logo
Empire Petroleum Reports Results for First Quarter 2025 and Advances Operational Initiatives

Empire Petroleum Reports Results for First Quarter 2025 and Advances Operational Initiatives

Business Wire14-05-2025
TULSA, Okla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Empire Petroleum (NYSE American: EP) ('Empire' or the 'Company'), an oil and gas company with producing assets in New Mexico, North Dakota, Montana, Texas, and Louisiana, today reported operational and financial results for the first quarter 2025.
FIRST QUARTER 2025 HIGHLIGHTS
Produced Q1-2025 net production volumes of 2,049 barrels of oil equivalent per day ('Boe/d') including 1,329 barrels of oil per day ('Bbls/d');
Boe/d is comprised of 65% oil, 17% natural gas liquids ('NGLs'), and 18% natural gas;
Initiating phase one of Enhanced Oil Recovery ('EOR') efforts in the Starbuck Drilling Program ('Starbuck') in North Dakota yielded encouraging early results, with daily production increasing significantly from approximately 80 bbls/d to more than 1,200 bbls/d during initial operations;
Extreme winter conditions and technical setbacks, including a pipeline failure and manufacturing defects in the EOR units, temporarily disrupted operations and resulted in a short-term 75% decrease in net production;
As of early Q2-2025, the failed pipeline has been fully replaced, and all three EOR units have been restored to service with interim solutions in place;
Empire expects to finalize the patented design specifications for its hydrocarbon vaporization technology, which target sustained heat levels between 550-650 degrees Fahrenheit, by end of Q2-2025;
Empire completed its technical evaluation of its Texas region and is preparing to initiate drilling operations in the second half of 2025;
Historically, development in the area has focused on vertical wells, but recent analysis identified six to seven prospective pay zones with potential for horizontal development;
The Company has completed its necessary infrastructure to support its planned drilling program and continues to position itself for long-term, capital-efficient growth in the area; and
Reported Q1-2025 total product revenue $9.0 million, a net loss of $4.2 million, or ($0.12) per diluted share;
Adjusted EBITDA of ($0.6) million for Q1-2025.
2025 OUTLOOK
'Empire's first-quarter results reflect the temporary production losses caused by severe weather and operational disruptions, which contributed to a net loss for the quarter,' said Phil Mulacek, Chairman of the Board. 'Despite these short-term impacts, our flexible structure and multi-basin footprint allow us to quickly adapt to changing market conditions and technical developments in real time. Whether advancing our EOR efforts in North Dakota or securing new regulatory approvals in Texas, we remain focused on allocating capital where it can deliver the greatest long-term value. We've seen natural gas prices rebound from a low of $1.30 to an upward trend of $4.50, $5.50, and even $6.50. With multiple stacked pays of oil and gas, our Texas assets are well-positioned to capitalize on this momentum over the next one to five years.'
Mike Morrisett, President and CEO, added, 'We entered 2025 with clear strategic priorities, and Q1 marked continued progress across several fronts, from field-level optimizations in North Dakota to new permitting activity in Texas and New Mexico. We are responding dynamically to new data and operational results, which allow us to fine-tune our approach in each region and ensure we're maximizing performance and recovery. Our operational agility remains a core advantage in the current energy landscape.'
North Dakota – Williston Basin:
Empire remains focused on stabilizing and optimizing EOR operations in the Starbuck region following initial setbacks and partial system restoration;
Since restoring partial operations, production has already increased nearly 70%;
Expectations are to reach recovery and performance over the next 3-5 quarters of steady-state EOR operations; and
Continued progress is dependent on consistent technical performance and seasonal operating stability.
New Mexico – Permian Basin:
After four years of expenditures, Empire is close to a resolution with the New Mexico Oil Conservation Commission ('NMOCD') related to Empire's applications to revoke the existing four permits granted and deny the five new applications for what the Company believes to be the illegal dumping of wastewater into Eunice Monument South Unit's ('EMSU') Unitized Interval by third-party Saltwater Disposal ('SWD') Companies;
