logo
Advertisers are thinking about tariffs, but they haven't cut spending. Check back in a month, says an industry veteran.

Advertisers are thinking about tariffs, but they haven't cut spending. Check back in a month, says an industry veteran.

How worried are US businesses about the impact of the tariff wars?
On the one hand: An increasing number of business leaders, like JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon, are warning about the risks of a recession. And retailers like Target and Walmart have reportedly told Donald Trump his policies could result in empty shelves in their stores.
On the other hand: Advertising in the US — an industry that's quite sensitive to economic swings — seems to be holding up. For now.
That's the takeaway I got from a recent conversation with ad veteran Laura Desmond, who has a pretty good point of view on the ad industry. That's because Desmond used to run Starcom Mediavest, a giant ad-planning business. And now she runs Smartly, a smaller business that focuses directly on digital advertisers, who tend to be more nimble and reactive to trends than those in traditional media.
Desmond says her clients are thinking about what might happen when Americans really see the impact of tariffs, perhaps in a month or so. But for now, they're mostly acting as if it's business as usual.
And when it comes to other big potential changes to her industry — like the potential for an actual TikTok ban, or government-mandated breakups of Google or Meta — there's even less appetite to break out the crystal balls.
You can hear all of my conversation with Desmond via my Channels podcast. Below is an edited excerpt of our chat:
Peter Kafka: It seems to me that your industry could be dramatically affected by US government actions. There's a theoretical TikTok ban-or-sell law that was supposed to start in January but has been delayed. The US government is also in court trying to force the two biggest ad companies — Google and Meta — to break up. But it doesn't sound like your clients are spending much time thinking about that.
Laura Desmond: It is business as usual for brands to be focused on their business, what they need to sell, how they need to build campaigns, have companies like Smartly orchestrate those campaigns, and focus on business, focus on the job to do. That is the state of play.
So people who are spending money on TikTok today are not coming to you saying, "Do you have a plan if TikTok goes away this summer?"
Were there conversations like that with some of our customers? Yes. Were they significant or dominant or overwhelming? No. And that's because our technology gives advertisers the opportunity to shift in real time if they felt like they needed to.
It's not like the way ads used to be, where you would buy months in advance, sometimes a year in advance, for television.
That's the era of Mad Men, and we are no longer in that era.
What about tariffs? I was listening to the Comcast Q1 earnings call. They were asked about tariff effects on their business and they said they hadn't seen any yet.
We have not seen any effect.
Even though I'm reading that manufacturing is changing and Shein and Temu ad spending has cratered. That seems like a real change.
Well, a lot of that has to do with the fact that there is very little shipping going on between China and the US right now.
But that seems like a meaningful change. One that would filter all the way through to all of your clients.
I think the next month to six weeks will be key to watch. You saw a couple days ago the big box CEOs from Walmart, Target, etc., talk about a real concern over shelves that will not be full because product will not be able to make it to the stores.
Digital spend tends to be more resilient because it's loved by consumers, they engage, it's trackable. You know what a purchase looks like, where it comes from, and how it occurs. And so you can make more precision decisions about where to put the next dollar, or what creative will work.
And with so much digital spend now commanding the budgets of big brands and even medium-sized brands, you look at them continuing to spend.
But the next four to six weeks will be a big decision point. Because if there's no product on the shelves, then that's gonna change anybody's advertising campaign. And it should.
What about the notion that consumers might not feel as good about spending under current conditions?
All indications right now are that consumers want to be resilient, too. And while sentiment is going lower and lower by the week, [consumer] spending that our clients are telling us about is staying solid.
Does anyone come to you and say, "We're still spending, but we're gonna pause a little bit," or, "We're going to delay a decision for a week or a month because we want to see how this shakes out?"
I think there's scenario planning that largely is happening now that will be kicked into gear, if it needs to, over the next four to six weeks.
But the point on consumers is important. If interest rates go back up, that is going to cut into pocketbooks. That's going to cut into people's ability to feel like they can purchase one more thing or have one more experience or take one more trip. And that will directly impact advertising.
Some of the data that I've seen predicted digital ad spend to grow around 12% for 2025. And we haven't seen a lot of down-ticks to that. Maybe a point or two.
But if tariffs really kick in across the board, as sweeping and as large as what we've been hearing, you could see advertising forecasts drop as much by 50%.
That's five-zero. And that includes digital, right? Digital does not get out of this unscathed?
Yeah, you could see it.
So day-to-day, then: Do you just go say, "We're just plugging ahead. We've got plenty of stuff to take care of — we just cannot spend much time thinking about what might happen in a month or a week?"
That's a CEO mindset. That is a focused mindset: Control what you can control, and do your best to scenario plan. Understand where you're going to spend your next dollar. Understand how you're gonna make your creative even more effective, so that it converts consumers and people engage.
That's what you do if you're a CMO. That's what you do if you're a CFO and you're CEO. And that is what we're seeing across the board.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TikTok influencer slammed for viral video about ‘unchic' fashion
TikTok influencer slammed for viral video about ‘unchic' fashion

