Republicans eagerly await Lara Trump's decision on North Carolina Senate seat
The daughter-in-law of President Trump and a former Republican National Committee (RNC) co-chair, Lara Trump has quickly become an early favorite for the GOP nomination if she chooses to run. A source close to the president said she's considering a bid; it would clear the Republican field if she chooses to go forward.
While she's turned down possible Senate bids in the past, she would bring significant name recognition and instant backing from the top levels of the GOP.
'She has, in my opinion, earned the right of first refusal if she wants to do it,' said North Carolina Republican strategist Jonathan Felts. 'And more importantly, regardless of what I think about it, the most powerful and the most popular Republican on the planet, he thinks so, too.'
A potential Senate run for Lara Trump, who is married to the president's son Eric, has been teased for years.
She was rumored as a possible candidate to succeed former Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) in the state's 2022 Senate race, but she decided against it, citing the difficulty of running with young children. She endorsed then-Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) in the race; he went on to win.
'I am saying no for now, not no forever,' she said at the time about her own possible candidacy.
She was also rumored last year to be an option for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) to fill the Senate seat vacated by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. She removed her name from consideration despite 'encouragement from so many.'
But speculation has been building for months that Trump would finally take the plunge for Tillis's seat in 2026, even before Tillis announced he wouldn't seek another term. A November survey from a Republican pollster found her leading Tillis in a hypothetical primary match-up by an overwhelming margin.
With Tillis out, Trump has commanded the attention in the race for the past few weeks.
The president mentioned Lara Trump when asked by reporters about who could replace Tillis, saying she's 'somebody that would really be great.' He acknowledged that she and Eric live in Florida, but he emphasized her ties to the Tar Heel State.
'She's a great person, Lara Trump. I mean, that would always be my first choice, but she doesn't live there now,' President Trump said. 'But she's there all the time, her parents are there. You know, she really knows North Carolina well.'
And one of the other top names being floated, RNC Chair Michael Whatley, signaled he would defer to her if she wants to run and would expect the party to do so as well.
'What I will say is this: If Lara Trump is going to be interested, then she is certainly going to have the entire Republican universe — myself included — that are going to coalesce behind her,' he told the Washington Examiner in an interview.
First-term Rep. Pat Harrigan (R-N.C.), another possible candidate, also said he wouldn't run if Trump does.
A GOP operative who's worked on North Carolina Senate races described Trump's choice as 'personal' and a 'family decision.'
But Republicans said a Trump candidacy would likely be their best-case scenario, particularly as former Gov. Roy Cooper mulls a bid for the seat on the Democratic side.
Felts said having Trump on the ballot could help increase turnout for Republicans, noting her father-in-law's demonstrated prowess at encouraging voters who often don't participate to come to the polls.
He said Republicans will have to maximize turnout in small rural areas to overcome Democratic strengths in other parts of the state.
Felts said no candidate could reach the level of support the president would have, but he would give a boost.
'He's just a uniquely popular figure, but having a Trump on the ballot would be helpful,' he said.
Still, Lara Trump could have some potential vulnerabilities if she runs. Despite playing an active role in campaigning for her father-in-law and other candidates previously, she has never run for office herself.
North Carolina Democratic strategist Morgan Jackson said her candidacy would solve a problem Republicans had with Tillis, who was increasingly unpopular with the Republican base. But she could turn off the critical 1 percent to 3 percent of voters who swing in the middle.
'I think Thom Tillis had a better shot at those voters than Lara Trump does because he did not come across to those voters as a partisan warrior,' Jackson said. 'And frankly, I think the last thing voters are looking for is a partisan warrior right now, and I say that as either a Democrat or Republican nominee.'
'What is clear is with Thom Tillis being run out of the race by [President] Trump is that they're going to get a partisan warrior,' he added.
Felts said he's not concerned about Lara Trump being untested as a candidate because she showed her strength while campaigning for others. He said she 'had audiences eating out of her hand' speaking at the state GOP convention in 2021, demonstrating her grassroots appeal.
'I know she's told Ted, she's all in for Ted,' Felts recalled thinking at the time. 'If she were to announce right now [she's running], I mean, the place would just go insane.'
One other attack she could face is a perceived lack of loyalty to North Carolina. Despite being born and raised there, she and her family live in Florida. Accusations of carpetbagging have been a common attack in key Senate races in recent years.