Following resolution with the NMOCD, Empire will proceed with the litigation for trespass and damages against all third-party SWD Operators, who the Company believes to be illegally disposing wastewater into the EMSU Unitized Interval;
The long-standing litigation has negatively impacted Empire's results by over $30.0 million in additional costs from May 2021 to present;
These legal expenses have contributed to elevated operating costs in recent periods; and
Upon final resolution, the Company expects a meaningful reduction in operating expenses, which is projected to positively impact the bottom line and further strengthen its financial position.
Texas – East Texas Basin:
Advancements in technology, reservoir modeling, and improved hydraulic fracturing techniques have significantly enhanced the development potential of the region;
These improvements allow for more precise targeting of productive zones, increased recovery rates, and more efficient use of capital;
Empire is currently evaluating horizontal well designs to maximize production from the prospective pay zones identified in the area; and
By targeting these stacked formations with horizontal drilling, the Company aims to unlock greater long-term value and improve overall project economics.
FIRST QUARTER 2025 FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL RESULTS
Q1-25 Q4-24 % Change
Q1-25 vs. Q4-24 Q1-24 % Change
Q1-25 vs. Q1-24
Net equivalent sales (Boe/d)
2,049
2,356
-13%
2,207
-7%
Net oil sales (Bbls/d)
1,329
1,581
-16%
1,437
-7%
Realized price ($/Boe)
$48.76
$46.48
5%
$50.96
-4%
Product Revenue ($M)
$8,992
$10,077
-11%
$10,235
-12%
Net Loss ($M)
($4,221)
($4,193)
-1%
($3,974)
-6%
Adjusted Net Loss ($M) 1
($4,253)
($4,193)
-1%
($3,865)
-10%
Adjusted EBITDA ($M) 1
($553)
($260)
-113%
($729)
24%
1 Adjusted net loss and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. See 'Non-GAAP Information' section later in this release for more information, including reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measure.
Expand
Net sales volumes for Q1-2025 were 2,049 Boe/d, including 1,329 barrels of oil per day; 349 barrels of NGLs per day, and 2,221 thousand cubic feet per day ('Mcf/d') or 370 Boe/d of natural gas. Oil sales volumes decreased approximately 9% compared to Q1-2024 primarily due to five wells being down to redrill in North Dakota during Q1-2025.
Empire reported Q1-2025 total product revenue $9.0 million versus $10.2 million in Q1-2024. Contributing to the decrease were lower oil and NGL sales volumes and lower realized oil prices.
Lease operating expenses in Q1-2025 decreased to $5.8 million versus $7.4 million in Q1-2024 primarily due to lower workover costs. Q1-2025 workover expense decreased to $0.4 million versus $2.0 million in Q1-2024. Higher workover expense in 2024 was primarily in New Mexico as Empire continued work in the region to enhance and maintain production.
Production and ad valorem taxes for Q1-2025 were $0.7 million versus $0.8 million in Q1-2024, as a result of lower product revenues.
Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization ('DD&A') and Accretion for Q1-2025 was $2.8 million versus $2.0 million for Q1-2024. The increase in DD&A is primarily due to the acquisition of additional working interest and the impact of the capitalized costs associated with the new drilling as part of Empire's Starbuck Drilling Program in North Dakota. Accretion increased slightly due to the new drilling activity.
General and administrative expenses, excluding share-based compensation expense, was $3.2 million, or $17.34 per Boe in Q1-2025 versus $2.9 million, or $14.33 per Boe in Q1-2024. The increase in expenses was primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits associated with an increase in employee headcount.
Interest expense for Q1-2025 slightly decreased, compared to Q1-2024, primarily due to certain non-cash interest expense in Q1-2024 from the convertible promissory note partially offset by a higher average outstanding balance on the Company's credit facility.
Empire recorded a net loss of $4.2 million in Q1-2025, or ($0.12) per diluted share, versus a Q1-2024 net loss of $4.0 million, or ($0.15) per diluted share.
Adjusted EBITDA was ($0.6) million for Q1-2025 compared to Adjusted EBITDA of ($0.7) million in Q1-2024.
