
China's Xi meets Thai prime minister with trade, online scams in focus
Paetongtarn is on an official visit to China from February 5 to 8, marking her first visit to Beijing since taking office in August last year.
The four-day visit coincides with the 50th anniversary of China-Thailand diplomatic relations, which are currently overshadowed by issues such as online fraud and safety concerns.
The recent high-profile case of Chinese actor Wang Xing, who went to Thailand for what he thought was an acting job but was abducted and later rescued from a scam centre in Myanmar, has sparked heated discussion in China about cross-border telecom scams.
Thailand, concerned about the impact on its vital tourism sector, has sought to allay safety concerns among Chinese, who constitute the largest group of visitors to the Southeast Asian nation.
On Tuesday, the Thai government said it would cut electricity supply to some border areas with Myanmar in an attempt to curb illegal scam centres.
Southeast Asia, especially border towns in Thailand, Myanmar, and Laos, has become a hub for telecom and other online fraud since the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the United Nations, which says hundreds of thousands of people have been trafficked to work in scam centres.
The talks between Xi and Paetongtarn also come as Beijing is navigating a new trade war with the United States, triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping 10% tariffs on all Chinese imports.
In November last year, Thai Commerce Minister Pichai Naripthaphan said the country had a good balance between the U.S and China and expects to benefit from the trade war as Thai exports to the U.S would increase because the U.S. would be taking fewer imports from China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reuters' X accounts blocked in India amid confusion over ‘legal demand'
The primary X handles of international news agency Reuters were blocked in India 'in response to a legal demand', according to a notice on the microblogging platform. A message displayed on Reuters ' X account (formerly Twitter) read: '@ Reuters has been withheld in IN in response to a legal demand.' However, the Indian ministry of electronics and information technology denied issuing any new legal demand to block Reuters' accounts on the Elon Musk -owned platform. 'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with ' X ' to resolve the problem,' the spokesperson for the ministry said. The absence of clear reasons for the block has led to confusion and concern among Indian users and media watchers, once again raising questions over press freedom and digital censorship in India. The block gained attention on Saturday evening. The Reuters World account became inaccessible shortly afterward, by 11.40pm local time. An Indian government source told the Press Trust of India that a demand to block several hundred X accounts was made during India-Pakistan tensions in April, particularly when India launched a counter-terrorism operation inside Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. The unnamed source said the government had issued the order on 7 May, but Reuters seems to have acted only now, calling it a 'mistake on their part'. India launched what it called Operation Sindoor, carrying out an attack inside Pakistani territory to target terrorist camps. Pakistan denied that terrorists were attacked, claiming all casualties were civilians. Around the same time, Indian news website The Wire said the Indian government blocked access to its news website and ordered the removal of Pakistan -linked content across digital platforms. The website of The Wire, a news organisation known for its investigative journalism and critical coverage of the government, became inaccessible across much of the country. In recent years, the Indian government has expanded its information technology laws to bring social media under its ambit and to allow the blocking of online content on the grounds of national security or public order. India ranked 151st in the World Press Freedom Index in 2025, a slight improvement from 159th last year.

