Government ‘pandering to whims of employers' by choosing VAT cut over ending child poverty, Ictu conference told
VAT
rates for the hospitality sector rather than use the money to address the issue of child poverty is the latest in a succession of major policy mistakes made by the current Government, delegates to the
Irish Congress of Trade Unions
(Ictu) biennial conference in Belfast heard on Tuesday.
Outlining the details of ICTU's new economic policy, Dr Tom McDonnell of the union-backed Nevin Economic Research Institute said Ireland faced a looming fiscal crisis because the Government has become dependent on windfall corporate taxes receipts to fund day-to-day spending.
'If you have an economy that is in full employment, that has never performed better, you should not be running a deficit,' he said.
The impact of the
housing crisis
on workers was repeatedly highlighted on the first day of the conference, with Mary Fogarty of the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation citing the example of one newly qualified nurse living in Dublin who is paying 77 per cent of her take-home salary on rent.
READ MORE
There is 'very little prospect of a significant improvement in the housing crisis in the next two years,' said Dr McDonnell.
The Government's commitment to cut the VAT back to 9 per cent for the hospitality sector was criticised by a succession of speakers, some of whom pointed to the estimated €770 million cost being almost identical to the likely bill for a proposed second-tier child benefit payment.
'We could be using that money to end child poverty forever,' said Dr McDonnell, 'but we're not going to do that.'
The country's largest union,
Siptu
, said ending 'the scourge' of low wages was key to addressing poverty among families, with the union backing a motion that called for a renewed emphasis on increases to the
national minimum wage
and proportionately bigger pay increases for the lowest paid employees of private sector firms.
'There is a misconception that low pay is confined to the sectors we would traditionally view to be low paid,' said the union's deputy general secretary, John King, 'but the reality is that two-thirds of low-paid workers work outside of the hospitality, contracting services and retail sectors'.
He said manufacturing, transport, private healthcare and 'even the high-income sectors of finance and IT have tens of thousands of low-paid workers' and the Government's response had been to 'pander to the whims of low-paying employers'.
The morning session of the conference ended early, meanwhile, after organisers were informed on Friday that Northern Ireland First Minister,
Michelle O'Neill
would not be attending.
Organisers were under the impression Ms O'Neill had had to attend a meeting of the Northern Ireland Executive instead but there was some annoyance when it emerged that meeting had taken place on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on long school holidays: a relic of another time
Schools in Ireland enjoy some of the longest summer holidays in Europe and elsewhere. The three-month break for secondary school students – and the two-month shutdown of primary schools, beginning this week – is a hangover from a time when agriculture was the dominant economic activity and children were needed to help work family farms. Agriculture now accounts for little more than 1 per cent of the Irish economy and the use of child labour is tightly regulated. Thus it is reasonable at this point to postulate that long school holidays are an anachronism out of step with the needs of modern Irish society. Much of the increase in productivity that underpinned economic progress in recent decades is linked to an increase in the number of women in the workforce. Female participation – at 61.4 per cent – is now at its highest since records began in 1998. Despite a marginal shift towards a more even distribution of parental responsibilities over the period, women remain the primary caregivers in the majority of domestic arrangements and the bulk of the responsibility for caring for children during the school holidays falls to them. READ MORE It is not hard to make the argument that the current regime limits economic growth and that shorter school holidays could further enhance female participation and bolster productivity. The counter-argument is that if a system is not broken then it does not need fixing. Irish school students consistently score above the average in EU and OECD surveys of academic achievement. This is of course only one measure of the effectiveness of the current system. It does not follow that spreading teaching hours – which are amongst the highest in the OECD – over a longer period would be detrimental. Likewise, it is wrong to assume that teachers are opposed to shorter days and longer school years. In truth the debate about school holidays is not an economic or pedagogical one. It is about the growing disconnect between the way the school year is structured and how we live our lives.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Occupied Territories Bill ‘blatant anti-Semitism', says influential US senator
A senior United States politician has accused the Republic of going down a 'hateful, anti-Semitic path'. US Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Senator Jim Risch said the Occupied Territories Bill 'will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering' for the State. Writing on X, the veteran Republican senator who represents Idaho, said: 'Ireland, while often a valuable US partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering. Ireland, while often a valuable U.S. partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering. If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to… — Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman (@SenateForeign) 'If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to blatant antisemitism.' READ MORE Senator Risch linked to an article in the Jerusalem Post, which stated that the Republic is the first country in Europe to introduce legislation to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Senator Risch previously raised the issue of the State's relationship with Israel in his role as committee chairman. Speaking at the confirmation hearings for US president Donald Trump's new ambassador to the Republic, Ed Walsh, in May, Senator Risch said it was 'heartbreaking to see the mistake that the Irish are making regarding the Jewish state and Hamas'. 'It's heartbreaking with zero recognition of what Hamas did on October 7th. I truly hope, Mr Walsh, that this is going to be a tough needle to thread when you got a close ally making a mistake, but you have got to thread that needle.' Senator Risch told Mr Walsh to convey a message to the Republic that the State is 'very much out of step with the United States as far as their relationship with those countries in the Middle East'. Mr Walsh said he was looking at getting a detailed brief on the issues relating to this. 'President Trump has been very clear that Ireland is an ally and there is no room for anti-Semitism across the world,' said Mr Walsh, who was confirmed as ambassador this week. 'It will be a big part of my conversations with them. I hear you. I do understand the issue.' Reacting to Senator Risch's X post, former Republic of Ireland ambassador to the United States Daniel Mulhall said he was sceptical that the Occupied Territories Bill can work, 'but I do not see it as an expression of anti-Semitism. Its roots lie in a genuine sympathy for the plight of Palestinians rather than in any antipathy towards Israelis.'