CAPITAL SPENDING, BALANCE SHEET & LIQUIDITY
For Q1-2025, Empire invested approximately $2.7 million in capital expenditures, primarily related to the continued drilling and completions activity related to Empire's Starbuck Drilling Program in North Dakota.
As of March 31, 2025, Empire had approximately $1.1 million in cash on hand and approximately $7.8 million available on its credit facility.
UPDATED PRESENTATION
An updated Company presentation will be posted to the Company's website under the Investor Relations section.
ABOUT EMPIRE PETROLEUM
Empire Petroleum Corporation is a publicly traded, Tulsa-based oil and gas company with current producing assets in New Mexico, North Dakota, Montana, Texas, and Louisiana. Management is focused on organic growth and targeted acquisitions of proved developed assets with synergies with their existing portfolio of wells. More information about Empire can be found at www.empirepetroleumcorp.com.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements involve a wide variety of risks and uncertainties, and include, without limitations, statements with respect to the Company's estimates, strategy, and prospects. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are disclosed in the Company's reports filed with the SEC, including its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and its other filings with the SEC. Readers and investors are cautioned that the Company's actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the Company's ability to acquire productive oil and/or gas properties or to successfully drill and complete oil and/or gas wells on such properties, general economic conditions both domestically and abroad, including inflation, tariffs and interest rates, uncertainties associated with legal and regulatory matters, and other risks and uncertainties related to the conduct of business by the Company. Other than as required by applicable securities laws, the Company does not assume a duty to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or circumstances, changes in expectations, or otherwise.
EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Condensed Operating Data
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31, December 31, March 31,
2025
2024
2024
Net Sales Volumes:
Oil (Bbl)
119,635
145,442
130,760
Natural gas (Mcf)
199,868
208,698
211,820
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)
31,453
36,556
34,785
Total (Boe)
184,400
216,781
200,848
Average daily equivalent sales (Boe/d)
2,049
2,356
2,207
Average Price per Unit:
Oil ($/Bbl)
$
67.28
$
64.94
$
72.21
Natural gas ($/Mcf)
$
2.74
$
0.35
$
1.78
Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl)
$
12.56
$
15.26
$
11.97
Total ($/Boe)
$
48.76
$
46.48
$
50.96
Operating Costs and Expenses per Boe:
Lease operating expense
$
31.27
$
27.13
$
36.78
Production and ad valorem taxes
$
3.86
$
4.09
$
4.15
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion
$
14.92
$
13.90
$
9.84
General & administrative expense:
General & administrative expense (excluding stock-based compensation)
$
17.34
$
17.13
$
14.33
Stock-based compensation
$
2.88
$
2.39
$
3.54
Total general & administrative expense
$
20.22
$
19.52
$
17.87
Expand
EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
March 31,
2025
2024
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash
$
1,081
$
2,251
Accounts Receivable
7,876
8,155
Inventory
1,504
1,305
Prepaids
1,106
640
Total Current Assets
11,567
12,351
Property and Equipment:
Oil and Natural Gas Properties, Successful Efforts
143,247
140,675
Less: Accumulated Depletion, Amortization and Impairment
(34,106
)
(31,974
)
Total Oil and Gas Properties, Net
109,141
108,701
Other Property and Equipment, Net
1,550
1,391
Total Property and Equipment, Net
110,691
110,092
Other Noncurrent Assets
1,425
1,425
TOTAL ASSETS
$
123,683
$
123,868
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts Payable
$
12,022
$
10,452
Accrued Expenses
10,947
10,348
Current Portion of Lease Liability
354
400
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
691
70
Total Current Liabilities
24,014
21,270
Long-Term Debt
11,558
11,266
Long-Term Lease Liability
87
144
Asset Retirement Obligations
28,949
28,423
Total Liabilities
64,608
61,103
Stockholders' Equity:
Series A Preferred Stock - $.001 Par Value, 10,000,000 Shares Authorized, 6 and 6 Shares Issued and Outstanding, Respectively
-
-
Common Stock - $.001 Par Value, 190,000,000 Shares Authorized, 33,710,727 and 33,667,132 Shares Issued and Outstanding, Respectively
