Starmer to warn of ‘backroom stitch-up' in Welsh elections
In a speech to the Welsh Labour conference, the Prime Minister is set to say that a coalition of those parties would be a 'return to the chaos and division of the last decade' and risk rolling back the progress his party is starting to make.
Welsh First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan meanwhile will call next year's polls a 'moment of reckoning' and 'serious threat' as Reform UK is 'rising' and Plaid Cymru 'mobilising'.
And Labour will announce funding to help those made redundant by the Tata Steel closure in Port Talbot.
Reform UK is eyeing an opportunity to end Labour's 26 years of domination in the Welsh Parliament at the Senedd elections in May next year.
Labour performed poorly in this year's local elections in England, which saw Nigel Farage's party win a swathe of council seats.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has not ruled out making deals with Plaid Cymru or Reform at the next Senedd election.
Welsh Labour leader Baroness Morgan will say the election is not going to be a 'routine affair'.
She will add: 'It will be a moment of reckoning. Reform are rising. Plaid are mobilising. And across the country, people are asking big, serious questions about the kind of future they want for Wales.
'This is not a moment to look away. This is the moment to look forward – a moment of maximum opportunity and, yes, also of serious threat. It's time to stand up. It's time to get involved.'
The conference in Llandudno comes on the heels of Sir Keir's U-turn on welfare policy to avert a major backbench rebellion that will leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves facing a scramble to fill a potential hole in her budget this autumn.
Ahead of marking a year in office next week, Sir Keir will point to moves his Government has made since the election that he says bring direct benefits to Wales, including international trade deals that give a boost to brands such as Penderyn whisky and legislation to bolster workers' rights.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer praised Wales's First Minister Baroness Eluned Morgan (Andy Buchanan/PA)
Wales Secretary Jo Stevens is set to announce a new £11 million fund for businesses offering skilled employment in Port Talbot as it seeks to help those left unemployed by Tata Steel's closure of the steelworks.
The fund is made up of £6.78 million from the Government and £5 million from Tata Steel.
'The Tories abandoned our steelworkers. Reform want to cancel the Electric Arc Furnace, throw away 5,000 jobs, and send people back down the mines.
'We have the backs of our steelworkers, their families and local businesses,' Ms Stevens will say.
Sir Keir will tout the advantages of having parallel Labour governments in Westminster and Wales, with Baroness Morgan leading the latter as a 'fierce champion'.
'This is the party that has got wages rising faster in the first 10 months than the Tories managed in 10 years. This is the government that is cutting bills and creating jobs. This is the movement that will rebuild Britain and renew Wales,' Sir Keir is expected to say.
Labour is the party with the 'interests of working people at their heart' and 'it always will be', he will say.
'Or, there's the other option. The risk of rolling back all the progress we're beginning to make. A return to the chaos and division of the last decade.
'A backroom stitch-up between the Tories, Reform and Plaid. And once again, it will be working families left to pick up the bill.
'Whether that's with Reform, or with Plaid's determination to cut Wales off from the rest of the country – with no plan to put Wales back together.'
The Conservatives have said that Labour has 'let Wales down for far too long'.
Shadow Welsh secretary Mims Davies said: 'Divisions between a complacent Welsh Labour and Starmer's failing UK Government in Westminster have simply not improved Wales's outlook, despite the fabled benefit of two Labour Governments in Wales, which is absolute bunkum.'
