Latent Labs launches web-based AI model to democratize protein design
Latent Labs model has 'achieved state-of-the-art on different metrics' when testing the proteins it developed in a physical lab, according to Latent Labs CEO and founder Simon Kohl, a scientist who previously co-led DeepMind's AlphaFold's protein design team. State-of-the-art, or SOTA, is a term often used in the AI field that represents the industry's best performance to date on a specific task.
'We have computational ways of assessing how good the designs are,' he told TechCrunch, adding that a high percentage of proteins the model creates will be viable when tested in the lab.
The company's foundational biology model, known as LatentX, enables academic institutions, biotech startups, and pharmaceutical companies to design novel proteins directly in their browser using natural language.
LatentX goes beyond what's found in nature, creating entirely new molecule designs like nanobodies and antibodies with precise atomic structures. This approach can help develop new therapeutics at much faster rare.
This ability to design entirely new proteins is what distinguishes LatentX from the AlphaFold, according to Kohl.
'Alpha fold is a model for protein structure prediction. So it allows you to visualize existing structures, but it doesn't, it doesn't let you generate new proteins,' he said.
In contrast to AI-driven drug discovery companies like Xaira, Recursion or DeepMind spinout Isomorphic Labs, which focus on developing proprietary medicines, Latent Labs' business model involves licensing its model for use by external organizations.
'Not every company is in a position to build their own AI models, to have their own AI infrastructure, and to have their own AI teams,' Kohl said.
While LatentX is available for free, Kohl said the company intends to eventually charge for advanced features and capabilities as they're introduced.
Other companies providing open-sourced AI foundational models for drug discovery include Chai Discovery and EvolutionaryScale.
Latent Labs is backed by Radical Ventures, Sofinnova Partners, Google's Chief Scientist Jeff Dean, Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei and Eleven Labs CEO Mati Staniszewski.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook
(NASDAQ:AMZN) is poised to potentially outperform market expectations in its July 31 second-quarter earnings report, driven by a combination of robust U.S. retail sales, advantageous foreign exchange rates, and accelerating demand for its artificial intelligence-related services through Amazon Web Services (AWS). Strong consumer spending and ongoing efficiency gains in its e-commerce operations are also contributing to a positive outlook for the tech giant. Reinforcing this positive sentiment, Bank of America Securities analyst Justin Post maintained (NASDAQ:AMZN) with a Buy rating and raised the price forecast from $248 to $265. Post raised its second-quarter estimates for the company, citing stronger-than-expected U.S. retail data, favorable foreign exchange (FX) movements, and rising AI-related demand via Anthropic. The analyst forecasted second-quarter revenue of $164 billion, exceeding Wall Street's consensus of $162 expects Amazon Web Services (AWS) to grow 16.5% year-over-year, slightly below the first-quarter's 16.9% but in line with Street projections of 17%. However, Post noted that robust AI demand and accelerating AWS infrastructure investments will drive growth reacceleration in the second half of the year. The analyst projects $17.8 billion in second-quarter profit, above the consensus estimate of $17.0 billion and the high end of Amazon's own guidance of $17.5 billion. Key drivers include resilient consumer spending, signs of acceleration in e-commerce trends, and FX benefits, especially with the euro up 5% year-over-year (Y/Y) and 8% quarter-over-quarter (Q/Q) against the dollar, potentially delivering a 130bps FX tailwind vs. the Street's modest 30bps estimate, he noted. In North America Retail, aggregated BAC credit/debit card data and Bloomberg Second Measure point to a 4-point acceleration in sales growth versus the first quarter, Post noted. The analyst said this sets the stage for Amazon to beat Street expectations by over 2% in the region. International Retail could benefit from FX trends, as the Street models only offer a modest boost. Amazon's guidance for the third quarter is expected to range between $169 billion and $174 billion (vs. Street at $172.8 billion) with GAAP EBIT projected between $14.0 billion and $18.0 billion (Street at $19.4 billion), Post noted. He suggested Amazon's historical conservatism could result in cautious guidance, but if second-quarter results show substantial upside, the third-quarter outlook could surprise higher. Post also highlighted reports of AWS job cuts, which may support margin expansion in the second half. The analyst estimates second-quarter AWS operating margins at 36.0%, slightly above the consensus of 35.3%, though down 3.5 points from the first quarter due to higher stock-based compensation. He further noted that AWS capex spending is scaling rapidly, up 38 points Y/Y, now accounting for 70% of Amazon's capex, signaling a ramp in infrastructure buildout that should alleviate previous supply constraints and support future growth. Post said positives that could boost investor confidence included solid second-quarter retail performance from resilient consumer demand, potential third-quarter boost from a longer Prime Day, retail margin leverage from hiring freezes and cost discipline, AWS revenue acceleration tied to increasing AI and chip demand and improved operating efficiency and tax savings from the Big Beautiful Bill, which could add $6.4 billion in incremental cash tax benefits between 2025–2027. Despite trading at 13.4 times 2026 