Italian woman pulled alive from rubble after Bari building collapse
The rescue took place on Thursday evening and was met with an emotional round of applause from onlookers, as seen in a video posted by Italy's fire service on social media platform X.
È viva‼️Estratta dalle macerie e affidata ai sanitari la donna dispersa. Eccezionale intervento dei #vigilidelfuoco a #Bari, emozionante l'applauso finale liberatorio della gente pic.twitter.com/L7QTPErHGu
— Vigili del Fuoco (@vigilidelfuoco) March 6, 2025
Rosalia De Giosa, 74, had been missing since Wednesday afternoon following the collapse of a residential building on Via de Amicis, just south of the city's train station.
The building was evacuated by local authorities in February last year after being deemed structurally unsafe due to a damaged central pillar.
Italian media reports said the woman had defied the evacuation order and continued to live in her fourth-floor apartment.
Following the rescue, emergency medical personnel immediately assessed De Giosa's condition before transporting her to the local hospital for further treatment.
The Bari fire service said De Giosa 'appears to be in good health', according to news agency Ansa.
"She was found inside the building, in the area of the stairs,' Bari fire service commander Rosa D'Eliseo said.
"She was taking the stairs to get out [of the building]; evidently, she sensed the danger and was running away," she added.
A passerby who witnessed the collapse told Rai News that it was "a scary, apocalyptic scene", with "dust everywhere [and] people screaming, running in every direction".
D'Eliseo said the collapse was caused by structural failure.
'A part [of the building] collapsed first, which then brought down the rest," she said.
The Public Prosecutor's Office in Bari opened an investigation into the incident on Thursday, according to Ansa.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Italy
2 days ago
- Local Italy
Which crimes could get your Italian residency permit revoked?
Getting an Italian residency permit (or permesso di soggiorno) is an essential step for non-EU nationals looking to spend more than 90 days in Italy. The permesso essentially connects your visa and passport information to your biometric data and place of residence, giving you legal grounds for staying in Italy long term. Unfortunately, obtaining a permit can be far from easy, as it involves a complex, multi-step process that can often take months due to chronic delays at Questure (provincial police headquarters) around the country. But once you've successfully navigated the world of Italian bureaucracy and secured your residency permit, can it ever be taken away from you? Under Italy's immigration laws, several circumstances can lead to the revocation of a residency permit. These include false declarations (i.e., the permit was obtained through fraud, false documentation, or misleading information), loss of requirements (for instance, if a student permit holder stops attending their academic course without justification) and extended stays outside Italy (usually, stays that are more than half the duration of the permit's validity). An Italian residency permit can also be revoked if its holder commits certain types of offences, which are generally referred to as reati ostativi. Such offences are listed under Article 380 of Italy's Penal Code (Codice Penale) and include: Terrorism-related offences Mafia-type association Human trafficking Exploitation of prostitution Production, trafficking, or possession of narcotics Drug dealing Sexual violence Domestic abuse Stalking Robbery Assault Home burglary and mugging Aggravated theft Facilitation of illegal immigration Labour exploitation Extortion Do any of these offences mean automatically losing your permit? No. If a residency permit holder is found guilty of any of the above crimes, their case will be evaluated by the Questura of the province they live in. Before issuing any verdict on the revocation of a residency permit, police authorities consider all of the following factors: The seriousness of the crime committed: A conviction for a serious offence, such as terrorism, sexual violence, or mafia-type association, is more likely to result in the revocation of a residency permit than other crimes. The offender's character and personal background: Questure are required to take into account factors including a person's cooperation with police authorities and their commitment to attending social rehabilitation programmes, as well as their overall character and life background. The specific circumstances of the case: Police authorities must also consider the circumstances of the case, including premeditation, the presence of previous convictions, and whether the offence was committed together with other people. 'Social dangerousness': Ultimately, police also consider whether or not the offender poses a danger to public order under a principle known as pericolosità sociale (literally, 'social dangerousness'). What happens if a permit is revoked? If a Questura chooses to revoke a foreign national's residency permit, they immediately lose the right to stay in Italy and have a maximum of 15 days to leave the country voluntarily. If the person in question fails to leave the country within that window, police authorities can go ahead with issuing an expulsion order. Can a residency permit revocation be appealed? Yes. A revocation order can be appealed within 60 days of its issuance and the appeal must be filed with the Regional Administrative Court (Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale, TAR). A revocation can be challenged based on reasons including violation of due process by police authorities (e.g., a Questura failed to abide by the required legal procedures) and failure to assess individual circumstances (family ties, social integration, commitment to rehabilitation, etc.). The appeal can include a request to suspend the revocation order pending the tribunal's ruling. If approved, this allows the permit holder to stay in Italy until the ruling is issued. Foreign nationals looking to appeal a revocation order must do so through an immigration lawyer. Italy's Administrative Procedure Code states that "legal representation by a lawyer is mandatory" in 'proceedings before the regional administrative courts'. People whose yearly income is below €12.838 are eligible for free legal aid. Though there's no available information on the length of these appeals, it generally takes between 12 and 24 months for administrative tribunals to issue a ruling depending on the court's workload and the complexity of the case. Are revocation cases frequent? There is no publicly available data on the number of revocation orders issued every year in Italy. However, reports of foreign nationals being stripped of their residency permits in connection with criminal offences aren't infrequent in Italian news media. In late May, police authorities in Bolzano, northern Italy, issued a permit revocation order for three Moroccan nationals aged 18, 20 and 23 after they were involved in a fight with other youths. In January, a 30-year-old foreign national living in Bologna successfully appealed against a permit revocation order issued after he was found guilty of stalking his former girlfriend. In May last year, the residency permit of a 38-year-old Algerian was revoked after he expressed support for Hamas in an online chat.
