logo
Trump's reciprocal tariffs could be struck down as soon as this month — and the administration is warning of economic apocalypse

Trump's reciprocal tariffs could be struck down as soon as this month — and the administration is warning of economic apocalypse

Yahoo5 days ago
President Donald Trump and his Justice Department have issued doomsday warnings recently on what would happen if a federal appeals court rules against the administration in a legal challenge to his so-called reciprocal tariffs. James Lucier at Alpha Capital Partners said the court could issue a ruling later this month or next month.
The Trump administration sees complete disaster for the U.S. economy if its reciprocal tariffs are struck down, revealing its level of concern as a court is expected to issue a critical decision soon.
On July 31, a federal appeals court heard arguments in a case challenging the tariffs' legal basis under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), and the judges expressed deep skepticism about the administration's side.
In a note this past week, James Lucier at Capital Alpha Partners said a decision is expected by the end of September, but could come as soon as late August. A unanimous or near-unanimous ruling could give the Supreme Court cover to avoid taking the case immediately and reject the administration's request to issue a stay that would keep the tariffs in place in the meantime.
The dire warnings also represent 'a remarkable change in tune by the administration, which until now has always insisted that it had legal authority to get the deals done one way or another even if the IEEPA tariffs were struck down,' he added.
Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs helped leverage a series of trade deals, including an agreement with the European Union, which pledged to invest $600 billion in the U.S. and buy $750 billion worth of U.S. energy products, with 'vast amounts' of American weapons in the mix. Similarly, the U.S.-Japan trade deal entails $550 billion of investments from Tokyo.
'Financial ruin'
The U.S. hasn't received immediate cash transfers in those amounts. Still, in a letter to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on Monday, Justice Department officials suggested the government would suddenly owe everyone money—leading to catastrophe.
'The President believes that our country would not be able to pay back the trillions of dollars that other countries have already committed to pay, which could lead to financial ruin,' wrote Solicitor General D. John Sauer and Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate.
They also warned that unwinding the trade deals would lead to a '1929-style result.' That echoed a post from Trump on Truth Social days earlier, when he predicted another Great Depression would hit America if the court rules against his tariffs.
Sauer and Shumate turned up the volume even higher in their subsequent letter, elaborating further on the depression warning.
'In such a scenario, people would be forced from their homes, millions of jobs would be eliminated, hard-working Americans would lose their savings, and even Social Security and Medicare could be threatened,' they wrote. 'In short, the economic consequences would be ruinous, instead of unprecedented success.'
'The president is in a jam'
To be sure, the government has generated significant tariff revenue since April, and importers who paid the reciprocal duties could seek reimbursement if they are struck down.
But that's only about $100 billion and also includes revenue from sectoral tariffs that were imposed under a separate legal basis that's not at risk.
'The real problem, the letter implies, is that Trump does not have legal authority to replicate the IEEPA tariffs under other tariff statutes if the court strikes the IEEPA tariffs down,' Lucier explained. 'In other words, the president is in a jam because if the court strikes down the IEEPA tariffs, his trade deals have no legal basis.'
A note from Yardeni Research on Wednesday also pointed out that the administration is becoming increasingly concerned about losing the court case.
The letter from the Justice Department officials appears to anticipate that they will lose the case as they are asking for a stay if the court goes against them.
There will be 'messy' consequences if reciprocal tariffs are struck down, according to Yardeni, as Trump needs the revenue from tariffs to reduce the budget deficit and help to lower bond yields.
'If he loses in court, these yields might move higher. Stock prices might decline on this news initially due to a new round of policy uncertainty,' the note said. 'So the dire tone in the letter is understandable, even though it is a wee bit over the top.'
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China
Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Boeing in Talks to Sell as Many as 500 Planes to China

