&w=3840&q=100)
India needs 40-50 astronauts for future space missions: PM Modi to Shux
During their interaction at the Prime Minister's residence on Lok Kalyan Marg, PM Modi stressed that India must prepare its cohort of astronauts to meet future demands.
'We need to have a pool of 40–50 astronauts for India's upcoming space missions,' the Prime Minister told Shukla. He added that the officer's experience would be invaluable for India's human spaceflight programme, including the Gaganyaan mission.
Shukla shares spaceflight experiences with PM Modi
Shukla, who flew as part of the Axiom-4 commercial mission to the ISS between June 25 and July 15, shared his experiences of space travel and the international attention India's space programme has received.
'Wherever I went, people were aware of what India is doing in space. Many were even more excited about Gaganyaan than me, asking when our mission is scheduled,' he told the Prime Minister.
As part of the Axiom-4 mission, Shukla joined three international crewmates: Peggy Whitson (US), Slawosz Uznanski-Wisniewski (Poland), and Tibor Kapu (Hungary) in conducting over 60 experiments and 20 outreach sessions during their 20-day stay on the ISS.
Gaganyaan mission enters final phase
The Gaganyaan mission is India's first human spaceflight programme. The Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro) plans to send three astronauts into a 400 km orbit for three days and bring them back safely. The project includes two unmanned test flights before the crewed mission.
As of May 2025, the Gaganyaan mission has entered its final phase with the first human spaceflight now scheduled for the first quarter of 2027.
Lessons from life in orbit
The astronaut also spoke of the challenges of space living, especially food logistics. 'Cargo is expensive and space is limited. You try to pack maximum calories and nutrition into minimum space. Experiments are ongoing in this area,' he explained.
Dressed in an Isro astronaut jacket embroidered with his nickname Shux, Shukla presented Modi with the Axiom-4 mission patch and a framed Indian tricolour that he had carried to the ISS. The flag had been displayed behind him when he spoke to the Prime Minister from orbit on June 29.
Shux completed 'homework' for India's future missions
Before his return, Shukla said he had completed the 'homework' given to him by the Prime Minister — documenting his training, experiments, and stay on the ISS to strengthen India's human spaceflight programme.
'I am confident this knowledge will prove extremely useful for Gaganyaan,' he said.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
BJP opposes Greater Bengaluru Authority, says it fails objective of Constitution
Bengaluru: Karnataka BJP has opposed the Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill 2025, stating that the Bill defeats the very objective of the Indian Constitution. Former Deputy Chief Minister and BJP MLA C.N. Ashwath Narayan, raising his voice after the tabling of the Bill in the Assembly on Tuesday, said, 'As per the Constitutional objective, local bodies are functioning. To ensure freedom for local bodies, the 73rd and 74th Amendments were brought into the Constitution. Specifically, in the 74th Amendment, Section 243 clearly states that there should not be interference. Through this Bill, all the powers of the local bodies have been taken over by the state government.' He further said, 'The state government has stooped down to the level of taking away the powers of corporators. The reality is, they won't have time to look into their own work. In matters of development, management, and planning, there will be interference. There is no provision under the Constitution for the creation of the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA).' Ashwath Narayan underlined, 'The head of the state is the Chief Minister, and the head of the GBA is also the Chief Minister. The freedom and empowerment that should have been given to local bodies are taken away through this Bill. The Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, overall, intends to interfere, and this is evident.' He demanded that complete freedom must be given to local bodies as per the 74th Amendment. 'I demand that the government give more powers to local bodies and ensure decentralisation of power. Local bodies are not getting the authority to collect taxes. If the CM and Dy CM interfere, how will you save democracy?' he questioned. Appealing to Congress legislators, he said, 'Many of you have been elected from local bodies; protect their rights. If Constitutional objectives are failed, the judiciary will intervene and take over our role. Do not bring this situation.' Ashwath Narayan further questioned, 'Why was the PIL filed against the GBA Act? What are the objections? Dy CM Shivakumar should reveal this.' Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka stated, 'I oppose the proposed name 'Greater Bengaluru'. Can't you find any other name in Kannada? You must think. Was 'Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike' not fine? Why use an English name? Mumbai has now become 'Maha Mumbai'. Shivakumar is doing great injustice to Kannada. Remove the word 'Greater'.' He further said, 'Secondly, the concept of decentralisation has been damaged and freedom taken away. The corporation should have been independent, but you have made it a parasite by dividing it into five divisions. If one corporation collects good revenue, another will go bankrupt. There won't be enough money. They will come under the grip of the government.' Ashoka added, 'Former PM late Rajiv Gandhi brought the 73rd Amendment to the Constitution, but this Bill goes against its objectives. Is that right? What benefit will the people of Bengaluru get from this Bill? This is not decentralisation of power. Since Dy CM Shivakumar is in charge of Bengaluru, there is centralisation of power. We don't want this. You may have the majority and get it passed, but this is not in the interest of society. Roll back this Bill.' Congress MLA Rizwan Arshad stated, 'This is only a small amendment for the sake of clarity. The government's intention is to ensure no interference in the administration of city corporations.' Responding to criticism, Dy CM D.K. Shivakumar said, 'There must be clarity in this matter. Bengaluru needs proper governance. Let us discuss this for a full day if needed. Opposition members have more experience than us, and I am ready to accept their suggestions. If there are flaws in our draft, we will correct them. There is no secrecy here." "We even formed a House Committee for open discussions. Let us first conduct elections. August 18 was the last date for objections, August 25 is the deadline for the Governor's assent, and the final notification will be issued on September 2. Opinions of opposition leaders will also be taken into account.'