EV/EBITDA, Amazon remains below its 10-year average of 16.5 times, the analyst said, suggesting potential for multiple expansion if growth momentum holds. Upcoming results from Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) may also influence sentiment ahead of Amazon's report, Post noted. Post projected second-quarter revenue of $163.92 billion and EPS of $1.40. Price Action: AMZN stock is trading higher by 0.26% to $228.05 at last check Wednesday. Photo via Shutterstock Latest Ratings for AMZN Date Firm Action From To Mar 2022 Deutsche Bank Initiates Coverage On Buy Feb 2022 Tigress Financial Maintains Buy Feb 2022 Credit Suisse Maintains Outperform View More Analyst Ratings for AMZN View the Latest Analyst Ratings Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? (AMZN): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Amazon's AI-Powered AWS, Efficiency Gains, And Consumer Demand Fuel Bullish Q2 Outlook originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's AI Action Plan aims to block chip exports to China but lacks key details
The Trump administration wants its AI technology to be considered an industry leader both on home soil and abroad. But it also doesn't want the U.S.'s AI prowess to empower or embolden a foreign adversary. That's quite the balance to strike. If President Trump's AI Action Plan, which was released on Wednesday, is any indicator, the administration seems to still be figuring out the right course of action to achieve those goals. 'America currently is the global leader on data center construction, computing hardware performance, and models,' the plan stated. 'It is imperative that the United States leverage this advantage into an enduring global alliance, while preventing our adversaries from free-riding on our innovation and investment.' The plan mentions strengthening AI chip export controls through 'creative approaches' followed by a pair of policy recommendations. The first calls on government organizations, including the Department of Commerce and National Security Council, to work with the AI industry on chip location verification features. The second is a recommendation to establish an effort to figure out enforcement for potential chip export restrictions; notably, it mentions that while the U.S. and allies impose export controls on major systems required for chip manufacturing, there isn't a focus on many of the component sub-systems — a hint at where the administration wants the DOC to direct its attention. The AI Action plan also talks about how the U.S. will need to find alignment in this area with its global allies. 'America must impose strong export controls on sensitive technologies,' the plan states. 'We should encourage partners and allies to follow U.S. controls, and not backfill. If they do, America should use tools such as the Foreign Direct Product Rule and secondary tariffs to achieve greater international alignment.' The AI Action plan never gets into detail on exactly how it will achieve Al global alliances, coordinate with allies on export chip restrictions, or work with U.S.-based AI companies on chip location verification features. Instead, the AI Action plans lay out what foundational building blocks are required for future sustainable AI chip export guidelines, as opposed to policies implemented on top of existing guidelines. The upshot: chip export restrictions are going to take more time. And there's ample evidence, beyond the AP Action plan, to suggest it will. For instance, the Trump administration has contradicted itself multiple times on its export restriction strategy in the past few months — including just last week. In July, the administration gave semiconductor firms, like Nvidia and AMD, the green light to start selling AI chips they had developed for China, just months after rolling out licensing restrictions on the same AI chips that effectively pulled Nvidia out of the Chinese market. The administration also formally rescinded the Biden administration's AI Diffusion Rule in May, just days before it was supposed to go into effect. The AI Diffusion rule put a cap on how much AI computing capacity some countries were allowed to buy. The Trump administration is expected to sign multiple executive orders July 23. Whether these will contain detailed plans on how it will reach its goals is unclear. While the AI Action Plan talks at length about figuring out how to expand the U.S. AI market globally, while maintaining dominance, it's light on the specifics. Any executive order regarding chip export restrictions will likely be about getting the proper government departments together to figure out a path forward, as opposed to formal guidelines, quite yet. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss
Too many carriers are chasing the wrong scoreboard. They measure success by the number of miles they run, the number of loads they book, or how many trucks they have on the road. But here's the truth: more miles don't mean more money—and more loads can sometimes mean more losses. Real growth in this business doesn't come from working harder. It comes from working smarter. From stacking margins, not miles. If your strategy is built on chasing volume, you're on a hamster wheel. You might be busy. You might even look successful from the outside. But your profit and loss statement will eventually expose the truth. You're not building a business—you're burning fuel, time, and energy just to stay afloat. This article is about rewiring your mindset. It's about getting off the volume treadmill and focusing on the one thing that actually builds wealth in trucking: profit per mile. Not gross. Not rate per mile alone. Not how many loads you touch. Margin. That's the game. Why Most Fleets Get It Wrong from the Start Let's be real—most carriers start their business with a hustle