But Republicans emphasized that she still has deep ties to the state and knows it well.
One North Carolina Republican insider pointed to former Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R), who was originally from the state but hadn't lived there for years before her comfortable electoral victory to the Senate in 2002.
'She's very well known,' he said. 'She has taken time with the grassroots, speaking [at] a bunch of Lincoln-Reagan dinners across the state over the years, and so she's definitely a known commodity and considered North Carolinian by the key folks in this state.'
The insider said she would start out with an advantage in name identification that the other possible GOP candidates couldn't match and get the voters who only vote every four years.
'It's just a question of, are there voters in the middle, unaffiliated voters' who preferred President Trump to former Vice President Kamala Harris but aren't fully invested in Trump himself, he added.
'I don't know. That would be tested for sure,' he said. 'I do think that that's offset by all of the enthusiastic Trump voters that would turn out in a midterm that might not otherwise.'
Jackson stressed that the result in the battleground state will likely be close regardless of the candidates, though analysts agree candidate quality will matter considerably.
'North Carolina is a very big state. It's big. It's hard to win. I don't care which side of the aisle you're on,' he said. 'You're going to have a close race, and it's going to be a tough race.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'
Law enforcement officers in areas primarily run by Democrats continue to flock to red states for job security, better pay and bosses who will back them up, according to one police leader. Joe Gamaldi is the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). He is an active lieutenant with the Houston Police Department, and he said police in blue cities are tired of facing hostility from local leaders. Advertisement 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' he told Fox News Digital. 'Because, ultimately, people want to feel appreciated for what they do, and when you have a boss — in this case, mayors or city councils, who regularly call you a piece of crap to the public — why would anyone stay?' Florida is one example of a Republican-led state that has benefited from the mass departures. 5 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' Joe Gamaldi said. AP Advertisement According to a 2024 statement from former Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, the state welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. 'Florida is the most pro-law enforcement state in the nation because we back our blue,' Moody said at the time. 'We've been spreading the word about all the great incentives to join our ranks, and individuals like the new Sarasota recruits have answered the call, leaving behind places where their service was not as appreciated as it is here.' She said she was 'as inspired as ever to continue doing all we can to show our support to those who bravely protect and serve' after seeing the influx of police officers into the state. 5 Florida welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. Fox News Digital Advertisement Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community, adding officers are 'voting with their feet.' 'We're also seeing it [in] Texas in Houston, which is a city that leans a little blue, but they have been supportive of police officers,' he said. 'The mayor there has given a massive raise to police officers. You're seeing officers go there. You're seeing officers go to Dallas. So, you're seeing all these communities, and there's one common thread. It's 'We support police officers.'' Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement and said, in many cities, law enforcement officers are afraid to do their jobs in 'critical incident' situations, even when they do them by the book. 5 Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community. LightRocket via Getty Images Advertisement 'I think you can look no further than Seattle, Portland, Chicago [and] New York,' he said. 'All of these cities have basically told their police officers, 'We don't support you. We're not gonna be there for you when you need us. We're gonna try to defund you when given the opportunity.' 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said, referring to socialist Zohran Mamdani, who has been open with his anti-police rhetoric. 5 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said Zohran Mamdani /X Blue cities, Gamaldi said, are worse off for driving out their police forces. 'Look at the mass exodus of experience in solving cases and experience of just mentoring the next generation of police officers,' he said. 'I mean, the damage that was done in 2020 with the defund the police movement, rhat's going to reverberate for decades. You don't just recover from something like that when you have all of that experience walking out the door.' 5 Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement. Christopher Sadowski He also pointed to better pay and other financial perks, like cities covering moving expenses, as reasons law enforcement officers are moving away from far-left areas. Ultimately, he posed a question to those who patrol the streets where they are unappreciated, saying, 'Why not leave?' Advertisement 'To anyone watching this right now,' Gamaldi said, 'if your boss was constantly telling you [that] you're doing a horrible job, and, in addition, if you were following the exact policies, training and the law of your job, and yet they are still demonizing you, still throwing you under the bus, still trying to indict you, why the hell would you stay?'
