Unacceptable: Germany accuses China of laser attack on its jet during EU mission
Although the precise coordinates of the incident were not disclosed, the defence ministry confirmed the aircraft was conducting a routine mission when the laser was directed at it.A spokesperson from Germany's defence ministry stated that the Chinese warship had previously been encountered multiple times in the region. During the laser incident, no prior communication or warning was issued by the Chinese vessel. As a precaution, the mission flight was aborted, and the aircraft landed safely at a base in Djibouti.The MSP, described by officials as a "flying eye", is operated by a civilian commercial service provider, with German armed forces personnel also on board. The platform has contributed crucial reconnaissance data to the ASPIDES mission since its deployment in October. The ministry confirmed that the MSP's deployment in the region has since resumed following the incident.Germany is one of several European nations contributing to ASPIDES, a mission launched in February 2024 to ensure maritime security and freedom of navigation in the region. Other contributing nations include Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, and Sweden.The latest incident adds to a growing list of laser-related confrontations involving China's military. While such cases have previously been reported by the United States, including a 2020 claim that a Chinese warship targeted a US naval aircraft over international waters near Guam, incidents involving a European NATO member are relatively rare. In past instances, China has denied using lasers against US aircraft, calling the claims unfounded.- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
16 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump to pull US out of UNESCO again, citing bias toward Palestine and China: ‘Totally out-of-step'
The United States will again withdraw from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), marking another reversal of President Joe Biden's multilateral approach, according to reports citing US and European officials. The move is part of President Donald Trump's renewed campaign to distance the US from international institutions he deems hostile or unaligned with American interests. 'President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from UNESCO — which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November,' said White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly, as quoted by The New York Post. The administration cited the agency's pro-diversity, equity and inclusion policies, and a perceived bias in favor of Palestine and China. A White House official told the news outlet that UNESCO 'has leveraged its influence to advance global standards favorable to Beijing's interests' and 'force through anti-Israel and anti-Jewish actions.' UNESCO, headquartered in Paris, is best known for designating World Heritage Sites. However, US officials have objected to some recent listings, accusing the agency of politicising heritage by designating Jewish holy sites as 'Palestinian World Heritage.' This is not the first time the US has parted ways with the agency. The country first withdrew from UNESCO in 1984 under President Ronald Reagan, citing mismanagement and anti-US bias. It rejoined in 2003 under President George W. Bush after reforms. Trump previously pulled the US out in 2017 on similar grounds, and Biden rejoined in 2021. The latest withdrawal comes as Trump reimplements a broader disengagement from global institutions. Since returning to the White House in 2025, Trump has already decided to quit the World Health Organization (WHO) and cut funding to the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA. 'This President will always put America First and ensure our country's membership in all international organizations aligns with our national interests,' Kelly added.
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
India-U.S. trade deal: Deadlock over agri continues, but Trump surprise not ruled out
With the August 1 deadline approaching, agriculture continues to loom large as an impediment to a trade deal between India and the U.S. India continues to hold firm against opening up the sector to imports to protect Indian farmers, and the U.S. remains keen that the sector be opened up as such a deal would set the precedent for future deals it strikes with the EU and Japan. Officials, however, are not ruling out a last-minute surprise from U.S. President Donald Trump, similar to what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam. 'The Indian team is back from the U.S. and has left them with what India has to offer,' an official aware of the negotiations told The Hindu. 'Now, whether they accept the terms or not is up to them. Agriculture remains a major issue where there is lack of agreement.' India has been resisting the opening up of the agriculture sector to imports to protect domestic farmers. According to the official, however, opening up the Indian market to U.S. agricultural imports is not just about market access. 'India is one of the few countries that is pushing very hard for a deal,' the official said. 'So, it is likely a deal with India will be concluded before the U.S. concludes a deal with the EU or Japan. If agriculture is excluded from the India deal, then that could set the precedent for the EU and Japan deals, and the U.S. doesn't want to risk that.' However, according to another source, the bulk of India's negotiation points are now aimed at a broader Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September or October this year, rather than a 'mini deal' before August 1. Yet, the government is prepared for a surprise deal announced by U.S. President Donald Trump. 'See what happened with Indonesia and Vietnam; the U.S. President announced details of the deal that both Indonesian and Vietnamese negotiators said were not part of what they agreed to,' the second source said. 'This was done after a phone conversation between Mr. Trump and the heads of Indonesia and Vietnam, respectively. The same can always pop up with India; we have not ruled it out.' Both sources confirmed that, while agriculture and dairy remain hurdles from the Indian side, a key hurdle from the U.S. side is their reluctance to reduce import duties on automotive components to zero.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Existential issues not just Europe's concern': India counters Western pressure on Russian oil
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi prepares for his upcoming visit to the United Kingdom, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri has pushed back against renewed Western criticism over India's continued imports of Russian oil. Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Misri emphasised that India's energy security remains a fundamental priority and warned against viewing the global energy crisis through a narrow, Eurocentric lens. While acknowledging the gravity of the security crisis in Europe stemming from Russia's war in Ukraine, Misri stressed that other parts of the world are facing their own urgent and potentially existential challenges — many tied to energy affordability and access. "On energy-related issues itself, also, as we have said previously, it is important not to have double standards and to have a clear-eyed perception of what the global situation is insofar as the broader energy market is concerned... We do understand that there is an important and serious security issue that is confronting Europe, but the rest of the world is also there. It is also dealing with issues that are existential for the rest of the world, and I think it's important to keep balance and perspective when talking about these issues," Misri was quoted as saying. He argued for a balanced, globally inclusive perspective on energy policy and warned against double standards in applying sanctions or pressuring energy partners. EU sanctions put India's oil exports at risk His remarks come as the European Union rolls out a fresh round of sanctions targeting Russia's oil revenues. The new restrictions — aimed at curbing Moscow's ability to finance its war effort — include tighter controls on fuels derived from Russian crude, a lower price cap, and new banking penalties. Among the targets is an Indian refinery operating in partnership with Russian energy giant Rosneft, raising concerns about collateral damage to India's energy trade. The EU's crackdown is expected to affect countries like India, Turkey, and the UAE, which process Russian crude and export refined products such as diesel and jet fuel — often to European buyers. Analysts warn that this could pose a direct threat to India's export earnings. According to trade policy think tank GTRI, India's petroleum product exports to the EU have already fallen sharply — from $19.2 billion in FY24 to $15 billion in FY25, a drop of over 27per cent. The EU's new sanctions may further squeeze India's $5 billion in oil-derived exports to the bloc, especially since they now prohibit imports of refined fuel made from Russian crude, even if processed outside Russia. At the same time, India's reliance on Russian oil has grown. In FY2025, India imported over $50 billion worth of crude oil from Russia — making up more than a third of its total oil import bill of $143 billion. U.S. threatens harsh tariffs on Russian oil buyers Meanwhile, Washington has also adopted a tougher stance. US President Donald Trump and several U.S. lawmakers have threatened punitive trade measures against countries like India, China, and Brazil for maintaining energy ties with Moscow. Senator Lindsey Graham, speaking on Fox News, warned that the U.S. would impose steep tariffs on nations buying Russian oil, accusing them of enabling the war through "blood money." Trump has gone a step further, saying the U.S. would levy 100per cent secondary tariffs on any country continuing to import Russian fossil fuels, unless Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees to a peace deal within 50 days. His remarks came during a meeting with NATO officials, signaling that this could become a key foreign policy position in a potential second Trump administration.