The National
an hour ago
- The National
The Union is the last desperate grip of an empire refusing to let go
Yet, to those who examine the legal and historical reality, it becomes clear: Scotland is a colony, and its subjugation is no mere abstraction. It has real-world consequences – economic, political and moral. The most damning of these is that there is no legal exit mechanism for Scotland to leave the so-called 'Union' of 1707, a treaty that was never properly implemented and has since been weaponised to deny self-determination to an entire nation. The United Kingdom has long presented itself as a voluntary Union of nations, but the truth is far uglier. The Treaty of Union was not a merger of equals but an annexation – an act of political and economic coercion that extinguished Scotland's sovereignty while preserving England's institutions under the cosmetic rebranding of 'Great Britain'. The Scottish Parliament was dissolved, its legal system subordinated and its economy restructured to serve London's interests. This was not a partnership; it was an absorption. Today, Scotland remains a captive nation, its resources – oil, gas renewable energy – exploited by Westminster, its democratic mandates ignored and its constitutional status a legal fiction. The UK Supreme Court has ruled that Scotland has no right to hold a referendum without Westminster's permission, effectively rendering the Scottish people prisoners in their own land. Even Margaret Thatcher, no friend of nationalism, acknowledged that Scots had an 'undoubted right to national self-determination' – a right now being denied in the most undemocratic fashion. If the United Nations were to formally classify Scotland as a Non-Self-Governing Territory (NSGT) under its decolonisation framework – as legal experts and human rights organisations are now advocating – the implications would be seismic. First, the UK would be forced to comply with international law. Under UN Resolution 1514 (XV), colonial powers are obligated to facilitate self-determination. Westminster could no longer block a referendum or claim Scotland's constitutional future is a purely 'domestic' matter. The UK would face mounting diplomatic pressure, sanctions or even expulsion from international bodies if it continued to defy decolonisation norms. Second, Scotland's independence process would be internationally supervised. Unlike the 2014 referendum – controlled and constrained by Westminster – a UN-backed vote would be conducted under impartial observation, ensuring fairness and legitimacy. The terms of independence (currency, borders, debt) would no longer be dictated by London but negotiated under international oversight. Third, the myth of 'voluntary Union' would be shattered. The UK's claim that Scotland is a 'willing partner' would collapse under scrutiny. The UN does not tolerate indefinite colonial rule, no matter how well disguised. Historical grievances –the Highland Clearances, economic plundering, political suppression – would be re-examined as part of a legitimate decolonisation process. Fourth, the precedent would empower other stateless nations. If Scotland succeeds in asserting its colonial status, Wales, Northern Ireland and even regions like Cornwall could follow suit, accelerating the disintegration of the British imperial construct. Finally, the UK's global standing would be irreparably damaged. A country that lectures others on democracy while denying self-determination to its own captive nations is a hypocrisy too glaring to ignore. The UK's moral authority – already diminished by Brexit and imperial nostalgia –would evaporate overnight. The most grotesque feature of Scotland's colonial status is that there is no legal way out. The UK Supreme Court has ruled that even a non-binding referendum would 'affect the Union' and is therefore illegal without Westminster's consent. This is not democracy; it is imperial veto power masquerading as law. If Scotland were a true partner in Union, it would have the right to leave. But like all colonies, it is trapped – its fate decided by a distant parliament where Scottish votes are perpetually outnumbered. The only remaining recourse is international intervention – exactly as happened with other colonies that broke free from British rule. The British Empire is dead, but its corpse still twitches in Westminster. Scotland's struggle is not just about nationalism; it is about the basic democratic right to choose. If the UN recognises Scotland's colonial status, the UK will face a choice: comply with international law or be exposed as a 21st-century colonial oppressor. The clock is ticking. Scotland will not wait forever. And when the reckoning comes, the world will see the so-called 'Union' for what it truly is: the last, desperate grip of an empire that refuses to let go. Alan Hinnrichs Dundee ALAN Hinnrichs's letter, headed 'Criminalisation of dissent is a prelude to something worse', takes us a few steps further in a brilliant Orwellian extension. He references behaviours on display among some current world leaders, London included, causing fear and terror to those who pay attention. He chillingly suggests that what is happening now, and yesterday is drawing the planet closer to self-destruction. Eh? Not while we are all watching Wimbledon ... Elizabeth Dickinson Glasgow


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Is this how World War 3 will start? Nato chief gives chilling prediction with simultaneous attacks by Putin & China
