Regulatory uncertainty hits housing investment
In its latest State of Private Markets Report Elkstone - which has invested in LetsGetChecked and Flipdish - said international investors are keen to deploy capital in European property but are not convinved they can get a return if they do so in Ireland.
"When we think about interest rates and the interest cost of debt associated with it, as well as inflation and increased costs that are associated with that in terms of development - in most areas across Europe, those costs would be pushed through to the end user and the development would still have the same kind of return expectation," said Karl Rogers, chief investment officer at Elkstone.
"In this case, however, because only a portion of that goes through, the cost of the project gets increased and it goes outside of the range of institutional capital requirements - which helps create a slow up in the actual development itself," he said.
Mr Rogers said the country was between a rock and a hard place in terms of trying to protect consumers while also trying to encourage enough development to ease housing costs.
"Short term there would be more pain before the relief comes," he said. "If there isn't as much supply coming then the price is going to remain higher.
"If there was a situation where rental caps were taken away, those costs would be pushed through in the shorter term but more supply would be enabled. After a few years time that supply would catch up and should decrease the prices."
The report also highlighted short-comings in other forms of infrastructure - in particular around energy.
However it said that while the moratorium on data centre development was a bottleneck, it was actually coming because Ireland was ahead of the global trend in terms of building this industry.
And, he said, the problem was creating opportunities in other ways.
"We need to increase the supply of the grid and we're doing that through the likes of offshore winds," he said. "So instead of capital going into developing demand assets, capital is going into the development of supply increasing assets."
Meanwhile the Elkstone report highlighted a broader trend in the investment market, with larger 'mega-funds' increasingly drawing in more capital than smaller players. This was a consequence of higher risk aversion among investors.
"What that means for Ireland is that these mega-funds aren't located here - so the very, very big funds aren't located here," Mr Rogers said. "The smaller funds aren't getting as much funding - therefore it's important that both the State funding continues as well as local, private capital.
"Otherwise they're not getting the advantage of that international capital," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Extra.ie
2 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Soaring grocery bills blamed on farmers as costs rise by 20%
Soaring grocery bills are being blamed on farmers as farm-gate prices rose by almost a fifth in the past 12 months, while their costs are up by less than 1%. However, the Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) said grocery price hikes are not down to them and are due to the EU reducing the amount of food that can be produced. Latest Central Statistics Office (CSO) figures show that the most significant price increases hit cattle, which are up almost 44%, while milk rose by 12%. But the cost of production for farmers has risen in areas such as fertiliser, which shot up by 10%, and veterinary expenses, up by almost 5%. Latest Central Statistics Office (CSO) figures show that the most significant price increases hit cattle. Pic: Shutterstock The recent grocery price analysis by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) sees two reasons why food prices are going up. It reiterates the IFA's belief that Ireland is an expensive place due to higher wages, geographic location and higher costs in construction, legal services and insurance. The other reason is that food producers, such as farmers, are increasing their margins. Tadhg Buckley of the IFA refuted the idea that farmers were to blame for the hike. He said: 'There is a lot of discussion on how food prices have increased over the past three years. The price of groceries in Ireland had grown by 27%, which is below the EU average of 35%. The crucial thing is we are the only country in the EU where the price of food did not increase between 2008 and 2023. The recent grocery price analysis by the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) sees two reasons why food prices are going up. Pic: File 'Now we saw agricultural input prices increase substantially during the 2021-to-2023 period as well. What is driving the output price up is the lack of supply of agricultural produce across the EU.' For example, the number of cattle in Ireland has dropped by 218,000 in the period from 2023 to December 2024, according to CSO figures. Mr Buckley said: 'Farmers can't push up prices as they are at the bottom of the food chain. 'So if we are producing less, the price goes up. The output and input indices don't always move in tandem. In Ireland, we are seeing a significant increase in prices, so we have seen static food prices over the past 15 years, and now they are going up quite quickly over a short period of time. 'It's been going up everywhere [in Europe], but they [other countries] didn't get the same drop as we did [over that period of 15 years]. Farmers are not making a killing on price rises.' IFA president Francie Gorman pointed out that farmers are 'price takers'. Pic: Sasko Lazarov / © He explained that the core cause of this is EU policy, as it reduced agricultural output across all European countries, and 'we are now seeing the price of it'. He added: 'They [the EU] have stopped incentivising [production] and they have brought in an increased level of regulation, which has curtailed production, and now it's gone too far the other way and we are paying the price of it with less supply. It's classic supply and demand.' IFA president Francie Gorman pointed out that farmers are 'price takers'. He said: 'Wider society needs to wake up to the importance of food security. Young people are not returning to farming, and people are beginning to see the effects of falling output.' Michael Kilcoyne of the Consumers' Association of Ireland asked what the office of agri-food regulator An Rialálaí Agraibhia was doing to about the situation. He said: 'Either somebody is making a lot of money or somebody has got it wrong, it's one or the other. The food regulator was set up a couple of years ago, An Rialálaí Agraibhia, but there's nothing from him at all. 'It's time that the office clarified exactly what they're finding and whether they've started looking, whether they've started examining this, because this is a very serious issue.' The office of An Rialálaí Agraibhia and the CCPC were contacted for comment.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Retirement age remains bone of contention at WRC and Labour Court ahead of legislation