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

TikTok influencer slammed for viral video about ‘unchic' fashion

Tara Langdale talked to Fox News Digital about how she received hurtful messages from critics after a not-so-serious fashion post describing what she views as 'unchic' went viral, spawning a cascade of events that made her apolitical post a victim of attacks. The self-described stay-at-home working mom amassed some 250,000 views and found herself on the receiving end of some hate after an April 7 TikTok of her seated, drinking from a wine glass with nicely done hair, gold jewelry and manicured nails as she skimmed through a list of 'unchic' fashion sins. Advertisement Tattoos, Lululemon, baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines were just a few that made part one of Langdale's controversial 'unchic' list, which drew backlash from seething critics who called her out with a political twist. 'Voting for Trump is unchic,' one said. 'To her, privilege = chic. Hope this helps!' said another. A third said, 'just say you're a republican and go lmao,' while a slew of commenters took exception to her tattoo stance and ranted about classism. Advertisement The video even caught The Guardian's attention, prompting an article that coined 'chic' as 'a shorthand for a type of conservative-coded aesthetic' and spoke of the 'rigid and airbrushed' looks of Trump allies, sch as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. 4 Tara Langdale received backlash for her 'unchic' fashion TikTok. @tara_langdale / TikTok Though Langdale diddles cribe herself as conservative when speaking to Fox News Digital, she insists not everything is about politics. 'When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that,' Langdale said. Advertisement 'I think conservativism is more of culture, religion – all of those things go into your conservativist mindset. Now, if you're talking about conservative style of dress… that's also going to be more like religion and culture,' she went on. 'Of course, if I'm going to church on Sunday, I'm dressing very conservative. I'm going to keep it classy, but if you see me in the street in my regular day-to-day, I am not at all conservative. I would never consider my style to be conservative. But am I conservative? Absolutely, so I can differentiate the two. I know that the internet has a hard time doing that.' 4 Lululemon made Langdale's controversial 'unchic' list — along with baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines. REUTERS 4 Tattoos were also on Langdale's list. xartproduction – Langdale addressed the politicized dogma, saying she doesn't understand why TikTok users jumped to conclusions about 'conservative' or 'Republican makeup' as they did. Advertisement 'Because I'm blonde, because I have more of a natural look about me, I'm not fully glammed all the time… I'm really not sure how that makes me appear conservative, but, again, I just think when people don't agree with what you say, they have to find a way to discredit you, and that's just an easy tactic,' she continued. At the same time, Langdale pushed back against the idea of her video implying that people too poor to afford expensive items are automatically 'unchic,' and pointed to brand-name items like athletic apparel brand Lululemon, Apple Watches and Golden Goose sneakers – all of which can be pricey – as evidence pointing to the contrary. 'Just keep in mind that money talks and wealth whispers, and I don't know any wealthy people that are wearing Gucci across their chest,' she said in her original post. Langdale explained that the TikTok trend of users showcasing 'things I find incredibly chic' grabbed her attention as they began circulating on the app. She found them 'pretentious and off-putting,' so she felt compelled to take her own stab at the video. 4 'When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that,' Langdale said about the political criticism she received. @tara_langdale / TikTok 'Of course, my video came off as pretentious and off-putting as well, but it felt like a certain level of cringe for me, and I don't like to personally attack anybody on social media, so I wouldn't go after a specific creator. I just kind of wanted to hop on the trend… so that was my initial, 'Why I created the video.'' Advertisement Langdale shared that her direct messages on the platform have been 'insane' with threats and comments about her family since the video went viral. 'It does make you step back and take a pause,' she shared. 'Like, is this really worth it for how crazy people react? And I would never want to put my family in danger, but I think a lot of it is just the keyboard pirates that are just back there behind their computer typing whatever they can to try to get more likes in the comments,' Langdale added.

Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for ‘Disrespecting the Vets'
Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for ‘Disrespecting the Vets'

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dropkick Murphys and Veterans Rally Against Trump for ‘Disrespecting the Vets'

'Music is sometimes a good way to kick the front door open,' says Ken Casey, the co-lead singer and bassist for the Celtic punk band Dropkick Murphys. On Friday, the 81st anniversary of D-Day, Casey and his band took to the stage on the National Mall, the headline act as several politicians and activists rallied thousands of veterans in a march on Washington D.C. Ostensibly, the rally — organized by an array of veterans groups and backed by labor unions, such as the AFL-CIO — was a non-partisan protest against proposed cuts to veterans benefits and to the federal workforce, including at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). In reality, it was an expression of rage against President Donald Trump and his MAGA agenda. 'I think there's a lot of people in America that think this is a fight between the far right and the far left. And it's not,' Casey tells Rolling Stone. It is impossible to make substantial cuts to the government without disproportionately impacting veterans, who make up nearly 25 percent of the federal workforce, but only five percent of employed Americans as a whole. The VA alone is facing losses of nearly 83,000 jobs, as proposed by the department's secretary, Doug Collins — about 18 percent of its total workforce. 'When we join the military, we take an oath to this country. And they, in turn, promise certain benefits if we serve,' says Everett Kelley, the national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, or AFGE, which represents about 750,000 government workers across the country. 'If you start attacking those workers that provide the services to the veteran then you are attacking, indirectly, the veteran.' Kelley says his members are keenly watching as lawsuits contesting job cuts make their way through the courts: 'They're saying that they want us to continue to stay in this fight. They are very relieved that the courts are seeing that these decisions are not rational, and that they are not in accordance with our Constitution.' 'We are winning some of these battles, but that's not where we want to be. We want to be winning the war,' he says. As the rally warmed up, Rolling Stone caught up with Casey. 'The facts are that the Trump presidency and all those involved are disrespecting the vets. And that's my opinion. And we're going to sing about it,' Casey tells Rolling Stone. His gentle voice purrs with an unmistakable Boston accent as he sits on a shady bench in the sweltering heat. 'We all know what's caused us to be here.' 'People are slowly waking up to it. I do think that the Trump plan of just throwing so much shit at the wall does work. It makes people just want to put their head in the sand,' he says. A young woman nearby, who this reporter later learns also hails from Boston but encountered the protest by accident, curiously eyes the 56-year-old punk rocker — with his old-school sailor tats, dapper black outfit, and neatly trimmed crewcut — and his interlocutor. She strains to listen in without being rude — it's not every day a founding member of one of your hometown's iconic bands plops down beside you to talk politics with a reporter, after all. 'I think that that's part of what keeps the moderates away, and part of it is that 'It's not affecting me personally right now,' and that's why that famous old statement from, I forget who said it: 'First they came for the trade unionists, and then they came for me,'' Casey says, summarizing a confessional-turned-poem by Martin Niemöller, a Lutheran pastor imprisoned by the Nazis, of which there are many versions. It's not the first time on this day that Rolling Stone hears a direct reference to the Nazis, or the rise of totalitarian political ideologies in the 1920s and 30s — fascism on the right, and communism on the left. The organizers of the rally, a recently established non-profit called the Unite for Veterans Coalition, likens their movement to the 'Bonus Army' of 1932 — a group of World War I veterans who took to the streets amid the Great Depression to get cash payments that had been promised to them — and talk admiringly about Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler, a legendary U.S. Marine who was instrumental in crushing a clumsy fascist coup attempt against President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933. Here, now, in Washington D.C. on the anniversary of Operation Overlord, many veterans consciously sought to evoke that past — summoning the days when America had offered the lives of its citizenry to defeat a dictator. 'Dad Fought Fascism in Europe,' one man's sign says. 