
HMRC boss ‘regrets' frustrations over £49m phishing scam disclosure
The revenue body has faced criticism and questions over why MPs were not informed earlier about the incident.
On June 4, it was disclosed that HMRC had lost £47 million after a phishing scam breached tens of thousands of tax accounts.
Following updated information published by HMRC on Tuesday, that figure was revised upwards, to £49 million.
Senior civil servants at HMRC told the Treasury Committee that 100,000 people had been contacted, or were in the process of being contacted, after their accounts were locked down in what they said was an 'organised crime' incident which started last year.
The Treasury Committee, which held a live session on June 4, wrote to Mr Marks earlier this week, telling him that: 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.'
During a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Thursday, Mr Marks told MPs: 'We welcome your scrutiny.'
Mr Marks described the incident as a 'serious, and (an) unacceptable loss of £49 million to the Exchequer, affecting 100,000 of our customers, which is about 0.2% of the PAYE caseload'.
He added: 'Given we collect over £840 billion a year, the judgment on materiality is different for HMRC perhaps than other government departments.
'But nonetheless, I agree with the point with regards (to) disclosure, and I will do that in my annual report, which I will publish next month for the first time, so that is, again, properly done according to the rules under public money.
'The final thing really to say, I do regret if there's been any frustration in terms of our handling of this, that was not our intent at all.'
He said he would respond to correspondence he had received this week with more detail.
Mr Marks continued: 'I welcome your point, with regards (to) the opportunity to have in-private briefings, the level of security threats is significant and constant.
'The team detected and disrupted this one well. There was a criminal investigation. And in (a) private hearing, I'm happy to bring the head of the fraud investigation service, my chief security officer, to explain more about some of that detail but also the threat environment and the way in which we are ensuring HMRC is secure now and secure for the future as well.'
Earlier this week, an HMRC spokesperson said: 'We faced a series of evolving and complex criminal attempts to access online tax accounts and our priority has been to protect customers and their accounts.
'Our customers suffered no financial loss as a result.
'Thorough investigation has been necessary to understand the extent of this activity and pursue the criminals responsible.
'We've worked closely with the Information Commissioner's Office throughout to ensure we met our obligations.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch says she no longer considers herself Nigerian
Kemi Badenoch has said she no longer identifies as Nigerian and has not renewed her Nigerian passport since the early 2000s. Speaking to Gyles Brandreth's Rosebud podcast, the Conservative leader, who was born in London and raised in Lagos and the United States, said: 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents, but by identity I'm not really." Ms Badenoch explained she felt "home is where my now family is'. The Tory politician was born in Wimbledon in 1980 before her parents took her home to Nigeria. She was one of the last people to receive birthright citizenship because she was born in the UK before these rules were abolished by Margaret Thatcher the following year.


BBC News
a minute ago
- BBC News
Harvey Willgoose death 'no less tragic' if teen cleared of murder
The death of a 15-year-old schoolboy is not "any less tragic or pointless" if the pupil who stabbed him is cleared of murder, a jury has been told. Harvey Willgoose died after he was attacked during his lunch break at All Saints Catholic High School in Sheffield on 3 February.A fellow student, who is also 15, is on trial at Sheffield Crown Court after admitting manslaughter but denying barrister, Gul Nawaz Hussain KC, told jurors on Friday that if they cleared his client of murder, "it doesn't mean Harvey's death is any less tragic or pointless". Mr Hussain said: "A loved son has lost his life, a family have been deprived of him. A family mourns him."Another boy of a similar age had admitted his fault and, whatever happens, will pay the price for it."The defendant has accepted responsibility for what he has done. He needs to pay a price, but that price must be a just one."He told the jury that a not guilty verdict to murder would be the just decision in this case, according to the evidence. 'Final straw' The barrister told the court the defendant had a "horrific home life" and suffered a "background of bullying".He said "all that was what came together" when he encountered Harvey and this was the "final straw".Mr Hussain added that his client had reason to fear he told the jury he wanted to make it "very, very, clear" that he was not "maligning Harvey or dishonouring his memory".He said: "We are not saying that Harvey was all bad or the defendant was all good. Nothing of the sort."He discussed evidence of Harvey's "association with football hooliganism", with one school record describing him as "extremely aggressive and threatening" and a social care record saying he "threatened aggression".A range of interactions have been described between the defendant and Harvey that morning, and Mr Hussain said: "The defendant wanted to avoid Harvey. He did not want trouble."However he described how, in a lesson just before the incident, Harvey had mocked the defendant and been aggressive towards the CCTV footage of the stabbing, Mr Hussain said it could be seen that Harvey was the "first one to make it physical".The barrister said his client thought it was an aggressive approach from Harvey and the fact that he stabbed him so hard, breaking one of his ribs and piercing his heart, was further evidence that he "lost control".He added his client was "so scared of being hurt, so frightened, so devoid of calm, that that boy had never ever felt this way in his life before".The barrister also pointed to how his client was heard to to say "you know I can't control it" by a teacher seconds after stabbing Hussain told the jury this was the "best piece of evidence that you all have as to why (the defendant) did what he did".He concluded his closing speech to the jury on Friday morning and the judge, Mrs Justice Ellenbogen, began summing up the evidence. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North


The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Why millions of motorists denied payouts after car finance court ruling
The Supreme Court ruled that car finance lenders are not liable for hidden commission payments to millions of drivers, overturning a previous Court of Appeal decision. This decision significantly reduces the potential compensation payout for lenders from an estimated £45bn to between £5bn and £15bn. The court rejected arguments that the payments were 'bribes' or that car dealers had a 'fiduciary duty' to customers, but upheld one case where the finance relationship was deemed unfair. Despite the ruling, consumers who paid particularly large commissions may still be eligible for compensation under the Consumer Credit Act. The Financial Conduct Authority is expected to announce a redress scheme for cases where the relationship is deemed unfair, with experts advising consumers to await further guidance.