![ICE Masks Are Just Modern Ku Klux Klan Hoods [Op-Ed]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsone.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F22%2F2025%2F07%2F17521723320825.jpg%3Fquality%3D80%26strip%3Dall&w=3840&q=100)
ICE Masks Are Just Modern Ku Klux Klan Hoods [Op-Ed]
Donald Trump is barking over a proposed Democratic bill that would bar ICE and Border Patrol agents from wearing masks and covering their badges while on duty.
He's claiming that Democrats 'must hate America' for pushing such a bill. Which is ironic, given that Trump has spent years cheerleading for an American immigration policy that borrows its aesthetics and tactics straight from the Ku Klux Klan, including the convenient use of masks to terrorize the vulnerable while staying anonymous.
But this performative outrage about unmasking isn't about officer safety or patriotism. It's about protecting the same tradition of faceless, unaccountable violence that has always marked American repression. Trump knows exactly how powerful a mask can be when you want to terrorize without consequence. His own father was arrested at a Ku Klux Klan rally in Queens in 1927, back when hoods were the uniform of choice for bigots who wanted to raid and lynch with impunity while avoiding responsibility. The hood is the perfect accessory for cowards, and ICE masks are their modern update.
Trump's real complaint is that unmasking would humanize the victims and implicate the perpetrators. And God forbid we acknowledge that this isn't some neutral bureaucratic process but an organized racist infliction of suffering on people trying to survive. Trump and his allies want these agents to be able to slap on a mask, break down doors at 3 a.m., haul families away, and go home for dinner with no one knowing their names. They want the terror without the guilt. The hoods may have changed style, but the impulse is exactly the same.
What does the bill actually say?
Simply that federal agents enforcing immigration laws shouldn't be able to hide who they are. That's it. It's about basic transparency and accountability. And yet Trump is shrieking as if it's an existential threat to the republic. Why? Because he knows the effect of taking away the mask: it forces responsibility. It turns abstract cruelty into personal choice. And it reveals the humanity of the victims and the culpability of the perpetrators. Source: Michael M. Santiago / Getty
Trump loves the aesthetics of unaccountable force. He always has. In July 2020, when unidentified federal agents showed up in unmarked vans in Portland and grabbed protesters off the street, he praised them. He threatened to send federal agents into 'Democrat-run cities' without local permission, bragging about crushing dissent.
He celebrated police who used tear gas and rubber bullets on peaceful protesters outside the White House for a photo-op with a Bible. He told police officers in 2017 not to be 'too nice' when arresting suspects, encouraging rougher treatment. He threatened to deploy the military under the Insurrection Act to put down protests in the summer of 2020, describing American streets like a war zone to justify force.
He defended Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two people during unrest in Kenosha, praising him as someone who was 'trying to get away' and acting in 'self-defense.' He repeatedly called for shooting looters, invoking violent crackdowns reminiscent of past police abuses against civil rights activists. He urged governors to 'dominate' protesters, mocking them for being weak if they didn't unleash their police.
Trump wants government enforcers who can operate with impunity, who can make whole communities afraid to resist because they don't know who's coming for them next. That's the same logic the Klan used when they donned hoods and terrorized Black communities. The goal wasn't just anonymity; it was intimidation. It told Black people and other targeted groups that white supremacist violence was everywhere and no one could be held responsible.
ICE and U.S. border protection have their own long history of abuse and impunity. Border Patrol agents have been caught sharing violently racist memes and joking about migrant deaths. ICE has separated mothers from babies, retaliated against immigrants who spoke out, and 'lost' children in the system. Source: Michael M. Santiago / Getty
Many agents routinely obscure or remove nameplates. The idea that they 'need' this anonymity for safety is rich coming from a political movement that cheers when teachers get doxxed for including LGBTQ books or when librarians are threatened for 'woke' reading lists. They want school employees and activists to live in fear of being named, harassed, and punished. Transparency is apparently only dangerous when it threatens the people enforcing state violence.
Trump's entire political brand is built on stoking fear of immigrants. He called them 'rapists' and 'animals.' He oversaw family separation policies that traumatized thousands of children. He threatened to shoot migrants in the legs. He made cruelty the point. Deliberate and public cruelty designed to make people afraid to even try coming here. And he wants the agents carrying out that cruelty to stay anonymous. Because if they're faceless and untouchable, then the violence doesn't have to feel personal. No one ever has to answer for it.
That's why he's so desperate to preserve the mask. Because unmasking ruins the fantasy of righteous, impersonal enforcement. It forces the country to confront that these are real people choosing to inflict harm on other real people. It denies them the moral cover of being mere cogs in the machine. It opens the door to accountability. And Trump can't have that, because accountability is poison to the entire politics of fear he's built.
