logo
Gene Hackman had a will, but the public may never find out who inherits his $80M fortune

Gene Hackman had a will, but the public may never find out who inherits his $80M fortune

Yahoo2 days ago
Gene Hackman was found dead inside his New Mexico home on Feb. 26, 2025, at the age of 95. The acclaimed actor's wife, Betsy Arakawa, had also died of a rare virus – a week before his death from natural causes.
Details about the couple's plans for Hackman's reportedly US$80 million fortune are only starting to emerge, months after the discovery of their tragic demise. While their wills have not yet been made public, we have seen them through a reputable source.
Both documents are short and sought to give the bulk of their assets to Hackman's trust – a legal arrangement that allows someone to state their wishes for how their assets should be managed and distributed. Wills and trusts are similar in that both can be used to distribute someone's property. They differ in that a trust can take effect during someone's lifetime and continue long after their death. Wills take effect only upon someone's death, for the purpose of distributing assets that person had owned.
Both trusts and wills can be administered by someone who does not personally benefit from the property.
Hackman, widely revered for his memorable roles in movies such as 'The French Connection,' 'Bonnie and Clyde' and 'The Birdcage,' made it clear in his will that he wanted the trust to manage his assets, and he apparently named Arakawa as a third-party trustee. But that plan was dashed by Arakawa's sudden death.
The person managing Hackman's estate asked the court to appoint a new trustee, a request that the court approved, according to public records. But the court order is not public, and the trust itself remains private, so the public doesn't yet know who will manage his estate or inherit his fortune. U.S. courts vary in how much access they provide to case records.
As law professors who specialize in trusts and estates, we teach courses about the transfer of property during life and at death. We believe that the drama playing out over Hackman's assets offers valuable lessons for anyone leaving an estate, large or small, for their loved ones to inherit. It also is a cautionary tale for the tens of millions of Americans in stepfamilies.
'Pour-over' wills are a popular technique
The couple signed the wills in 2005, more than a decade before Hackman was diagnosed with dementia. There's no reason to doubt whether Hackman was of sound mind at that time. Although he had retired from acting and led a very private life for a public figure, after the last film he starred in, 'Welcome to Mooseport,' was released in 2004, Hackman continued to write books and narrate documentaries for several more years.
Based on the wills that we have been able to review, Hackman and Arakawa used a popular estate planning technique that combined two documents: a lifetime trust and a will.
The first document, sometimes called a 'living trust,' usually contains the most important details about who ultimately inherits a person's property once they die. All other estate planning documents, including wills, all financial and brokerage accounts, and life insurance policies can pour assets into the trust at death by naming the trustee as the death beneficiary.
The trust is the only document that needs to be updated when life circumstances change, such as divorce, the death of a spouse, or the birth of a child. All of the other planning documents can be left alone because they already name the trustee of the trust as the property recipient.
Hackman also signed a second document, known as a 'pour-over' will. A pour-over will is a catchall measure to ensure that anything owned at death ends up in the trust if it wasn't transferred during life. Hackman's pour-over will gave his estate at death to Arakawa as the designated trustee of the trust he had created.
The combination of a trust coupled with a pour-over will – a technique that Michael Jackson also used – offers many advantages.
One is that, if the trust is created during life, it can be administered privately at death without the cost, publicity and delay of probate – the court-supervised process for estate administration. That is why, while Hackman's personal representative filed his will in probate court to administer any remaining property owned at death, the trust created during Hackman's life can manage assets without court supervision.
Who might get what
The trust document has not been made public, but Hackman's personal representative stated that the trust 'contains mainly out-of-state beneficiaries' who will inherit his assets.
Hackman's beneficiaries are unlikely to be publicly identified because they appear in the trust rather than the pour-over will. His will does not leave anything directly to any relatives. Even Arawaka was not slated to receive anything herself, only as trustee, but the will does mention his children in a paragraph describing his family.
Hackman had three children, all born during his first marriage, to Faye Maltese: Christopher, Elizabeth and Leslie. Hackman had acknowledged that it was hard for them to grow up with an often-absent celebrity father, but his daughters and one granddaughter released a statement after he died about missing their 'Dad and Grandpa.' It is possible that Hackman's children, as well as Arakawa, are named as beneficiaries of the trust.
Arakawa had no children of her own. Little is known about her family, except that her mother, now 91, is still alive. Arakawa's will gave the bulk of her estate to Hackman as trustee of his trust, but only if he survived her by 90 days. If he failed to survive by 90 days, then she instructed her personal representative to establish a charitable trust 'to achieve purposes beneficial to the community' consistent with the couple's charitable preferences.
Her will refers to charitable 'interests expressed … by my spouse and me during our lifetimes.' But it offers no specific guidance on which charities should benefit. Because Hackman did not survive Arakawa by 90 days, no part of her estate will pass to Hackman's trust or his children.
Christopher Hackman has reportedly hired a lawyer, leading to speculation that he might contest some aspect of his father's or stepmother's estates.
Research shows that the average case length of a probate estate is 532 days, but individual cases can vary greatly in length and complexity. It is possible that the public may never learn what happens to the trust if the parties reach a settlement without litigation in court.
Takeaways for the rest of us
We believe that anyone thinking about who will inherit their property after they die can learn three important lessons from the fate of Hackman's estate.
First, a living trust can provide more privacy than a will by avoiding the publicity of a court-supervised probate administration. It can also simplify the process for updating the estate plan by avoiding the need to amend multiple documents every time life circumstances change, such as the birth of a child or end of a marriage. Because all estate planning documents pour into the trust, the trust is the only document that requires any updating.
You don't need a multimillion-dollar estate to justify the cost of creating a living trust. Some online platforms charge less than $400 for help creating one.
Second, remember that even when your closest loved ones are much younger than you are, it's impossible to predict who will die first. If you do create a living trust, it should include a backup plan in case someone named in it dies before you. You can choose a 'contingent beneficiary' – someone who will take the property if the primary beneficiary dies first. You can also choose a successor trustee who will manage the trust if the primary trustee dies first or declines to serve.
Finally, it's important to carefully consider how best to divide the estate.
Hackman's children and some of his other relatives may ultimately receive millions through his trust. But parents in stepfamilies must often make difficult decisions about how to divide their estate between a surviving spouse and any children they had with other partners.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Naomi Cahn, University of Virginia and Reid Kress Weisbord, Rutgers University - Newark
Read more:
Legal wrangling over estate of Jimmy Buffett turns his widow's huge inheritance into a cautionary tale
Gene Hackman will be remembered as the Hollywood actor's actor
Hantavirus: here's what you need to know about the infection that killed Gene Hackman's wife, Betsy Arakawa
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

