logo
Tougher sentences for criminals who abuse LGBT people ‘vital step forward'

Tougher sentences for criminals who abuse LGBT people ‘vital step forward'

Yahoo5 hours ago

Tougher sentences for violent offenders who hurt people based on their sexuality would mark a 'vital step forward', a Labour MP has said.
Jacob Collier called for new aggravated offences as part of the Government's Crime and Policing Bill, as he warned many LGBT+ people 'don't feel safe in reporting hate'.
More than 100 cross-party MPs backed the proposed amendment, originally put forward by Rachel Taylor, which would create the new offences if violent crimes are motivated by hostility towards a person's sexuality, transgender identity or disability.
Home Office minister Dame Diana Johnson has vowed to broaden the framework for aggravated offences.
Mr Collier said: 'I know what it means to think twice how you walk down the street, to pause before holding somebody's hand, to wonder whether that shout from across the road is something you can ignore or something you can't afford to.
'And I know that I'm not alone in that.
'I've spoken to my constituents and people from far beyond who tell me that they don't feel safe in reporting hate when it happens. They don't believe that they'll be taken seriously and there's a profound failure of trust, and one that we in this House have a duty to repair.'
The Burton and Uttoxeter MP also told the Commons: 'I think it's also fitting that we are introducing this amendment in Pride Month, and in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling which has caused so much anguish amongst the trans community.'
He said the move 'represents a vital step forward in the protection of some of the most marginalised people within our society' and added: 'Too many victims still believe that the system is not on their side and this new clause gives us the opportunity to change that. It gives police and prosecutors a clear route to charge and convict offenders in a way that truly reflects the nature of these crimes.'
Mr Collier said the proposed change was 'about dignity, about recognising that whether you're a trans teenager being punched in the park, a gay couple being spat on on the Tube, or a disabled man being harassed on his way to work, all people deserve the full protection of the law'.
Aggravated offences would also offer 'vital protection for disabled people, who often remain far too invisible in the public conversation around hate crime', he added.
The law already provides for aggravated offences, if they are motivated by hostility towards a victim's race or religious group membership.
'That discrepancy cannot be right. We cannot as a society say that some forms of hatred are more evil than others,' Ms Taylor told the Commons.
The Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth added she was 'at university when section 28 was introduced', part of the Local Government Act 1988 which banned town halls from promoting or teaching 'the acceptability of' homosexuality in schools.
'I remember it vividly, it was more than the law, it was an attack on the right of people like me to live openly,' she said.
'It stigmatised lesbians, gays and bisexual people, it pushed us out of public life.
'I got into politics to fight that cruel law and everything it represented.'
Ms Taylor said her amendment would be 'an important step forward for equal rights'.
Marie Tidball, the Labour MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge who also backed the amendment, said the proposal 'would foster respect and equality for all by ensuring justice for disabled victims of hate crime'.
Responding to the debate, Dame Diana branded these crimes 'disgraceful', and said the increase in hate crime towards transgender people 'cannot be tolerated'.
On the proposed new clause, Dame Diana said: 'The Government supports this change, as set out in our manifesto last year.
'And I can confirm to the House that we will bring forward a suitable Government amendment to give effect to this commitment in the Lords at committee stage.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In the City: Even a Reversal May Not Bring the Ultra-Rich Back
In the City: Even a Reversal May Not Bring the Ultra-Rich Back

Bloomberg

time40 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

In the City: Even a Reversal May Not Bring the Ultra-Rich Back

It's no secret the Labour government's policy to tax the UK's wealthiest as part of its effort to fix a budget crisis left by the Conservatives has caused Prime Minister Keir Starmer some headaches. The biggest exodus of wealth in the UK's recent history appears to be underway, and the data shows the departure is likely to be a drain on the economy. But is it enough for Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves to change course? And should she? Bloomberg reporter Benjamin Stupples joins host Allegra Stratton to discuss.

