1 US service member killed, 62 injured in Biden's Gaza pier failure
According to the Defense Department Office of Inspector General's report, U.S. Central Command reported 62 injuries as part of the Biden administration's humanitarian aid Gaza pier mission, which was labeled 'Operation Neptune Solace.' The report indicated that it was not clear whether the 62 injuries occurred 'during the performance of duties or resulted off duty or from pre-existing medical conditions.'
The Pentagon watchdog's report claimed that the U.S. Army and Navy were not properly prepared for the Biden administration's Gaza pier mission and faced 'low equipment mission-capable rates and low manning and training levels.'
'The Army and Navy did not allocate sufficient maintenance, manning, [or] training,' the report stated. The Pentagon watchdog also claimed that the Army and Navy 'did not organize, train, and equip to a common joint standard' for the Gaza pier operation.
READ MORE: Pics: US soldier dies from failed Gaza pier injury
The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General determined that the Gaza pier mission resulted in 27 watercraft and other military equipment sustaining damage that cost the U.S. military roughly $31 million to repair. 'Army- and Navy-specific equipment, including watercraft, piers, and causeways, as well as command, control, and communications systems was not interoperable,' the report stated.
Following the release of the Defense Department Office of Inspector General's report, CNN commentator Scott Jennings tweeted, 'One of the biggest Biden embarrassments – the half baked Gaza Aid Pier. $230 million. 20 days in use. And now we find out it injured 60+ US soldiers. One soldier died! All to placate terrorists & their sympathizers in the Democratic Party. Insane scandal.'
The Defense Department Office of Inspector General warned that the Pentagon faces 'potential challenges in global operations' that require Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore (JLOTS) capability.
The report noted, 'Insufficient manning, training, and materiel readiness at the Military Service level, coupled with the lack of integration and the interoperability of JLOTS capability and capacity at the Joint level, reduced the DoD's effectiveness by repeatedly encountering known challenges and inefficiencies in JLOTS operations and exercises, including Operation Neptune Solace in Gaza.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
Trump Has No Cards
President Donald Trump berated President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. He allowed the Pentagon twice to halt prearranged military shipments to Ukraine. He promised that when the current tranche of armaments runs out, there will be no more. He has cut or threatened to cut the U.S. funds that previously supported independent Russian-language media and opposition. His administration is slowly, quietly easing sanctions on Russia, ending 'basic sanctions and export control actions that had maintained and increased U.S. pressure,' according to a Senate-minority report. 'Every month he's spent in office without action has strengthened Putin's hand, weakened ours and undermined Ukraine's own efforts to bring an end to the war,' Senators Jeanne Shaheen and Elizabeth Warren wrote in a joint statement. Many of these changes have gone almost unremarked on in the United States. But they are widely known in Russia. The administration's attacks on Zelensky, Europeans, and Voice of America have been celebrated on Russian television. Of course Vladimir Putin knows about the slow lifting of sanctions. As a result, the Russian president has clearly made a calculation: Trump, to use the language he once hurled at Zelensky, has no cards. Trump does say that he wants to end the war in Ukraine, and sometimes he also says that he is angry that Putin doesn't. But if the U.S. is not willing to use any economic, military, or political tools to help Ukraine, if Trump will not put any diplomatic pressure on Putin or any new sanctions on Russian resources, then the U.S. president's fond wish to be seen as a peacemaker can be safely ignored. No wonder all of Trump's negotiating deadlines for Russia have passed, to no effect, and no wonder the invitation to Anchorage produced no result. There is not much else to say about yesterday's Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska, other than to observe the intertwining elements of tragedy and farce. It was embarrassing for Americans to welcome a notorious wanted war criminal on their territory. It was humiliating to watch an American president act like a happy puppy upon encountering the dictator of a much poorer, much less important state, treating him as a superior. It's excruciating to imagine how badly Trump's diplomatic envoy, Steve Witkoff, an amateur out of his depth, misunderstood his last meeting with Putin in Moscow if he thought that the Alaska summit was going to be successful. It's ominous that Trump now says he doesn't want to push for a cease-fire but instead for peace negotiations, because the latter formula gives Putin time to keep killing Ukrainians. It's strange that Russian reports of the meeting focused on business cooperation. 'Russian-American business and investment partnership has huge potential,' Putin said today. I appreciate that many Ukrainians, Europeans, and of course Americans are relieved that Trump didn't announce something worse. He didn't call for Ukrainian capitulation, or for Ukraine to cede territory. Unless there are secret protocols, perhaps some business deals, that we haven't yet learned about, Anchorage will probably not be remembered as one of history's crime scenes, a new Munich Conference, or a Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. But that's a very low bar to reach. The better way to understand Anchorage is not as the start of something new, but as the culmination of a longer process. As the U.S. dismantles its foreign-policy tools, as this administration fires the people who know how to use them, our ability to act with any agility will diminish. From the Treasury Department to the U.S. Agency for Global Media, from the State Department to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, agency after agency is being undermined, deliberately or accidentally, by political appointees who are unqualified, craven, or hostile to their own mission.