The Hill
31 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mamdani fundraises off Cuomo's launch video
New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani fundraised off a new campaign video from former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo as the two are set to battle in the general election later this year. 'Only 13 percent of New Yorkers voted in the June primary. The general election is in November, and I am in it to win it. My opponent, Mr. Mamdani, offers slick slogans, but no real solutions,' Cuomo said in a campaign video, which was posted Monday on the social platform X. In response to the earlier campaign video Cuomo posted on X, Mamdani posted a link to donate money to his campaign. Mamdani's response had earned 95,000 likes by later Monday night, with Cuomo's original video at 2,900 likes. Mamdani's recent win in the Democratic primary shocked the political world, with a mostly previously unknown democratic socialist taking down Cuomo, a notable political heavyweight. Cuomo has formally announced he is running as an independent in the Big Apple's mayoral race later this year. Cuomo joins Mamdani, Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in the general election race. Former Obama staffer Dan Pfeiffer, also a co-host of the 'Pod Save America' podcast, slammed Cuomo's Monday ad by saying there was 'no charisma' in it. 'This is one of the least compelling campaign videos that I have ever seen. No message. No charisma. No compelling visuals,' Pfeiffer said in a post on X in response to the Cuomo video. 'Just a visibly annoyed man wearing an ill-fitting shirt saying things he clearly doesn't believe,' he added. When reached for comment about Pfeiffer's remarks earlier Monday, Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi told The Hill that 'If we upset the pod guys, we must be on the right track.'
Politico
35 minutes ago
- Politico
Time is money, and cap-and-trade is running low on both
With help from Blake Jones, Sam Ogozalek and Jason Plautz A LONG AUGUST: Lawmakers are leaving town for summer recess next week without cap-and-trade reauthorization done — and they could be leaving a half-billion dollars on the table as a result. Both of the Legislature's vehicles for extending the state's marquee carbon-trading program are getting hearings this week: The Senate's vessel, Sen. Monique Limón's SB 840, was awaiting a hearing in the Assembly Natural Resources Committee as of press time, and Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin's AB 1207 gets its turn in the Senate Environmental Quality Committee Wednesday. But the odds of reaching a consensus by Friday's deadline to clear policy committees are low as discussions over how much to reform the program grind on. 'As much as I wish we would just get a deal done before recess, I'm not sure that there will be much movement at this point,' said one senator, granted anonymity to discuss ongoing negotiations. That's bad news for market watchers who are hoping for some certainty ahead of the next emissions auction on Aug. 20, just two days after the Legislature reconvenes in Sacramento. If history is any guide, that means the state should expect a lot less revenue to fund its climate ambitions at an August auction where investors are likely to be spooked. The last auction, held on May 21, failed to sell all of the available allowances for the first time since the pandemic and brought in roughly $595 million, half of what was generated in last May's auction. 'I think this auction is going to be a wake-up call for legislators,' said Katelyn Roedner Sutter, California state director at the Environmental Defense Fund. 'For anybody who doesn't think there is urgency to cap-and-trade, when we start seeing programs have funding pulled back, that's going to be painful.' The holdup is largely centered on a debate around how much to tinker with cap-and-trade's rules. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who committed to reauthorization this year after President Donald Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to block state climate programs in April, has laid out a plan that would leave the structure of the program largely unchanged. Environmental justice organizations, meanwhile, are pushing for reforms like the elimination of free allowances that keep major polluters' costs down and emissions caps on individual facilities. Clayton Munnings, a climate economist who leads Clean and Prosperous California, a nonprofit that advocates for carbon markets, said the uncertainty about the future of the program is costing the state billions it could be using to keep energy bills down and pay for things like electric vehicle incentives. His organization released a report Monday that found lawmakers' delay in reauthorizing the program, which expires in 2030, has cost California up to $3 billion in potential revenue over the past year as the price of pollution allowances has plummeted. Prices reached $42 at an auction in February 2024, but were down to around $26 in May. 'Now is not the time to be horse-trading with climate change,' Munnings said. 'California is in a climate crisis and our state's commitment to cap-and-trade is in question.' Katie Valenzuela, a consultant for environmental justice groups, pushed back, saying she appreciates that lawmakers aren't rushing to finalize changes that will be in place through 2045. 'This is the most consequential climate decision that will be made for 20 years, period,' Valenzuela said. 