Legislation intended to allow employees work until they qualify for the State pension will not be enough for many of the workers who want, or need, to defer retirement, a Siptu official who fights cases on the issue at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and Labour Court believes. 'This won't be the end of it,' says Rachel Hartery of the Employment (Contractual Retirement Ages) Bill 2025, a piece of legislation intended to address a situation in which people find themselves caught for a time between having to retire from work and being entitled to their State pension, currently on reaching 66. 'People are definitely going want to work later.' With the legislation still pending, a steady stream of cases involving workers wanting to work beyond their 65th birthday continue to be heard at the WRC and Labour Court. Recent decisions on the issue include one from the WRC in which a warehouse worker, Eugene McEnery, at Partners in Logistics, was found not to have been discriminated against when he was forced to retire five months after his 65th birthday when he declined an extension based on reduced hours. READ MORE The Labour Court, meanwhile, overturned a WRC decision and awarded €18,000 to Liam Murphy, who had worked as a general operative at Deepak Fasteners in Shannon, Co Clare, for 45 years but whose request to stay on beyond his 65th birthday was refused by the company. In another case, the Labour Court reduced an award for discrimination made to Patrick O'Callaghan against his employer, Ferrero Ireland, by €5,000, to €15,000, with aspects of the company's position described as inconsistent to the point of being 'incomprehensible' but the firm is now seeking a judicial review of the decision in the courts. What the various cases highlight is that the outcomes are often dependent on how carefully the company has considered and implemented its own policies and that cases can be won even where there are apparent inconsistencies. As in the instance of Denise Murphy, an administrative worker at the Royal College of Surgeons , who was found not to have been discriminated against when refused a second extension despite being able to point to the fact that the college employed up to 27 people who had been retained beyond 66. The college told the WRC it had done so because those people were in technical or academic roles and were much harder to replace. Whether a role is physically demanding or not is regularly a factor in cases too, with safety issues often cited, as they were in the McEnery case. John Murphy, who took a case against Bausch and Lomb and initially returned to work after mediation while the company changed its policies and allowed other workers to stay on, admits the lack of any physically aspect to his job on production at the firm's Waterford plant was one reason he was so keen to extend his working life. 'I was physically well, I keep myself fit,' says Murphy, who was represented by Hartery in the WRC and the Labour Court, where he was ultimately awarded €2,000 when he sought a further extension at 68. 'I loved my job so I wanted to stay on but there was a financial part to it, too, I went to get a medical card and was told I wasn't entitled to one until I was 70 after more than 40 years working, so there was that. I'd have the odd visit to the doctor or the dentist and they add up if you are paying for them out of your pension.' Murphy's position is fairly typical of the sort of motivations driving people to work longer, says Laura Bambrick, head of social policy and employment affairs at the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu). 'If you look at it, there's a lot of people hitting life's milestones a lot later,' she says. 'They're having second families, they're buying homes later, so the mortgage is going later. The children are being born later, so the parents are bankrolling them for longer. 'So there is often a desire to stay on in your job for longer but there is also, for many people, the financial necessity to do it.' The new Bill, currently working its way through the Oireachtas and which is expected, Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment Peter Burke has said, to come into effect early next year, will go a long way towards addressing one particular reason many people currently wish to work beyond their scheduled retirement age of 65 – that they cannot get a State pension for another year. It will allow the majority of private-sector workers – most in the public sector can already stay on until 70 – to tell their employers they want to remain in place for that time and employers will have more limited scope to decline the request. 'The onus would be on the employer to defend the right to refuse the employee's request. We are very clear on that,' Mr Burke said last month. 'The threshold is very high in terms of fines and the reasonable justification.' While there are exceptions, the new law should substantially change the landscape, agrees Bambrick. People will not be compelled to work the extra year and it is impossible to know how many will but some 4,500 65-year-olds received the specific Department of Social Protection payment intended to tide them over to State pension age last year and it seems clear many of these lacked an alternative. A number of employers have already revised their retirement policies in anticipation of the legislation, which had originally been expected to be enacted by the last government. 'We have already seen a small bit of an uptick in the number of companies informing employees as a whole that they can retire either at their contractual retirement age or 66. Other companies are managing it on a request-by-request basis,' says Nichola Harkin, head of employment law services at Ibec . 'For traditional reasons the most common contractual retirement age will be 65 but I would say that employers are quite frequently giving employees a post-retirement fixed-term contract to bring them to 66 or maybe even a longer one than just one year.' Even after the new legislation comes in, she says there will continue to be instances in which employers have legitimate reasons for preferring not to extend the terms of some employees. Goals such as intergenerational planning, the creation of a more balanced workforce or health and safety are all provided for in both the Bill and the existing code of practice on longer working. The WRC cases, it seems, will likely continue.
