
What might your napping habits say about your health?
Sleep quality and duration is closely linked to physical and mental health.Adults should aim to get 7–9 hours' sleep a night, which can be a challenge, particularly as we get older.To compensate, many people nap during the day, but new research suggests that this may not be beneficial.A study has found a link between daytime napping and increased risk of all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older adults.The researchers suggest that napping may be an indicator of underlying health issues, rather than directly causing mortality, although their observational study cannot prove this.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that adults get between 7 and 9 hours of sleep a night to maintain physical and mental health.Getting sufficient sleep can lower a person's risk of developing a number of health conditions, including type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, and stroke.As people age, getting a good night's sleep can become more difficult, leading to daytime napping to make up for lost night time slumbers. However, a new study in middle-aged and older adults suggests that daytime napping, particularly around the middle of the day, is linked to a higher risk of death from any cause.The study, which was presented at Sleep 2025 — the 39th Annual Meeting of the Associated Professional Sleep Societies (APSS), held in Seattle, WA, between June 8–11 — cannot prove a causative link but suggests that further research is needed into links between daytime napping and health.An abstract of the study is available in Sleep, the journal of the Sleep Research Society, though its full results are yet to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Emer MacSweeney, MD, CEO and consultant neuroradiologist at Re:Cognition Health, who was not involved in this study, told Medical News Today that:'These findings are significant because they suggest that daytime napping patterns could serve as early markers of declining health or disrupted sleep architecture in older adults. While previous research has focused on nighttime sleep duration and quality, this study expands the scope by identifying the timing, length and variability of naps as potential indicators of all-cause mortality risk. […] the findings underscore the importance of viewing sleep as a 24-hour cycle, where daytime behaviours are just as telling as those during the night.'When and how long you nap is linked to death riskThe study used data from 86,565 participants in the UK Biobank. At the start, participants had a mean age of 63 years, 57% were female, and none had a history of shift work.All participants completed 7 days of actigraphy monitoring — continuous wearing of a wristwatch-like device that tracks activity to monitor sleeping and waking times. The researchers used this data to identify frequency, timing and duration of daytime naps.They recorded mean nap duration between 9 am and 7 pm, variability in nap duration for each individual across days, and timing of naps within the 2-hour time windows of 9–11 am, 11 am–1 pm, 1–3 pm, 3–5 pm, and 5–7 pm.After adjusting for demographics, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol consumption, comorbidities, nighttime sleep duration, and chronotype, the researchers assessed associations between napping patterns and all-cause mortality during the 8-year follow-up.Median nap duration for all participants was 0.40 hours, with a variation in nap length of 0.39 hours for each individual. People took the most naps between 9 and 11 am (34%), with 10% between 11 and 1, 14% between 1 and 3 pm, 19% between 3 and 5 pm, and 22% between 5 and 7 pm. During the 8-year follow-up, 2,950 participants died (3.4% of the total). For those who died, mean survival from the start was 4.19 years.The researchers found that those who died during follow up took longer naps, had more variation in their nap times, and were more likely to nap between 11 am and 3 pm.MacSweeney commented that: 'This study is a reminder that napping is not inherently negative, but changes in napping behaviour, particularly longer and irregular naps, can signal evolving health concerns. It reinforces the need for clinicians to ask about daytime sleep as part of a routine assessment, especially in older adults.''It also opens the door to further research into the neurobiological and physiological changes that may link daytime sleep patterns to mortality, particularly in relation to early-stage dementia, inflammation, or metabolic instability,' she told MNT.Why might napping habits be linked to mortality?Previous research has suggested that short daytime naps may be beneficial to health, potentially lowering systolic blood pressure, but long daytime naps are associated with higher BMI, waist circumference, blood glucose and blood pressure.Another recent study suggests that excessive daytime napping is linked to a higher risk of dementia.However, these, as well as the latest study, are observational, so cannot show a causative link.Kanwar Kelley, MD, JD, triple-board-certified in Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery (ENT), Obesity Medicine, and Lifestyle Medicine, and co-founder and CEO of Side Health, who was not involved in the current research, agreed that the study cannot establish causation.Kelley explained why there might be an association between daytime naps and higher mortality:'This may be because individuals with higher comorbid conditions are more likely to experience lower energy levels during the day or require naps. Alternatively, naps may be more frequently needed for those who are not getting enough sleep at night, which can lead to an increase in co-morbid conditions. Further research will be necessary to identify stronger associations between sleep and mortality.'MacSweeney agreed, noting that, '[g]iven the observational design of the study, it is more plausible that excessive or irregular napping is a symptom rather than a cause of underlying health conditions.''In this context,' she told us, 'excessive napping likely functions as a clinical red flag rather than a direct contributor to mortality.'7 expert tips to improve nighttime sleepThere are several measures you can take to try and get a better night's sleep, so that you are less likely to need those daytime naps.MacSweeney recommended the following evidence-based strategies:establishing a consistent sleep schedule, even on weekendslimiting caffeine and alcohol, especially in the eveningcreating a calming bedtime routine, free from screens and overstimulationincreasing daytime exposure to natural light to strengthen circadian rhythmsmanaging medical conditions such as pain, heart failure or respiratory issues that may disrupt sleeptreating underlying sleep disorders like sleep apnea or restless legs syndromeexercising regularly, but avoiding vigorous activity close to bedtime.She cautioned that, '[i]f excessive sleepiness persists despite good sleep hygiene, a clinical sleep assessment is recommended.''[The new] study is essential to remind medical workers to ask patients and caretakers about individuals' sleep and their quality of sleep. Establishing good sleep habits may help you maintain healthier, longer sleep.'– Kanwar Kelley, MD, JD

