logo
Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world?

Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world?

Minta day ago

Shweta Singh As tensions escalate following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears rise that Tehran could choke the Strait of Hormuz, which is significant for its strategic location. What does this imply for countries like India and for the broader geopolitical landscape? The Strait of Hormuz sees roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil, and oil products shipments,. REUTERS/Hamad I Mohammed/File Photo
Gift this article
As tensions escalate following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears rise that Tehran could choke the Strait of Hormuz. However, patterns in history indicate that while there might be temporary disruption in maritime traffic, Iran might refrain from choking the Strait of Hormuz, as it will pinch its friends more than its enemies.
As tensions escalate following Israeli strikes on Iran, fears rise that Tehran could choke the Strait of Hormuz. However, patterns in history indicate that while there might be temporary disruption in maritime traffic, Iran might refrain from choking the Strait of Hormuz, as it will pinch its friends more than its enemies.
Mint explains why the Strait of Hormuz is significant geopolitically, and economically and what it means for India and Iran-US talks. Why is the Strait of Hormuz significant geopolitically and economically?
The Strait of Hormuz is significant for its strategic location. It lies between Oman and Iran, linking the sea passage from the countries on the Gulf (Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates) with the Arabian Sea and beyond.
The strait is only 33 km wide at its narrowest point. According to available statistics, it sees roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil, and oil products shipments, and accounts for nearly one-fifth of global oil shipments. Further, one-third of the world's liquified natural gas LNG passes through the route.
The maritime sea lanes, as the critical outlet for Gulf countries, are watched by the US Navy's Fifth Fleet based in Manama, Bahrain. The Strait of Hormuz is the vital oil artery for the world, and any disruptions, or even temporary closure, will send global oil shocks across the world. Will Tehran, or can Tehran, actually shut the Strait of Hormuz?
With the Israeli air strikes on its military and nuclear establishments, Tehran has threatened to shut the Strait of Hormuz. But will it do so? Or is Iran using Hormuz as bargaining chip that leverages the fears of global oil shock and oil vulnerability of its friends, and enemies alike? While there could be some disruption- Iran might actually refrain from a full-scale blockade.
There are three significant reasons why Iran might not actually do so, even while signalling that it might do so rhetorically. First, it will hurt Iran's friend, China, the world second-largest economy, and Iran's largest trading partner. China, is number one importer of oil, accounting for nearly three quarter of its oil export.
So China, will not like to see any disruption in its maritime oil shipments, and might actually use its economic leverage with Iran to prevent Iran from closure of the narrow lane.
Second, it will rupture Iran's relationship with Oman (which owns the southern half of the strait) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC States). With Oman, careful crafting of a relationship has resulted in greater dependency for Iran on a wide range of issues.
Further, Oman has been a strong advocate of freedom of navigation in the sea passage. On the other hand, while there has been a history of difficult relationships between GCC states, in the recent past, there has been a détente of sorts, and Iran risks a fallout if it were to close the Strait of Hormuz.
Third, domestically this might not work for the interest of the regime, as any economic hits or closure of its oil exporting terminal, will see a surge in prices, and fuel popular discontent, which might impact both regime stability, and reformist tendencies for President Masoud Pezeshkian.
Also Read: Javier Blas: An Israel-Iran war may not rattle the oil market Where does this leave US-Iran talk?
The US is giving clear indications that it will attend Sunday's talks with Iran in Oman with a focus on limiting Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb- a move that Iran has vehemently resisted.
While the US claims it has no role or remains unaware of Israel's strikes on Tehran, the timing of the strikes raises a pertinent question. This comes just before the crucial 15 June talks between the US and Iran in Oman.
While the US and Trump deny any role, it remains doubtful that Netanyahu and Israel would act without a green signal from the US. So, it seems the attacks serve a dual purpose, for the US, it pushes Tehran to re-engage in talks with the US that it has put on the slow burner in the past few weeks.
For Israel, a tacit US support in any case works, given it sees Iran, and its nuclear programme as an existential threat. Further, Netanyahu, would anyway want to see the collapse of the deal between US and Iran, and has for the longest time opposed it.
However, despite strategic denials by the US, the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists, and the reported wounding of one of its negotiators many actually convince a anyways belligerent to Iran, to walk down the path towards a nuclear weapon to build its own nuclear deterrence. Will China rein in Iran?
In the recent past, China has strategically drawn in Iran into the Belt and Road Initiative, which Tehran joined in 2019. China has been working to build new connectivity opportunities, for instance, railway projects for Iran that serve two significant aims: first, it provides opportunities for bringing in Central Asian countries and Iran into the connectivity matrix. And second, it helps counter US hegemony, and can offset the US sanctions that are imposed time and again.
In the moment of the current crisis, if Hormuz is choked, China will be hit, given it's the largest exporter of Iranian Oil. So China, might actually reign in Iran, given its impending economic interest, and disruption in global oil supply chain, will impede its own economic interest first and foremost.
Also Read | Israel's war on Iran to hit Indian workforce What will this mean for India?
For India, over two-thirds of its oil imports and nearly half of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) imports transit through the Strait of Hormuz. This surely puts India in a tight spot, given that any disruption in the global supply chain will hit India, particularly in the LNG sector—given that it imports a major chunk of its LNG from Qatar and UAE.
According to available reports, January-November 2024, India imported 9.82 million tonnes of LNG from Qatar, which accounted for 38.8 per cent of India's overall LNG imports.
So, a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a chunk of LNG exported by Qatar and the UAE passes, will hit countries like India. Further, in the recent past, India has strengthened strategic ties with Israel, particularly in the sectors of defence, intelligence, and technology. For India, it is tightrope walk, given the need to do a balancing act between Israel and Iran.
Further in terms of India's connectivity interest, both Chabahar port and IMEC corridor anyway stand in a freeze mode, given the ever-growing tensions between Israel and Iran.
Shweta Singh is an associate professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of International Studies, South Asian University. Topics You May Be Interested In