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘India profiteering from Russian oil, China is different': Top US official ahead of tariff deadline
As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. As Trump's tariff deadline for India nears, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that New Delhi was 'profiteering' and 'making billions' from its purchases of Russian oil. (AFP) In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India had made huge profits on the sale of Russian oil during the war in Ukraine. "This ... Indian arbitrage - buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war - which is unacceptable," he said. The US official further added that India's purchase of Russian oil has been benefiting 'India's richest families.' Speaking to CNBC, Bessent defended US' move to not put tariffs on China for its purchase of Russian oil as Beijing as 'diversified oil imports and so its situation is different.' This is a developing story…
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
GST reform could boost government revenue in long term, says S&P
S&P Global Ratings has seemingly approved of the Indian government's proposed reform of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, dismissing concerns about New Delhi's finances due to lower indirect tax rates. Days after the agency upgraded its rating on India, Yee Farn Phua, director of sovereign and international public finance ratings at S&P, said on Tuesday in a webinar that while the initial reaction to the government's proposal would be that tax rates would come down and hurt revenues, it might not necessarily be the case. 'If you look at the current GST regime, it is quite a complex one – four different rates, which make accounting and implementation sometimes quite difficult. With the proposed two-rate system now being looked at, though the effective rate could be somewhat lower, but actually because of easier implementation and fairer accounting processes, there actually could be a boost to fiscal revenues in the longer term,' Yee Farn Phua said. On August 14, S&P upgraded its rating on India to BBB from BBB-, saying the country is 'among the best performing economies in the world'. A day later, on August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced a host of reforms in his Independence Day speech, including one that would see the GST move to a two-slab system of 5 per cent and 18 per cent by the end of 2025. In addition to the two slabs, a special 40 per cent category has been proposed for sin and demerit goods. This higher tax rate is expected to be imposed on only 5-7 items. 'It's still very early days to see the actual fiscal impact, but we don't think that the government would reform this system to the point that it would hit fiscal revenues for them. After all, in the past five to six years, GST reform has proven (to be) a driver of and a very important and major component of the government's fiscal revenues. So, we think that story will continue to play out… Overall, we don't think it would be a major drag on fiscal revenue,' Yee Farn Phua said, adding that S&P is 'monitoring' this new development. S&P's assessment is broadly in line with that of other economists, who see higher consumption from lower indirect tax rates aiding the government's tax collections in the long term, although the short run could see a fiscal hit. According to Morgan Stanley economists Upasana Chachra and Bani Gambhir, while the fiscal balances of the central and state governments will likely come under pressure due to revenue losses, it could be 'partly offset by higher GDP growth improving direct and indirect tax collection'. 'All else being equal, a loss in GST revenues could put upward pressure on the consolidated fiscal balance, but we believe that as growth picks up, the net effect will potentially be limited. Further, specifically for 2025-26, the impact on central government deficit should be less than 0.1 per cent of GDP, assuming no offsetting impact,' Chachra and Gambhir wrote in a note on August 17. State governments, however, are wary, with The Indian Express reporting this week that multiple states have expressed concerns over substantial losses in their share of GST revenues due to lower indirect tax rates. Annually, top officials from state governments said, the revenue loss could be Rs 7,000-9,000 crore for most major states. Over the years, GST rates have gradually come down due to tweaks made by the GST Council. As per an RBI study from September 2019, the weighted average effective GST rate had decreased from 14.4 per cent at the time of the new indirect regime's launch in mid-2017 to 11.6 per cent by mid-2019, with higher buoyancy 'achieved by widening the tax base and removing distortions'. According to S&P's forecasts, made prior to the GST reforms announced by Modi, the combined fiscal deficit of the central and state governments is seen at 7.3 per cent of GDP in 2025-26, which it expects to decline to 6.6 per cent by 2028-29. In terms of debt, S&P expects India's net central plus state debt to decline to 78 per cent of GDP by 2028-29 from 83 per cent in 2024-25, bringing it closer to pre-pandemic levels. The Centre has targeted a reduction in its debt-to-GDP ratio to 49-51 per cent by 2030-31 from 57.1 per cent in 2024-25. States do not have a debt target. Rating agencies view government debt on a consolidated basis – Centre plus states. At the webinar on Tuesday, when asked if the rating upgrade was 'too little, too late' considering India's performance, Yee Farn Phua laughed, saying he had seen Indian media headlines which said 'S&P upgrades India after 18 years'. 'My response to that is that we generally take a long-term view to these sorts of things. If you look at India's performance as an economy over the past 10-20 years, there have been up-cycles and down-cycles. Economic growth has sort of chugged along, but fiscal numbers have spiked up and down.'