IPO market heats up: These 4 names prepare to go public next
IPO market heats up: These 4 names prepare to go public next

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

IPO market heats up: These 4 names prepare to go public next

EquityZen head of market insight Brianne Lynch joins Market Domination with Josh Lipton to discuss the initial public offering (IPO) market in light of Figma's (FIG) recent public debut and whether companies need to have an artificial intelligence (AI) story to succeed. She also shares which private companies are likely to go public next. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination. Which are the possible candidates in your opinion, that would be on your radar, who might be willing to test the public markets this year? Sure. So, you know, several of the names on our IPO outlook for the year have already gone public. But there are a few that we're still waiting on. One of the big ones being Klarna. This is a company that was planning to go public in the spring, tabled those plans given the volatility in the market post deliberation day. Uh but they're reportedly now looking at a September IPO. So that'll be, um, the next of several Fintech IPOs we've seen. You had Circle, um, Chime, eToro. So certainly, uh, Fintech is an area where we're seeing more activity and given Klarna's brand recognition, um, and you know, value in the market, that's one we have our eyes on. Right now if you're going to go public, Brian, do you have to have an AI story? Do you have to be able to just sprinkle some of that AI magic on your S-1? Yeah. I would say at a minimum you have to try. And Figma, you know, that's something that played into their story as well. They had so many case studies of their large enterprise clients saving, you know, lots of time and money because of the AI tools that they've built into their products. So, I think that's a table stake for any company that is looking to go public. And that might be the best option for public market investors at the time because you have to remember a lot of these pure play AI companies are still very young in their life cycle. They're less likely to be going public in the next few years. So yes, that's bringing more investors into the private markets to invest. Uh but to kind of capitalize on that interest, public companies or contenders to go public will also need to have that as part of their story. Do you think there there are certain kinds of private companies, Brian, that would be more likely to receive a warm welcome to the public markets in in this environment against this backdrop? Sure. I mean, we've seen a few examples of what has worked. You know, I talked about a little bit about the need for growth, the need for profitability, but when we look at the companies that may be coming next or even the IPOs we've seen in the first half of the year, it hasn't been just one sector or one industry. You've seen Fintech, um, you've seen crypto, which is obviously growing a lot and given, you know, the regulatory tailwinds, uh, we expect that to continue to be a hot market. Um, but then, you know, Netskope, another name on our outlook, that's a cybersecurity company. Um, StubHub, another one. That's an e-commerce player. So, it's definitely not a, you know, one sector narrative that's driving the market. It's more are you growing? Are you profitable? Do you have the brand name? Um, and do you have a a story that's exciting to investors, uh, especially, uh, given the lack of public companies relative to private companies now. Related Videos Berkshire Hathaway earnings: 'Perfect' stock to own when 'worried' Tesla must pay $240M+ for deadly 2019 car crash: What to know Fed Governor Adriana Kugler to resign Dow falls more than 500 points on jobs report, tariffs Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why Bloom Energy Plunged Today Before Recovering
Why Bloom Energy Plunged Today Before Recovering

