Texas Democrat Tells Joe Rogan His Advice to GOP That Trump 'Tapped Into'
In what was a highly awaited conversation, Texas state Representative James Talarico joined The Joe Rogan Experience podcast and urged Republicans to compete for young voters rather than trying to suppress them—acknowledging that President Donald Trump had "tapped into" something real with younger Americans.
"I do think there is something that Donald Trump tapped into. I think that other Republicans could tap into," Talarico said during the episode. "And again, this is weird because I'm a Democrat making an argument for Republicans. The reason I'm doing this is I think when politicians feel that they can win over voters, we all compete to win over those voters and that leads to better public policy."
BREAKING: Democrat James Talarico just perfectly laid out to Joe Rogan how Republicans are suppressing the vote in Texas. This is wild to watch. pic.twitter.com/FfHb9gmaDw — Democratic Wins Media (@DemocraticWins) July 18, 2025
Talarico, a 36-year-old Democrat from Austin, argued that GOP-backed voting laws in Texas—which he called "voter suppression"—disproportionately hurt young voters. "Instead of making it harder for young people to vote, why don't you just go out and try to win their votes? Clearly, Donald Trump was able to do it," he told Rogan.
On why Trump resonated with young men, Talarico said his own party misunderstands what voters really want: "Democrats too often—my party—we think that people are going to be happy with a handout. I've never met someone who wants a handout."
Faith, Biden and the Meaning of Power
The conversation, which lasted more than two hours, touched on faith, politics and generational change.
Talarico criticized a Texas law requiring the Ten Commandments in public schools, calling it unconstitutional and harmful to religion. "If we have to force people to put up a poster, to me, that means that we have a dead religion—a religion that no longer moves people, a religion that no longer speaks to people's hearts," he said.
He warned about "Christian nationalism," which he defined as "the worship of power—whether it's social power, economic power, political power—in the name of Christ," adding: "This is what people think about religious people—that we're more interested in imposing our faith or our values or our beliefs on others instead of living it out ourselves."
Podcaster Joe Rogan, left, interviewed Democratic Texas state Representative James Talarico, right. The 36-year-old from Austin argued that his state's GOP-backed voting laws—which he called "voter suppression"—disproportionately hurt young voters.
Podcaster Joe Rogan, left, interviewed Democratic Texas state Representative James Talarico, right. The 36-year-old from Austin argued that his state's GOP-backed voting laws—which he called "voter suppression"—disproportionately hurt young voters.
The Joe Rogan Experience / YouTube
Talarico also criticized former President Joe Biden, saying he should have stepped aside to allow younger leadership. "We focus so much on President Biden's age, which I agree was a problem, but I don't think we've really discussed that the biggest problem was ego. It was his inability to step aside and let someone else do the job," he said. "In 2020, we all knew—anybody that was paying attention—knew that he was compromised."
On abortion and LGBTQ+ rights, Talarico defended his abortion-rights Christian perspective. "Creation has to be done with consent. You cannot force someone to create. Creation is one of the most sacred acts that we engage in as human beings," he said. "If this was something that really was central to Jesus' ministry, I would think he would have said something about it ... We have four Gospels with tons of teachings from Jesus and none of them are about this."
AI, Bipartisanship and a Lost Generation
Talarico also addressed how artificial intelligence (AI) could disrupt work and society, calling it "a spiritual question about what does it mean to be a human being." He added: "We're all either thrilled or terrified of this AI future. It's going to change how we understand work. It's going to change how we understand our jobs and our careers. It's going to eliminate a lot of jobs, I would imagine."
He described how bipartisan friendships in the Texas Legislature led him to work with Republicans on issues like drug pricing and homeschool sports. "I ended up crossing party lines to support that bill. And I got a bunch of blowback from my folks," he said. "But I felt like this trust that I had with James [Frank]—someone who is on the completely polar opposite side of me—moved me in a way that I actually changed my opinion on something."