93
93
Additional Paid-in-Capital
144,020
143,489
Total Stockholders' Equity
59,075
62,765
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
$
123,683
$
123,868
Expand
EMPIRE PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31, December 31, March 31,
2025
2024
2024
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net Loss
$
(4,221
)
$
(4,193
)
$
(3,974
)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash
Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities:
Stock Compensation and Issuances
531
519
710
Amortization of Right of Use Assets
121
132
136
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
2,226
2,493
1,490
Accretion of Asset Retirement Obligation
526
520
485
(Gain) Loss on Derivatives
-
-
858
Settlement on or Purchases of Derivative Instruments
-
-
(11
)
Gain on Financial Derivatives
-
-
(738
)
Gain on Sale of Other Fixed Assets
(32
)
-
-
Change in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts Receivable
279
(2,005
)
1,065
Inventory, Oil in Tanks
(199
)
195
(364
)
Prepaids, Current
94
(64
)
(2
)
Accounts Payable
1,676
(7,254
)
4,339
Accrued Expenses
599
1,073
361
Other Long Term Assets and Liabilities
13
(178
)
(446
)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
1,613
(8,762
)
3,909
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Additions to Oil and Natural Gas Properties
(2,680
)
(4,460
)
(16,941
)
Disposal of Other Fixed Assets
49
-
-
Purchase of Other Fixed Assets
(18
)
(12
)
(31
)
Cash Paid for Right of Use Assets
(113
)
(123
)
(125
)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
(2,762
)
(4,595
)
(17,097
)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Borrowings on Credit Facility
-
2,700
3,950
Proceeds from Promissory Note - Related Party
-
-
5,000
Proceeds from Rights Offering, net of transaction costs
-
9,973
-
Principal Payments of Debt
(21
)
(215
)
(62
)
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
(21
)
12,458
8,888
Net Change in Cash
(1,170
)
(899
)
(4,300
)
Cash - Beginning of Period
2,251
3,150
7,791
Cash - End of Period
$
1,081
$
2,251
$
3,491
Expand
Empire Petroleum Corporation
Non-GAAP Information
Certain financial information included in Empire's financial results are not measures of financial performance recognized by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include 'Adjusted Net Loss', 'EBITDA' and 'Adjusted EBITDA'. These disclosures may not be viewed as a substitute for results determined in accordance with GAAP and are not necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures which may be reported by other companies. Adjusted net loss is presented because the timing and amount of these items cannot be reasonably estimated and affect the comparability of operating results from period to period, and current periods to prior periods.
The Company defines adjusted EBITDA as net loss plus net interest expense, DD&A, accretion, amortization of right of use assets, income tax provision (benefit), and other adjustments. Company management believes this presentation is relevant and useful because it helps investors understand Empire's operating performance and makes it easier to compare its results with those of other companies that have different financing, capital and tax structures. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for net income (loss), as an indication of operating performance or cash flows from operating activities or as a measure of liquidity. In addition, adjusted EBITDA does not represent funds available for discretionary use.
Three Months Ended
March 31, December 31, March 31,
2025
2024
2024
(in thousands)
Net Loss
$
(4,221
)
$
(4,193
)
$
(3,974
)
Add Back:
Interest expense
296
269
315
DD&A
2,226
2,493
1,490
Accretion
526
520
485
Amortization of right-of-use assets
121
132
136
EBITDA
$
(1,052
)
$
(779
)
$
(1,548
)
Adjustments:
Stock based Compensation
531
519
710
(Gain) loss on derivatives
-
-
858
Settlement on or purchases of derivative instruments
-
-
(11
)
(Gain) loss on financial derivatives
-
-
(738
)
Gain on Sale of Other Fixed Assets
(32
)
-
-
Adjusted EBITDA
$
(553
)
$
(260
)
$
(729
)
Expand
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Terra Firma Energy Welcome UK Government Consultation on Hydrogen Blending into Great Britains Gas Transmission Network
Terra Firma Energy Welcome UK Government Consultation on Hydrogen Blending into Great Britains Gas Transmission Network

