Labour delivers mixed picture on environment after one year, campaigners say
Greenpeace UK and Friends of the Earth together assessed the party's progress on tackling the climate and nature crises ahead of Thursday, which marks one year since the general election.
The two groups said the Government's overall environmental record is a 'mixed picture'.
Assessing key policy areas, they rated the Government highest for its progress on climate and energy because of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband's efforts to reposition the UK as a global climate leader and oversee the UK's transition towards clean energy.
But the campaigners also criticised decisions to invest billions into nuclear power, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and roads, instead of funnelling more money towards carbon-cutting measures.
In terms of homes and transport, the groups welcomed investment in buses and railways, promotion of cleaner modes of transport and the requirement for landlords to raise energy efficiency standards.
However, they criticised Labour's support for airport expansion and said more money is needed to decarbonise these sectors if the UK is to meet its climate targets.
The Government fared worse on nature and the environment in the organisations' assessment.
While moving to ban bee-harming pesticides, launching reforms of the polluting water sector and banning bottom-trawling in some protected areas, the campaigners said planning reforms that sideline nature in pursuit of growth have been particularly alarming.
There has also been little progress on adopting laws to ensure UK companies do not contribute to illegal deforestation globally, nor the ratification of a UN treaty to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030, they added.
The Government saw the worst rating, however, in the policy areas of justice and democracy, with the groups claiming there has been an increase in arrests and imprisonment of non-violent protesters.
The campaigners also called for the introduction of taxes on the largest polluters through measures such as a stronger windfall tax on oil and gas profits, a frequent flyer levy and wealth taxes.
Mike Childs, head of science, policy and research at Friends of the Earth, said: 'There's no denying Labour has made some good progress on its clean energy mission, and it's extremely encouraging the Government remains committed to delivering on climate targets despite the breakdown in the political consensus.
'But where there have been some positive wins for nature, they've been overshadowed by false claims that protecting wildlife and vital habitats is hindering development.
'What has been most worrying is this Government's attitude to protest, which has seen it continue the last government's legacy of cracking down on dissent and encroaching on the right of us all to stand up for what we believe.'
Reshima Sharma, deputy head of politics at Greenpeace UK, said: 'This Government's record is like a dance pattern with impressive forward strides and sudden backwards steps.
'A year in, this administration certainly deserves much credit for holding the course on climate action and fully backing renewables, as well as investing in public transport, but championing a third runway at Heathrow is a blot on their climate record.
'Tough action on polluting water companies, bee-harming pesticides and destructive fishing are all welcome moves, but the obsession with putting growth above everything else risks undoing some of the good work on nature protection.'
The groups said improvement is needed across all four policy areas, arguing that action to protect the environment will actively benefit people's lives through cheaper energy bills, cleaner air, thousands of new jobs and a stronger economy.
PA has contacted the Government for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
37 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
One Year of Starmer as UK PM: Where Does Labour Stand?
00:00 Some degree of calm has returned, at least for the markets in Britain, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves underlining her commitment to fiscal discipline and reassurances about her position in the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer. Now the market moves have really underscored the fragility of Britain's economic position as the Labour Party marked one year in power. Let's get more now from Bloomberg opinions. Rosa Prince Good morning, Rose. We've seen the Labour Party promising to make growth its top mission. So really, as we review this first year in office for Starmer, how is the party doing so far? Yeah, not so great. As you say, I think I thought that they could put everything into growth as a way of balancing those books. But it's easier said than done. You can't just press a button and suddenly achieve growth. So there are some measures which have been successful. They've put through some planning reforms and greenlit a lot of infrastructure projects, which I think they hope will achieve growth in the longer term. Shorter term, not so much, particularly that budget that Rachel Rees herself unveiled back in the autumn, which really hit businesses hard and led to a lack of investment, a lack of job creation. And the figures speak for themselves, really. I think we're on course for growth of about an anemic 1%. And what have been the winners this year? Yeah. It's not been all bad. I think if you had asked Keir Starmer at the start of his term whether he thought he'd do better on the domestic front or the foreign well around, I think he would have said domestically. But in fact, it's he's proved rather a and adept world leader. He's handled President Trump in particular better than most other world leaders. Britain has signed three important trade deals India, the European Union, and that trade deal with America and I think has been the only country so far to manage to mitigate some of those tariffs he's been talking about this morning. So that's probably the big policy win from him. And of course, we've got to talk about the chaos this week, Rose. The drama really centering around Starmer's U-turn, forced U-turn on welfare reform. But there've been a series of walk backs recently. Looking ahead, what are the challenges that he's going to face in terms of seeing through his big agenda? I think the major challenge and the thing that everything