logo
Trump, Starmer agree to implement tariff-cutting trade deal

Trump, Starmer agree to implement tariff-cutting trade deal

Business Times5 hours ago

[LONDON] Prime Minister Keir Starmer reached an agreement with US President Donald Trump to implement trading terms disclosed last month to slash US tariffs on key British exports and raise UK quotas on certain American agricultural products.
Trump and Starmer on Monday (Jun 16) presented a document signed at the Group of Seven meeting in Kananaskis, Canada, agreeing to move forward on measures easing trade of cars, agricultural and aerospace products – but falling short of an immediate cut to steel tariffs, a key British ask.
'The UK is very well protected,' Trump told reporters. 'Because I like them, that's why, that's their ultimate protection.'
Trump signed an executive order on Monday that also exempts the UK's civil aerospace aircraft sector from Trump's baseline 10 per cent country-by-country tariffs, a significant tariff relief measure for a sector closely intertwined with the US industry. UK auto exports will see US tariffs slashed to 10 per cent from 27.5 per cent later in June on an annual quota of 100,000 vehicles.
On steel, the US agreed to exempt the UK up to a certain quota that has not yet been set. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick will determine the quota of products that can enter the US without being subject to the 25 per cent tariffs, a White House official said.
The UK in turn committed to 'working to meet American requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminium' including on the 'nature of ownership' of relevant steel plants, according to the document. That confirms reports of US concerns about the foreign ownership of British Steel, which runs Britain's last remaining blast furnaces that make steel from raw materials. While the UK government has taken effective control of the manufacturer, its legal owner remains China's Jingye Group.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
In an awkward moment, the US president dropped part of the document as he opened a folder to show it to reporters. Starmer retrieved the pages from the ground, before Trump went on to erroneously describe it as a 'trade agreement with the European Union', the bloc which the UK left five years ago.
The deal is the first sealed by Trump following his decision to ratchet up tariffs against countries worldwide. While the US president has also secured a trade framework with China that lowered escalating tariffs, agreements with other trading partners have proved more elusive.
His administration will tout the UK agreement as a signal that his tariff war is bearing fruit, after winning UK concessions on agriculture. The pair agreed to reciprocal access to 13,000 metric tonnes of beef for both US and British farmers, though the UK says any US imports will need to meet its food safety standards.
For Starmer, sheltering key industries from more aggressive tariffs before other countries strike their own deals with the US is a vindication of his diplomatic approach of refusing to overtly criticise Trump. But the absence of steel for now is a major blow, with a UK official saying tariffs remained at 25 per cent, despite last month's framework document laying out plans to drop them to zero. BLOOMBERG

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban, World News
Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban, World News

AsiaOne

timean hour ago

  • AsiaOne

Harvard secures extension of court order blocking Trump's international student ban, World News

BOSTON — A federal judge said on Monday (July 16) that she would issue a brief extension of an order temporarily blocking President Donald Trump's plan to bar foreign nationals from entering the US to study at Harvard University while she decides whether to issue a longer-term injunction. US District Judge Allison Burroughs, at the end of a hearing in Boston in Harvard's legal challenge to the restrictions, extended to June 23 a temporary restraining order that had been set to expire on Thursday. She said she wanted to give herself more time to prepare a ruling. "We'll kick out an opinion as soon as we can," she said. The judge scheduled the hearing after issuing a temporary restraining order on June 5 preventing the administration from implementing a proclamation that Trump had signed a day earlier. A preliminary injunction would provide longer-term relief to Harvard while its lawsuits proceeds. Almost 6,800 international students attended Harvard in its most recent school year, making up about 27 per cent of the student population of the prestigious Cambridge, Massachusetts-based school. The judge, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, did not indicate how she would ultimately rule. But she said a US Department of Justice attorney defending Trump's policy faced an "uphill battle" convincing her that Harvard would not be irreparably harmed if the proclamation was implemented. Ian Gershengorn, the school's lawyer, told the judge the "impact of the proclamation is devastating to Harvard and its students." He said Trump signed the proclamation to retaliate against Harvard in violation of its free speech rights under the US Constitution's First Amendment for refusing to accede to the administration's demands to control the school's governance, curriculum and the ideology of its faculty and students. Justice Department attorney Tiberius Davis countered that Congress had given Trump "sweeping authority" under the Immigration and Nationality Act to suspend the entry of specific categories of foreign nationals, which the president relied on to address national security concerns at Harvard. "We don't trust them to host foreign students," Davis said. The Trump administration has launched a multifront attack on the oldest and wealthiest US university, freezing billions of dollars in grants and other funding and proposing to end its tax-exempt status, prompting a series of legal challenges. Harvard has filed two separate lawsuits before Burroughs seeking to unfreeze around US$2.5 billion (S$3.2 billion) in funding and to prevent the administration from blocking the ability of international students to attend the university. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on May 22 announced that her department was immediately revoking Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme certification, the governmental mechanism that allows it to enroll foreign students. Her action was almost immediately blocked by Burroughs. While the Department of Homeland Security has since shifted to challenging Harvard's certification through a months-long administrative process, Burroughs at a May 29 hearing said she planned to issue a "broad" injunction to maintain the status quo. A week later, though, Trump signed his proclamation, which cited national security concerns to contend that Harvard is "no longer a trustworthy steward of international student and exchange visitor programmes." The proclamation suspended the entry of foreign nationals to study at Harvard or participate in exchange visitor programmes for an initial period of six months and directed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider whether to revoke visas of international students already enrolled at Harvard. At Monday's hearing, Davis cited Harvard's acceptance of foreign money including from China and what he said was an inadequate response to the administration's demand for information on foreign students who engaged in illegal activity during a period of "increased unrest" on its campus as examples of those national security concerns. Trump has accused Harvard of creating an unsafe environment for Jewish students and allowing antisemitism to fester on its campus. Protests over Israel's treatment of Palestinians during its war with Hamas in Gaza have roiled numerous universities' campuses, including Harvard's. [[nid:718336]]