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Bloom Energy Plunged Today Before Recovering

Key Points Bloom's energy server technology is a great fit for AI data centers. Last night's earnings report was strong, with Bloom beating revenue expectations. However, the stock had already rallied on a big announcement with Oracle last week, leading to profit taking following earnings. 10 stocks we like better than Bloom Energy › Shares of on-premises electricity generator provider Bloom Energy (NYSE: BE) plunged initially today, down 13% at one point, before recovering to a 1.4% decline as of 3:26 p.m. ET. Bloom reported second-quarter earnings last night, beating revenue estimates but missing the mark on the adjusted (non-GAAP) earnings-per-share (EPS) line. Of course, Bloom is a growth stock, so the top line matters more. However, since the stock had already had a massive run following recent deals with big data center and utility names, investors appeared to take profits on the less-than-absolutely perfect quarter. Management also merely "reaffirmed" 2025 guidance, without raising numbers. Bloom Energy is blooming at AI data centers In Q2, revenue climbed 19.5% to $401.2 million, beating expectations, while adjusted losses per share narrowed from $0.27 to $0.18, missing expectations of $0.08. Bloom management also said it was looking forward to doubling its production capacity, which will no doubt entail higher costs. But that capacity growth appears to be backed up by strong demand. Bloom's energy server product can produce electricity from either natural gas or hydrogen via a chemical process without combustion, thereby lowering emissions. The technology appears to be on the brink of much wider adoption, given the need for reliable, cleaner electricity at AI data centers. Last week, Bloom announced a direct partnership with Oracle (NYSE: ORCL) in which Bloom will supply on-site power to Oracle data centers within 90 days. The announcement sent the stock flying, and CEO KR Sridhar noted the partnership may pave the way for more direct deals with AI hyperscalers. On the conference call with analysts, Sridhar noted the Oracle deal is "the first time we as a company are directly interacting with the hyperscaler as our are the primary source, and it is load following. So it will prove that we can load follow at large scale." Earnings seem to be a "sell-the-news" event Bloom has exciting AI-fueled growth potential, but since the stock had already rocketed higher last week on the Oracle announcement, it appears investors were eager to take profits on the less-than-perfect quarter. However, the bounce back following today's initial plunge indicates there weren't really any red flags to speak of. Valuation would be the biggest risk here, as Bloom's stock is quite expensive. Shares trade for 5.5 times sales and 80 times this year's adjusted earnings estimates. Should you buy stock in Bloom Energy right now? Before you buy stock in Bloom Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bloom Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Billy Duberstein and/or his clients have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Oracle. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Bloom Energy Plunged Today Before Recovering was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

A Fed governor is resigning, opening a spot for a Trump appointee
A Fed governor is resigning, opening a spot for a Trump appointee

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Fed governor is resigning, opening a spot for a Trump appointee

A member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors announced Friday that she is resigning several months before the end of her term, handing President Donald Trump an early opportunity to fill a key vacancy. Fed Governor Adriana Kugler is stepping down from her role, effective August 8. She was appointed by former President Joe Biden in 2023 and her term was slated to end in January 2026. The Fed did not cite a reason for her departure. 'It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,' Kugler said in a statement. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market.' Trump claimed to reporters on Friday that Kugler was resigning because of the Fed's stance on interest rates. 'I understand it was over the fact that she disagreed with somebody from her party …she disagreed with 'Too Late' on the interest rate,' he said. Trump has taken to calling Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'Too Late' because the president wants Powell to cut interest rates. Fed officials have held interest rates steady so far this year. Trump did not offer any evidence to back his claim. But, he said, he was 'very happy' about having an open spot on the Fed Board. Kugler was absent from the Fed's latest meeting, in which officials voted to hold borrowing costs steady for the fifth consecutive time. Trump has bashed the Fed for months because the central bank hasn't lowered interest rates this year, and Kugler's resignation means he will soon be able to install a new voice at a time when policymakers are unusually divided. And whoever Trump picks will then be eligible to be the next Fed chair, if they're confirmed by the Senate to serve on the Fed's board. According to Fed rules, the chair can be chosen only among the current members of the Fed's board. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the administration is already actively searching for Powell's successor. Contenders for the top job at the central bank include Bessent himself; Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor; Christopher Waller, a current Fed governor; and Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House's National Economic Council. But even when Powell's term as chair ends next year, he could still stay on the board, meaning Trump's choices for Fed chair will be limited to the current members of the board. Fed chairs technically have three jobs: member of the Fed's Board, chair of the Board of Governors and chair of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The FOMC is the Fed group that sets interest rates, and the chair is voted into their position by committee members. It's legally unclear if Trump has the power to demote Powell and elevate another governor as chair. Powell's term as a Fed governor ends in 2028. In a news conference Wednesday after the Fed announced its latest decision, Powell refused to say if he intends to remain on the board after his term as chair ends.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store