Former CIA Insider Highlights America's Buried Advantage in Online Presentation
Washington, D.C., July 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Rediscovering America's Strategic Core
In a released presentation , renowned former national security advisor Jim Rickards warns that the next major shift in U.S. policy may come not from Wall Street or Washington—but from beneath the surface of federally controlled lands.
'This story is not about real estate… the government retained the most valuable part'.
Rickards points to a dormant but active legal provision—originally designed to encourage domestic growth—which may now hold the key to America's technological future.
The Invisible Wiring of Modern Power
The materials Rickards identifies are not commodities in the traditional sense—they are foundational enablers of global advancement: Application Mineral Inputs AI Chips & Data Centers Silicon, gallium, germanium, copper EV Batteries Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, graphite Missile Systems & Drones Neodymium, dysprosium, samarium, rare earth alloys Satellite Navigation Indium, tantalum, beryllium, aluminum
'These seemingly obscure minerals… they're the building blocks of everything from NVIDIA chips to advanced military weapons'.
Sources: U.S. Department of Energy
CSIS
Visual Capitalist
A 150-Year-Old Law, Still in Effect
Rickards centers the opportunity on Title 30—a little-known federal statute from the 1800s that allowed Americans to claim rights to public lands, which were often rich in mineral deposits.
'Back then, anyone could make a claim… pay $2 to $5 per acre… and do a minimal amount of work'.
The framework still exists—and Rickards believes it may quietly be resurfacing to address modern strategic needs without requiring congressional debate.
Technology May Be the Catalyst
Rickards believes a convergence of technology and geopolitics is making this moment different: The use of AI mapping tools to identify previously unreachable mineral deposits
The Pentagon's direct involvement in securing U.S. rare-earth supply chains
Escalating foreign control over strategic mineral exports
'We have truly massive mineral wealth here. It's not hard to extract. We know where it is. And how to get it'
About Jim Rickards
Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, White House, and Treasury. His work has guided U.S. leadership during global crises including the Iran Hostage Situation and the 2008 financial collapse. He is the editor of Strategic Intelligence , a monthly report on national security, macroeconomics, and resource policy.
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 minutes ago
- The Hill
Congress wants to cut the smartest investment taxpayers ever made
Virtually every smartphone on the planet runs on a chip paid for by American taxpayers — a chip that I helped invent. Now Congress is moving to cut funding for the National Science Foundation that could lead to future breakthroughs. Investing in innovation is not wasteful spending. It is one of the smartest investments Washington makes, creating new jobs, stronger businesses and higher tax revenue in every corner of the country. Cutting the level of government funding for scientific research now would rip those future returns out of American hands and deliver them to our global competitors. I built my career in public universities. Over four decades, I helped lead a dozen federally funded research labs. Five of them produced breakthrough technologies that became part of the backbone of modern life. In the 1980s, we developed a much more efficient style of microprocessor (the RISC chip) in a university lab with graduate students funded by the government. At the time, few imagined that breakthrough would one day power 300 billion chips. The National Science Foundation also funded research that made digital storage much more reliable and affordable (called RAID storage), enhancing everything from cloud computing to online banking. These innovations helped launch entire industries and are used daily by billions of people. These breakthroughs did not come from corporate boardrooms or billionaire-backed startups. They were built by students, developed in public labs and funded by American taxpayers. For decades, my research received support from the NSF's Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, through grants and Ph.D. fellowships. All told, American taxpayers invested just under $100 million in the labs I helped lead. Accounting for inflation, technologies that came out of them went on to generate over $1 trillion in product sales. That is a 10,000-to-1 return on investment to the public and surely at least 1,000-to-1 return directly back to the government in taxes. Not from luck, but from decades of public investment. And the payoff is real. These gains show up as jobs in 44 states, tools that power small businesses and tax revenue that supports public schools, infrastructure and national defense. These returns belong to the American taxpayer. This isn't some ivory tower experiment or elite subsidy. It is an innovation engine and one of the most powerful drivers of U.S. economic strength. So what is Congress doing with one of the few federal programs that consistently creates value for everyday Americans? Preparing to cut National Science Foundation funding by $2 billion, a 23 percent reduction from 2025. The Trump administration has signaled that it wants to prioritize artificial intelligence, with efforts such as the recent AI Action Plan and the announcement of $100 million in NSF investment. These efforts can't begin to offset the damage of deep cuts to the broader ecosystem that makes future AI breakthroughs possible. Cutting the budget of the Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering would be a self-inflicted blow to American competitiveness. Lawmakers say they're prioritizing programs with the greatest national impact, but this cut targets the very office funding the administration's top priorities: AI, quantum computing and cybersecurity. That's not prioritization. It's a fiduciary failure. AI is advancing