His father, Fred Trump, understood that dynamic perfectly. The KKK hoods weren't just about secrecy; they were about collective power. They let ordinary white people commit extraordinary violence while pretending they were just like everyone else when the sun came up. The hood was both a disguise and a threat. And though Trump himself doesn't wear one, he's inherited that same impulse. He wants state power to be able to terrorize without consequence.
Meanwhile, Trump's screaming about Democrats hating America is the height of projection. If you love America, you should want its agents identifiable and accountable. You should want them held to the highest standards of conduct precisely because they wield the power of the state. Trump doesn't want that. He wants them to be his shock troops, enforcing a racialized border regime in the shadows.
The truth is simple: the Klan's hoods and ICE's obscured nameplates serve the same function. They both allow the state (or its proxies) to terrorize with plausible deniability. They both depend on fear to enforce social hierarchy. And they both rely on the cowardice of those who want to inflict harm without ever being recognized for it.
We should rip the masks off. Make them show their badges. Make them answer for what they do. Because real patriotism doesn't mean cheering on secret police tactics or protecting government agents from accountability. It means refusing to let our public servants become a faceless mob. It means naming them. And it means remembering that anyone who fights that transparency is fighting for the right to terrorize in our name without consequence.
Dr. Stacey Patton is an award-winning journalist and author of 'Spare The Kids: Why Whupping Children Won't Save Black America' and the forthcoming 'Strung Up: The Lynching of Black Children In Jim Crow America.' Read her Substack here .
SEE ALSO:
ICE Agents Claim Assaults Are Reasons For Masks, But That's A Lie
Experts Sound The Alarm On New Rules For ICE Detention Center Visits
SEE ALSO
ICE Masks Are Just Modern Ku Klux Klan Hoods [Op-Ed] was originally published on newsone.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
11 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Gifford fire burns 30,000 acres in Los Padres National Forest
The Gifford fire has scorched more than 30,000 acres in less than two days in Los Padres National Forest as firefighters struggle to quell the blaze in the Sierra Madre mountains. Wildland firefighters were continuing to battle the blaze Saturday along Highway 166 in rural Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties, about 20 miles east of Santa Maria, according to the U.S. Forest Service and Cal Fire. But fire crews were faced with challenging conditions such as high temperatures, dry vegetation and rugged terrain. As of Saturday evening, the fire was 5% contained and continuing to chew through the tall, dry grass and chaparral that covers the steep hills and mountains. Evacuation orders and warnings were issued for agricultural lands near the unincorporated community of Garey. Although the fire is on federally managed land, Cal Fire crews joined the response to assist with more ground personnel and firefighting aircraft. Criticized on the social media platform X for the fire's explosive growth, Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office reiterated that the fire was not on state land. 'The #GiffordFire started on Trump's federally managed land in the Los Padres NATIONAL Forest,' read the post. 'While Trump just gutted wildfire funding, @CAL_FIRE is now stepping in to clean up what federal mismanagement helped fuel.' Newsom has criticized President Trump for cutting funding for forest management, including activities such as prescribed burning, a process that reduces the risk of explosive fires by proactively burning vegetation in a controlled environment. As of Saturday evening, a California Interagency Incident Management Team — composed of federal, state and county firefighters from various agencies, including the U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Indian Affairs, National Park Service, Cal Fire, the state's Office of Emergency Services and county-level fire departments — was tasked with taking command of the incident. The fire was first reported about 2 p.m. Friday near Los Padres National Forest's Gifford trailhead, not far from the perimeter of the recently extinguished Madre fire. According to Cal Fire, the blaze had multiple start points along Highway 166. The cause of the fire remains under investigation.