'Rushing this process without being thoughtful would really be a disservice to California's climate goals.' Lawmakers and groups that rely on cap-and-trade revenues also need to hash out exactly how that funding will be spent. That's only getting harder as the pool of available dollars has already shrunk. Newsom and lawmakers have already committed $1 billion in auction revenues this year to backfill CalFire and want another $1 billion for the state's high-speed rail project, half of the $4 billion that the program's generated annually in recent years. All of this comes amid what's shaping up to be a particularly hectic end of session for climate and energy policy. Newsom and lawmakers still need to hash out sprawling energy affordability legislation, a plan to establish a West-wide energy market and California Energy Commission recommendations for preventing refinery closures and gas price spikes, with less than a month between session resuming on Aug. 18 and ending on Sept. 12. — AN Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! GRID LOCK: Another discussion getting punted to after recess: Sen. Josh Becker's bill to launch a West-wide energy market, which got pulled from Wednesday's Assembly Utilities and Energy Committee agenda after the Senate and Assembly agreed Monday to keep working towards a deal. The decision to pull SB 540 from the hearing comes after the Environmental Defense Fund and Natural Resources Defense Council, co-sponsors of the bill, said in a late Friday letter that they are now opposed unless Becker amends it to remove language they argue would dissuade other states from joining an expanded day-ahead Western energy market. 'At the heart of the concern is the May 29th amendments which make it unappealing or even impossible for our regional partners to join such a market,' the groups wrote, alongside energy trade groups and companies including Amazon, Rivian and PacifiCorp. It's the latest back-and-forth in a tug of war over whether California feels comfortable opening up its grid to other states' energy mixes — and whether other states feel comfortable linking to California. The 'regional oversight council' that Becker added in May would give California the ability to kick out members that procure coal or other fossil fuels, but that's turning off potential members in other states. Becker said in a statement that lawmakers 'are in dialogue with all stakeholders to ultimately land a bill that will lead to the reliability, affordability and clean energy advancement of a west-wide energy market and make sure California is protected.' — AN SPEAKING OF REGIONAL MARKETS: Environmental groups sued the federal Bonneville Power Administration last week over its May decision to join the Arkansas-based Southwest Power Pool instead of the West-wide effort. The federal hydropower agency's own modeling showed that the cost savings would be even greater if it joined the California market, but the grid operator said it had concerns about the Western market would be governed, Jason Plautz reports for POLITICO's E&E News. Groups, including the Northwest Energy Coalition, Sierra Club and Oregon Citizens' Utility Board, filed the lawsuit in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that BPA's decision violates its mandate in the Northwest Power Act to ensure cost effective power and to protect fish and wildlife in the Columbia Basin. — AN TURN OFF THE TAP: Republicans are taking another shot at California's high-speed rail project, this time through a federal spending bill. Republican House lawmakers included a provision in their Department of Transportation spending bill that would bar federal funds under future DOT appropriations or 'any other Act' from flowing to the project. The language also applies to a proposed high-speed rail line between Dallas and Houston, POLITICO's Sam Ogozalek reports. The move comes after the Federal Railroad Administration announced in early June that it was planning to ax roughly $4 billion in federal grants to California's project awarded under the Biden administration, a few months after President Donald Trump slammed it for cost overruns and called for an investigation. High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri hit back last week, saying the project was not fairly evaluated and calling the outcome of the investigation 'predetermined.' — AN THE STENCH OF CAMPAIGNING: Republican San Diego County Supervisor Jim Desmond on Monday pressed the Trump administration to negotiate Tijuana River sewage cleanup in a trade deal with Mexico — drawing attention to a defining political issue in the region as he challenges Democratic Rep. Mike Levin. Desmond, though a local official and not a negotiator in talks, shot out a statement saying Mexico should be forced to construct wastewater treatment plants to secure a new deal with the U.S., openly pushing his party's leader while stopping short of criticizing him. 'I urge President Trump and his administration to make the Tijuana Sewage Crisis a non-negotiable part of any trade deal,' Desmond said. 'No more blank checks. No more empty promises.' Levin last fall held onto his district that stretches down the coast between San Clemente and Del Mar by 4.4 points. Both parties in the area are under significant pressure to mitigate the decades-old issue of pollution spilling across the Mexico-California border in order to cleanse beaches of the waste. And Levin showed it Monday, touting funding for cleanup that he has brought home to the district, and backed Democratic legislation aimed at cleaning up the river's E. coli-tainted waters. — BJ — Rooftop solar is the tip of the cost-shift iceberg, writes UC Berkeley's Severin Borenstein. — Data centers are sucking up water in Georgia. — Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs is questioning the feds' management of a fire in Grand Canyon National Park that's destroyed dozens of buildings.