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Knowledge Nugget: Red Sea shipping route and Suez canal — What you must know for UPSC Exam
Knowledge Nugget: Red Sea shipping route and Suez canal — What you must know for UPSC Exam

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Knowledge Nugget: Red Sea shipping route and Suez canal — What you must know for UPSC Exam

Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today on Red Sea shipping route and Suez canal. (Relevance: Understanding the geopolitical, economic, and strategic importance of the Red Sea shipping route and Suez Canal is crucial for the UPSC CSE, as it highlights international trade routes and global shipping dynamics, which are key for all stages of the examination, including prelims, mains, and interviews.) Just as global shipping lines and traders had started to breathe a sigh of relief from elevated freight rates, with vessels returning to the crucial Red Sea route from the longer Cape of Good Hope passage, a conflict between two major West Asian powers — Iran and Israel — has reignited fears of surging oil prices and more trade disruptions. Signs of a sustained escalation emerged after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said strikes targeting military and nuclear sites across Iran would continue 'for as many days as it takes'. Experts warn that Iran may respond by closing the strategic Strait of Hormuz . In this context, let's know about the Red Sea route, its significance for global trade and Suez Canal, 1. The nearly 2,000-km Red Sea connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Indian Ocean via the narrow Suez Canal. Before the Suez Canal's construction, ships had to go around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa to travel between Europe and Asia. 2. The Suez Canal is one of the world's busiest waterways. It was officially opened to ships on November 17, 1869. 3. The 193-km artificial waterway that connects the Red Sea to the Mediterranean through the Isthmus of Suez cut down the sea route from Asia to Europe by up to 7,000 km by negating the need for ships to travel around the southern tip of Africa to traverse between the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. 1. A trade route through Suez connecting Europe and Asia can be traced to antiquity. There is some evidence of a canal being constructed in the region during the reign of Pharaoh Senausret III, who ruled in the second millennium BCE. 2. But the idea for the modern-day canal can be traced to the eighteenth century, during the peak of European colonial expansion. In 1799, Napoleon's efforts to build a canal were thwarted by inaccurate measurements. 3. It was French diplomat and engineer Ferdinand de Lesseps, whose efforts to win over the support of the Egyptian viceroy Sai'id Pasha for support for the canal's construction that eventually bore fruit. In 1858, the Universal Suez Ship Canal Company was tasked to construct and operate the canal for 99 years, after which rights would be handed to the Egyptian government. 4. After more than ten years of construction, which claimed thousands of lives and was faced with many obstacles including crippling financial difficulties, the canal was opened for international navigation in 1869. 5. Upon its construction, the Suez Canal became the lifeline for all trade between the East and the West. 1. The Suez Canal accounts for nearly 12-15 per cent of global trade, according to IMF data. It is also a key passage for 8-9 per cent of global energy flows. 2. As of May 11, 2025, Suez Canal's daily transit trade volume (TTV) stood at 484,137 mt, compared with 1,349,086 mt a year ago, shows data from PortWatch, a live conflict tracker maintained by the IMF and Oxford University. TTV denotes the total volume of goods transported through a shipping route. 