G-7 statement expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability
G-7 statement expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

G-7 statement expresses support for Israel, calls Iran source of instability

The statement issued late on June 16 by the G-7 nations has called for peace and stability in the Middle East. PHOTO: EPA-EFE WASHINGTON – The Group of Seven (G-7) nations expressed support for Israel and labelled its rival Iran as a source of instability in the Middle East, in a statement issued late on June 16 that called for peace and stability in the region. 'We affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself,' the statement said. 'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.' 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' The air war between Iran and Israel – which began on June 13 when Israel attacked Iran with air strikes – has raised alarm in a region that had already been on edge since the start of Israel's military assault on Gaza in October 2023. REUTERS, AFP More to come Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

UK failed to identify disproportionate number of Asian men in 'grooming gangs', report says, World News
UK failed to identify disproportionate number of Asian men in 'grooming gangs', report says, World News

AsiaOne

timean hour ago

  • AsiaOne

UK failed to identify disproportionate number of Asian men in 'grooming gangs', report says, World News

LONDON — British police will be ordered to record the ethnicity of gangs involved in organised child sexual abuse after a report on Monday (June 16) detailed state failures to tackle the issue and a reluctance to recognise an "over-representation" of Asian men. For about 15 years, Britain has been shocked by revelations of so-called child "grooming gangs" exploiting thousands of children for sex, becoming one of the most contentious political issues amid findings that fears of being accused of racism had played a part in the failure of the authorities to intervene. Those on the political left have argued that far-right groups have used the issue to stigmatise entire Asian communities, while others say the ethnicity question has been ignored, often at the expense of the victims. The scandal returned to the spotlight this year after US billionaire Elon Musk criticised Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government over its stance, forcing him to commission a review by Louise Casey, a member of the House of Lords, into the scale and nature of the problem and who was responsible. The report found data from three areas showed "clear evidence of over-representation among suspects of Asian and Pakistani heritage men", but that ethnicity was not recorded in two-thirds of cases. "Despite reviews, reports and enquiries raising questions about men from Asian or Pakistani backgrounds grooming and sexually exploiting young white girls, the system has consistently failed to fully acknowledge this or collect accurate data so it can be examined effectively," the report said. The report found the questions about the ethnicity of those behind the abuse had "been dodged for years" and partly because of "fear of appearing racist, raising community tensions or causing community cohesion problems". Interior minister Yvette Cooper apologised to victims in parliament saying there had been "too much reliance on flawed data, too much denial, too little justice, too many criminals getting off, too many victims being let down". The government accepted all the recommendations of the report, including setting up a national enquiry into the grooming gangs after months of resistance. Opposition parties, including Nigel Farage's Reform UK and the Conservative Party, have accused the government of delaying its decision and failing the victims. To counter those accusations, the government announced that the policing agency that investigates serious crime would help track down the perpetrators of abuse. The police have already identified more than 800 cases for review, with the figure expected to rise to over 1,000 in the coming weeks, Cooper said. Cooper said survivors of the abuse had been ignored for too long and "blindness, ignorance, prejudice, defensiveness and even good but misdirected intentions all played a part in this collective failure". [[nid:719110]]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store