(Bloomberg) -- Boeing Co. is heading closer toward finalizing a deal with China to sell as many as 500 aircraft, according to people familiar with the matter, a transaction that would end a sales drought that stretches back to US President Donald Trump's last visit in 2017. The two sides are still hammering out terms of the complex aircraft sale, including the types and volume of jet models and delivery timetables, according to one of the people, who asked not to be identified discussing confidential matters. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone Neom's Desert Ski Resort Strains Saudi Prince's $1.5 Trillion Plan The mega sale to China, years in the making, is contingent on the two nations defusing the trade hostilities that hark back to Trump's first term in office — and could still fall apart, they said. Chinese officials have already started consulting domestic airlines about how many Boeing aircraft they'll need, the people said. The transaction taking shape is similar in scope to the order for as many as 500 jets that China's central planners have struck with Airbus SE, but haven't yet announced, they added. The Boeing order is expected to be the centerpiece of a trade agreement that would benefit both Trump and China's President Xi Jinping, the culmination of long-running and sometimes contentious negotiations. The nation's leaders were close to a similar announcement in 2023, but then-President Joe Biden and Xi left a San Francisco summit without consummating an aircraft sale. Complicating matters for Boeing is a leadership void in China. Alvin Liu, its top executive in China and a fluent Mandarin-speaker with extensive government contacts, left the company in recent weeks. Carol Shen has been named interim president of Boeing China, said people familiar with the matter. Boeing declined to comment on any potential deal or management changes. Shares of the US planemaker advanced less than 1% in New York on Thursday following Bloomberg's report, as most members of the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined. The stock had risen 27% this year amid a turnaround under Chief Executive Officer Kelly Ortberg. Aircraft orders for Boeing have figured large in US diplomacy since Trump returned to the White House in January, with nations touting new, tentative and existing deals for airplanes, which are as expensive as skyscrapers, to narrow trade imbalances with the US. The US and China have engaged in several rounds of talks since de-escalating tit-for-tat tariffs that soared to as high as 145%, but have yet to reach a final trade deal. Earlier in the summer, Xi, in a phone call, invited Trump to China at an unspecified date. One opportunity for the pair to meet is in late October, ahead of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea. For China, the deal would secure aircraft delivery slots that are hard to come by at both Boeing and Airbus, which are largely sold out into the 2030s. The world's second largest aviation market is expected to more than double its commercial fleet to 9,755 airplanes over the next 20 years, by Boeing's estimation, far more than China's homegrown planemaker Comac could manufacture. While Boeing slots are scarce, the company likely has some flexibility in its delivery schedule to accommodate strategic customers, Jefferies analyst Sheila Kahyaoglu said in a research note. The country's top economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, recently sought input from Chinese carriers about how many jets they want, one of the people said. Talks centered on the 737 Max series of aircraft, Boeing's popular single-aisle jet, in a sign Beijing is laying the groundwork for a major order. Boeing's last Chinese deal was unveiled in November 2017 during Trump's first state visit to China. The deal amounted to orders and commitments for 300 single-aisle and twin-aisle planes valued at $37 billion at the time. The next year, Boeing's China deliveries peaked, when a quarter of its jets ended up in the mainland. Airbus has dominated sales and deliveries to China since 2019, when the nation's regulators were the first to ground the 737 Max after two fatal accidents. Boeing has notched only 30 orders with Chinese carriers and leasing companies since the start of 2019, according to the company's website. In an interview with Bloomberg in January, CEO Ortberg was optimistic that years of talks with Beijing would finally pay off. 'We certainly hope that there's an opportunity for some additional orders in the next year with China,' he said. --With assistance from Jenni Marsh. (Updates with Jefferies comment in 12th paragraph) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined Volkswagen EVs Outsell Tesla in Europe a Decade After Dieselgate What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Survived Bankruptcy. Next Up: Cultural Relevance? Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Walmart raises guidance despite EPS miss, tariffs weighing
Walmart raises guidance despite EPS miss, tariffs weighing

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Walmart raises guidance despite EPS miss, tariffs weighing

Walmart still managed to sprint past nearly everyone else despite profits falling this quarter and a rare miss on earnings-per-share, snapping a 12-quarter winning streak. But revenue rose, guidance climbed, and the retail giant once again reminded Wall Street that it's better at surviving storms than celebrating streaks. Adjusted earnings came in at 68 cents, short of the 73 cents analysts expected, sending the stock down about 3% in premarket trading. But revenue jumped nearly 5% to $177.4 billion, U.S. comparable sales rose 4.6%, and Walmart raised its full-year forecast for both sales and profit. The picture was less a stumble than a reminder of what makes the company hard to knock over: When profit is pressured by tariffs, labor costs, or insurance claims, Walmart has multiple levers to pull — and it's not shy about using them. CEO Doug McMillon acknowledged that tariffs are steadily increasing costs and that the cumulative effect of higher costs is beginning to impact shopping patterns. He said, 'As we replenish inventory at post-tariff price levels, we've continued to see our costs increase each week, which we expect will continue into the third and fourth quarters.' But if tariffs were the headwind, Walmart's answer was the same tailwind it has relied on for decades: everyday low prices. 'With regard to our U.S. pricing decisions, given tariff-related cost pressures, we're doing what we said we would do,' McMillon told investors. 'We're keeping our prices as low as we can for as long as we can.' This quarter, his answer — and the company's — was to lean into the brand's oldest promise: low prices. In practice, that meant 7,400 'Rollback' discounts during the quarter, a not-so-subtle reminder to shoppers that Walmart intends to be the last place inflation shows up. 'Shoppers for the past few years have spent somewhat cautiously, leaning toward needs over wants, but tariff-related price increases have caused middle- and low-income shoppers to rein in their spending even more,' McMillon told analysts. The pattern is clear: smaller baskets, sharper focus on value, and a consumer leaning harder into Walmart's core strengths. Most retailers would see that as a warning flare. Walmart is treating it as a competitive weapon. Its scale allows it to swallow some of the added costs and still plaster those 'Rollback' tags across aisles, daring rivals to keep up. Groceries, memberships, and ads buffer margins, letting Walmart absorb blows others can't. Ahead of the earnings report, Jefferies' Corey Tarlowe described those share gains as 'durable momentum,' pointing out that tariffs may nick profits but also accelerate the company's ability to pull traffic away from mid-tier competitors. But those rollbacks weren't a magic trick. Groceries and health products carried the quarter, providing steady traffic while more discretionary categories lagged. Membership income climbed more than 5%, helping pad recurring revenue. E-commerce surged 26% in the U.S. and 25% globally, with store-fulfilled delivery now accounting for nearly half of the company's growth. Advertising revenue — the kind of high-margin side hustle that most retailers dream about — jumped 46% worldwide. Chief financial officer John Rainey described the quarter as one of quiet share gains. 'We have seen growth across all income cohorts in the quarter,' he said, stressing that inventory levels remain healthy enough to keep the company nimble in a shifting economy. Analysts largely sided with management's framing. JPMorgan said the report doesn't fundamentally change its positive outlook on the stock. Wall Street wants to know how long Walmart can keep absorbing costs before it feels the pinch, yet the stock largely remains rated a 'Buy.' With analysts calling out its pricing power, Walmart has turned tariffs into both a moat and a marketing message; higher costs may be a storm, but it's one the company seems built to weather better than anyone else. The quarter may have ended Walmart's EPS streak, but it didn't change the story. The contrast with rivals only sharpens that point. Target, once seen as Walmart's trendier twin, has been struggling with slower foot traffic and tariff exposure in apparel and home goods. Home Depot and Lowe's are contending with stalled home-improvement spending . Even Costco, whose membership model is its shield, has seen sales growth flatten as households stretch their budgets. What ties the sector together is a pivot to more resilient revenue streams: loyalty programs, advertising, and delivery services. But where others are experimenting, Walmart is scaling. With more than 90% of U.S. households shopping at its stores each year, the company has a platform that can turn side bets into profit engines. Its ad business now looks less like a pilot project and more like a media arm. Its e-commerce growth suggests it's no longer just chasing Amazon but carving out a different model, with stores doubling as fulfillment hubs and groceries anchoring digital loyalty. That's why the market's fixation on the earnings miss may seem out of step with the substance of the quarter. Profits slipped. But sales rose, forecasts climbed, customers kept coming, and Walmart kept widening the gap with peers. For most retailers, a 3% dip in premarket trading would sting. For Walmart, it was almost comic relief — a reminder that even when it trips, it keeps outpacing the field. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them)
Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them)