3. Like various other countries, India was also heavily reliant on the Red Sea shipping route for exports to Europe, with nearly 80 per cent of the volumes going through the Suez Canal. The shifting of trade flows from the Red Sea to the route around Africa have evidently impacted Indian exporters by denting their margins as they now have to contend with higher freight rates for exports to Europe and beyond. With much of India's trade dependent on overseas shippers and foreign-flagged commercial vessels, there is little the country can do in the short term to shield itself from the impact of the Red Sea crisis. 1. Although the Suez Canal is one of the world's busiest waterways, it also has its issues. Such as, the 193 km-long, 205 m-wide, and 24 m-deep Suez Canal is the world's biggest shipping bottleneck. Despite being widened and deepened over the years, it remains perennially congested, with long queues at either end. In March 2021, the mammoth cargo ship Ever Given got stuck in the canal, blocking passage for more than a week. 2. The Suez Canal was also the focal point of both the 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars and was shut from 1967 to 75. 1. Completed in 1914, the Panama Canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans through the narrow Isthmus of Panama. It is one of the two most strategically important artificial waterways in the world, alongside the Suez Canal. For ships traveling between the east and west coasts of the United States, the canal reduces the journey by 8,000 nautical miles, avoiding the dangerous passage around Cape Horn. 2. The Panama Canal is more than just a channel of water that links two larger bodies; it is a complex, highly engineered system that incorporates locks and elevators to transport ships from one end to the other. This design is necessary because the two oceans connected by the canal are not at the same elevation, with the Pacific Ocean being slightly higher than the Atlantic. 3. The Panama Canal needs massive amounts of fresh water to facilitate the passage of ships using this system of locks. Most of this water is supplied from Lake Gatun using the force of gravity (no pumps are needed). 1. The strait lies between Oman and Iran. It links the Gulf north of it with the Gulf of Oman to the south and the Arabian Sea beyond. 2. It is 21 miles (33 km) wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lane just two miles (three km) wide in either direction. 3. It is key passage through which 20–25 per cent of global oil supply transits, as well as a critical corridor for LNG shipments from Qatar and the UAE. Qatar, notably, is among the top LNG suppliers to India. (1) The Great Bitter Lake is associated with: (a) Panama Canal (b) Black Sea (c) Pacific Ocean (d) Suez Canal (2) Which of the following statements are correct about the Panama Canal? 1. It saves approximately 12,600 km in a trip between New York and San Francisco. 2. Lake Superior acts as the artificial reservoir of the Panama Canal system. 3. The Panama Canal system uses a system of locks and elevators to take ships from one end to the other. 4. The canal connects the Atlantic Ocean with the Mediterranean Sea. Select the correct answer using the codes given below: (a) 1 and 3 only (b) 2, 3 and 4 only (c) 1, 3 and 4 only (d) 2 and 3 only (Sources: Renewed Iran–Israel conflict threatens Red Sea shipping route recovery, impact India trade, Explained: History of Suez Canal, its economic importance, Knowledge nugget of the day: Panama Canal) Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: ... Read More

Israeli strikes hit key oil, energy sites in Tehran, triggering fires and panic
Israeli strikes hit key oil, energy sites in Tehran, triggering fires and panic