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
De Valera's acrimonious relationship with US President Roosevelt's man in Dublin during Second World War
The requirement that students must unlock social media profiles when applying for US visas reminds us that Irish sentiment is out of step with the White House when it comes to international affairs. The new American ambassador, Edward Walsh, is not the first to find himself at odds with Irish opinion makers – during his 1984 presidential visit, TDs and senators listened to Ronald Reagan's remarks on Central America in stony silence. Such challenges do not compare, however, to the acrimony between Éamon de Valera and David Gray, then US president Franklin D Roosevelt's man in Dublin during the second World War. Before Germany surrendered, Gray had been told by the State Department Ireland would not be invited to participate in the inaugural conference of the United Nations in San Francisco. De Valera's courtesy call on the German minister, Eduard Hempel, to express his condolences after Hitler's death caused outrage in Britain and the US, but at home it reinforced the perception that neutrality was administered impartially. READ MORE The extent of Ireland's co-operation with the Allies remained secret, and Winston Churchill's personal remarks about de Valera's policy on VE Day – the Irish government had stayed out of the war 'to frolic' with the Germans 'to their heart's content' – incensed public opinion. De Valera's dignified response on radio won him admiration, and identified neutrality with Irish independence. Following his visit to Hempel, a gesture his senior officials saw as grotesquely ill-judged, the taoiseach received fiercely critical letters from Irish-Americans. One serviceman in the Philippines wrote, 'I have a mother in Ireland, I also have brothers fighting this war, but I guess Dr Hempel means more to you. Have no more time, got to fight the Jap.' Other letter writers wrote of 'great embarrassment' and feeling 'ashamed'. On the other hand, the tactful British representative in Dublin, John Maffey, thought that de Valera's pose as the elder statesman in his reply to Churchill – skilfully working on 'all the old passions' – represented a setback for Britain's approach to Ireland. Gray arrived in Dublin in February 1940, three months before Hitler's tanks rolled over the Netherlands, Belgium, and then France. Like Roosevelt, the inexperienced American representative had no sympathy for Ireland's neutral stance – even though the US stayed out of the war until Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor in December the following year. Gray could not understand the diplomatic balancing act de Valera had to perform to avoid antagonising the two nearest belligerent powers. As one of his critics put it, the American representative 'brandished the big stick too much'. Relations between the two deteriorated when Frank Aiken went to Washington in April 1941 in an effort to ease the supplies squeeze enforced by Churchill. De Valera's close cabinet colleague, responsible for co-ordinating defensive measures, did succeed in purchasing two ships, but only after a fraught meeting with the president. According to an Irish source, Aiken insisted that Ireland had to contend with a twin threat of 'aggression' – from Britain, and Germany. The pro-British Roosevelt thundered 'nonsense' and pulled the tablecloth to land his lunch on the floor. Furious with the reception Aiken received during his visit, de Valera believed Gray had misrepresented him to the president. But their relationship reached a critical point in February 1944 when the American envoy asked de Valera to recall the German and Japanese representatives. The taoiseach saw the 'American note' as an ultimatum and rejected it as undermining Ireland's neutrality. When Hitler took his own life in April 1945, Gray demanded the keys of the German legation before its records could be destroyed ' – de Valera rejected this too. T he cessation of hostilities in Europe did not mark the end of this period of testy US-Irish relations as Gray stayed in Dublin until 1947. Sceptical about the benefits of joining the UN, de Valera told the Dáil in June 1946 that Ireland 'was losing nothing' by not applying for membership. 'But all changed in a matter of weeks,' his biographer Ronan Fanning writes, 'as the cold war deepened'. Soviet efforts to have their Eastern European satellites admitted as members of the UN led to the British and the Americans supporting the applications of neutral European countries. However, the Soviet Union used its Security Council veto to reject Irish membership – ostensibly because diplomatic relations had not been established. This refusal caused little upset in Dublin, creating, as one leading civil servant put it, 'neither surprise nor disappointment'. A Soviet spokesman later stated at the UN general assembly that states such as Ireland and Salazar's Portugal could not be regarded as 'peace-loving' because they had 'supported fascism' during the war, and, he said, they maintained 'particularly friendly relationships' with Franco's Spain, 'the last offshoot of fascism in Europe'. Ireland finally became a member of the UN in 1955.