'We Will Fight it Here.' A woman holds another: 'My Grandpa Fought Nazis.' Two men carry flags with three downward pointing arrows, one saying 'American Iron Front' on it. This reporter asks Kris, the Navy veteran holding it, what the flag represents. He says that he is part of a local anti-fascist chapter, formed during the first Trump administration. He is aware that the Iron Front was a political paramilitary that fought the Nazis, among other forms of totalitarianism: The three downward pointing arrows are generally considered to represent opposition to Nazism, Communism, and Monarchism. One of the lessons of that era is that political extremism, fueled by proliferating violence and a masculinity crisis among young men, can create the conditions for the failure of a democracy. It forms part of the rationale for why the veterans who organized the rally say they are focused on cultivating a non-partisan, moderate movement. The fight to claim the political allegiance of veterans is, after all, a proxy battle in the war for the future of the American Republic — and both sides get a vote when it comes to war. Veterans largely voted in favor of Trump during the 2024 election, perhaps 60 percent to 40 percent. While Trump and his supporters may be ceding some of that ground by cutting veterans benefits, others are waiting to build movements around the political legitimacy supposedly conferred by veteran status. Far-right extremists have been omnipresent throughout modern American history, and veterans are a natural target for cultivation by ideologues. Right-wing paramilitary groups like the Three Percenters are explicitly aimed at veterans and law enforcement, while groups like the Proud Boys or Patriot Front adopt the language, dress, and symbolism of the War on Terror-era military. What is common to all of them is the implied threat of violence against dissent, and a willingness to take to the streets. Political violence is nothing new, and a number of the veterans who spoke to Rolling Stone fear that civil unrest will be used as a pretext for a government crackdown on liberties, perhaps even used in an attempt to justify martial law. Other vets were at the rally to protest job cuts inflicted by Trump and Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency. A thirtysomething former Marine mortarman who asked to be identified only as Andrew says that he lost his job at the Veterans Administration due to the DOGE cuts. He traveled from Michigan to show up at the protest. 'I wasn't really political before,' Andrew says. 'Like, everyone knows when you're the one liberal in an infantry battalion, but back then I didn't give politics much thought.' 'Now, I'm fucking furious. I'll show up for anything,' he says. Damian Bonvouloir graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy in 1978, and served in the Navy until 1986. He describes generations of family that had served in the military or in federal jobs, proudly counting them on his fingers as he shouts their relationship and role, while the Dropkick Murphys take to the stage. Bonvouloir carries a sign with a shamrock and the words: 'Who'll stand with us?' That is a reference to 'Who Will Stand with Us,' a new single which in the band's promotional material is described as 'an urgent call to action to stand up against division and inequality.' 'So here we are on D-Day today, and it's like everything that so many of our grandparents fought for — you're willing to just walk away from that, because you feel like the world's too 'woke?' What? How did you do the math there? Like, what do you care if someone else wants to be woke?' Casey says. 'Was it really worth it to surrender the democracy of the country, just so you could feel a little more like you had your guy win? It just doesn't add up.' Casey tries to put his money where his mouth is. Last month, he traveled to Ukraine as part of a mission to deliver desperately needed ambulances and medical aid. He sees the conflict there as part of the same fight that brought the veterans to the National Mall. 'People over there are defending democracy, and people over here are defending democracy,' he tells Rolling Stone. The Dropkick Murphys new album, For the People, comes out on July 4 on the band's own label. There's a lot of energy and anger, and much of it is clearly political. But Casey is hesitant to describe it as a protest album: 'Not every song is directly in relation to what's going on. But I think even when you're writing music that doesn't directly relate, the times shape that music.' 'There's a song on that album about the day my father died when I was a kid, that I never thought I'd write,' he says. 'And I'm just saying… maybe you get to the point where you don't take for granted that you'll be making music in the future, and maybe the times just make you feel an urgency for everything in your life.' At the rally, one of the biggest responses from the crowd was for a punk cover of the bluegrass song 'Dig a Hole in the Meadow,' an anti-fascist anthem from 1927, popularized by Woody Guthrie and others: 'Dig a hole, dig a hole in the meadow. Dig a hole in the cold, cold ground. Dig a hole, dig a hole in the meadow. We're gonna lay you fascists down.' Clearly a band whose eleventh album was titled This Machine Still Kills Fascists, is unapologetic about both its politics and its embrace of America's early anti-fascist traditions. 'I just feel when people say now, like, 'Shut up and sing!' — whatever. I feel OK. We've been going for 30 years with the same message,' Casey says. 'Listen, if you're a punk band and you can't write good angry music in these times… Then something ain't working, you know what I mean?' More from Rolling Stone 'We Are Taking Away Elon's Friends' Trump Finally Brings Back Illegally Deported Man - to Indict Him Trump Says He's 'Totally' Focused on Policy ... While Calling Reporters to Bash Musk Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

