
Tips on how to decide who pays to look after elderly parents
With the cost of living increasing more than our parents would have thought, and with them living longer, many are now in a position where they have to depend on their children to pay for their care because their savings fall short.
While the responsibility of caring for elderly parents has long been a deeply held value in many South African families, changing social and economic dynamics are reshaping how this care is shared among siblings, Lee Hancox, head of channel and segment marketing at Sanlam, says.
'Today, more adult children are navigating complex caregiving roles, often balancing work, distance and family life, while still honouring the cultural importance of supporting their parents. Even if care for elderly parents is a shared value, the means and methods of providing that care can differ, especially when siblings have different financial situations or 'money personalities'.
'In many South African families, caring for elderly parents is a natural extension of family responsibility, but the way siblings approach this care, especially when financial resources and priorities differ, can be complex.'
Even in families where love and commitment to eldercare run deep, siblings may approach financial responsibility in different ways. These differences, often shaped by personal experiences, values and financial habits, can lead to misunderstandings or tension, she warns.
'You might have one sibling who is more spontaneous, wanting to act quickly, provide the best care possible and spare no expense. Meanwhile, another might be methodical, carefully weighing what is affordable and sustainable. Both approaches come from love, but without a shared plan and open communication, these differences can create tension – especially under pressure.'
ALSO READ: Warning! The retirement savings gap is widening in South Africa
Drawing from professional expertise and personal insight, Hancox shares her top tips to navigate this emotional financial terrain:
Start saving for your own retirement from day one
Supporting your parents as they age is a profound act of love and respect – one that many South Africans embrace as part of their family values. But it is also important to care for your own financial wellbeing in the process.
'Planning ahead is important. Retirement is not just about reaching a certain age but about preparing for the decades that may follow, including medical costs, frail care and maintaining dignity in daily life.'
Hancox says even small steps to save and set financial goals can make a meaningful difference.
'Creating clear boundaries around what you can realistically contribute, both financially and emotionally, can help protect your future and that of your children, while still honouring your commitment to your parents.'
ALSO READ: Funding the family: Black tax and the 'sandwich generation' are on the rise
Have the tough conversations early, with your parents if possible
Initiating conversations about your parents' future care and financial plans can feel uncomfortable, but it is an important step in supporting them with dignity. 'It is not always easy to ask, but having these discussions early can help avoid stress during a crisis.'
Hancox says if your parents are in a home that is becoming difficult to maintain, gently explore the idea of downsizing or adapting the space. If their medical cover is limited, investigate options together while there is still time to plan.
'And if emotions run high, consider involving a financial planner or family lawyer – someone neutral who can guide the conversation and help shape a plan that respects everyone's needs. Even meeting in a relaxed setting, like a coffee shop, can help ease the tension and create space for honest dialogue.'
ALSO READ: Black tax is hitting a generation regardless of skin colour
Find common ground with siblings
When your siblings have different financial habits or 'money personalities', planning for a parent's care can be complex. But rather than focusing on differences, it helps to centre the conversation on shared values and your parent's wellbeing, Hancox says.
'A respectful, structured approach can make space for everyone's voice and lead to practical solutions.'
She says you can consider preparing guiding questions in advance:
What kind of care would Mom or Dad feel most comfortable with?
What can each of us realistically contribute – financially, emotionally, or in terms of time?
How will we manage unexpected costs together?
'Some may prefer a detailed budget and contingency plan, while others may value flexibility and responsiveness. It is also important to acknowledge who is providing most of the hands-on care and explore how others can support consistently, whether through financial contributions, emotional support, or taking on specific tasks. Open, empathetic dialogue can help families honour their shared commitment while navigating the realities of caregiving.'
ALSO READ: Black tax survival guide: Getting your financial groove back
Remember what is best for Mom and Dad
Hancox says you may never be able to fully measure the sacrifices your parents made, but you can honour them in a way that is sustainable for you and your family.
'That means finding a balance, supporting them with care and dignity, while also protecting your own financial wellbeing and peace of mind.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
8 hours ago
- The South African
Did Elon Musk snub handshake to Ramaphosa?