comes back to really is that this government is so boxed in on it's room for maneuver on the economy. So as we were saying, he had wanted to get some growth going in the British economy and really be able to fund those projects that he cares about, like improving public services. The growth hasn't come. They had hoped then to make the numbers add up by doing some public sector cuts. And as the welfare reform debacle showed this week, that's proved harder than they expected as well. So that really leaves only breaking the borrowing rules, which Rachel Reeves again committed to not doing. She says that she will continue to balance the budget and that borrowing will not rise. Then we've only got tax rises left, which again is the last thing that this Labour government wanted to do. So going forward, they've got a budget coming down the track. Then again, we don't know exactly when, but it'll probably be at the end of October or early November and the difficult choices are coming. And I wonder, Rachel Reeves was finding the pressure really quite tough.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Crunch nears for UK's Reeves, with stability elusive and markets wary
By Andy Bruce, Kate Holton and Elizabeth Piper MANCHESTER, England (Reuters) -After a year in office, Britain's finance minister Rachel Reeves faces a reckoning over unmet promises of economic stability, with a stop-start economy and restive bond markets pointing to another tax-raising budget that she had hoped to avoid. Wednesday saw the biggest collapse in British government bond prices since the ill-fated 2022 economic agenda of former prime minister Liz Truss, sparked by investor fright at a tearful appearance by Reeves in parliament. A major rebellion in Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party against welfare reforms - which forced him to gut key parts of the plan - also fed doubts about its ability to cut spending and raised questions about party control. Economists say events this week have increased the chance that Reeves will need to raise tens of billions of pounds in taxes later this year after the government's plan to grow the world's sixth largest economy failed to sufficiently deliver. That would further heap pressure on a party that has consistently trailed Nigel Farage's insurgent, right-wing Reform U.K. in the polls. Economists say the government is caught between unruly lawmakers, a disgruntled electorate and rising borrowing costs that risk getting higher still if investors think the government has lost control of the public finances. "The economy is still stuck with sluggish growth," Michael Saunders, senior adviser to Oxford Economics and a former member of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee, told Reuters. "That means voters are persistently disappointed because they don't feel the living standards are getting any better." While more tax hikes are likely coming, he questioned whether the government had the stomach to raise the sums needed to put the public purse back on a sustainable footing - again raising the issue of investor confidence. ECONOMIC STABILITY Reeves and Starmer came to power a year ago, vowing to deliver political and economic stability and sustainable growth after 14 often-chaotic years of Conservative government rule. To win over investors, Reeves set what she described as non-negotiable fiscal rules, and angered businesses and households by raising 40 billion pounds ($55 billion) in taxes at her first budget, the biggest tax increases for three decades. Reeves had said that would be a one-off event to fund much-needed investment in Britain's decaying infrastructure. But economists say the limited headroom she had against that fiscal target has likely been wiped out by the reversal of cuts to the ballooning welfare budget, and a warning of a growth downgrade from the official economic forecaster - requiring higher taxes to keep the fiscal plans on track. "That ballpark (of repeating her first budget) is very much within the realms of the possible," said Ben Zaranko, associate director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank. That prospect means investors are increasingly questioning the credibility of an approach that leaves the government scrambling to find ways to restore fiscal headroom whenever there is bad news on the economy. And the violent market moves on Wednesday encapsulated unease over slipping budgets and the potential for more borrowing, with public sector debt currently just below 100% of GDP. "Any tax hike needs to be big, and it needs to be clear. Then you can restore the market's confidence," said Simon Harvey, senior macroeconomist at Swiss-based hedge fund LB Macro. "What we don't need is another round of 15 different measures where you question where the accounting is coming from." Harvey said Britain's economy might require a painful reset before it can recover: higher taxes, an economic slowdown and then fast Bank of England rate cuts which will eventually boost growth and the public finances. All of that will cause alarm in Starmer's Downing Street, which has been criticised for its handling of the welfare vote, and its connection with the parliamentary party group. Some Labour lawmakers expressed frustration that his team didn't listen to their concerns on financial cuts for disabled people, and the prime minister admitted he had been distracted by international events before he focused on the welfare vote. But lawmakers, many of whom feel greater loyalty to their voters than to the government, could now lobby for other policy changes, especially an end to a two-child cap that lets parents claim financial support only for their first two children. Starmer has responded by listing his government's achievements to show it is making a difference, citing trade deals, inward investment and more money for schools and hospitals. But the polls have refused to budge and some investors are joining the fray by criticising Britain's leadership. A hedge fund manager who has supported Labour said voters and many businesses did not realise that the government had to rein in its spending, and that Starmer needed to "lead on how to get out of the predicament" because the options were likely to "feel dreadful". ($1 = 0.7322 pounds) Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Which countries have the highest and lowest pensions in Europe?