Speaking about young Americans' spiritual struggles, Talarico said: "I hear from people all day long, yes on TikTok but also in real life, where they're just like, 'I want a relationship with God and I'm just not sure how to find that,'" he said.
"It does feel like young people in particular are the ones that are asking these questions ... they are waking up to how broken organized religion is and they are starting to yearn for something bigger and better and something that's more true and more honest."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
10 minutes ago
- New York Post
Curtis Sliwa pledges — again — to hang up iconic red beret if he wins NYC mayoral race
He'll hang up his hat — if he wins. Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa pledged Monday to retire his iconic red beret if he's elected mayor. 'I was born without a beret, I'll die without a beret, I can take the beret off,' Sliwa said as he led an hourlong manhunt for a dog-hating maniac in Queens, that didn't end up sniffing out the suspect. Advertisement The Republican mayoral nominee has shed his ruby noggin topper more often in recent days as he aims to appeal to well-to-do New Yorkers wary of socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani. 'If the people are good enough to elect me mayor, I'll retire the red beret. I won't wear the red beret. But for right now, I guess I'm going to have to switch on-and-off depending on what group I'm with,' he said. 3 Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa vowed to retire his beret if elected mayor. Michael Nagle Advertisement 3 He made the pledge as he led a manhunt for a monster who lit a pit bull on fire. Michael Nagle Sliwa has promised to ditch the beret before, during 2021's mayoral election, when he was also the GOP candidate. But Big Apple voters at the time evidently weren't jazzed enough by the prospect of a beret-free Sliwa — the bearer of quite the impressive tan line underneath his cap — and overwhelmingly voted Mayor Eric Adams into office. Sliwa wore a different hat, so to speak, for an hour Monday as he led an unsuccessful hunt across South Ozone Park for a monster accused of setting a helpless pit bull on fire last week. Advertisement He plastered fliers with photos depicting the suspect under car windshields and knocked on doors. 3 Sliwa's beret is so inseparable from his head that he has displayed a prominent tan line on the few occasions he has removed it. Stephen Yang The outspoken animal lover — who once showed off the 15 rescue cats inside his 320-square-foot Upper West Side studio apartment — vowed that animal abuse will be a priority if he's elected. 'I'm trying to get everybody to get involved to put this fiend in jail where he belongs,' he said.
Boston Globe
10 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
France calls on the EU to pressure Israel to come to the table on Palestinian two-state solution
Barrot spoke on the first day of a high-level UN meeting on a two-state solution to the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which is being cochaired by France and Saudi Arabia. The The aim of the conference, Barrot said, is 'to reverse the trend of what is happening in the region — mainly the erasure of the two-state solution, which has been for a long time the only solution that can bring peace and security in the region.' Advertisement He urged the EC to call on Israel to lift a financial blockade on $2.32 billion he says the Israeli government owes the Palestinian Authority, stop settlement building in the West Bank, which threatens the territorial integrity of a future Palestinian state, and end the 'militarized' food delivery system in Gaza by the Israeli-backed US Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which has resulted in hundreds of killings. Advertisement Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds. The United States has echoed its sentiment and on Monday called the conference 'unproductive and ill-timed.' 'The United States will not participate in this insult but will continue to lead real-world efforts to end the fighting and deliver a permanent peace,' State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a statement. 'Our focus remains on serious diplomacy: not stage-managed conferences designed to manufacture the appearance of relevance.' Ahead of the meeting, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that France would France is now the biggest Western power and the only member of the Group of Seven major industrialized nations to recognize the state of Palestine, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same. More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe. At the conference opening, Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammed Mustafa called for all countries that have not yet recognized Palestine as a state to do so 'without delay.' 'The path to peace begins by recognizing the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction,' he said. Advertisement The other issue being discussed at the conference is normalization between Israel and the Arab states in the region. Prince Faisal bin Farhan, the Saudi foreign minister, stressed that normalization of relations with Israel 'can only come through the establishment of a Palestinian state.' With global anger rising over desperately hungry people in Gaza starting to die from starvation. President Trump on Monday called for Both Barrot and Farhan said Monday the United States is an essential actor in the region and that it was the president in January who secured the only cease-fire in the 21-month war. 'I am firmly in the belief that Trump's engagement can be a catalyst for an end to the immediate crisis in Gaza and potentially a resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the long term,' Farhan said.