Wall Street Journal
26 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's ‘Slap in the Face' Puts Neutral Switzerland in Trade-War Crossfire
MEZZOVICO-VIRA, Switzerland—When Nicola Tettamanti looked at his phone Friday morning, his first reaction was disbelief: Overnight, President Trump had slapped Switzerland with close to the highest tariffs of any country in the world. Tettamanti is the chief executive of a 55-year-old precision toolmaking business nestled in this mountain-hugged town. He had planned in the near future to expand further into the U.S. by opening an office in Indiana.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Growing number of Jewish American groups speak out over Gaza famine
As global outrage intensifies over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, a growing number of prominent Jewish American organizations, including some traditional defenders of Israel, are speaking out and imploring the country to ensure that humanitarian aid is allowed into Gaza. This week, a UN-backed food security group warned that a 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza and health authorities there report dozens of deaths from starvation. On Sunday, the American Jewish Committee, a prominent Jewish advocacy organization, released a statement affirming that it stands with Israel in what it described as 'its justified war to eliminate the threat posed by Hamas and secure the release of the remaining hostages'. At the same time, the group called for Israel to take steps to alleviate civilian suffering. 'We feel immense sorrow for the grave toll this war has taken on Palestinian civilians, and we are deeply concerned about worsening food insecurity in Gaza,' the statement read. 'We urge Israel, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the UN, and all responsible parties involved in aid distribution to increase cooperation and coordination in order to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches Palestinian civilians in Gaza.' The GHF is an Israel- and US-backed aid group that has attracted condemnation for the killings of hundreds of civilians seeking food at the hands of Israeli forces and private contractors. The AJC statement reflected a cautious critique of Israel's aid blockade echoed by other groups noteworthy for their typically staunch support of the country, even as their statements condemned Hamas for refusing to release the Israeli hostages it continues to hold. The Reform movement in North America, which represents the largest Jewish denomination in the US, also issued a lengthy statement: 'Neither escalating military pressure nor restricting humanitarian aid has brought Israel closer to securing a hostage deal or ending the war,' it read. 'Hamas has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to sacrifice the Palestinian people in its pursuit of Israel's destruction, but Israel must not sacrifice its own moral standing in return. Starving Gazan civilians neither will bring Israel the 'total victory' over Hamas it seeks, nor can it be justified by Jewish values or humanitarian law.' The Rabbinical Assembly, a New York-based association of conservative rabbis, said last week that they were 'increasingly concerned about the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza' and called for 'urgent action to alleviate civilian suffering and ensure aid delivery'. 'Even as we believe Hamas could end this suffering immediately through the release of the hostages and care for its civilian population, the Israeli government must do everything in its power to ensure humanitarian aid reaches those in need,' it added. 'The Jewish tradition calls upon us to ensure the provision of food, water, and medical supplies as a top priority.' Jewish groups associated with the left have been prominent fixtures at protests against Israel's offensive since it began. On Tuesday, 27 rabbis and Jewish clergy affiliated with the group Jews for Food Aid for People in Gaza were arrested at a protest in the Washington office of the Senate majority leader, John Thune. But it appears clear that discomfort has significantly broadened outside the Jewish left. On Monday, eight rabbis were arrested outside the Israeli consulate in New York while protesting against the humanitarian crisis in Gaza – including clergy who had not been so outspoken before. 'The protests we've typically seen at the Israeli consulate in places like that are from the further left of the community,' Phylisa Wisdom, executive director of New York Jewish Agenda, told Gothamist. 'This represents an escalation from rabbis in this political lane.' More than 1,200 rabbis have signed a public letter calling on Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza. 'The Jewish people face a grave moral crisis, threatening the very basis of Judaism as the ethical voice that it has been since the age of Israel's prophets,' reads the letter. 'We cannot remain silent in confronting it.' The developments reflect shifting public support for Israel and the Israeli government within the US, which has accelerated as the war has gone on. A recent Gallup poll reported that support for Israel's military action in Gaza has precipitously declined among US adults, and is now at 32% – the lowest reading since Gallup first asked the question in November 2023. Support for Israel drops further among younger Americans – including US Jews. 'It's a tense time in the Jewish family group chats,' Ezra Klein wrote in a recent New York Times column. 'The consensus that held American Jewry together for generations is breaking down.' While emotional attachment to Israel is widespread among Jewish Americans, polling has consistently found that support for the state's current policies drops with age, a phenomenon perhaps best reflected in the community's support for the New York Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whom opponents have sought to tar with accusations of antisemitism over his vocal support for Palestinian rights. Despite those accusations, however, a recent poll found him leading with 67% of the votes of American Jewish voters in New York under the age of 44. That figure dropped to 25% of voters over 45. 'Zohran Mamdani's triumph in New York City's Democratic primary for mayor has forced, among many Jews, a reckoning with how far they have drifted from one another,' Klein wrote. Organizers of an action planned for Monday in New York City hope that groups that have not turned out before will do so to protest under the banner 'Jews Say: No More'. 'Our tradition teaches us that if we can protest [against] our people's actions and we don't, we are responsible,' said IfNotNow's executive director, Morriah Kaplan, in a statement to the Guardian. The group is helping organize Monday's action. 'As Jews and as Americans, whose government is funding this atrocity, we all must choose whether we want to bear responsibility for a policy of forced mass starvation.' The shift is also playing out within institutions whose members want their leaders to take a tougher stance on a country many had long reflexively supported. More than 200 alumni from Young Judaea, a Zionist youth group, this week called on the organization in an open letter to depart from its pro-Israel line to speak out against starvation in Gaza and call for a permanent ceasefire, including a release of the hostages. 'We see our families and friends, colleagues and teachers, rabbis and Jewish institutions – in Israel and abroad – join a growing movement to stand courageously in opposition to these policies,' the letter reads. 'Young Judaea cannot remain silent in this moment and maintain any moral credibility.'