Irish Examiner
12 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Fifa consider holding Club World Cup every two years from 2029 – and expanding it to 48 teams
Fifa will consider holding the Club World Cup every two years from 2029 in a move that would put more pressure on the international calendar and trigger another backlash from the Premier League and Uefa. The next Club World Cup is due to take place in four years' time, following the first expanded 32-team tournament held in the US this summer, but the world governing body is under pressure from leading clubs to make it a biennial event. Real Madrid are understood to have raised the issue of moving to a two-year cycle during talks with Fifa in Miami in June, a proposal that has gained support from other clubs who failed to qualify for this year's tournament, including Barcelona, Manchester United, Liverpool and Napoli. Chelsea received £85m in prize money for winning the competition and other big European clubs want the opportunity to take advantage of Fifa's huge revenue streams, which are being funded largely by Saudi Arabia's Surj Sports Investments. Liverpool in particular were unfortunate not to take part this year, as they met one of the qualifying criteria by being among the top eight ranked clubs in Europe, but missed out as Fifa opted to admit a maximum of two sides from a country. Chelsea and Manchester City took the English slots as recent Champions League winners. There is an exception to the limit if more than two clubs from a country win their continental competition during the qualifying period, as was the case with Brazil this year. Fifa sources said that while there is no serious consideration being given to staging the Club World Cup in 2027, the situation is likely to change after 2029, with the prospect of another tournament being held in 2031 to be explored. Fifa's hands are tied in the short-term as the international match calendar is fixed until 2030, with only the 2029 Club World Cup in the schedule, as part of a memorandum of understanding signed between Fifa and the European Clubs Association two years ago. With Fifa already facing legal action from World Leagues, an international lobby group that includes the Premier League, there is no appetite to inflame it further by ripping up the current schedule. World Leagues has filed a legal complaint to the European Commission with support from the global players' union Fifpro, accusing Fifa of 'abuse of dominance' for allegedly failing to consult them over the scheduling of the Club World Cup. Staging the new competition every two years would increase tensions still further, but there is an acknowledgement on both sides that the entire global calendar after 2030 is open for negotiation. As part of a quid pro quo for moving into the club game, sources have indicated that Fifa may be willing to remove the June international break to ease player workloads and create space for events such as the Club World Cup, although that would be opposed by Uefa, which uses summer dates to stage the finals of its Nations League competition. In a pre-season address last week the Premier League chief executive, Richard Masters, outlined his concerns with expanding the Club World Cup, although the biggest top-flight clubs appear to disagree. 'Fifa was put on earth really to regulate the global game and to run international football, and the Club World Cup is a move into club football,' Masters said. 'The leagues and the players have not been consulted at all on the timing and scheduling of the competition, and I think whatever iteration of it may come next, we do need to be consulted on that. 'Obviously, it does have an impact on the scheduling of the Premier League season, that much is clear. We're asking for a seat at the table, a proper discussion for the leagues.' Fifa is the process of reviewing the qualifying criteria for the 2029 Club World Cup and may lift the cap of two clubs per country, and as previously reported by the Guardian it is consulting on whether to increase the number of teams involved from 32 to 48. The men's World Cup next year and the 2031 Women's World Cup will involve 48 teams for the first time, so expanding the Club World Cup would be consistent with Fifa's tournament model. Having awarded hosting rights to this year's competition to the US without inviting tenders, Fifa is planning to run formal bidding process for future tournaments. Qatar, Spain and Morocco have all expressed interest in staging the 2029 Club World Cup, with details of the tender process expected later this year. The Guardian