American Military News
3 hours ago
- American Military News
Pentagon revokes security clearance of fmr. CIA official after Russiagate hoax exposed: Report
A new report claims that the Pentagon has revoked the security clearance of former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Susan Miller, who previously claimed to have helped create the 2016 U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment that was used to accuse President Donald Trump of colluding with Russia during the presidential election. The Federalist reported on Thursday that two Trump administration officials confirmed to the outlet that Miller's security clearance had been revoked. An anonymous senior defense official told The Federalist, 'This woman totally shouldn't hold a high level security clearance after pushing the Russia Hoax. All she did was lie to the American people to hurt Trump.' Additionally, a senior Trump official said, 'Russian Hoaxers sought to undermine President Trump's entire first term in office. A woman involved in the Russia Hoax cannot be trusted with a security clearance. Therefore, it has been revoked.' During a recent podcast episode, Miller said she 'headed up the report team' that completed the 2016 U.S. Intelligence Community Assessment that was used to target Trump. However, sources told Racket News in July that Miller did not play a major role in the assessment. READ MORE: Trump revokes security clearances, cuts off resources for major Democrat law firm A senior intelligence official told Racket News that Miller was 'not an author' and was 'not involved.' Meanwhile, a source with knowledge of the assessment told the outlet, '[S]he's not the author of the ICA … she wasn't leading this effort. So it's just totally bizarre that she claims the opposite.' Following Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's release of new evidence in July that showed former President Barack Obama's national security cabinet members 'manufactured and politicized intelligence' that led to a 'coup' against Trump and that the manufactured intelligence alleging collusion between Trump and Russia was not credible, Miller claimed that Gabbard was lying. 'The director of national intelligence and the White House are lying, again,' Miller told NBC News. 'We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected.' Miller added, 'At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time.'
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Vintage photos show how the military has evolved
Military technology has evolved from sword-fighting to AI-assisted drones and missiles. Russia's war in Ukraine highlights the use of advanced military technology today. Trump and Putin's Alaska meeting prompts reflection on military evolution since past alliances. In many ways, warfare has moved from the front line to online. From AI-assisted drones to computerized missiles, military technology has advanced greatly from the days of sword-fighting. Russia's war in Ukraine has showcased some of today's most state-of-the-art military technology, from intelligence-gathering ground robots to ballistic missiles with advanced maneuverability. Take a look at vintage photos of soldiers to see how much the military has evolved throughout history. Militaries have existed since ancient times. The first war ever recorded took place in Mesopotamia in 2700 BCE, according to The Ancient History Encyclopedia. Not "all is fair in love and war," as warfare usually abides by a certain etiquette. The Greeks and Romans had customary laws of war, which the Western military tradition took inspiration from, such as war being openly declared and with legitimate cause, pledged word being kept, and a truce being given to the defeated so that they could recover and honor their dead. The French Revolution brought about the idea of conscription. While the idea of drafting able-bodied men may date back to Egypt in the 27th century BCE, the nationwide system most closely resembling that of today was introduced in France during the French Revolution, and institutionalized by Napoleon after he became emperor in 1803. Suddenly, militaries were no longer limited by the number of soldiers they had, but by their country's population of able-bodied men. Conscription mandates the compulsory enlistment of citizens into the military, so countries with large populations have stronger military capabilities, and serving can help advance equality, per The Conversation. As Russia's war with Ukraine has developed, countries in Europe like Latvia, Sweden, and Lithuania have reintroduced or expanded conscription mandates. France drafted its men during WWI. Other European countries and the US soon followed. In 1917, the US Congress passed the Selective Service Act, which called all men ages 21 to 30 in the 48 states plus Washington, DC. In 1918, this expanded to include men ages 18 to 45 from Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico. The US military consists of the Navy, National Guard, Coast Guard, Marines, Army, and Air Force. The Army, Navy, and Marines were founded in 1775, and the Coast Guard was founded in 1790. The Air Force wasn't formed until 1947. Mass shortages of planes and weapons influenced how the US trained its military. During World War I, some pilots had to be trained with makeshift cockpits and pretend guns, per Getty. Over 4.7 million men and women served in the US forces during World War I. The US tried to stay out of WWI, but joined after Germany re-launched submarine attacks on passenger and merchant ships in 1917, after having pledged not to, and tried to get Mexico to turn against the US, according to the Office of the Historian at the State Department. With these huge new militaries came unthinkable death counts. There were an estimated 37 million deaths reported during World War I. People called it "the war to end all wars." In 1914, H.G. Wells wrote a series of essays, "The War That Will End War," which advocated for peace and the disarmament of the German Empire. As the book rose in popularity, the title soon became both a slogan and rallying cry. During the war, the battles were grim. Germany, at the time of WWI, had one of the world's most advanced chemical industries, and attempted to weaponize this as early as 1914. Ypres, Belgium, was the site of the very first chemical attack, on April 22, 1915 Joining the war effort, the US military saw hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even during the war, some humanity shone through. Even opposing sides could sometimes unite as humans during the tough fights, with soldiers seldom looking out for each other. When WWI ended in 1918, soldiers were finally able to return home. By the end of the war, many soldiers returned to their families. Thousands of others, however, weren't so fortunate. However, World War II brought even more civilians into combat. Military servicemen were trained rigorously in preparation. A formal fitness test was introduced by the US Army in 1942. The test reportedly included push-ups, sit-ups, pull-ups, a 300-yard run, and squat jumps. World War II was the biggest and deadliest war in history. After six years, it finally drew to an end. The end of the war marked the beginning of the Baby Boom as thousands of soldiers came home and formed families. The number of people serving in the US armed forces has since dropped. The military's size varies from country to country. The US is the world's most powerful military, according to firepower, but trails behind countries like South Korea, North Korea, India, China, and Russia in terms of size. Some countries require military service from all their citizens — others don't. Countries around the world still have military service, like Brazil, Turkey, Sweden, and Israel, to name a few. Technological advancement also varies by country. Israel's military is often regarded as one of the most technologically advanced today. The United States is considered the world's most powerful military in terms of firepower. No matter where or when they served, the sacrifices of soldiers have changed the course of history.