Google Makes New $200 Father's Day Offer To Pixel 9 Buyers
Google Makes New $200 Father's Day Offer To Pixel 9 Buyers

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Google Makes New $200 Father's Day Offer To Pixel 9 Buyers

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA - AUGUST 13: A new Google Pixel 9 phone is displayed during the Made By ... More Google event at Google headquarters on August 13, 2024 in Mountain View, California. Google announced new Pixel phones, watches and AI features during the Made By Google event. (Photo by) Following one of its most aggressive Pixel 9 price drops yet, Google has once again slashed the price of its flagship smartphone. However, for serious deal hunters the company's new Pixel 8 Pro bundle offer might be the better deal. Let's start with the Pixel 9 discount. All models, including the Pixel 9a, are cheaper for this sale, which ends on June 15th. The Pixel 9 price cut is similar to what we have seen in previous sales, but Google does have some new bundle deals, alongside discounts for virtually all wearables. Virtually all of Google's wearables and smart home devices are on sale, too. These are the standout deals. A Google Pixel 8 pro phone is displayed during a product launch event for the Google Pixel 8, and ... More Pixel 8 pro phones, Pixel Watch 2, and Pixel Buds Pro earbuds, in New York on October 4, 2023. (Photo by Ed JONES / AFP) (Photo by ED JONES/AFP via Getty Images) The most eye-catching promotion is for the Pixel 8 Pro, which is now down to $599. Google lists this as a $400 discount, but the 2023 flagship hasn't cost $999 since it launched two years ago. Despite the chicanery, this is a solid deal for a phone that isn't wildly different from the Pixel 9. The promotion is boosted by Google throwing in a free Pixel Watch 2 LTE and a free case with the Pixel 8 Pro. To me, this makes the Pixel 8 Pro the better choice if you're on a budget because the free Pixel Watch can be sold to extend the discount. If you're worried about buying older tech, there's very little daylight between the Pixel 8 and Pixel 9 ranges. The Pixel 8 has many of the Pixel 9's features, including AI tools like Magic Editor, Best Take, and Video Boost (on the Pixel 8 Pro). Formerly exclusive Pixel 9 features, such as the Pixel Weather app, have now migrated over to the Pixel 8. Only the updated hardware separates the two phones. I wrote more extensively about why the Pixel 8 Pro may be the better choice for tight budgets here. Crucially, the Pixel 8 still has five years of software support left. When the device launched in 2023, Google extended the amount of Android updates and security patches its Pixel phones would get to seven years. We will have to see if Google (and Samsung) honor that promise as we edge closer to 2030. But if we take Google at face value, that extended support adds value to the Pixel 8, especially since there are fewer reasons to buy new hardware that only marginally improves per year. Manufacturers may struggle to convince fans to buy new phones when the near-identical predecessor is half the price. This is good news for Pixel 9 and Pixel 8 shoppers because it is currently the best time to buy high-end, cheap, phones.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store