Irish corporate tax set for further short-term boost, fiscal watchdog says
DUBLIN, June 10 (Reuters) - Booming Irish corporate tax receipts could grow further in 2025 and 2026, even as the threat of potentially damaging tariffs hangs over the volatile source of revenue, the country's independent fiscal watchdog said on Tuesday.
A six-fold jump in corporate tax revenue since 2014 to 28 billion euros last year, or 29% of all tax collected - even before an extra 11 billion euros of Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab back taxes is included - has handed Ireland Europe's healthiest public finances.
While Ireland's finance ministry expects the taxes that are mostly paid by U.S. multinationals to fall by 2% this year and return to 2024 levels in 2026, the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) sees four factors why they could, instead, increase.
Firstly, it said the finance ministry's estimate that global tax reforms agreed five years ago would reduce corporate tax revenue by 2 billion euros a year from 2026 was not credible and that they will likely add around 3 billion euros from 2026.
The first part of the OECD-led reforms that Ireland expected to divert corporate tax receipts to other countries has not been implemented, whereas Dublin has been forced to increase its low corporate tax rate to 15% from 12.5% for larger companies.
IFAC said that many of Ireland's main corporate taxpayers - based in the technology and pharmaceutical sectors - were not currently impacted by U.S. tariffs and expected their global profits to increase this year.
A 154% year-on-year jump in Irish pharmaceutical exports in the first quarter, as some U.S. drugmakers with Irish plants reported stocking up ahead of threatened tariffs, may separately lead to higher corporate tax payments this year, IFAC said.
Finally, the exhaustion of capital allowances some firms used when they moved valuable intellectual property assets to Ireland could potentially add "billions" of euros more in corporate tax in the coming years, IFAC chair Seamus Coffey added.
Coffey said IFAC did not see any downside risks to the tax take in the short term, based on broad macroeconomic trends and the current tariff regime.
"We don't see it but it doesn't mean it's not there. That's down to the profitability and decisions these companies make," Coffey told a news conference.
($1 = 0.8760 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
This vision for Britain's nuclear future is to be warmly welcomed
A politician with such a long and mixed track record as energy secretary Ed Miliband should perhaps have been more wary of declaring that nuclear power will 'deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance', and that it is 'the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis'. Such things may yet prove to be so – and indeed investment in a new generation of nuclear power may well be inevitable. However, it is equally the case that the history of nuclear power in Britain, spanning some seven decades, has been far from an unalloyed success. At home and – sadly, more dramatically – abroad, scientists and engineers overconfident in their abilities and seized by the promise of the future have found themselves all too often watching the consequences of their complacency played out with devastating effect, most infamously at Fukushima, Chernobyl and Six Mile Island, but also at many other locations. Previous visions of a golden age melted down as rapidly as the faulty reactors. If the early post-war hopes for the peaceful use of nuclear power had been well founded, just as was claimed in the 1950s, the abundant electrical power generated by nuclear fission would have been so cheap it would have been pointless to meter and charge for it, fossil fuels would have been rendered redundant, and, as it happens, the pace of climate change greatly retarded. But it was not to be. Therefore, the public is right to be sceptical now about why, in the old and dangerous phrase, 'this time it's different'. With those heavy caveats, Mr Miliband's announcements about Britain's nuclear future are to be welcomed, and his reasoning endorsed. He is right, above all, to seek a great variety and plurality in sources of the UK's long-term energy supply. As the Germans discovered when the Nord Stream pipelines and gas supplies from Vladimir Putin's Russia were cut, it is extremely unwise to become so heavily dependent on any single source of energy. Mr Miliband declares himself an enthusiast for offshore wind, onshore wind, solar, hydro, nuclear, and even fossil fuel sources where effective carbon capture can be achieved. In the nuclear sphere, he's also correct to adopt the previous government's plans for small, 'modular' reactors, which could speed up the transition from carbon and reduce costs. The only disappointment in that area is that time has already been lost, and Rolls-Royce and other private interests are not yet in a position to make any deployment pump meaningful wattage into the National Grid before the early to mid-2030s, as Mr Miliband told the House of Commons. The £14.2bn investment in the Sizewell C plant is a more traditional kind of project, and carries the familiar risks. Mr Miliband will need to be much more specific about private sector involvement, and who will bear the financial risks for such a costly programme over such a long and uncertain timeframe. Disposal of waste and decommissioning costs will also have to be fully transparent to carry public opinion, especially for the people of Suffolk, who will be hosting this latest iteration of a long-standing lodger. Of course, it all would have been better if successive governments hadn't slowed the nuclear programme in the aftermath of successive accidents, and had found the money to invest in previous decades. In fact, the Sizewell C plant is set to become Britain's first new nuclear power station since 1995. The French have long prioritised nuclear power and weathered the recent energy crisis better than the British or the Germans, more tied as they were to foreign gas and soaring world prices. The aim now is to ensure that the new generation of nuclear power doesn't turn into a costly disaster, and can indeed help the transition to renewables and lower energy bills. Cheap, plentiful power and net zero on track? Mr Miliband may yet leave a legacy more permanent than any of his colleagues. Golden, indeed.
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
Euromillions winning numbers revealed for £208m jackpot draw
The winning numbers in Tuesday's EuroMillions have been revealed in the draw for the UK's biggest ever lottery jackpot. A record jackpot of an estimated £208m is up for grabs if any ticket-holders manage to choose the winning numbers. The winning numbers are 19, 36, 39, 40, 45, while the Lucky Stars are 2 and 12. Players must correctly choose all seven numbers in order to win the jackpot. No-one won the EuroMillions jackpot on Friday, meaning the top prize rolled over into Tuesday's draw. The National Lottery will soon announce whether any winning tickets have been purchased ahead of the draw on Tuesday.
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Alfa Romeo is going racing again… with a sailing boat
First Look Storied automotive brand will compete in the Americas Cup, which is famous for not having cars in it Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Spot the odd one out: a) Formula 1, b) Le Mans, c) the European Touring Car Championship, d) the America's Cup. If you said d), congratulations! You've successfully identified the one that isn't motorsport. That isn't stopping Alfa Romeo though. The Italian brand – known the world over for its cars, which are also known the world over for not really working very well on water – is entering the 2027 America's Cup in partnership with sailing outfit Luna Rossa Team. Let's get #AlfaLogic trending immediately. Advertisement - Page continues below But 'it's not just about putting a logo on the sails or on the boat' says team skipper Max Sirena. 'We actually started the engineering work and transfer between the two teams even way before signing the contract.' Allow us to explain. Sort of. Alfa argues that there will be an 'exchange' of know-how that will benefit both it and the sailing team, chiefly in aerodynamics, materials and (please don't snigger back there) quality control. You might like And there will legit be some Luna Rossa-based limited edition Alfas too. 'I don't want to reveal too much, but the idea is to make some specific cars, developed together with Luna Rossa,' teases Cristiano Fiorio, head of global marketing, communication and strategic projects. 'That means some performance cars, some limited edition cars that will embed the best know-how of both brands. We believe that a limited edition of cars carved together with Luna Rossa Team will be the answer to sell, as we were saying, additional cars. Advertisement - Page continues below 'So ideally we want to do something a little more bespoke, maybe more limited, and we are also working on ideas that can touch a higher number of people, because the DNA of Alfa Romeo is doing something very hard and very strong.' So not necessarily just themed trim levels for stuff like the Junior and Stelvio EV. More as we have it/understand what the heck is going on. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