fast, but it depends on breakthroughs throughout the computing stack. My own specialty, computer design, may seem distant from AI, but it's fundamental. Just look at NVIDIA's stock price. None of this appeared out of thin air. It came from researchers trained through NSF fellowships. Shrink the pipeline, and we lose the lead. Anticipating cuts, NSF has already halved its fellowships for 2025. We need more computer scientists, not fewer, and we need them trained here, not in countries eager to claim our place. China has more than tripled its research spending since 2010 and continues to raise it every year. China understands what is at stake: leadership in AI, semiconductors, cybersecurity and advanced computing. If we back off now, foreign firms will not hesitate to build on the breakthroughs that American taxpayers made possible. They will turn our investment in research into their dominance, and the jobs and industries that should grow in Atlanta, Boston and Dallas will take root in London, Bangalore and Shenzhen. As a scientist, I'm scared. As a taxpayer, I'm livid. We built a lead. Now Washington is ready to give it away. Since its founding, America has capitalized on innovation as the primary engine of wealth creation and nationwide prosperity. History is full of nations that failed to innovate and lost their edge. The U.S. has done the opposite. We invested in research, trained generations of scientists and engineers and built the most dynamic innovation ecosystem the world has ever seen. Every American taxpayer is a silent shareholder in that success. If we walk away now, we lose not just future breakthroughs but also what we have already earned. If Congress fails to preserve this funding, we hand our competitive edge and prosperity to someone else.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Latest Executive Orders: President to Sign New Declarations Into Law—Live Updates
President Donald Trump is expected to sign a series of executive orders on Thursday, focusing on banking and investments. They include an order which will allow riskier assets, such as real estate, private equity and cryptocurrency, to be included in 401(k) retirement accounts. Trump is also expected to sign an order formalizing "debanking" protections. What To Know Trump's 401(k) order would allow private equity and other fund managers to tap into trillions of dollars of Americans' retirement savings. "The order directs the Securities and Exchange Commission to facilitate access to alternative assets for participant-directed defined-contribution retirement savings plans by revising applicable regulations and guidance," the White House official told Reuters on condition of anonymity. His "debanking" order would would punish banks for restricting or blocking services to customers based on their political or religious beliefs. Conservatives and crypto industry advocates have been pushing for Trump to direct federal banking regulators to remove "reputational risk" language from their guidance which they say has been used to exclude them from mainstream organizations. Stay with Newsweek for the latest updates.
Newsweek
5 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Woman Loses Bracelet of 'Sentimental Value'—Then Security Cam Reveals Truth
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A California woman feared the worst when a priceless family heirloom went missing—but, thankfully for her, a little modern technology saved the day. Everyone is guilty of losing something from time to time. In 2023, a survey of 2,000 U.S. adults conducted by the jewelry firm Shane Co. revealed Americans lose around five items a month and spend an average of 16 minutes searching for them. Antonella, a woman from Chatsworth in California, found herself embroiled in one of those searches last month, after her mother realized a prized personal item was missing. "My mom noticed her bracelet was missing when we got back from the store," Antonella told Ring. "She immediately said, 'Oh no, it fell at the store!'" The slow process of trying to work out where the bracelet could be had begun in earnest, but it wasn't long before Antonella hit upon an inventive idea that would utilize the Ring security cameras' position inside and outside the house. "We started to retrace our steps around the house when we were unloading groceries, which is when I thought of looking through our Ring cameras," Antonella said. In doing so, the mother and daughter were able to deduce where the bracelet could be, although its likely location was not the most inviting. "By carefully reviewing footage from the front door, garage, and side gate, I was able to pinpoint the exact moment it slipped off while she was taking out the trash," Antonella said. What followed was a slow, methodical and often-unpleasant forage back through the trash to try to find the missing bracelet. Footage of Antonella and her mom wading through the trash to look for the jewelry was captured on a Ring device in the backyard of their home, with the footage subsequently shared with Newsweek. Despite the fact they were looking for something tantamount to a needle in a haystack, Antonella and her mom never gave up hope of finding the bracelet, as the Ring footage shows. The pair were eventually rewarded for their efforts too when they eventually located the irreplaceable piece, down at the bottom of the trash can. Despite the unsavory nature of what they were doing, both Antonella and her mom couldn't help but be overjoyed at finding the piece, which was of special significance to their family. "It was such a relief to find it, especially because it holds deep sentimental value connected to our late grandparents," Antonella said. The experience has also opened Antonella's eyes to one of a series of potential alternative uses for her Ring security camera system that she had never considered. "This was the first time we used a Ring to find a lost item, and now I always tell people how powerful it is for more than just security," Antonella said. "We're so grateful. Ring truly brought peace of mind in an emotional moment."