Boulder terror attack suspect appears in federal court; judge finds probable cause to move forward with hate crime charge
Boulder terror attack suspect appears in federal court; judge finds probable cause to move forward with hate crime charge

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Boulder terror attack suspect appears in federal court; judge finds probable cause to move forward with hate crime charge

The man charged with committing a terror attack in Boulder appeared in federal court in Denver on Wednesday. Mohamed Soliman is facing dozens of state and federal charges, including a hate crime charge. The judge found probable cause to move forward with that federal hate crime charge. Investigators say Soliman, 45, threw Molotov cocktails at a group of people marching in support of Israeli hostages on the Pearl Street Mall on June 1. Several people were hospitalized with severe burns. Authorities consider 15 people and a dog victims of the attack. Soliman will be back in state court for a hearing next month. Soliman allegedly planned the attack for a year and was driven by a desire "to kill all Zionist people." His defense attorney, David Kraut, urged Magistrate Judge Kathryn Starnella not to allow the case to move forward. Kraut said Soliman's anti-Zionist statements and his online search for a "Zionist" event to attack showed he targeted the demonstrators because of their perceived political views -- their assumed support for the nation of Israel and the political movement of Zionism. An attack motivated by someone's political views is not considered a hate crime under federal law. Assistant U.S. Attorney Melissa Hindman said the government alleged that the attack was a hate crime because Soliman targeted people based on their national origin -- their perceived connection to Israel. Prosecutors are not alleging that Soliman targeted demonstrators, who carried Israeli and American flags, because he believed they were Jewish, noting that he has said that not all Jewish people are Zionists. Starnella acknowledged that some of the evidence undercut the government's allegation that the demonstrators were targeted because of their perceived national origin but said other evidence supported it. At this stage, the government gets the benefit of the doubt on questions about evidence, she said. Investigators say Soliman told them he had intended to kill the roughly 20 participants at the weekly demonstration, but he threw just two of his over two dozen Molotov cocktails while yelling "Free Palestine." Soliman told investigators he tried to buy a gun but was not able to because he was not a "legal citizen." Mohamed Soliman in federal court earlier this month Robyn Cochran-Ragland Federal authorities say Soliman, an Egyptian national, has been living in the U.S. illegally with his family. During his Wednesday appearance, Soliman's lower right arm and hand were wrapped in a thick bandage, with handcuffs around his wrists. Police previously said he was taken to a hospital for unspecified injuries right after the attack. FBI agent Timothy Chan testified at Wednesday's hearing that Soliman burned himself as he threw the second Molotov cocktail. Soliman did not carry out his full plan "because he got scared and had never hurt anyone before," police wrote in an arrest affidavit. Soliman is charged separately in state court with multiple counts of attempted murder, assault and offenses related to more than a dozen additional Molotov cocktails police say he did not use. Run for Their Lives, the group targeted in the attack, started in October 2023 after Hamas militants from the Gaza Strip stormed into Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 250 others hostage. Federal authorities are seeking to deport Soliman's wife and their five children. They range in age from 4 to 18 years old and are being held in an immigration center in Texas, according to court documents. The White House said in a June 3 social media post that one-way tickets had been purchased for the family members, adding: "Final boarding call coming soon." A Colorado federal judge temporarily blocked their deportation with a restraining order on June 4. The case has since been transferred to Texas, where a federal judge on Wednesday extended the restraining order another two weeks. Lawyers for the family had asked to keep the order in place, even though government lawyers said in court documents that the family would be deported under the normal process, not an expedited one because the lawyers did not address the earlier comments from the White House.

SCOTUS ruling will bring more people to Minnesota for gender-affirming care, advocates say
SCOTUS ruling will bring more people to Minnesota for gender-affirming care, advocates say

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

SCOTUS ruling will bring more people to Minnesota for gender-affirming care, advocates say

In a landmark decision on Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Tennessee law restricting medical treatments — like puberty blockers and hormone therapy — for transgender minors. Twenty-six other states have laws with similar restrictions to Tennessee. With this latest news, LGBTQ+ advocates say they expect to see more people traveling to Minnesota, and even moving to Minnesota to seek gender-affirming care. "We are seeing a just plethoria of folks moving here to Minnesota just to get basic human care," said Andi Otto, executive director of Twin Cities Pride. House Republicans in Minnesota introduced a similar bill this past session banning gender-affirming care, but it didn't make it out of committee. While advocates say there's fear Minnesota could see similar restrictions, Otto said Minnesota's 2023 trans refuge bill gives him reassurance. "I continue to have faith in our legislators and our government to make those decisions and keep Minnesota exactly what it's supposed to be, and that's a state that you're free to be yourself," Otto said. Also on Wednesday, it was also announced the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline would no longer connect those in need of help to the Trevor Project, which helps LGBTQ+ individuals in crisis. "It's really tragic to have these two decisions come on the same day," said Kat Rohn, executive director for OutFront Minnesota. "To see that actually enacted and moved forward is a really hurtful blow to kids who need all the support they can get." Otto said the timing of this announcement during Pride Month is not a coincidence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store