Pensions are the main source of income for older people in Europe, according to the OECD's Pension at a Glance 2023 report. In many European countries, public transfers—such as state pensions and benefits—account for over 70% of older adults' total equivalised gross household income, exceeding 80% in some cases. So, how much do Europeans receive in old-age pensions? What is the average pension expenditure per beneficiary? And how do pension levels compare across Europe when adjusted for purchasing power? According to Eurostat, in 2022, the average pension expenditure per beneficiary for old-age pensions was €16,138 in the EU. This equals approximately €1,345 per month when divided over 12 months. It ranged from €3,611 in Bulgaria to €31,385 in Luxembourg within the EU. When EFTA and EU candidate countries are included, the range widens—from €1,648 in Albania to €35,959 in Iceland. The average old-age pension per beneficiary also exceeded €30,000 in two Nordic countries: Norway and Denmark. It was also significantly above the EU average in Sweden (€22,436) and Finland (€21,085). Related Eurozone inflation falls below ECB 2% target in May: Rate cut in sight Besides Albania, EU candidate countries have the lowest average pensions. These include Turkey (€2,942), Bosnia and Herzegovina (€3,041), Serbia (€3,486), and Montenegro (€3,962). Montenegro ranks just above Bulgaria, but only by a small margin. These are annual figures, not monthly, demonstrating the wide gap between the lowest and highest pension levels in Europe. The EU's 'Big Four' economies ranked consecutively, all above the EU average. Italy had the highest average pension among them at €19,589, followed by France (€18,855), Spain (€18,100), and Germany (€17,926). Related Meet the CEO trying to 'increase the net worth of an entire generation' Average pension figures show that: There's a strong East-West divide, with Western and Nordic Europe offering much higher pension benefits. The Southern European countries generally fare better than Eastern ones but still trail behind Northern Europe. The poorest performers are concentrated in the Balkans and Eastern EU, particularly among EU candidate countries. Inequalities in average pensions are significantly narrower when measured in purchasing power standards (PPS) compared to nominal terms. For example, within the EU, the ratio between the highest and lowest average pension is 8.8 in nominal terms, but it drops to 3.5 in PPS, reflecting differences in living costs. In the EU, average pension expenditure per beneficiary ranged from 5,978 PPS in Slovakia to 21,162 PPS in Austria. When non-EU countries are included, Albania had the lowest figure at 3,019 PPS. Turkey ranked significantly higher in PPS terms, with 8,128 PPS—placing it above several EU member states. All Nordic countries are above the EU average in pension spending, with some ranking among the highest in Europe. Related Living in debt? Savings expert shares secret to 'spring clean your finances' Where in Europe are workers losing ground as taxes rise faster than wages? In euro terms, the average pension fell in only three countries in 2022 compared to 2021—and by less than 5%. These were Turkey, Ireland, and Greece. In Turkey, the decline was primarily due to a sharp depreciation of the national currency, which affected the euro value of pensions. In contrast, Bulgaria saw the largest increase at 33%, followed by Czechia with 16%. Pension growth also exceeded 10% in Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, and Romania. Old-age pensions are periodic payments intended to i) maintain the income of the beneficiary after retirement from paid employment at the legal or standard age or ii) support the income of elderly people. According to the 2024 Pension Adequacy Report, jointly prepared by the European Commission and the Social Protection Committee, EU countries are taking further steps to safeguard adequacy, but future adequacy remains under pressure. Pension replacement rates for a given career are projected to decline over the next four decades. The risk of poverty and social exclusion among older people has continued to rise since 2019, mainly driven by increasing relative income poverty. In 2022, more than one in five people aged 65 and over in the EU—about 18.5 million individuals—were at risk of poverty or social exclusion. This number is growing due to both the rising poverty rate and the ageing population. Across much of Europe, pension income falls well below pre-retirement earnings. This gap makes it hard for many older adults to maintain their standard of living after they stop working. Related From gross pay to take-home: The real salary picture across Europe The report shows that older women face higher poverty risks than men in every EU country. On average, women in the EU receive 26.1% less pension income than men, and 5.3% of women receive no pension at all. These gaps are rooted in gender pay disparities, shorter or interrupted careers, and a higher incidence of part-time work among women.