She also added: 'Labour has let Wales down for too long, taken people for granted and now the PM is making a mess of the entire United Kingdom.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
27 minutes ago
- Scotsman
How a UK national ID card would 'stop the boats'
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The long days of summer bring another high tide of small boats across the English Channel, despite renewed efforts by the Labour government to stem the numbers. Some 17,000 have already made the crossing this year with the Prime Minister admitting the situation is 'deteriorating'. For the first time, immigration has been ranked amongst the top five concerns for Scots even though numbers coming here have traditionally been much lower. According to the polls, no politician can afford to ignore this issue. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad With a falling birth rate, Scotland has specific migration needs but they can only be met through a system that is regulated, transparent and understood. Migrants abandon a people-smugglers' boat after it was punctured with a knife by French police to stop them attempting to cross the English Channel from a beach at Gravelines, near Dunkirk (Picture: Sameer Al-Doumy) | AFP via Getty Images Social media surveillance Everyone who comes to this country, legally or illegally, does so for their own personal reasons. It might be the search for a better life and the opportunities available in a safe and secure country. It might be the pull of our language. It might be a welfare system more generous than elsewhere but there is another vital factor as well. The UK is one of the few countries in the world without a system of national identity cards. In some places, they are voluntary, in others mandatory, but the argument against them is out of date. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Civil liberties organisations used to fear the level of surveillance and control this would allow over individual citizens. That day is gone. Now Mark Zuckerberg knows what you think via social media, while Jeff Bezos has the lowdown on what you buy. Marks and Spencer probably knows your inside leg measurement. We're also one of the world's most surveilled countries with more than five million cameras on buses, in shops and offices, and even in our own doorbells. So what difference would identity cards make? Right now some estimates suggest the shadow migrant economy built around casual employment in places like car washes, nail bars, barber shops and fast-food outlets could amount 10 per cent of our GDP. Without a system for verifying identity, shutting it down is a mammoth task requiring the background of every individual to be checked. Biometric identity cards would change that overnight. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Uniform system across EU The lack of a system of identity verification is another unwitting consequence of Brexit. All 27 EU countries how have a uniform system with Portugal and Bulgaria the latest to sign up. The presence of a carte d'identite in France seems to be a key factor in pushing individuals to the Channel and the route to the UK where it's much easier to disappear from the scrutiny of the state. We've been here before. More than 20 years ago, an experimental system of ID cards was introduced but then dropped because of opposition from civil liberty campaigners. However that was long before the migration numbers we see today with the knock-on effects they have. According to former Home Secretary David Blunkett, the small boats scandal would never have happened if the government had persevered with that scheme because the requirement to have an ID card to work, claim benefits or receive healthcare would have been a big disincentive to people coming here in the first place.
Glasgow Times
29 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Mobile phone use in East Renfrewshire schools could be restricted
Parents, carers and staff have raised concerns about the use of smartphones in schools, which can 'facilitate bullying', councillors have said. There are plans to hand out questionnaires from August, which will help to refresh guidance on how phones can be used while at school. Cllr Katie Pragnell, Labour, said she has been 'contacted by a number of parents, carers and staff who work within East Renfrewshire schools' and there are 'some concerns about the use of mobile phones in our schools'. She added: 'I think it's really important that we consider this issue fully as there is evidence emerging, particularly on the impact mobile phones have on young people's mental health, especially as they are going through a quite vulnerable stage of puberty and adolescence.' Cllr Kate Campbell, Conservative, added: 'I am very aware from what I've heard from parents and pupils, it's not just receiving and sending texts, smartphones facilitate bullying. READ MORE: 'Very sad': School announces death of 'loved & respected' teacher 'They are being used for bullying, so we must really look into how they are used.' At an education committee meeting earlier this month, councillors were updated on work around the use of mobile phones in schools. Consultation has already been carried out through pupil council and head pupil meetings, parent council chair meetings and staff forums. Education officials have also audited current practice in secondary schools. They reported: 'Our next step will be to design and implement a fuller consultation, which will involve designing a questionnaire which will be issued to parents/carers, pupils and staff in schools. 'The results of this consultation will inform how we update guidance for schools in East Renfrewshire.' READ MORE: Glasgow restaurant visited by Celtic & Rangers star to temporarily close An official told councillors that they would engage with stakeholders on the content of the questionnaires and aim to 'have it ready for launching early August when schools come back'. Cllr Gordon Wallace, Conservative, said one of four rules on smartphones suggested in the book 'The Anxious Generation' by Jonathan Haidt is phone-free schools. It proposes storing phones, smart-watches and other personal devices that can send or receive texts in phone-lock pouches during the school day, he said. Cllr Wallace added: 'I appreciate to suddenly fire that out to our youngsters who really spend an awful lot of their time on smartphones, that would be a big ask. 'I do appreciate the value of going out to consultation on this, but I don't think there's any question in anybody's mind, the impact that smartphones are having on our youngsters. 'That's not to say that we must do without them but we need to find a way through this for the benefit of our young people.'