Business Wire

time7 hours ago

  • Business Wire

Terra Firma Energy Welcome UK Government Consultation on Hydrogen Blending into Great Britains Gas Transmission Network

LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--At Terra Firma Energy, we welcome the UK Government's consultation into the blending of Hydrogen into Britain's Gas Transmission Network as a timely and positive step forward for both the UK's decarbonisation goals and the future of flexible power generation. All our projects are engineered to be hydrogen-ready from the outset, ensuring long-term operational flexibility and resilience in a rapidly evolving energy landscape. By anticipating changes in fuel supply and regulatory frameworks, we have future-proofed our generation assets to adapt quickly to low-carbon solutions like hydrogen blending. The ability to support hydrogen integration, even at early-stage blend levels, reinforces our commitment to sustainable innovation and positions our portfolio to contribute meaningfully to a net zero grid. Terra Firma Energy welcome UK Government Consultation on Hydrogen Blending into Great Britains Gas Transmission Network. Share The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) has launched a new consultation exploring the potential for blending low-carbon hydrogen into Great Britain's gas transmission network. Following previous consultations on hydrogen blending into local distribution networks, the government is now seeking views on whether introducing hydrogen at the transmission level - the high-pressure National Transmission System (NTS) - could offer strategic and economic value. A Step Toward Net Zero Hydrogen is seen as a key player in the UK's push to reach net zero emissions by 2050. Blending low-carbon hydrogen with natural gas could offer a transitional path, supporting early-stage hydrogen production while reducing the carbon intensity of the existing gas network. DESNZ is currently evaluating whether to enable blending of up to 2% hydrogen by volume into the NTS. This small percentage could act as an 'off-taker of last resort' for hydrogen producers, providing a backup market when dedicated customers are not available. Balancing Innovation with Risk The consultation outlines both the potential benefits and challenges. While hydrogen blending could support the growth of the hydrogen economy and help manage electricity system constraints, it also raises concerns for industrial users connected to the transmission system. Many of these users rely on stable, high-quality gas supplies, and even a 2% hydrogen blend could affect equipment performance, increase costs, or require infrastructure upgrades. Terra Firma Energy have been proactive in ensuring all our projects have been built utilising hydrogen ready generation sets that can accommodate a 20% blend of hydrogen into the network. Studies cited in the consultation show that most transmission-connected users could technically handle a 2% blend with minimal changes, though feasibility studies and equipment modifications may still be necessary. At higher blends (5% or 20%), the risks and costs escalate significantly. Cross-Border Considerations The UK's ability to blend hydrogen is also influenced by developments in the EU. Under the EU Hydrogen and Decarbonised Gas Market Package, Member States can blend up to 2% hydrogen by volume, but are not required to do so. This creates potential interoperability issues with the UK's gas inter-connectors to Ireland, Belgium, and the Netherlands - especially if hydrogen blends exceed that threshold.

UnitedHealth Group Announces Changes to Leadership Team
UnitedHealth Group Announces Changes to Leadership Team

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealth Group Announces Changes to Leadership Team

July 31, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) today announced Wayne S. DeVeydt has been appointed its chief financial officer, effective September 2, 2025. John F. Rex, who joined the company in 2012 and has been CFO since 2016, will become strategic advisor to the CEO on the same date. "Wayne DeVeydt combines deep financial acumen and operating experience with the mission-oriented and compassionate approach to health care that is a perfect fit for UnitedHealth Group," said Stephen J. Hemsley, company chairman and chief executive officer. "John Rex has been an exceptional leader, having helped guide our company through substantial change with both strategic vision and strong commitment to our mission," said Hemsley. "I look forward to his continued insights as UnitedHealth Group moves forward." DeVeydt, 55, most recently has been a managing director and operating partner at Bain Capital, working with client leaders on operational improvement and growth acceleration. From 2018-2020, he was chairman and CEO of Surgery Partners, Inc. in Nashville, expanding the operational scale and financial performance of the surgical services firm. He joined Anthem, Inc. (now Elevance) in 2005 and served as its chief financial officer from 2007 to 2016. Prior to joining Anthem, DeVeydt served as a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, with a focus on the health care sector. "There is no organization besides UnitedHealth Group that presents the kinds of opportunities to make a difference in health care, from individual patient care to broad system efficiency, so I am eagerly looking forward to joining the team," said DeVeydt. "I've been fortunate to know John Rex for over two decades and am honored to follow a leader of his caliber." Rex, 63, joined UnitedHealth Group as chief financial officer of the company's then newly established Optum business and previously had spent his career focused in health care across multiple roles and sectors. "This pivotal moment for UnitedHealth Group is the right time for a new yet greatly experienced executive like Wayne DeVeydt, and I look forward to supporting him and the entire leadership team while continuing to advise on a range of matters," said Rex. About UnitedHealth Group UnitedHealth Group is a health care and well-being company with a mission to help people live healthier lives and help make the health system work better for everyone through two distinct and complementary businesses. Optum delivers care aided by technology and data, empowering people, partners and providers with the guidance and tools they need to achieve better health. UnitedHealthcare offers a full range of health benefits, enabling affordable coverage, simplifying the health care experience and delivering access to high-quality care. Visit UnitedHealth Group at and follow UnitedHealth Group on LinkedIn. View source version on Contacts Media: uhgmedia@ UnitedHealth Group Media Sign in to access your portfolio

