Trump cheers new portrait hanging in Colorado Capitol after he ripped into artist for 'unflattering' first try
Trump's view of the new one was considerably more positive, gushing about the artist after he found a previous version 'unflattering.'
'Thank you to the Highly Talented Artist, Vanessa Horabuena, and the incredible people of Colorado — Now on display in the Colorado State Capitol!' Trump posted on his Truth Social site, along with the image of the new portrait.
The new rendering, donated by the White House, shows a bronzed Trump staring dead ahead, and bears a resemblance to the recent official Trump portraits the president has installed at the White House.
They bear a resemblance to his infamous mugshot, taken when he was processed in Georgia during one of his four criminal trials during the 2020 campaign.
Trump also appears considerably slimmer than in the earlier portrait, which was the subject of a furious post.
'Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado, in the State Capitol, put up by the Governor, along with all other Presidents, was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before,' Trump raged. 'I would much prefer not having a picture than having this one.'
He also called the earlier painting by Sarah Boardman 'truly the worst.'
The state's Republican leadership quickly had the portrait taken down, the Daily Mail reported in March. But the drawing had been funded by a state Republican official, not the Democratic governor.
In June the White House unveiled a new official photo portrait of Trump that showed heavy indications of photo-shop.
Horabuena's website describes her as a 'Christian Worship Artist' and features other large portraits of Trump.
The artist defended it at the time as a neutral take that was not meant to be confrontational.
Also hanging in the White House is a portrait of a bloodied Trump making a fist after the attempt on his life in Butler, Pennsylvania.
The new portrait by Tempe, Arizona, artist Horabuena is a sterner, crisper image than Sarah Boardman's painting of Trump that had hung since 2019.
Last spring, Trump posted on social media that Boardman 'must have lost her talent as she got older' and 'purposely distorted' him, criticisms the Colorado Springs artist denied.
The next day, lawmakers announced they would remove the portrait from a wall of past presidents. By the day after that, Boardman's painting was gone, put into museum storage.
The Horabuena portrait donated by the White House a month or so ago went up this week after a Thursday decision by Lois Court, a former state lawmaker who chairs the Capitol Building Advisory Committee that helps select artwork for the Capitol in downtown Denver.
'There was a blank on the wall. It seemed inappropriate. We knew that the White House had sent us this replacement and it simply made sense to put it up,' Court said.
Trump's portrait hangs in federal buildings around the country and in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building
The White House donated the Horabuena portrait a month or so ago, said Court.
Horabuena is a 'Christian worship artist' who has done several other depictions of Trump as well as Abraham Lincoln, Mount Rushmore and Jesus Christ, according to her website.
On Tuesday, the Colorado statehouse was sleepy with lawmakers out of session and no schoolchildren visiting the historic building. A smattering of tourists took photos of the new portrait.
Horabuena did not return a phone message Tuesday seeking comment.
The portrait and others of past presidents might not remain up for long. The advisory committee is considering whether to replace them with portraits of past governors to mark the 150th anniversary of Colorado statehood next year.
The Daily Mail has reached out to the White House for additional information about the cost and payment for the portrait.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Noem fast-tracks construction for water barriers in Texas along Rio Grande to keep migrants from crossing into US
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has fast-tracked construction for about 17 miles worth of floating border barriers in the Rio Grande River in Texas, expanding the rapidly growing Trump administration footprint on the US-Mexico border. Noem signed a waiver bypassing environmental laws so about 17 miles of 'waterborne barrier' technology could be built in the Rio Grande Valley in South Texas, the Department of Homeland Security announced on Thursday. 'A capability gap has been identified in waterways along the Southwest border where drug smuggling, human trafficking and other dangerous and illegal activity occurs,' the department said in a statement. The project, which will be paid for with previously allocated funds, marks the sixth time Noem has used such a waiver. It revives a strategy that was a source of controversy under the previous administration, when the Biden administration sued the state of Texas for putting a 1,000 feet of razor-tipped barriers in the Rio Grande, in a case that was ultimately unsuccessful on appeal. Texas's much smaller floating barrier effort cost about $1 million, and Rep. Henry Cuellar, Democrat of Texas, warned Border Report that the latest DHS version of a river barrier could cost vastly more. 'When you talk about constructing a fence it could be $30 million per mile. This water structure is going to be expensive,' he said. Residents of the low-income, largely Hispanic region are divided over such border projects. The Rio Grande Valley voted for Trump in 2024, but some argue the border build-up in the area has drained needed resources and led to profiling against Latinos. 'This is like a rights-free area,' Michelle Serrano, of the local advocacy group Voces Unidas RGV, told The Independent last year. 'We're talking about an area where they freely racially profile us. It feels like a separate but equal situation.' In addition to expanding border construction, the second Trump administration has also transferred nearly 400 miles of border land to military control, as a means of expanding the use of troops in direct immigration enforcement, while deploying Marines and National Guard troops internally in response to anti-immigration raid protests in Los Angeles. Prior to Trump returning to office, states like Texas embarked on their own border infrastructure sprees, erecting razor barriers, walls, and floating buoys. As part of the Trump administration's Big, Beautiful Bill spending package, the federal government will spend over $13 billion reimbursing states like Texas for their efforts.
Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Russia helped create the US, Putin tells Trump
Vladimir Putin has claimed in a phone call with Donald Trump that Russia played a role in the formation of the United States. Speaking a day before America celebrates Independence Day, the Russian leader reportedly congratulated Mr Trump about its national holiday, held on July 4. According to a report by Tass, a state-owned news agency, Yury Ushakov, the Russian presidential aide, said during the call 'it was noted from our side that Russia played an important role in the formation of American statehood including during the War of Independence 250 years ago, and then during the Civil War, which ended 160 years ago'. He added: 'It was stated that our countries are linked not only by the alliance in the First and Second World Wars, but also by deeper historical roots.' It was not immediately clear how Mr Trump responded or what Mr Putin was referring to, although some historians such as Paul Behringer have written about a 'distant friendship' between the two countries. 'During the 19th Century, as the US began to spread across the North American continent and Russia established colonies in Alaska, America remained officially neutral during the Crimean War. 'However, there was widespread public support for Russia. 'Russia also supported the Union during the US Civil War and in 1867 Russia agreed to sell Alaska to the US for $7.2 million.' Putin will not 'back down' The call had been arranged for the leaders to address the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, three years after Russia invaded. Mr Ushakov added that during the call Putin said he would not 'back down' from its goals. He added: 'Our president also said that Russia will achieve the goals it has set: that is, the elimination of the well-known root causes that led to the current state of affairs.' Putin has previously claimed he invaded Ukraine because it was set to join Nato, even though that was not a certainty. During the 2024 election campaign Mr Trump often said he could secure a ceasefire in just a day after returning to the White House. Yet Putin has appeared unwilling to either end its military operations or hold meaningful negotiations about a peace plan. This week it was reported the US was freezing the dispatch of some military equipment to Ukraine. The decision was taken after the US assessed its own stockpiles of some weapons were running low. Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian leader, said he hoped to speak with Mr Trump on Friday.
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Space Shuttle is set to be moved out of Smithsonian and to Texas thanks to Trump's tax bill
A famous NASA space shuttle is set to be moved out of the Smithsonian and to Texas after House Republicans passed President Donald Trump's tax bill Thursday. The focal points of the so-called 'big, beautiful bill' have been an extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts and cuts to the low-income healthcare program Medicaid. But there is a lesser-known provision sparking controversy. Once the bill is signed by Trump, $85 million will be allocated to transport the Discovery space shuttle from the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum to Space Center Houston. The shuttle was part of NASA's Space Shuttle program, which ran from 1981 to 2011. The provision was criticized by the Smithsonian and others because of the cost and potential for damage of moving the space shuttle. In a new report by The Washington Post, the Smithsonian estimated it will actually cost more than $300 million to transport Discovery when accounting for costs such as constructing a new facility at Space Center Houston for the shuttle and creating an alternative museum display at the Smithsonian. Discovery would also be 'extremely complex and difficult' to transfer, the Smithsonian said, adding there is a 'significant' threat of damage to the shuttle. Garrett Reisman, a former astronaut who flew on the Discovery, also voiced his concerns about the transfer, calling it 'ludicrous and unnecessary.' 'I would much rather see that money invested in NASA's science program,' Reisman told the Post. Trump has proposed cutting back the science program calling its current $7 billion in spending 'unsustainable' in his 2026 budget request. 'If you're going to cut that and then cough up hundreds of millions of dollars into this for what is essentially a political mission — two senators who are concerned only about what's best for their state and not what's best for the country — I find that to be just a travesty,' Reisman said. Those two senators would be Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, both Texas Republicans who backed the provision. A spokesperson for Cornyn told the Post the Smithsonian's estimate for the cost to transfer the shuttle was 'purposefully overblown.' 'An outside vendor skilled at moving military equipment like tanks, military aircraft larger than a space shuttle, and the shuttle mock-up has estimated the total cost to be between $5-$8 million,' the spokesperson said. Cruz argued in a statement to the Post: 'Houston has long stood at the heart of America's human spaceflight program, and this legislation rightly honors that legacy.'