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
I think Keir Starmer's ineptitude here takes some beating
Sir Keir Starmer pays for that first challenge through reputational damage. We will all pay for the second challenge through other spending curbs and possible tax hikes. I have covered politics for the odd decade. I have witnessed missteps aplenty by leaders from each and every political party. However, the ineptitude displayed here takes some beating. Read More: Consider the PM's demeanour. There he was at the NATO summit, promising a substantial increase in defence spending. Which, in itself, leaves some Labour MPs disquieted. Asked about the growing insurrection over cuts to disability payments, he dismissed the complaints as 'noises off'. Cue yet more anger from discontented backbenchers, furious that their genuine concerns for the disadvantaged were downplayed in such a fashion. Then, inevitably changing tack, he conceded on Thursday that there would be talks with the dissidents, aimed at achieving a settlement in line with 'Labour values of fairness.' The rebels duly entered those talks. But many were privately asking themselves what happened to those 'Labour values' when Ministers proposed a package of reforms which their own official advisers said would push a quarter of a million people into poverty, including 50,000 children. For pity's sake, what did Sir Keir and his Cabinet think the reaction would be to such a forecast? Meek acquiescence? In viewing this spectacle, I could not help thinking of Neil Kinnock's 1985 conference speech, condemning Militant, when he summoned up 'the grotesque chaos of a Labour council – a Labour council – hiring taxis to scuttle round a city handing out redundancy notices to its own workers.' Change the accent, excise the oratory and you have Keir Starmer heading a Labour government – a Labour government – driving people into poverty with cuts in disability support. Sir Keir has now performed a hat-trick of U-turns. On winter fuel payments, on a statutory inquiry into grooming gangs – and on welfare. This is by far the most substantive. Can he come back from this? He can – although there is a much shorter electoral timetable in Scotland. But, still, it makes us revisit basic questions about his leadership. Firstly, last July's big Labour win is not solely or even chiefly down to him. He entered Downing Street because folk were heartily sick of the Tories – and sought a conduit to kick them out. As things stand, Reform seem to be offering an alternative for those who have broadened their disgust – and are utterly sick of established politics, full stop. Secondly, with some exceptions, the team around him have failed to shine. Including the Chancellor. Was there really nobody to suggest gently that the emperor was somewhat short of bodily cover on the benefits issue? Were they, perhaps understandably to some degree, so engrossed in global crisis that they failed to notice – or, rather, sufficiently address – the concerns of their backbenchers over the most distressed and disadvantaged of our citizens? Thirdly, and ironically, the very weakness of the Conservatives adds to Sir Keir's problems. To be blunt, he has nothing to beat. Relatively little is required of him in the Commons or in public discourse. Finally, those Labour values. When you contemplate Sir Keir, do you really summon up principles such as egalitarianism and fairness? Yes, you will know of his upbringing, His mum, the nurse. His father, the toolmaker. He told us often enough. But do values of commonality and collective endeavour shine through from him? I get the concept. He took over from Jeremy Corbyn and felt obliged to stress that Labour had moved from the Left, had changed – and would, consequently, change the country. On assuming office, Rachel Reeves felt the need to assuage the markets with a balanced budget. Hence the stress she placed upon curbing winter fuel payments. For a Labour Chancellor, it was deliberately counter-intuitive. Again, I get it. In due course, they backed down on winter fuel. And the cuts to disability benefits went too far for their party. Way too far. And for the voters. By chance, I chaired a conference on the issue in Glasgow this month. Two things stood out. Deep, genuine apprehension over the benefit cuts. And entrenched distrust over the package of support for getting jobs. Labour know they got this badly wrong. The emphasis on job creation needed to come first. The cuts needed to be moderated. Both will now happen. Sir Keir will insist that reform is still on track. However, this has been a fundamentally damaging episode for the PM. I understand the motivation. The desire to be fiscally cautious, to generate funds for spending in other quarters. But this was the wrong target, introduced in the wrong way. No doubt temporarily, Sir Keir seemed to forget which party he was leading – and in which legislature. He is Prime Minister, primus inter pares, completely dependent upon Commons votes. Not a dismissive, stand-alone President. Those were not 'noises off'. They were concerns voiced by his backbenchers, his supporters, the bulwark of his power. Then there is Scotland. Where former Labour Minister Brian Wilson, writing in The Herald, urged a rethink to avoid 'a deep and lasting split'. Where former MSP Neil Findlay questioned the sanity of Labour MPs – while warning that their chances of re-election would be reduced, not enhanced. Where the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was left stranded. Backing the principle of reform – while urging 'fairness'. In practice, as his MP colleagues made up their minds, his influence appeared minimal. He was duly lampooned by John Swinney at Holyrood – as the SNP cited figures indicating that child poverty is down in Scotland, by contrast with England and Wales. There is a way back for the PM. There is almost always a way back. But this has been deeply, deeply damaging. For Sir Keir Starmer, never glad confident morning again. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre – and Dundee United FC