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Harvard researcher accused of smuggling frog embryos indicted on more charges
A Harvard University researcher detained by Ice for months after being accused of smuggling frog embryos into the US was indicted on Wednesday on additional criminal charges. Kseniia Petrova, a Russian-born scientist conducting cancer research for Harvard Medical School, was indicted on Wednesday by a federal grand jury in Boston on one count of concealment of a material fact, one count of false statement and one count of smuggling goods into the United States. She had originally been charged with smuggling in May. Petrova was stopped at Boston's Logan airport by US authorities on her way back from France in February, over what appeared to be an irregularity in customs paperwork related to a packet from a specialist lab of superfine spliced sections of frog embryos, for research. She was arrested and ended up in detention in Louisiana. Petrova was told her visa was being revoked and she was being deported to her native Russia, despite saying she feared persecution for opposing the invasion of Ukraine She was ordered released on bail in May and transferred back to Massachusetts to face the federal charges. Despite the additional charges on Wednesday, Petrova will remain on pretrial release. A lawyer for Petrova could not be reached for comment. She said in an interview with the Associated Press in April that she did not realize the items needed to be declared and was not trying to sneak anything into the country. If convicted of the smuggling charge, Petrova faces a sentence of up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. She also faces a sentence of up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on the charges of concealment of material fact and false statements. Her colleagues at Harvard have been dismayed at her treatment, saying her expertise in their research is 'irreplaceable', while Petrova said foreign scientists 'enrich' the US. She had described conditions in detention as overcrowded, with extremes of temperatures, constant noise and terrible food.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Is this the best way to cook pasta?
Cooking pasta al dente, meaning firm to the bite, is recommended by nutritionists to help manage blood sugar levels. Overcooked pasta can release starch, and also cause a rapid spike in blood sugar, increasing risks for heart disease and other complications. Al dente pasta is more digestible and has a lower glycemic index, leading to a slower absorption of glucose. A lower glycemic index helps maintain stable blood sugar, which is beneficial for overall health, particularly for individuals with diabetes, and can promote longer-lasting satiety. Avoid rinsing pasta after cooking, as this washes away beneficial starches and nutrients.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Protesters in wheelchairs cuffed with zip-ties during Capitol demonstrations against Medicaid cuts
A group of protesters, some in wheelchairs, were arrested and zip-tied on Capitol Hill and dragged out by police officers as they demonstrated against proposed cuts to Medicaid in Republicans' massive spending package. Proposed cuts could mean that some 10 million low-income Americans would lose coverage over the course of the next 10 years. The legislation would also put in place additional work requirements for those using the program. At least 33 people were arrested for 'illegally demonstrating' inside the Russell Senate Rotunda, a Capitol Police spokesperson told The Independent on Wednesday. The group was arrested for 'crowding, obstructing, and incommoding,' police said. Another protester was arrested for allegedly crossing a police line, police told The Independent. 'It should be noted that there are other places on Capitol Grounds where people can lawfully demonstrate without issue,' the agency said in a statement. Protesters chanted slogans such as 'no cuts to Medicaid' and 'kill the bill.' Other protesters unfurled a banner stating 'Senate Republicans don't kill us' on one of the staircases. Police quickly confiscated it. The demonstrations took place ahead of President Donald Trump's Fourth of July deadline to pass the legislation. The initial votes on the legislation, a version of which has already passed the House, are expected as soon as Thursday or Friday. Medicaid cuts are widely unpopular among congressional Democrats and even some Republicans who represent rural areas with hospitals that rely on federal funding to stay open to serve lower-income patients. Another group of Republicans are pushing for a $15 billion 'stabilization fund' specifically for such hospitals. Some Republican senators and members of the House have noted that they're still not sure what's even going to be in the final version of the bill. White House officials have said they expect to have the final text this week. With narrow majorities in both the House and the Senate, Republicans can't afford to lose many votes against a Democratic party unified in opposition to the bill. Republican North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis has warned his own party that the cuts could be wildly unpopular. Tillis has handed out flyers outlining why the legislation is bad for North Carolina, exactly because of the cuts to Medicaid, Punchbowl News noted. He argued that Republicans up for re-election next year — including him — will face negative consequences if it passes.