Fox News
12 minutes ago
- Fox News
Fox News Poll: Support for deportation depends on who is being targeted
As the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, or ICE, continues to crackdown on illegal immigration, about half of voters say the department is too aggressive in its deportation efforts. Furthermore, while support for deportation is high, it depends on who is being targeted. The latest Fox News survey, released Monday, finds 3 in 10 back deporting all illegal immigrants, while 6 in 10 supports only deporting those charged with crimes but would allow others to stay and apply for citizenship. One in 10 favors letting all illegal immigrants remain in the U.S. Since 2015, a majority has generally favored the deportation of illegal immigrants. Republicans (54%) are about eight times more likely than Democrats (7%) to say all illegal immigrants should be deported, and one-quarter of independents agree (25%). Roughly 8 in 10 Democrats, 6 in 10 independents, and 4 in 10 Republicans agree that at least illegal immigrants charged with crimes should be deported, while others should be offered a path to stay. On the current approach to deportation, however, views are divided. Half, 49%, feel ICE has been too aggressive in its efforts to deport illegal immigrants while a quarter (24%) say it has not been aggressive enough. Nearly 3 in 10 say deportation efforts are about right (27%). Most Democrats think ICE is too aggressive (81%), while Republicans are split between saying its actions are about right (43%) or not aggressive enough (40%). Some 17% of Republicans think ICE has been too aggressive. Independents are more likely to say the agency is too aggressive (49%) than about right (28%) or not aggressive enough (23%). When asked what concerns them about illegal immigration, the largest number of voters say that it overburdens government programs (39%). Fewer worry whether it leads to an increase in crime (16%) or terrorism (10%), takes jobs from U.S. citizens (14%), or changes the country's culture (9%). Concerns about illegal immigration have shifted somewhat compared to 15 years ago. At that time, by a 10-point margin, a greater share were worried about economic issues like overburdening government programs or taking away jobs from citizens (63% in 2010 vs. 53% now), and fewer were concerned about increasing crime (6% in 2010 vs. 16% now). Meanwhile, majorities oppose immigration-related elements included in the new budget legislation, the "One Big Beautiful Bill," as 55% are against increasing spending on the border wall and 59% oppose spending more on immigrant detention centers. By a 6-point margin, voters think the Republican Party is better able to handle immigration than the Democratic Party, and President Donald Trump's best job ratings are on border security (56% approve, 44% disapprove) and immigration (48%, 51%). Fewer voters approve on foreign policy (45%, 54%), the economy (44%, 55%), and inflation and tariffs (36%, 62% for both). Overall, 46% approve of his job performance, while 54% disapprove. One reason Trump does so well on border security is that 1 in 5 Democrats approve of the job he's doing – their highest rating on any issue tested. The same is true of independents as more than half approve, making border security his best issue. A look at Hispanic voters… On illegal immigration, attitudes among Hispanic voters look similar to those among voters overall: 60% support deporting illegal immigrants charged with crimes while 15% support deporting all those here illegally (23% say let all stay). The majority thinks ICE has been too aggressive (57%) with a quarter (24%) saying about right, and 1 in 5 not aggressive enough (19%). More than half of Hispanic voters like Trump's performance on border security (54% approve) but dislike it on immigration (60% disapprove). Overall, 42% approve and 58% disapprove. And like voters overall, the biggest concern on illegal immigration among Hispanic voters is overburdening government (35%). Otherwise, concern spreads across other issues such as crime (15%), jobs (14%), culture (14%), and terrorism (11%). Conducted July 18-21, 2025, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,000 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (114) and cellphones (636) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (250). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher (among Hispanic voters it is ±9 percentage points). In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics of respondents are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis and voter file data.