Local Italy
3 days ago
- Local Italy
Residents evacuated as major fire breaks out at university north of Rome
The fire broke out on the roof of the university's agriculture faculty building shortly after 10am, Italian media reported. As of mid-afternoon on Wednesday, firefighters and military officers were still struggling to contain the blaze. #Viterbo, #incendio facoltà di agraria: proseguono le operazioni di spegnimento dall'esterno dell'edificio, #vigilidelfuoco in azione di contenimento delle fiamme che hanno coinvolto il 2° piano, oltre al tetto [ #4giugno 12:30] — Vigili del Fuoco (@vigilidelfuoco) June 4, 2025 Everyone within 500 metres of the building, including local residents, was evacuated and those within a 1-kilometre radius instructed to close their windows to avoid inhaling smoke. No injuries were immediately reported, though some in the vicinity were sent to Santa Rosa hospital with smoke inhalation symptoms. A worker who was initially reported missing has since been found, La Repubblica newspaper said. Dramatic video footage published on the paper's website showed flames engulfing the roof of the building. The Viterbo Prosecutor's Office is reportedly waiting to receive information from the firefighters and rescue workers on the ground before opening an investigation into the cause of the fire. According to initial reports, the roof had been undergoing renovation work by workers who were using an oxyacetylene torch for welding. It may then have spread to chemistry and genetics laboratories where highly flammable substances including ethanol were stored. Patrizia Marini, president of Italy's national association of agricultural institutes, RENISA, told reporters she was 'very saddened by the serious incident that has occurred in one of Italy's most important agricultural colleges.'
Local Italy
28-05-2025
- Local Italy
Italy court overturns ban on self check-ins for holiday rentals
The ban was introduced by Italy's interior ministry on November 18th, abruptly ending popular remote check-in practices for guests and forcing property owners to carry out check-in operations in person. Italy's interior ministry said at the time that the measure sought to 'prevent public order and safety risks in relation to the possible accommodation of dangerous individuals or those linked to criminal or terrorist organisations". The absence of 'in-person identification of guests' meant that properties 'could be occupied by [...] individuals whose identities remain unknown' to police, it added. The ministry ban was followed by a spate of police operations aimed at removing key boxes in cities around the country, with the move sparking anger among the thousands of holidaymakers and property owners relying on self-check-in methods. In a ruling issued on Tuesday, Lazio's Regional Administrative Court (TAR) overturned the previous interior ministry directive, saying that it lacked sufficient legal grounds and placed disproportionate burdens on property owners. 'In-person identification is not, in itself, capable of ensuring public order and security, which is the explicit aim of the circular,' the court said. The ban doesn't have 'adequate justifications for the obligation it imposes,' it added. Italian holiday rental association FARE welcomed Tuesday's ruling, saying that safety concerns 'cannot be used as an excuse to slow down the evolution of the [rental] sector and place undue responsibilities on those who operate within the law". Besides not being justified 'by real needs', the ban 'violated the principles of legality' and placed an 'excessive burden' on the non-hotel accommodation sector, FARE added. Italy's interior minister Matteo Piantedosi hasn't yet commented on the ruling. However, a ministry spokesperson told Italian media that the minister would wait for the court to publish the full list of reasons behind the ruling before deciding whether to appeal to a higher administrative court. Italian media reports said the Lazio court ruling only applied to the national ban enforced on November 18th. Bans on self check-ins introduced by individual municipalities (comuni) around the country wouldn't be affected, meaning any local ordinances would remain in place, they said. Florence Mayor Sara Funaro told La Nazione that the court's verdict wouldn't affect a city-wide ban on key boxes introduced in late February. 'We acknowledge the court's decision, but it doesn't affect our regulations,' she said. 'The ban remains in place.' Following TAR's ruling, however, members of Florence's right-wing opposition urged Funaro to immediately repeal the municipal ban. Marco Stella, head of the Tuscany branch of the Forza Italia party, said the court's decision was 'a definitive blow to the anti-holiday-rental policies put in place by the Florence city administration'. He also called on Funaro 'to immediately scrap the ridiculous and inquisitorial mission' against holiday rentals.