A clip of Elon Musk seemingly snubbing a handshake from President Cyril Ramaphosa has gone viral. But is it all it seems for the Pretoria-born billionaire who has accused the South African government of promoting 'openly racist laws'? On the X app, a short clip of President Cyril Ramaphosa's visit to the White House resurfaced. In May, the president visited the Oval Office alongside a delegation, where he met with US President Donald Trump. In the video, Ramaphosa shakes the hands of US officials, whilst Elon Musk laughs and looks on. 'Elon Musk doesn't touch k******. This is embarrassing 💔', read a X post. However, a community note quickly corrected the fake news by posting the full clip of Elon shaking the president's hand. Last year, the two men met to discuss the potential operation of Elon Musk's internet satellite service, Starlink, in the country. In images posted by the president, Musk was seen smiling while shaking his hand. South Africa is one of a few African countries that has not granted Elon Musk's internet satellite service, Starlink, a licence to operate. According to the world's richest man, this is a result of 'racist laws', which require his company to adhere to a 30% local ownership mandate. The Pretoria-born billionaire is referring to the transformative legislation, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), which he has reportedly rejected. According to reports, Starlink, which falls under SpaceX, could effectively bypass the law with its plans to invest over R2 billion in the country. Business Day reports that the company would finance infrastructure to support the Southern African Development Community (SADC), which is made up of 16 countries. Could Starlink operate in South Africa without adehering to transformative legislation? Images via X: @starlink In May, Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies Solly Malatsi gazetted a policy direction for his department on Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs), which are considered 'alternatives' to transformative legislation. Without mentioning Starlink or Elon Musk, the minister claimed that the policy would 'attract investment,' specifically in operating licensing. The minister revealed that current legislation for foreign investments 'did not allow companies to contribute to transformation goals in ways other than traditional ownership'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
South African banks face scrutiny over political account closures
SA's big banks' trade policies in the spotlight Image: IOL Regulators have been warned against approaching complaints about South African banks in the same way as US president Donald Trump, who this week issued an executive order after accusing financial institutions of unacceptably restricting law-abiding individuals and businesses' access to banking services based on political or religious beliefs. Mametlwe Sebei, president of the General Industries Workers Union of SA (Giwusa), an affiliate of the SA Federation of Trade Unions (Saftu), said Giwusa would not support merely implementing moves similar to Trump's as the situation required the same interventions but for different reasons. Sebei said moves against the banks for being reactionary and assaulting human rights must be supported. "We also know that banks are not accountable in this country, there are political parties, trade unions, community organisations whose bank accounts were closed without an adequate explanation," he said. Sebei described banks as untransformed and that there is not much to look into as far as the banking industry and its conduct are concerned as many South Africans have suffered a lot. He said even Giwusa recently had a dispute with one of the country's major banks, which gave some members access to the union's accounts without authorisation and there were no adequate explanations. According to Sebei, companies perceived to be close to certain public figures have had their bank accounts closed without explanation. "When they close bank accounts, they are effectively condemning workers in those companies to unemployment, retrenchments and job losses. You cannot destroy a company to punish the owners," he said. Sebei said the idea that private banking institutions can take political decisions is extremely dangerous and that is why this should be strongly regulated. In addition, he said the law already provides for instances where there is suspicion of misuse of banking facilities by a client that is able to be reported to the authorities as provided for in the Financial Intelligence Commission Act. Sebei added that the current laws can be implemented without jeopardising jobs and the livelihoods of workers. "Financial services are a lubricant by which the economy is working, it has enormous power in society and in the economy that can destroy not only individuals but also companies and whole industries. These people are wielding enormous public power that has been privatised into institutions that are guided by profiteering and nothing else and want to exercise this power without transparency, accountability and even pass political judgment and that for me is deeply troubling," he said.


The South African
13 hours ago
- The South African
Shauwn Mkhize's Royal AM ordered to repay R27 million sponsorship
Royal AM Football Club will be required to repay all funds received from a controversial R27 million sponsorship deal with the Msunduzi Municipality, following a High Court ruling declaring the agreement unlawful. The judgment comes just weeks after the municipality moved to cancel the three-year sponsorship agreement, which had sparked public outrage. The football club is owned by Durban businesswoman Shauwn Mkhize and her son, Andile Mpisane. Local ratepayers and civil society groups, who have long opposed the deal, have welcomed the court's decision as a victory for transparency and accountability. 'We've been against the sponsorship from the start,' said Anthony Waldhausen, CEO of the Msunduzi Association of Residents, Ratepayers and Civics (MARRC). 'Now, we're looking forward to the municipality taking steps to recover the money owed. That funding should be redirected to urgently needed service delivery.' The sponsorship was originally pitched as a strategic investment in sports development and brand exposure. However, critics slammed it as irresponsible spending in a municipality grappling with service delivery challenges and financial strain. Calls have also intensified to broaden the investigation into the origins and motivations behind the deal, with demands for greater oversight of municipal finances. The court's ruling now compels the Msunduzi Municipality to initiate processes to recover the full R27 million from Royal AM. It remains to be seen whether the club will comply voluntarily or if further legal action will be required. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.