LINEAGE INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Lineage, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead the Lineage Class Action Lawsuit
LINEAGE INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Lineage, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead the Lineage Class Action Lawsuit

Business Wire

time2 days ago

  • Business Wire

LINEAGE INVESTOR ALERT: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Lineage, Inc. and Announces Opportunity for Investors with Substantial Losses to Lead the Lineage Class Action Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Lineage, Inc. (NASDAQ: LINE) common stock in or traceable to the registration statement used in connection with Lineage's July 2024 initial public offering (the 'IPO'), have until September 30, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit. Captioned City of St. Clair Shores Police and Fire Retirement System v. Lineage, Inc., No. 25-cv-12383 (E.D. Mich.), the Lineage class action lawsuit charges Lineage and certain of its top executives, directors, IPO underwriters, and IPO sponsor with violations of the Securities Act of 1933. If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit, please provide your information here: CASE ALLEGATIONS: Lineage is a Maryland REIT focused on temperature-controlled cold-storage facilities. In the July 2024 IPO, Lineage sold over 65 million shares of Lineage common stock to investors at $78 per share, raising more than $5 billion in gross offering proceeds. The Lineage class action lawsuit alleges that the registration statement was false and/or misleading and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Lineage was then experiencing sustained weakening in customer demand, as additional cold-storage supply had come on line, Lineage's customers destocked a glut of excessive inventory built up during the COVID-19 pandemic, and Lineage's customers shifted to maintaining leaner cold-storage inventories on a go-forward basis in response to changed consumer trends; (ii) Lineage had implemented price increases in the lead-up to the IPO that could not be sustained in light of the weakening demand environment facing Lineage; (iii) Lineage was unable to effectively counteract the adverse trends listed above through the use of minimum storage guarantees or as a result of operational efficiencies, technological improvements, or its purported competitive advantages; (iv) as a result, rather than enjoying stable revenue growth, high occupancy rates, and steady rent escalation as represented in the registration statement, Lineage was in fact suffering from stagnant or falling revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices; and (v) consequently, Lineage's financial results, business operations, and prospects were materially impaired. Since the IPO, the price of Lineage stock has fallen to lows near $40 per share. The price of Lineage stock has remained substantially below the IPO price at the time of the filing of the complaint. The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has extensive experience in prosecuting investor class actions including actions involving financial fraud. You can view a copy of the complaint by clicking here. THE LEAD PLAINTIFF PROCESS: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who purchased Lineage common stock in or traceable to the registration statement issued in connection with Lineage's IPO to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the Lineage class action lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is generally the movant with the greatest financial interest in the relief sought by the putative class who is also typical and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the Lineage class action lawsuit. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice to litigate the Lineage class action lawsuit. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff of the Lineage class action lawsuit. ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is one of the world's leading law firms representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder litigation. Our Firm has been ranked #1 in the ISS Securities Class Action Services rankings for four out of the last five years for securing the most monetary relief for investors. In 2024, we recovered over $2.5 billion for investors in securities-related class action cases – more than the next five law firms combined, according to ISS. With 200 lawyers in 10 offices, Robbins Geller is one of the largest plaintiffs' firms in the world, and the Firm's attorneys have obtained many of the largest securities class action recoveries in history, including the largest ever – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Please visit the following page for more information: Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Services may be performed by attorneys in any of our offices.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store