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them)

Businessman and television personality Mark Cuban has become one of the richest and most successful men in America. From founding to owning the Dallas Mavericks and later investing in entrepreneurial hopefuls on 'Shark Tank,' Cuban knows a thing or two about savvy financial decisions. Yet, his journey is not without missteps. Trending Now: For You: Here are three of Mark Cuban's most high-profile money mistakes — and what he learned from each. Failing To Secure a New Contract with Steve Nash After becoming the majority owner of the Dallas Mavericks, Cuban took the team's win rate from 40% to an impressive 69%. But not all his decisions were good ones. Failing to secure a new contract with Steve Nash has openly been Cuban's biggest (and most expensive) regret. The decision to not bid higher (to re-sign Nash) was based on the advice of doctors who said Nash's body was breaking down. But Nash proved them wrong after moving to the Phoenix Suns. 'Nash won back-to-back MVP awards while playing for the Suns,' wrote 'In Phoenix, Mike D'Antoni let him run a run-and-gun offensive scheme that would change the landscape of the NBA.' Try This: No only did Cuban miss out on winning additional championships, but he lost the subsequent revenue that come with increased ticket sales, merch and higher team value. Cuban learned a valuable lesson that sometimes the best business and financial decisions have nothing to do with spreadsheets (or medical data and opinions), but, instead the tenacity and character of those you invest in. Never forget the personal element. Not Investing in Uber In the early days of Uber, Cuban had the opportunity to invest in the company but turned it down. While he liked the idea, he had reservations. 'He didn't agree with the valuation of the company,' stated insurance and finance expert at Melanie Musson. 'He saw the possibility of negatives, like pushback from the taxi industry, instead of the complete disruption that Uber would cause.' Today, Uber is valued at roughly $187 billion. 'When you're trying to disrupt, just bust through the doors and deal with regulatory issues later,' Cuban has since said. In other words, it's easier to ask for forgiveness than permission. Cuban learned it's better to take a risk on a good idea rather than getting bogged down by all the potential obstacles. Misusing Credit Cards Back in the day, Cuban played fast and loose with credit cards. He wasn't paying off his cards on time, and interest was accruing out of control. This cost him a ton of money. In fact, Radio Shack once turned down his attempt to buy a computer on credit because his credit score was so bad. Cuban has frequently stated, 'cut up your credit cards […] if you use credit cards, you don't want to get rich.' Paying 15% to 20% interest is rarely a smart move — especially when you consider the S&P 500 only has an average return of 10% per year. Nowadays, Cuban advises that, instead of investing, just pay down your credit cards and then burn them. He learned an important lesson familiar to young people: Don't become too heavily dependent on debt to get ahead — especially if you have no immediate path to pay it off. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money 5 Cities You Need To Consider If You're Retiring in 2025 This article originally appeared on Mark Cuban's Top 3 Money Mistakes (And What He Learned from Them) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store