affordability challenges facing first-time buyers mean that we now have a generation locked out of homeownership. This government is determined to change that, ensuring that young families and hard-working renters can buy a home of their own.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
The militant ‘crabs' threatening to bring the NHS to a standstill
A militant group of doctors who use social media to recruit is driving forward strike action by resident doctors. The current co-chairs of the British Medical Association's (BMA) resident doctors' committee are members of DoctorsVote, which professes to be 'a grassroots organisation committed to advocating for the full pay restoration of UK doctors'. The group is prolific on social media, where disgruntled medics unite, often behind pseudonyms, seeking to forge ahead with more strikes designed to further boost their salaries. In spring, junior doctors – now referred to formally as resident doctors – were offered the biggest pay rise in the public sector in a bid to end years-long disruption to the NHS. The average full-time salary for a resident doctor will now be more than £54,000, the Department of Health and Social Care said – but the BMA wants another set of strikes to force another 30 per cent pay hike. The slogan: 'Be a crab, not a scab' is used to enforce picket lines, and now crustaceans can be seen on the social media accounts of advocates. The humble crab is now shorthand for strike approval. Reddit, TikTok, Instagram and X are awash with the group, which makes use of Gen Z memes and trends to promote its message. This, in tandem with a traditional TV and PR campaign, creates a potent propaganda machine. In recent years, the group has come to dominate the BMA. The co-chairs of the BMA resident doctors' committee in 2022-2024 both had roots in DoctorsVote. Their successors, Dr Melissa Ryan, a 45-year-old paediatrician from Nottingham, and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, a 29-year-old surgical trainee from Merseyside, were also elected under the same banner. DoctorsVote won 70 out of 75 seats on regional junior doctor committees across England in 2023. The fresh 30 per cent demand comes on the back of a 22 per cent pay rise that Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, and Sir Keir Starmer prioritised after Labour's landslide election win last year. Now, the Government appears to be paying the price for it negotiation tactics. As one Tory MP told The Telegraph: 'If you roll over so easily then, why would they stop now?' Or, as one anonymous doctor online put it: 'We have them by the balls. Let's squeeze.' Dr Nieuwoudt confessed earlier this week that Mr Streeting's latest offer was 'generous' – but, he said, not generous enough. The BMA sent out a leaflet to the 50,000 members who will vote on whether they are prepared to take strike action and to further the pay dispute. Half need to reply for it to progress. In the leaflet, a section of frequently asked questions includes one in which junior doctors raise concerns that they are now perceived as greedy by their registrars and consultants. They are now cognisant of the reality that they profited the most in recent years compared to other public sector professions, and are worried about how fresh action would look. And, it seems, the public shares their stance and has a diminishing perception of the strike advocates. Gone is the majority support for them to be paid more, replaced by a sense of fatigue that strikes and withdrawal of care are being used to wring out more money from the taxpayer. More people now oppose strikes than support them, a YouGov poll has found – a profound shift from last year, when more than half of people said they supported the strikes. Now, the resident doctors of DoctorsVote want to strike again. Coordination of industrial action with more senior doctors and specialists could hobble the NHS at skeleton staffing akin to Christmas Day levels. The cost to the NHS of 44 days of strike action last year was around £3 billion, according to the NHS Confederation, and this enormous cost is now also being weaponised by the movement. Dr Ryan told The Sunday Times: 'We know how much the strikes last time were disruptive to patient care and the waiting list, but we also know exactly how much they cost the government, and it was more than what it would cost to get to full pay restoration. 'Last time we ended up coordinating some action and it was immensely disruptive for patient care, and we can see that on the horizon for this Government too.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Left-wing haters need a lesson in Thatcherism
Deputising for Charles Moore in these pages from time to time is more than enough to make my imposter syndrome run wild, but emulating him by writing a biography of Margaret Thatcher when he has already written a magnificent three volume one, is perhaps inevitably a step too far. Mine will be published on Thursday but is barely a pamphlet by comparison, and perhaps has a different objective. Its aim is twofold – to introduce her to a new generation, which wasn't alive when she was in power. It's astonishing to realise that, to have ever voted for Margaret Thatcher, you would have to be at least 54 years old. In the 35 years since her fall from power, so many myths have grown up about her that many younger Brits probably think she was responsible for the slaughter of the first born. There have been only three significant prime ministers since the war whose policies still impact the way we live today – Attlee, Thatcher and Blair. As Tony Benn would have put it, they were each signposts rather than weathervanes. But today's younger generations have been indoctrinated into believing that Margaret Thatcher was privileged and her policies were only ever aimed to benefit the rich. That's presumably why she oversaw the biggest transfer to the working classes in the history of our country – by which I mean the sale of council houses and encouraging ordinary people to buy shares in privatised companies. People believe she supported the racist Apartheid regime in South Africa because she didn't impose sanctions. In fact, she did more to bring Apartheid to an end than virtually anyone else, as our then Ambassador to South Africa, Robin Renwick, has detailed in his various books. Nelson Mandela personally thanked her for her role in getting him released and bringing the evils of that regime to an end. According to Left-wing haters, Thatcher did nothing for the environment. Yet it was she who was the head of government in the world to warn of the dangers of climate change in 1989 – before most people had ever heard of the term. If I was wanting to court controversy, I could also have said she closed down most of the coal industry, something our current Government is urging China and others to do. That she was a dictator who brooked no dissent is another myth about Lady Thatcher. Yes, she would lead from the front and challenge others to defeat her argument, but there are countless occasions when people did just that and contrary to their fears, their careers prospered. It's how John Major got into the cabinet. A theme of the book is also that although she revelled in being seen as a conviction politician, in reality she was very pragmatic and realised that a bull in a china shop approach rarely achieved the desired results. Trade union reform is a case in point. Contrary to popular myth, Thatcher was not 'anti-European' and most people who knew her doubt she would have supported Brexit. Her famous Bruges speech, where she said she said 'We haven't successfully rolled back the frontiers of the state only to see them reimposed at a European level' was actually very pro-European if people took the time to read the whole thing. Woke up Did you know that men can have periods and menstruate? Nope, me neither. But that's the latest quackery promoted by the more extreme parts of the trans lobby. Their logic, presumably, is that trans men are men (just as 'transwomen are women'), and as such they continue to menstruate. Bunzl, one of the biggest toiletry suppliers in the UK, has produced an inclusive language guide, God save us. It recommends that common terms such as 'sanitary', 'hygiene' and 'feminine products' should be replaced with the term 'period products' to avoid offence. Who on earth is supposed to be offended? This sort of ridiculous virtue-signalling idiocy needs to be called out by people across the board, and not just those with Nigel and Farage in their names. Biological men cannot menstruate. Fact. And that's the end of it. Every little helps For a Government that repeatedly tells us that it is unashamedly pro-growth, it has spent much of its first year in power introducing policies which achieve the exact opposite, and the chickens are starting to come home to roost. I've lost count of the number of business people I know who have imposed recruitment freezes, had to shed workers or cancel planned pay rises as a result of the decision to increase Employers' National Insurance to 15 per cent and cut the threshold to £5,000, and in addition increase the minimum wage by 6.7 per cent. There is no form of political or economic sophistry that Rachel Reeves can deploy to persuade us that there measures are anything else but growth killers. Tesco now tell us they're planning for many of their stores to shut an hour earlier as their costs have increased by £235 million, just from the NI hike alone. Proof, were it ever needed, that actions have consequences.