Indian Express

time7 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Israeli strikes hit key oil, energy sites in Tehran, triggering fires and panic

Israel's latest wave of airstrikes on Iran has hit several major energy facilities in and around Tehran, igniting fires and triggering widespread panic among residents. The attacks, which began late on Saturday and continued into the early hours of Sunday, targeted the Shahran fuel and gasoline depot in the north of the capital and the Shahr Rey oil refinery in the south, according to Iran's oil ministry and state media reports. The strikes sent thick plumes of smoke and flame billowing across the Tehran skyline. 'The fire is terrifying, it's massive; there is a lot of commotion here,' Mostafa Shams, a resident of Shahran told The New York Times. 'It's the gasoline depots that are exploding one after another, it's loud and scary.' The Shahran depot, which contains at least 11 storage tanks and handles up to 8 million litres of gasoline daily, has long been viewed as a high-risk site. Officials say the facility holds enough fuel to supply the capital for up to three days. Explosions at the depot threatened nearby residential buildings, according to a ministry official. In southern Tehran, emergency crews were dispatched to contain a fire at the Shahr Rey refinery, one of Iran's largest. Reza Salehi, a resident of the city, told NYT he could see the flames from miles away. According to Israeli defence officials, warplanes also struck locations in Tehran linked to Iran's nuclear programme, including experimental research labs. Earlier on Saturday, Israel also targeted energy infrastructure elsewhere in the country, including a section of the South Pars gas field, one of the largest of its kind in the world and central to Iran's energy production. The attacks mark a significant escalation in Israel's military operations against Tehran, focusing not just on military or nuclear sites but on vital civilian infrastructure. 'We have entered the second phase of the war, which is extremely dangerous and destructive,' Abdollah Babakhani, a Germany-based expert on Iran's energy sector, told NYT. Hamid Hosseini, a member of the energy committee at Iran's Chamber of Commerce, said officials had long debated relocating the Shahran depot due to the risks it posed. 'An attack or an accident here could be catastrophic,' he said. (With inputs from Agencies, The New York Times)

Elon Musk's 3-word message after activating Starlink in Iran amid war
Elon Musk's 3-word message after activating Starlink in Iran amid war

Time of India

time9 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk's 3-word message after activating Starlink in Iran amid war

Source: Elon Musk announced that his Starlink satellite internet service is now active in Iran , providing crucial connectivity as the Iranian government imposed nationwide internet restrictions following escalating military exchanges with Israel . Iran's communications ministry announced Friday that "temporary restrictions have been imposed on the country's internet" in response to Israel's wave of attacks on military and nuclear facilities. The ministry stated the curbs would remain until "normalcy returns," effectively cutting off millions from digital communication. Responding to the blackout on social media platform X, Musk wrote simply: "The beams are on," confirming Starlink's activation in the country. The satellite internet service utilizes low Earth orbit satellites to provide connectivity to remote locations or areas where traditional communications infrastructure has been disabled. Satellite network bypasses government controls Starlink's network of low Earth orbit satellites can deliver internet access to remote locations or areas where traditional communications infrastructure has been disabled or restricted. An estimated 20,000 Starlink terminals are believed to be operating in Iran through black market channels, according to industry analysts. The service provides a critical lifeline for Iranian citizens seeking to communicate and access information during the government-imposed blackout. Starlink's cell-to-satellite communications are also functioning, expanding connectivity beyond just terminal users. Military escalation drives communication crackdown The internet restrictions coincide with intensifying military conflict between Iran and Israel. Israel's military said Saturday it was striking dozens of missile launchers across Iran, after Tehran fired multiple barrages in retaliation for Israeli attacks on its nuclear and military installations. Israeli emergency services reported two civilian deaths when a rocket struck a residential area early Saturday, as both sides traded fire despite international calls for de-escalation. Israel's air force commander described the overnight strikes in the Tehran area as carrying "operational and national significance." The Iranian government's decision to restrict internet access appears aimed at preventing potential civil unrest, echoing tactics used during previous protest movements. However, Starlink's activation may complicate these efforts to control information flow during the ongoing military crisis. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store