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A CHILLING forecast of how World War Three will start has been revealed by Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte. The alliance chief has warned of Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin launching simultaneous invasions - putting the planet under threat of nuclear Armageddon. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 Russian T-90 tanks take part in the Victory Day military parade, marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War Credit: EPA 8 Chinese President Xi Jinping reviews the troops during his inspection of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Credit: AP 8 President of Russia Vladimir Putin (R) and President of China Xi Jinping (L) Credit: EPA 8 Mark Rutte in The Hague for the 2025 Nato Summit, discussing key global security issues and strengthening alliances Credit: Splash 8 China would start by seeking to grab Taiwan - while ensuring the Kremlin dictator simultaneously attacks Nato territory. Stressing the urgent need to re-arm and boost military budgets, Rutte chillingly told the New York Times: 'Let's not be naive about this: If Xi Jinping would attack Taiwan, he would first make sure that he makes a call to his very junior partner in all of this, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, residing in Moscow, and telling him, 'Hey, I'm going to do this, and I need you to to keep them busy in Europe by attacking Nato territory'. 'That is most likely the way this will progress." Rutte explained that in order to "deter" the two powerful nations, there are two things that must be done. He said: "One is that Nato, collectively, being so strong that the Russians will never do this. 'And second, working together with the Indo-Pacific - something President [Donald] Trump is very much promoting. 'Because we have this close interconnectedness, working together on defence industry, innovation between Nato and the Indo-Pacific.' Russia could rebuild its military to a worrying capacity as early as 2027, according to a report by a top security think tank. The International Institute for Strategic Studies said Putin may deploy his army onto a 'war footing' and try to test Nato by evoking Article 5. This may see the Kremlin decide to leave Ukraine alone as it continues to recover from Russia's three-and-a-half year onslaught. 'Daddy' Trump stopped Israel and Iran war, Nato chief tells 'strong' Don Instead, Putin could commit to an attack on Nato states in the Baltics. Fears are already looming that the Russian dictator is eyeing the Baltic republics Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, formerly part of the USSR. Acknowledging how Putin is rearming at a speed "which is unparalleled in recent history," Rutte has insisted that Western countries increase defence spending. He said: "We have an enormous geopolitical challenge on our hands. 'They are now producing three times as much ammunition in three months as the whole of Nato is doing in a year. 'This is unsustainable, but the Russians are working together with the North Koreans, with the Chinese and Iranians, the mullahs, in fighting this unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine. 'So here, the Indo-Pacific and your Atlantic are getting more and more interconnected. We know that China has its eye on Taiwan.' Russia today hit back at ex-Netherlands premier Rutte, claiming he had 'gorged on too many of the magic mushrooms beloved by the Dutch', while warning he should look forward to a future in a hellish Siberian labour camp. 8 Russian President Vladimir Putin talks to Deputy Commander of the Airborne Troops Anatoly Kontsevoy at a training centre Credit: Reuters 8 Operation Dynamic Front in Finland earlier this year saw British and Nato allies take part in live fire exercises Credit: Doug Seeburg 8 Romanian army tanks fire during the Exercise Steadfast Dart earlier this year Senior Putin puppet and security official Dmitry Medvedev lashed out on X: "He sees collusion between China & Russia over Taiwan, and then a Russian attack on Europe. "But he's right about one thing: he should learn Russian. It might come in handy in a Siberian camp.' The warnings came as Russia continued its onslaught on Ukraine - days after Putin informed US President Donald Trump by telephone that he had no intention of halting his war of invasion. Mad Vlad pummelled Ukraine with four S-300 missiles and 157 drones, with 127 of the UAVs shot down or suppressed by electronic warfare. Explosions hit Kyiv and the surrounding region, with multiple people wounded and residential buildings damaged. Putin unleashes huge onslaught of 500 missiles & drones in night of hell for Ukraine as Nato warplanes scrambled In Ukraine's second city Kharkiv, a two year old child and a woman, 46, were among those hurt as Putin continued to terrorise civilians, seeking to weaken the population's resolve. The Russians also hit Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region. Apartment buildings were also hit in Kramatorsk in drone strikes. Ukraine hit back with an attack sea drone seen being destroyed by Russian defences in Novorossiysk Bay in the Black Sea. Moscow was forced to close its major international airport Sheremetyevo due to the threat of drones. Rutte praised Trump for seeking to make progress with Putin just a few weeks after calling the US President "daddy" during a summit. The Nato chief said: "He is the one who broke the deadlock with Putin. When he became president in January, he started these discussions with Putin, and he was the only one who was able to do this. 'This had to happen. A direct dialogue between the American president and the president of the Russian Federation.' Yet this had not yet resulted in a long-awaited peace deal. "We are not there yet, and that means that in the meantime you have to make sure that Ukraine has what it needs to stay in the fight.'