mentality. They get a truck, find a dispatcher or hit the load boards, and try to keep that truck moving 6 or 7 days a week. They think the more they move, the more they'll make. And for a little while, that seems true. But here's what happens next: The fuel bill eats up half the revenue The driver gets burned out The maintenance costs pile up One bad load puts you in the red You're cash-flow negative, even though you're 'busy' Why? Because the model was never built to scale. It was built to run. But running without margin is running toward a cliff. Let's Talk About What Margin Really Means Margin isn't just what's left over. It's the purpose behind every mile you run. And it comes down to three things: 1. What You Book It ForAre you just accepting loads because they're available? Or are you choosing freight that fits your lane strategy, customer base, and pricing power? 2. What It Costs to MoveMost carriers don't know their cost per mile down to the penny. If you don't know your baseline, you can't improve your margin. You're negotiating blind. 3. How Efficiently You OperateDeadhead, dwell time, driver turnover, empty miles between loads—all of that cuts into your margin. Tight systems build profit. Loose ones bleed cash. Here's the kicker: you can make more profit moving 1,200 miles a week with strong margins than someone moving 3,000 miles with weak ones. But you've got to change how you think. The Dangerous Trap of Volume Thinking Let me show you how volume thinking hurts growing carriers: You Take Any LoadYour dispatcher sees a $3,000 load and jumps on it. It looks good. But it's 1,500 miles. It burns 250 gallons of fuel. The rate looks high, but after fuel, driver pay, tolls, and lost repositioning miles, your profit margin is paper thin. You Don't Control the LaneWhen you chase spot freight in random markets, you lose all leverage. Now you're not just chasing a load—you're chasing a way out of that load's destination. You lose margin on both ends. You Grow Without SystemsYou add trucks because your revenue looks big, but you don't have a process to monitor each unit's margin. Now you've multiplied your overhead and made your problems bigger—not better. You Burn Out Your TeamLong miles, inefficient planning, poor rest cycles—your drivers leave or disengage. And turnover kills margin more than anything else. The Power of Stacking Margins Now let's flip the script. Let's talk about what stacking margins looks like: Intentional Lane PlanningYou focus on short to mid-haul freight in repeatable lanes. You know your top customers and top regions. You can forecast fuel, time, and detention risk. That allows you to price with purpose. Profitable Load CombinationsInstead of just looking at a load in isolation, you think like a chess player. You ask: What's my next move after this? Maybe a $900 short haul tees you up for a $1,700 local move that gets you home early. Together, they create a $2.60 per mile average and minimize deadhead. That's margin stacking. Driver-Centric PlanningYou design schedules around efficiency, rest, and repeatability. The driver stays engaged, your turnover stays low, and your cost per mile stays consistent. Margin isn't just financial—it's operational. Customer-Focused StrategyYou shift from 'how do I fill the truck?' to 'how do I solve a shipper's problem?' That shift opens the door to higher rates, less competition, and consistent volume. Margin follows value. Real-World Margin Play: Two Fleets, Two Outcomes Fleet A runs 5 trucks, 3,000 miles per week each. Their rate per mile averages $2.10. Their operating cost is $1.80 per mile. Revenue per truck: $6,300 Cost: $5,400 Profit per truck: $900 Fleet B runs 5 trucks, but only 2,000 miles per week. Their rate per mile averages $2.60. Their cost per mile is $1.70 because of fewer miles, better lanes, and tighter planning. Revenue per truck: $5,200 Cost: $3,400 Profit per truck: $1,800 Same size fleet. Lower miles. Double the profit. Which fleet would you rather run? How to Shift Your Strategy Toward Margin 1. Know Your True Cost Per MileNot just fuel. Include insurance, maintenance, payroll, IFTA, subscriptions, everything. Break it down monthly, then weekly. Then compare it to what you're booking. 2. Evaluate Every Load by Margin, Not Just GrossBefore you accept a load, ask: What's my estimated profit after costs? If you're just looking at top-line revenue, you're playing a losing game. 3. Use Tools to See the Full PictureTrack lane profitability. Monitor deadhead. Build dashboards that show your average loaded vs empty miles, gross revenue vs margin, profit per hour. The data tells the truth—if you know how to read it. 4. Train Your Team to Think Like You DoIf your dispatcher only thinks about 'what pays the most,' you've already lost. Train them to plan ahead, look for backhauls, and evaluate full-trip margin. Incentivize margin, not miles. 5. Build Long-Term Shipper RelationshipsWhen you serve a consistent customer, you reduce risk, improve planning, and stabilize your revenue. That gives you leverage and lets you focus on efficiency instead of scrambling. Final Word The mindset that built your business—grind, hustle, stay moving—is not the mindset that will grow your business. Scaling in trucking isn't about booking more loads. It's about booking smarter loads. Loads that protect your bottom line, maximize your assets, and let you breathe. Stacking miles keeps you busy. Stacking margins builds wealth. So stop asking how many loads you can run this week. Start asking how much profit you can generate per load. That shift alone will take your fleet from surviving to scaling—without burning out your trucks, your drivers, or yourself. Let's get to work. The post Stacking Margins, Not Miles – The Growth Mindset Most Fleets Miss appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
